#LCM and HCF
267 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
what is your current method of finding LCMs?
let me show u
do note that no matter what your method of finding LCMs are, large numbers are computationally expensive to compute the LCMs of.
because, well... they are large.
the general trick is to use prime factorizations.
but there is one shortcut you can make under one specific circumstance.
if all of your numbers do not share any common factors (other than 1 of course), the LCM of that set of numbers can be found by multiplying them together.
but otherwise, prime factorization is your best bet.
and as a bonus, the prime factorization method works to find the HCF as well, with a minor tweak.
what is prime fcatorizations? sorry im dumb im trying to be good in maths but i cant understand it much
9 is not prime.
oh
but more importantly, do you know the definition of a prime number?
in other words, do you know what makes a number prime?
no..
alright.
prime numbers are numbers that can only be divided by 1 and itself.
this is why 9 is not a prime - it can be divided by 3.
the rest of the numbers on your list are indeed prime, though.
now, separately, do you know what the factorization of a number is?
nope
yes
good! this is an example of a factorization for a number - breaking a number down into two (or more) numbers multiplied together.
3 x 6 is also a possible factorization for 18, so you might wonder, how do we know which factorization to use for the LCM?
the answer is, we don't need to rely on this. that's where prime factorization comes into play.
now, let's take 9 x 2 as an example.
we know this gives us 18. but can either 9 or 2 be broken down further?
nope
are you sure?
9 can actaully but not 2
^^^
hmm
alright, good! remember that I asked if either 9 or 2 can be broken down further.
I never specified that both of them have to be.
so 9 can be broken down further, and I trust you agree with me that it would be 3 x 3.
yes
so, we went from 18 = 9 x 2 = 3 x 3 x 2.
now in that last set of numbers, can any of them be broken down further?
9?..
nope
bingo! these three numbers are all prime, and therefore cannot be broken down any further.
okay
but wait, you might ask! what about 3 x 6, right?
multiplication tables.
right.
so, if we took 3 x 6 earlier, we can break down 6 into 3 x 2, and that still gives us 3 x 3 x 2.
how do u get it 2?
I'm sorry?
yes i agree
then we have 3 x 6 = 3 x (3 x 2), and that's it.
you may be smelling a rat right about now. we got the same sequence of numbers - 3 x 3 x 2 - no matter how we break down 18 initially.
this is why we work with prime factorizations - every number has a unique prime factorization.
there is a proof for this but it's too early to show it right now.
can i see it please??
not right now if it’s inconvenient
you can open your own thread and ask about it if you wish to. I am not about to mess up the OP with a wall of text.
got it thanks
anyway, since every number has a unique way of breaking it down into primes, we can skip worrying about "but what if we broke down the number this way?".
so, let's get back to LCM.
suppose I asked you to find the LCM of, say 12 and 18.
yeah
before even thinking about finding the LCM of these two numbers, let's break them down into primes first.
you know that 18 = 3 x 3 x 2.
now, do the same for 12.
may i do it first?
sure!
on paint
but don't try to find the LCM yet. just break 12 down into primes.
so like u did for 18?
ok nvm i dont get it
how do u get the prime
beacuse 6x2 is 12
that is correct.
yes.
holy spelling
so you have 6x2, and you know 6 = 2x3. what would you get after?
12 = 2x3x6?..
you already broke down the 6. it should not be there any more.
oh
I'll show you a way to keep track of your prime factorization.
you can use the same method to help keep track of your prime factorization for 12.
sure. try prime factorizing 24.
can you write out your final prime factorization?
isnt that final?
write it in one line.
like so.
just 3 x 2?
oh wait
don't forget the other terms you didn't break down!
i bring that 2 down aswell?
yes, of course. bring down anything that has been fully broken down!
why is the 2 after the 6 sharing the same 2 as the 2 you got from breaking down the 6?
sorry
no worries, just questions to guide you onto the right step.
yes, it's incorrect.
if this method is still confusing, you can try this alternative method of notation.
i was taught this method so i can understand this easier
but
how did u get two 3?
from 24 or 18?
but how is 3 x 2 wrong?
no
there's the problem.
how do i fix it?
look at how I keep track of the 2s that were already broken down.
I made sure to carry all 2s from the previous step into the next.
using the alternative method gives the same thing. maybe it's cleaner to look at.
what do i put after removing the 1?
just 3?
5x3x2?
oh WAIT
its correct both ways
ok but i have a big problem for you
my teacher gives me 3 dijit lcm
how do i slove it easily
you mean digit*?
yes sorry
well, unfortunately, large LCMs are not feasible to solve by hand. you can still use this method, and then how fast it is depends on how fast you can break down the numbers.
it remains the easiest method I know of to find LCMs generally.
725 and what?
pretty sure 77
you can't find the LCM of a single number!
i was in class thinking for a long time what is half of 725
okay, so 77 and 725.
if you think you can halve 725, please don't.
halve meaning?
725 ends in a 5, which is odd. you shouldn't expect a whole number if you divide an odd number by 2.
halve = divide by 2.
oh
anyway, in this case...
77 = 7 x 11, and there's no further breaking down for this,
now, 725 ends in a 5. numbers that end in a 5 are guaranteed to be divisible by 5, so try that first.
I get 725 = 145 x 5, and- hey, another number ending in 5! let's do that again!
that gives us 39 x 5 x 5.
note that the digits of 39 sum up to 12, which means it's divisible by 3. so break it down using 3 and we'll get 13 x 3 x 5 x 5, and we're done.
how did u 145 so fast
practice, unfortunately.
of division?
it's really just doing exercises and figuring out patterns.
oh
is there a way u could teach me long division for this?
its gonna make my life way easier
huh? didn't the other guy do so already?
his method confused me alot
i was taught the long division method and he was taught an different
so it was hard for us both to communicate
I don't think you should start practicing with that large of numbers yet...
but my teachers gives me large numbers
ever heard of "dream big, start small"?
but if you insist, find the LCM of 110 and 25.
for 25, you could have stopped after breaking it down once.
so im wrong?
same for 110 - the last line is unnecessary (you can see that it's the same as the line above it).
neither of them are wrong.
both of them are correct, actually!
but why these lines?
i didnt realize that before u told me
anyways the teacher gives me 3 digit odd numbers
how do i know what to multiply it so it equals that
meaning of divisibility?
if you can take a number, say A, and divide it by another number, say B, and the answer is a whole number, we say A is divisible by B.
oh
by the way, a personal comment - considering how much tutoring you need, I highly recommend finding a tutor or getting in touch more with your teacher.
problem is
i already have an tutor
but i get very shy asking her to explain it
i barely talk to my other family members (expect mom dad)
i just get shy idk why
mm, understandable, but personal tutors would be able to help you much more and much faster than most any helper can here.
because they can diagnose issues on the spot.
i wanna tell u something..
maybe try to communicate with your tutor via writing?
when i get something wrong in math like 3 times my math tutor laughs or smiles
so thats why i dont ask her to explain it
what would be wrong with smiling? are they condescending? do they explain to you after the fact?
can u give an explain if possible?
I'm mentioning this because there is no way I can teach you all of arithmetic. I'm a helper, not a tutor.
6 divided by 3 = 2. since 2 is a whole number, we say that 6 is divisible by 3.
possible explain with 3 digit numbers?
yeah smth like 525
125 / 5 = 25. therefore, 125 is divisible by 5.
of LCM? or prime factorization?
LCM
well you haven't given me the answer to this, so this can be the example question.
okay
i have to go eat dinner.
thanks for explaning to me
ill look forward to this tomorrow
to revise it
sure. have a nice meal!