#Volume by double integral
42 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
same
Always let the outer integral have constant bounds and the the inner integral have non constant bounds.
For example y goes from 0 to x which is a bound that depends on x so you know you have to integrate with respect to dy first.
Notice that in the volume calculation, they leave
$\int_{0}^{1}$ last.
AstroGuy
That’s because of what I’ve told you earlier. Outer integral must have constant bounds. If not, then it’s not a defined integral
Ya ya I know, the outer integral must have constant bounds, I am asking about the inner one, do I start with dx or dy
You start with dy
Why? Because y has non constant bounds
0<= y <= x
While x:
0<= x <= 1
x is the one that has constant bounds so you integrate with respect to y first
That’s what they did
dy first because its bounds are non constant
If you knew that outer integral must have constant bounds then you would have known that you need to start with dy
y does have constant bounds I mean like the bounds are 2 points (0,0) and (1,1) , so in both functions u can get the bounds with respect to y or x , and if u can look at the pic , u can see that he wrote it in both ways , so the idea here is not about the constant bounds .
He changed the region
He defined a different region that’s why he was allowed to change bounds
Well. It describes the same triangle but using a different region
You’re talking about that one right?
For the whole calculation he used the integral at the left
And you can’t just switch a region like that. You would have to redefine everything
y has constant bounds because you decided to change the region and it changes the integral completely
In the first configuration, y has non constant bounds. In THAT configuration. But if you choose to change the region then in THAT new configuration, y has constant bounds
Redefining is not a problem, in some problems we redefine, like this one
The idea is how to know if we should start integrating with respect to dy or dx by looking at the graph
By looking at the graph, you choose the order that makes the region simplest to describe.
By should, you mean the most convenient way.
Here the most convenient way would be to integrate with respect to x first because if you look at the boundary curves, they are both already written nicely as x= (something in y)
Look at the boundary curves always
See if their expression are nicer for x or for y
Wdym by nicer? Like they are both ugly to me🙂↕️
If you keep y=sqrt(2x+6) will have to deal with two branches:
y=-sqrt(2x+6) and y=+sqrt(2x+6)
But if you do it with x:
x=(1/2)y^2-3 and x=y+1
Easy bounds compared to sqrt
Both are ugly but x less..
Well I mean in the last question sent , ya I can see if with respect to y , then I have to integrate as u said between the first curve boundries then I'll switch to the 2 curves , so it's pretty easy to tell in second question, but in the first one I sent? Can u put it in the same way?cuz I see if with respect to y then i have to deal with x=0 and x=y , and with respect to x I have to deal with y=1 and y=x, all the time so i don't see it there
Well for first one you sent, You can either deal with y=0 to y=x if you start integrating with dy right?
Or deal with x=y to x=1 if you start with dx
So both configurations look great right?
The problem here is the integrand
e^(y/x)
If you integrate with respect to x first, you will get logarithms
Do you agree?
So in the second picture it was rather about “what boundary curves look nicer, dx or dy first then?”
But first picture it was about: “integrand will be simpler to integrate if i choose dx first or dy first,”