#Medium Level Integral
79 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
@open hinge Honestly not sure, but I think the first step would be to see if you can rewrite the integrand in a simpler way.
Usually with infinitely nested functions, you set the entire thing equal to y, and get something like y = (a function of x and y), and see if you can solve for y.
Not entirely sure though
so like replacing x with y thats what u mean?
If y = ln(x + ln(x + ...), then y = ln(x + y)
ah i see
Not sure what useful results that can give you honestly, but that was my first attempt
then what next?
I was going to suggest solving for y, but that's not very easy here. That's where I got stuck for this
Idk if the lambert W function or that weird thing is needed here
Yeah I just learned that from watching random youtube videos. It's not something I think people should be expected to know honestly
Is this a calc 2 class?
ah - i have no idea what they're expecting then
some qns can be really nasty
it looks kinda like an interesting problem
you struggling with it? I certainly am lol
same
that's what i thought, but then y = ln(x + y) and then what
e^y = x + y isn't solvable algebraically
lambert w function doesn't even solve this
it's joever
another method might be needed
Yo
my last attempt would be just to set u = integrand and see what happens lol
wait: this would like to implicit differentiation in a u-sub - that's kinda funny
shoot am i really going to do math when i don't need to?
Im trying solving by putting x+ln....=y and chaning integral accordingly
i think y = ln(x + y)
use y = x + ln...
and then integrand is ln(y)? That's an interesting idea
this should be solvable via lambert w function
all that's left might be knowing the integral of W()
yeah, for me that's a little silly to expect, but i guess they aren't meant to be friendly integrals
that was pretty tricky
the author probably knew we'd use like y = ln...
and made it a bit harder
they got me with that lol
pretty neat
i didn't get it
i'll try it that way
y = -W(-exp(-x))?
i couldn't be bothered trying to integrate W(x), but whatever
Nice one now trying this
how'd you find that math site? it's pretty cool - like wordle but for math
discord
nice
someone was talking about this
the problems are kinda tricky, idk if it's something i want to dump that much time/effort into, am lazy
here
Daily Integral
wow i figured that out
i'm kinda surprised you don't need to know about integrating W(x) to do that
@open hinge Did you want the solution?
it's pretty popular in #calculus
good daily exercise
u dont need W(x)
its solvable using elementary stuff
and its solvable using y= ln(x+y) .. instead of what u guys came to conclude that is y = x + ln y
u had to change the integral wrt to X to wrt Y and its pretty straight forward after that
this website is cool.. lol thank u OP for postin this
No problem
this recurisive tpe of shit
Yeah but I think it is kind of analytic continution