Just for fun but I am curious to see if their exists a function that can behave like this graph.
#Is it possible to find a function that behaves exacly like this graph?
wicked crest
meager ingotBOT
idle ginkgo
Ohh i Will try
wicked crest
gl
wicked crest
closest ive been: ln(x)/(sin(x))
idle ginkgo
,w plot ln(x)/sin(x) from x=-2 to x=100
mystic cliffBOT
idle ginkgo
Not baadd
mystic cliffBOT
wicked crest
but you know
I gave its roots, max local point and the point where it actually starts decreasing all the way to -infinity
I was thinking it might help
idle ginkgo
I gave its roots, max local point and the point where it actually starts decreas...
That would help a lot
wicked crest
yeah
here it is again
all roots are of the form npi where n is an integer ofc
then the max local idk
idle ginkgo
What I’ve seen is that it intercepts the x axis every pi
wicked crest
yes
wicked crest
exacly
since as x->npi then f(x) -> infinity
thats why the closest ive come is ln(x)/(sinx)
where ln(x) comes from the tail of the function
idle ginkgo
thats why the closest ive come is ln(x)/(sinx)
It cant be divided by sin(x)
Your graph is continuous
wicked crest
?
idle ginkgo
I mean the curve can be drawn without leaving any gaps. Just like 1/x is not continuous
idle ginkgo
If sin(x) is in denominator and that x=2pi or 2kpi then it’s not continuous
You will have something divided by 0
But in your graph there are no gaps
wicked crest
k
idle ginkgo
But your right about considering sin though
Maybe even ln(x)
But sin is definitely not is denominator
ln(x) can’t be there either because at x=0 there is a defined value in your graph
wicked crest
but we can do ln(x+a)
idle ginkgo
Yeah that
wicked crest
but again if we inster -a we would get a singularity
idle ginkgo
Wait it can’t be that either
wicked crest
yh
idle ginkgo
Just keep sin
idle ginkgo
Do you have a wider view?
idle ginkgo
DANGG
wicked crest
not continuous (obviously)
idle ginkgo
It is continuous because i see no gaps, do you see some?
wicked crest
yes
idle ginkgo
Where
lucid ridge
What is going on here
idle ginkgo
everywhere
No it just oscillates
wicked crest
k
lucid ridge
👀
wicked crest
point is
can we get a function out of this graph
for now the most suiteable is somewhere around (lnx)/(sinx)
even tho its not even close
wicked crest
No it just oscillates
im sped srry
but yh
What I also did was trying to make a infinite product series expansion
since we have npi
also dint quite work either until I got this
that was the same product infinite series expansion but with some modifications
kinda used Euler's method for that
but still wasnt what I was looking for
lucid ridge
Where did you get this graph from
wicked crest
Where did you get this graph from
the infinite product series I made
but it isnt a full closed in function
slow marsh
are the gaps due to asymptotes, or are they due to a curve that has an extremely high max/low min
idle ginkgo
I don’t think you would need to go that far but i honestly don’t know either.. Also i noticed that starting from x=8 approximately, the function “jumps” very high
wicked crest
are the gaps due to asymptotes, or are they due to a curve that has an extremely...
asymptotes but you start with low and mid
wicked crest
I don’t think you would need to go that far but i honestly don’t know either.. A...
¯_(ツ)_/¯
idle ginkgo
,w plot sin(x)tan(x) from x=-3 to x=100
mystic cliffBOT
idle ginkgo
Nah it’s bad
tepid fiber
,w plot 2^xsin(x)
mystic cliffBOT
lucid ridge
Is it continuous
wicked crest
try desmos
idle ginkgo
Is it continuous
Well it looks like it is
wicked crest
it is
tepid fiber
,w plot 2^xsin(x) from x=-10 to x=100
mystic cliffBOT
tepid fiber
close
idle ginkgo
,w plot 2^xsin(x) from x=-10 to x=100
OHHHH
lucid ridge
Well it looks like it is
What if those are asymptotes
tepid fiber
,w plot 2^xsin(x) from x=-10 to x=10
mystic cliffBOT
tepid fiber
i mean you can piecewise
idle ginkgo
What if those are asymptotes
I think these are very high oscillations. Like so high you can almost say they are asymptotes
wicked crest
yh
tepid fiber
does wolfram supports piecewise?
