For about 3 days now I’ve been absolutely stumped by solving equations with the gauss Jordan method and finding the inverse of 3x3 matrices, I understand that you are meant to solve the top right to one first but how to get there correctly without messing up the answer has brought so much frustration. If anyone could help tutor me or just help me out in general in teaching the proper way to do so it would be appreciated a ton.
#Im having major struggles with solving 3x3 Gauss Jordan matrices and inverse matrices
110 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
<@&286206848099549185>
can you send a practice problem of one you are trying to do and the steps you do to solve it
ofc!
Like this one (though it’s unfinished as it’s my 4th go through on it) where there are multiple ways to single out that one in a11
Im just stumped because all those different ways result in varying answers that result in other varying answers and I’m just so confused at this point 😞
so you are tryign to get the inverse of the matrix by adjoining it to the identity matrix right
Yup!
sorry was doing something
its alright
so remember our goal is to get the identity matrix to be on the left matrix by the end as that will mark the end of our steps and show that we have gotten the inverse matrix
yeah I understand that loosely its just the getting there is what ive been stumped on
ok so lets start from the beginning after adjoining it
lets try to get row 1 col 1 to turn into 1
any ideas on what step we should do to make that happen ?
subtracting r1 by r2?
(side note why not cofactors)
thats for determinants
close, we would add r2 to r1
so R1 + R2
since r2 starts with -1 we will get 2 + -1 which will make our first column turn into 1
transpose of matrix of cofactors over det is inverse but thats way too impractical
gotcha!
but yeah you can uh
r1+r2 -> r1
wuh??????😭
now what do you do with that to get 1st row 2nd column as 0
dont worry youll be doing that later in like 3 months
im gonna go crazy i swear
ok ok
oh wait i noticed something that i didnt at the beginning so remember we want it to end with 1 0 0 , 0 1 0 , 0 0 1 so we want our bottom row to have a 1 at the end so we should swap something
which one would you like to swap ?
yeah that works
it wouldnt mess up the end result?
actually no that wouldnt work because our first row needs to start with a 1 also
ahh i see okay okay
so which one do you think we should wap if the first row and third row swap isn't valid ?
ahh okay okay row 1 with row 2 to get -1 on top
that also works, but it doesnt help the fact that row 3 is missing a number in row 3 col 3
remember for us to get the identity matrix there should be a number in the green spots so we should do a swap so the green diagonal has numbers in it
it will help us stay focuesd on the goal
ahh i see i see so our goals at first should be to ensure that there is a number that isnt 0 so that we can get them into 1s later?
exactly
so is that for every single one of these problems as well? ensure that there is a number in each of those dots
you can do it for every single problem and it will help its just what i like to do not sure if is the most efficent but it hasnt failed me yet
I see okay okay so
swap R2 and R3 so that there is a number other than 0 in those circles first
also i had a slight mistake in my adjoining matrix i fixed here because i forgot to swap that side
look at the picture i sent earlier i for got to swap the adjoined matrix when i swapped row 2 and row 3
so i fixed it in that image
wdym by this
mb by R11 i mean like row 1 collumn 1 and R21 I mean Row 2 collumn 1
oh in that case yes that should be our goal
i like to get row 1 col 1 to be 1 first and work my way down into making the diagonal into 1s staring from the top
so first lets try to get a 1 in row 1 col 1. Do you have any ideas on what we should do to get that ?
adding R3 to R1
alright! gimme a sec ill also do some more steps after then lmk on what you think

ok ok
Sorry it took a sec
Anyways here’s what I did
all you did was good until the 5th matrix
remember you want the identity matrix on the left side
so what i would have done is multiply row 2 by 3 and add it to row 3
the bottom matrix is where i did what i suggested
but arent you meant to get rid of the negatives first?
no it doesnt make a difference whether you get rid of them first or at the end
instead you should use them to your advatage to cancel things out like i did
because it doesnt matter if i make the negative postive now or if i do it at the end i will end up with the same result either way
I see so as long as you can get it to a 1 or -1 either one will work no matter what as well?
yes, just remember to make it postive once you are completely done
which is as simple as just multiplying the whole row by (-1)
I see let me fix it now and ill update you in a sec

ok ok sorry it took a second got busy with something in between
its ok dont worry im waiting on a friend to play a game with anyways so i got nothing to do
but he has not gotten off the game hes been on for the past 7 hours 🙏 😭
wait bro is a joe bart viewer
yuh
Ok so here’s what I did though I think I went wrong somewhere
🫡
ahh i see what i did wrong now nvm 1 sec
yup i see it
you accidentally forgot to put a 1 in row 1 col 2 and put a 0 which led you slightly off
besides that everything is right so once you fix that you should get the right answer
yeah but thankfully it doesnt take awfully long to fix
YAY
I DID IRT
YIPEE
horray

if you ever need help with linear algebra, and or calculus feel free to send me a message if im free ill help
