#Olympiad problem
29 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Consider the area of a potential square with vertices on the lattice points. Can you deduce a contradiction?
also this is a PROMYS problem not an olympiad problem
you’re technically supposed to do these on your own :\
ik 🥲 im trying man but i gotta get in nd idk quite h ow to prove this
im tryna use vectors
deadline is already passed broski
not quite for eu
but stil like
i like maths but i found out abt the program rly late
and its due in 5 days
for the 8 questions
nd they r jst hella difficult like for some of them i have no idea where to start dyk any like information or smth i cld read to help cz i gotta prove every step of my working
is this php?
whats that?
what is php
pigeonhole principle
nah thats q8 which icl is bamboozlingly difficult
is this not jst vectors
like u can use them to show the first part but 0.1 and 0.01 part idk
Anyone know?
u can ping the helpers
<@&286206848099549185>
Since it says "at least" so let's consider the cases where the drawn square has it's bottom side horizontal. The minimum vertical distance between any 2 grid points is (½√3)•2=√3, and the minimum horizontal distance between any 2 grid points is 1. Thus for the first question it is not possible. Now for the second question, if we draw a square with horizontal side 1, the vertical side must also be 1, so the remaining vertical distance is √3-1≈0.732. But that is the case when the first picked horizontal side has 2 of it's vertices lie on 2 grid points. To make the distance between the vertices of the square and grid points minimum, we move the square downwards vertically till the vertical distance of each point with the nearest grid point is equal, which is (√3-1)/2≈0.366. The distance is smaller but it is still more than ⅒=0.1. Thus for the second question it is also not possible. Lastly, for the third question, 1/100 < 1/10 so it is obviously not possible either.
But how would i go proving the last parts where its not possible within 0.1 or 0.01 of a grid square how could i prove it
I have already answered it too
but why isnt it possible for 0.01 i dont get it