wicked crest
idk
tepid fiber
,w plot (-2)^xsin(x)
mystic cliffBOT
idle ginkgo
,w plot (2^x)sin(x)tan(x) from x=50 to x=70
mystic cliffBOT
tepid fiber
,w plot \begin{cases} x&x>0\0&x<0\10&x=0\end{cases}
wicked crest
,w plot (2^x)sin(x)tan(x) from x=50 to x=70
not even close😭 🙏
mystic cliffBOT
idle ginkgo
CASE COUNT LETS GOOO
tepid fiber
$\begin{cases} x&x>0\0&x<0\10&x=0\end{cases}
$
mystic cliffBOT
Tangent
Compile Error! Click the 
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
tepid fiber
oops
wicked crest
yh
tepid fiber
$\begin{cases} x&x>0\0&x<0\10&x=0\end{cases}$
mystic cliffBOT
Tangent
wicked crest
not bad
tepid fiber
whats case count?
idle ginkgo
whats case count?
No idea lol
wicked crest
its better
idle ginkgo
,w plot (2^x)xsin(x) from x=-3 to x=30
mystic cliffBOT
idle ginkgo
I just copied lol
tepid fiber
wicked crest
let me copy and see on desmos rq
slow marsh
beautiful
idle ginkgo
i found this
It looks air turbulence
slow marsh
It looks air turbulence
yes it does
wicked crest
i found this
I dont think thats even close but I guess
tepid fiber
does this count?
idle ginkgo
Let me try a function
slow marsh
but i was finding it when yall were doubg your first attempts
lucid ridge
So close
idle ginkgo
,w plot 2x
mystic cliffBOT
idle ginkgo
I got the best one
tepid fiber
,w plot 2x
yes very close
tepid fiber
I got the best one
real
slow marsh
THIS SHIT IS PEAK 🔥🔥
idle ginkgo
Thank you thank you
wicked crest
I checked and the beginning of the graph doesnt really quite match but with some coefficients here and there it probably would end up matching
tepid fiber
yeah
also doesnt have to be a variant of -x^2, thats just the first thing i thought of
wicked crest
also you did set up boundaries /:
tepid fiber
wait i have an idea
idle ginkgo
Never thought i would have some pleasure finding functions lol
tepid fiber
without piecewise
wicked crest
wait i have an idea
go ahead
slow marsh
Never thought i would have some pleasure finding functions lol
this is what makes us nerds~
we dont look to heaven and we put math first~
wicked crest
Never thought i would have some pleasure finding functions lol
Its not fun to me tbh /: Im doing this for a reason actually
idle ginkgo
Its not fun to me tbh /: Im doing this for a reason actually
Not even the tiniest slightest bit..?
wicked crest
not rlly...
idle ginkgo
not rlly...
Dang…
slow marsh
bros locked in
wicked crest
appart from being closer to my goal then I was before
slow marsh
you sound like a very math-oriented anime villain
slow marsh
ye
tepid fiber
W math
wicked crest
im obsessed
slow marsh
im obsessed
so basically a math-oriented anime villain
slow marsh
may i earn these graphing skills
^^^
wicked crest
so basically a math-oriented anime villain
sure I guess
wicked crest
also
tepid fiber
Ever since you came up with 2^xsin(x) this all got easier
yes i saw this in a "desmos music" video today and i immediately thought it is kinda matching
slow marsh
this was extremely fun
wicked crest
slow marsh
desmos music video im crying
slow marsh
OMGGG
tepid fiber
send me the original
wicked crest
k
x\prod_{n=1}^{100}\left(1-\frac{x^{3}}{n^{3}\pi^{3}}\right)
but its an infinite product
thats what I hate
slow marsh
bestie chill
wicked crest
and thats why I came here
tepid fiber
uh oh where do you graph it
wicked crest
uh oh where do you graph it
desmos
tepid fiber
what since when desmos has $\prod$
mystic cliffBOT
Tangent
tepid fiber
yoooo
wicked crest
bro
just go on desmos
and write the following
prod
boom
here it is
anyways
tepid fiber
dunno
wicked crest
or just look up I guess
I have a course in like 20 minutes so Ill leave and you guys can keep trying and compare with the real graph if you want. Ill come back in around 3 hours or so
gl
slow marsh
kk bye man
tepid fiber
thats betetr
slow marsh
how are you doing this you absolute whiz
tepid fiber
i got better
$\frac {2^x\sin x\left(\frac {|x-\pi|+x-\pi} {15} + 1\right)} {e\left(\frac {|x-\pi|+x-\pi + 1} {2} + 1\right)}+\frac{|x|(-x^2)} 5+\frac{x^3}5$
mystic cliffBOT
Tangent
hardy gazelle
lemme try lmao
wicked crest
nice👍 Maybe try a bit more until it matches perfectly. Ill test this function on my side.
hardy gazelle
god dayum
$y=(2^xsin(x)((abs(x-pi)+x-pi)/12+1))/(2.718281828*((abs(x-pi)+x-pi)/2+1))-(abs(x)*x^2)/6+x^3/6$
mystic cliffBOT
V
wicked crest
nice!
