#Volume by double integral

42 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

jade abyss
#

Hi, I have a confusion about knowing what to start the integration with, dx or dy? I mean I can tell from the f(x,y) function easily but I can never tell just by looking at the graph, I don't see lines switch, I don't get it, can anyone explain that please
Thank you

round wrenBOT
dawn bluff
#

same

stuck lynx
#

Notice that in the volume calculation, they leave
$\int_{0}^{1}$ last.

rain horizonBOT
#

AstroGuy

stuck lynx
#

That’s because of what I’ve told you earlier. Outer integral must have constant bounds. If not, then it’s not a defined integral

jade abyss
#

Ya ya I know, the outer integral must have constant bounds, I am asking about the inner one, do I start with dx or dy

stuck lynx
#

You start with dy

#

Why? Because y has non constant bounds

#

0<= y <= x

While x:

0<= x <= 1

#

x is the one that has constant bounds so you integrate with respect to y first

#

That’s what they did

#

dy first because its bounds are non constant

#

If you knew that outer integral must have constant bounds then you would have known that you need to start with dy

jade abyss
#

y does have constant bounds I mean like the bounds are 2 points (0,0) and (1,1) , so in both functions u can get the bounds with respect to y or x , and if u can look at the pic , u can see that he wrote it in both ways , so the idea here is not about the constant bounds .

stuck lynx
#

He defined a different region that’s why he was allowed to change bounds

#

Well. It describes the same triangle but using a different region

#

You’re talking about that one right?

#

For the whole calculation he used the integral at the left

#

And you can’t just switch a region like that. You would have to redefine everything

#

y has constant bounds because you decided to change the region and it changes the integral completely

#

In the first configuration, y has non constant bounds. In THAT configuration. But if you choose to change the region then in THAT new configuration, y has constant bounds

jade abyss
#

Redefining is not a problem, in some problems we redefine, like this one
The idea is how to know if we should start integrating with respect to dy or dx by looking at the graph

stuck lynx
#

Look at the boundary curves always

#

See if their expression are nicer for x or for y

jade abyss
#

Wdym by nicer? Like they are both ugly to me🙂‍↕️

stuck lynx
#

If you keep y=sqrt(2x+6) will have to deal with two branches:

y=-sqrt(2x+6) and y=+sqrt(2x+6)

#

But if you do it with x:

x=(1/2)y^2-3 and x=y+1

#

Easy bounds compared to sqrt

stuck lynx
jade abyss
#

Well I mean in the last question sent , ya I can see if with respect to y , then I have to integrate as u said between the first curve boundries then I'll switch to the 2 curves , so it's pretty easy to tell in second question, but in the first one I sent? Can u put it in the same way?cuz I see if with respect to y then i have to deal with x=0 and x=y , and with respect to x I have to deal with y=1 and y=x, all the time so i don't see it there

stuck lynx
#

So both configurations look great right?

#

The problem here is the integrand

#

e^(y/x)

#

If you integrate with respect to x first, you will get logarithms

#

Do you agree?

#

So in the second picture it was rather about “what boundary curves look nicer, dx or dy first then?”

But first picture it was about: “integrand will be simpler to integrate if i choose dx first or dy first,”