Now can you guys measure the error between the starting function and the one you found??
hardy gazelle
i have been working on nimbus ( google cloud from past 5 hours almost) and well finialsed it rn, its just storing up
wicked crest
i have been working on nimbus ( google cloud from past 5 hours almost) and well ...
oh nice!
well hope its going well
wicked crest
no pressure
hardy gazelle
as under my own perspective, the starting fucntion is controlled
but yea i'll be writing aa long asss shiitt for explanation i can feel. already on it tho. can say 13% done
slow marsh
my hands are hurting lmao can u send the starting fucntion
omg its you- bro did so much calculus and graph modelling that bro forgot basic arithmetic 😭💔 i get it tho
hardy gazelle
mother fuckaaa
i got it
*The starting function is
f(x) = x ∏ from n = 1 to 100 of (1 − x^3 / (n^3 pi^3))
This function is a finite Weierstrass-type product. Its structure is completely determined by its zeros and by polynomial growth.
First, the zeros.
The factor x forces a zero at x = 0.
Each factor (1 − x^3 / (n^3 pi^3)) becomes zero when x = n pi.
Therefore, the function has zeros at x = 0, pi, 2pi, 3pi, … , 100pi.
These zeros are polynomial in nature. Near x = n pi, the function behaves like a linear factor multiplied by many nonzero constants. This gives smooth, flat crossings of the x-axis with no sharp cusps or switching behavior.
Second, smoothness.
The product consists only of polynomials. Therefore f(x) is smooth and differentiable everywhere. There are no absolute values, no exponential switches, and no artificial cutoffs. Every change in the graph is dictated by algebraic structure alone.
Third, growth behavior.
Each factor contributes a cubic term in x for large x. Since there are 100 such factors and an additional x in front, the overall growth of f(x) behaves like x to the power 301. This means the function grows polynomially, not exponentially.
The constructed function is
g(x) = (2^x sin(x) times a switching factor) divided by a constant, minus a polynomial correction term.
This function is not a product approximation. It is a curve-fitting construction.
First, zeros.
The sin(x) term forces zeros at x = n pi for all integers n, not just up to 100. These zeros are trigonometric in origin, not algebraic. Near each zero, sin(x) crosses the axis linearly, which is a different local behavior than the polynomial factors in the original product.
Second, growth behavior.
The dominant term in g(x) is 2^x. This introduces exponential growth. Exponential growth cannot approximate polynomial growth over large intervals. Even if the graphs look similar in a small window, they diverge rapidly as x increases.
Third, switching terms.
The absolute value expressions introduce piecewise behavior. This creates nondifferentiable points where the original function is perfectly smooth. These switches do not exist in the product and therefore introduce structural error.
Fourth, artificial damping.
The polynomial subtraction terms are used to suppress unwanted growth on one side of the graph. This is not derived from the original product but is added by hand to force visual similarity.
The error between the two functions can be understood conceptually as follows.
Near x = 0, the two functions can be made to look similar because both behave like low-degree polynomials.
Near x = n pi, the zero locations match, but the local shape does not. The original function has algebraic zeros coming from product factors, while the constructed function has trigonometric zeros from sin(x). This creates noticeable local curvature differences.
For larger x, the error grows rapidly because the original function grows like a high-degree polynomial, while the constructed function grows exponentially. No choice of constants can reconcile this difference globally.
Conclusion would be that -
The starting function is a structurally defined algebraic object whose behavior is dictated by a finite product and polynomial growth.
The constructed function is a visually motivated imitation that matches some qualitative features, such as zero locations and spike placement, but does not preserve the underlying mathematical structure.
Therefore, the difference between them is not a small numerical error but a fundamental theoretical mismatch in growth order, smoothness, and functional origin.*
@everyone
@slow marsh @wicked crest @tepid fiber
hardy gazelle
omg its you- bro did so much calculus and graph modelling that bro forgot basic ...
turu
my hands lmao
typing all this
im gonna rest now
u read it
wicked crest
ill be reading it later because I have a tutorial to attend to but honestly this deserves a round of applause
👏
slow marsh
👏👏
hardy gazelle
ill be reading it later because I have a tutorial to attend to but honestly this...
thanks bud, anything for math
but why aint these peeps approving my graduation + role
ouchie
wicked crest
thanks bud, anything for math
same here
wicked crest
¯_(ツ)_/¯
wicked crest
ok
hardy gazelle
bro u got contact with admin or mod
duh i need my graduation + role
lmao
i mean post graduate
wicked crest
no. I tend to work alone on a white board then spending time in this math server. I only come to give side problems when they come as an obstacle in my mathematic research
hardy gazelle
no. I tend to work alone on a white board then spending time in this math server...
i was bored tbh so thought why not give out my PhD knowledge
lemao
wicked crest
make sense
hardy gazelle
i mean, being senior developer alot of things are on ur shoulders, and i needed a brain teaser for myself
wicked crest
of course
hardy gazelle
so what u do?
idle ginkgo
*The starting function is
f(x) = x ∏ from n = 1 to 100 of (1 − x^3 / (n^3 pi^3))...
Wth
You guys are still on this ??
hardy gazelle
You guys are still on this ??
until we die, we always on smth
i get horny studying maths or physics
these are my turn on
wicked crest
basically a guy named Euler one day said to himself "Why cant I just factor sin(x) as a infinite polynomial" and so he did. Then, he proceeded to ask what would happen if we de-factorized the infinite product series he built and that reveald to him something interresting because the second term of the original taylor series of sin(x) which is -(x^3)/3! but then when expanding the infinite product series we instead get (when tracking all that has x^3): -x^3 (1/(pi^3) + 1/(2^2 pi^2) + 1/(3^2 pi^2) + ...). Logical thing he did: Since it will eventually make the -(x^3)/3! term he set them equal on both sides: -(x^3)/3! = -x^3 (1/(pi^3) + 1/(2^2 pi^2) + 1/(3^2 pi^2) + ...) and later found out that eventually (pi^2)/3! = 1 + 1/2^2 + 1/3^2 + ... = zeta(2) therefore claiming that zeta(2) = (pi^2)/6.
Here its quite similar but the starting point is another infinite product series
in this case that one:
hardy gazelle
mhm...
wicked crest
here if we are able to find a function that is related to this infinite product series then its bingo since we also have its taylor series
and thanks to you
I also found the following equality
hardy gazelle
ayy no worries, my pleasure
wicked crest
zeta(3) = (theta)(pi^3)/4! where theta ~= 0.930436310465
try it out if you dont believe me
hardy gazelle
god dayum, im hard
junior sundial
*The starting function is
f(x) = x ∏ from n = 1 to 100 of (1 − x^3 / (n^3 pi^3))...
did u take phd degree
hardy gazelle
hardy gazelle
i get horny studying maths or physics
..
hardy gazelle
did u take phd degree
im pursuing it right now
wicked crest
ill comeback in 2 hours lecture starting now
hardy gazelle
im pursuing it right now
can say, im finished, its my final year, practicals right now and then final exams
and im finished
junior sundial
im pursuing it right now
slay
hardy gazelle
i would have studied enough to like be that cool guy in society, and will continue my own reasearch after it
like im a CSE major
idle ginkgo
like im a CSE major
What’s CSE?
hardy gazelle
but, maths is love lmao
hardy gazelle
What’s CSE?
computer science engineering
idle ginkgo
computer science engineering
Dangggg okayy
junior sundial
like im a CSE major
same but still didnt really major in it yet
since im a first year
hardy gazelle
in simple words, im programmer
idle ginkgo
in simple words, im programmer
print(“hello world”)
hardy gazelle
print(“hello world”)
print("hello world")
print("functions have inputs")
print("changing the input changes the function")
god somebody kick my ass
there's this guy in #1464335239672500507
god
idle ginkgo
Import numpy as np
A=np.array([1],[2],[3])
B=np.array([4],[5],[6])
t=np.dot(A, B)
print(t)
32
idle ginkgo
there's this guy in <#1464335239672500507>
Wait I’m coming
hardy gazelle
Import numpy as np
A=np.array([1],[2],[3])
B=np.array([4],[5],[6])
t=np.dot(A,...
oh my baby
tepid fiber
basically a guy named Euler one day said to himself "Why cant I just factor sin(...
"a guy named euler" lol
hardy gazelle
same but still didnt really major in it yet
soooo need help lmao
tacit furnace
@tepid fiber
Bro. You're a graphing genius!
tepid fiber
ty ig
hardy gazelle
bro himself is a tangent
tacit furnace
bro himself is a tangent
His powers were given to at birth.
tacit furnace
bro himself is a tangent
Your proof was awesome too, ngl.
hardy gazelle
I'm a nerd.
I read mathematical proofs for entertainment. Lol.
i get horny seeing them
tacit furnace
i'm currently reading a book about you, zeta
Ooh.
I'm flattered.
That hypothesis is a fascinating one.
tacit furnace
i get horny seeing them
Ayyyyyy me too.
tepid fiber
Ooh.
I'm flattered.
That hypothesis is a fascinating one.
lol
yeah
"the music of prime numbers" by marcus du sautoy
recommended although he started saying stuff aboit physics that i dont like
tacit furnace
recommended although he started saying stuff aboit physics that i dont like
I thought you were gonna say politics. Lol.
Let's keep those out of here.
tacit furnace
"the music of prime numbers" by marcus du sautoy
I'll have to check that out.
hardy gazelle
wanna here smth guys?
broo i have been up soo muh
i can see my text going into fourth dimension
tepid fiber
i can see my text going into fourth dimension
ok
tacit furnace
he said that there's a chance physicists will prove reimann's conjecture
Physicists eh?
tepid fiber
yuck
tacit furnace
wanna here smth guys?
What? I am interested?
tacit furnace
i can see my text going into fourth dimension
Oh. Isl see.
hardy gazelle
This looks like calculus until you write it down carefully, then it turns into analysis, then functional analysis, then probability, then you realize it was information theory the whole time and the problem was never about numbers, it was about you.
tacit furnace
yuck
They're like mathematicians with more formulas, and less "mystery solving" type math.
tacit furnace
**This looks like calculus until you write it down carefully, then it turns into...
HA!
tacit furnace
also lets go to <#268882317391429632>
Alr.
wicked crest
I'm a nerd.
I read mathematical proofs for entertainment. Lol.
I try to break you for entertainment. Lol. And sometimes it even works.😭 🙏
wicked crest
for more context, your name is zeta yk zeta function haha get it? 
slow marsh
i'm currently reading a book about you, zeta
wow, is this how mathematicians flirt? making bad math-puns to each other? because if so, get a damn room
tacit furnace
wow, is this how mathematicians flirt? making bad math-puns to each other? becau...
Get out if the discord server named "mathematics" if you don't like it.
tacit furnace
I try to break you for entertainment. Lol. And sometimes it even works.😭 🙏
What!?
Impossible.
Tell me your findings!
wicked crest
What!?
Impossible.
Tell me your findings!
Not literally XD. For example: zeta(3) = (sigma)(pi^3)/4! where sigma = - (d^4)/(dx^4) (x product(k>1) (1 - (x^3)/(k^3 pi^3)))|(x=0) ~= 0.930435923838 and normally we want a clean (pi^3)/4! so then to find the missing percentage we do (1 - sigma)(100) ~= 7% so we are missing zeta(3) by just 7%. Crazy right?
hardy gazelle
ayoo gois wassup
wicked crest
But the general formula should be zeta(s) = -(pi^s)/(s+1)! (d^(s+1))/(dx^(s+1)) (x product(k>1) (1 - (x^s)/(k^s pi^s)))|(x=0)
hardy gazelle
yooooooooooooo
oh wait smth serious is goin
@idle ginkgo @tepid fiber @tacit furnace ayo guys
i bought a new superbike, 4th in my collection
slow marsh
Get out if the discord server named "mathematics" if you don't like it.
i never stated that i wasnt one of them ;)
slow marsh
ayoo gois wassup
yoo proof lover
tacit furnace
Not literally XD. For example: zeta(3) = (sigma)(pi^3)/4! where sigma = - (d^4)/...
You know way more about this than I do, lol.
You deserve the title zeta.
tacit furnace
i never stated that i wasnt one of them ;)
Niceee.
hardy gazelle
yoo proof lover
aghh yestarday was her first wash
cuz it rained here
its the aprilla rsv4
tacit furnace
That's gonna be sick!
hardy gazelle
waddupp zetaa
wicked crest
You know way more about this than I do, lol.
You deserve the title zeta.
I guess… but it’s not enough tbh. That’s why I’m now trying to find the multiplication of multiple converging functions that is equal to the infinite product of 1 - (x^3)/(k^3 pi^3). This will allow (if found) to find the full Taylor series of that function which would help defining sigma as a combination of transcendentals and fractions/irrationals since Apéry never mentioned that zeta(3) !=?/? + ?/? if yk what I mean… he only said that zeta(3) !=(pi^n)/a where a is a number and n also.
tacit furnace
I guess… but it’s not enough tbh. That’s why I’m now trying to find the multipli...
I'd like to get on this train, ngl.
Ima go watch some videos, and read some papers.
I don't completely understand what you're saying, but I want to learn!
hardy gazelle
ay ping me what's the prob im bored rn
wicked crest
ay ping me what's the prob im bored rn
Find a closed form for x product(k>1) (1 - (x^3)/(k^3 pi^3)) = ? Just like how for example x product(k>1) (1 - (x^4)/(k^4 pi^4)) = sin(x)sinh(x)/x
hardy gazelle
mhmmmm less seee
wicked crest
mhmmmm less seee
If you find such function it will simplify my life
hardy gazelle
roughed out like 4 papers rn
wicked crest
Damn
I already used 10 chalkboards to find a closed form expression and got really close to find one
hardy gazelle
aghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
i might have gott itt
MIGHTT
but i would say one thing
**There is no elementary closed form like
sin(x)sinh(x)/x
for the product
product over k>=1 of (1 - x^3/(k^3 pi^3))
The reason is that this product has three sets of zeros (coming from cube roots of unity), unlike the x^4 case which splits nicely into sin and sinh.
The best possible closed form is in terms of Gamma functions:
product over k>=1 of (1 - x^3/(k^3 pi^3))
= C / [ Gamma(1 - x/pi) * Gamma(1 - omega x/pi) * Gamma(1 - omega^2 x/pi) ]
where
omega = exp(2 pi i / 3)
and C is a constant (can be fixed by normalization).
So the conclusion, in one line:
There is no representation using only sin, cos, sinh, etc.
The natural closed form lives in Gamma / Barnes type functions.**
$prod_{k>=1} ( 1 - x^3/(k^3*pi^3) )
= S_3( x/pi | 1,1,1 )$
mystic cliffBOT
V
hardy gazelle
$S_3(z | 1,1,1)
= prod_{n1,n2,n3 >= 0}
( n1 + n2 + n3 + z )
/ ( n1 + n2 + n3 + 3 - z )S_3(z | 1,1,1)
= prod_{n1,n2,n3 >= 0}
( n1 + n2 + n3 + z )
/ ( n1 + n2 + n3 + 3 - z )$
mystic cliffBOT
V
wicked crest
slow marsh
Niceee.
thank you ;)
wow i understand none of this but my love for yall has increased exponentially
slow marsh
wait i js realised
the mathematics servers gif is the rainbow pride flag and trans flag
ohh
hardy gazelle
yo guys i was working out on relativity theory and i came across a theory of my own
@tepid fiber u think that the universe is observer dependent?
@slow marsh @wicked crest @tacit furnace my bad for mass tags but its just going over my head i hope you get me
wicked crest
<@1288751435785441369> u think that the universe is observer dependent?
<@876713...
no. Universe is universe and universe is not unique for each individuals. Unless... Yk they have certain condition then the universe would look different to them but in general the universe is one thing that doesnt differ. Always chaotic too btw.
hardy gazelle
bro but If two observers can record different times and lengths for the same event, then reality itself is observer dependent, not fixed.
and doesnt it challenges newtonian ideas?
Time flows the same everywhere
Space is rigid and absolute
these ideas
what do u say
wicked crest
its not a bad idea tbh
hardy gazelle
yea that's what im sayinggg
ayoo wake these nuggas up
lets hit vc
im having a rot
wicked crest
hardy gazelle
wicked crest
💀
hardy gazelle
i love this guy
wicked crest
yk 9/11 was to cover up the mestirious money that vanished from the government and a excuse to go to iraq to get oil
just cool fun fact nothing personal
hardy gazelle
hardy gazelle
💀
wicked crest
hardy gazelle
hey twitch
Relativity does not merely revise measurements of space and time,
it destroys the existence of a global, observer-independent temporal order.
and if that happens then
Time is not an intrinsic feature of the universe.
Space & time does not exist as a fixed container.
Reality is relational, defined only through physical interactions.
tepid fiber
btw this guy just planned this. he didnt fly in the plane, and also the plane didnt just drop a bomb it FLEW RIGHT IN THE TOWER
hardy gazelle
btw this guy just planned this. he didnt fly in the plane, and also the plane di...
ayyy its just jokes