#Measuring Density around a point?
39 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Measuring Density around a point?
why don't you just use a metric on the space?
i understood what you were saying just now
you could weight the distance from the average by how the authors' points are dense
and calculate density by the average of all the distances between a pair of authors
then normalize
there is
it's the hyper-area of the convex hull
but for your porpouses you should use the n-root of it
not the n-root of it, but the d-root, where d is the dimension of the span of the points, where the average point is fixed as the origin
i think it's a quite standard method
but we can't weight the distance by the density
but i think you're right in thinking it is not really how we intuitively think as density (convex hull's area inverses)
i meant the inverse of the convex hull sorry
it is more a measure of how they're spread out instead
you read the message i deleated?
no need to define k
measure(hull(S))^{-1} is a mesure of how much the points are not spread out
aaa
ok
i thought you needed a measure of how one's style was unique in the sense of globally different
ask chat gpt to locate a source of informations, a method must exists somewhere in internet
yesterday i found the solution of a problem i was working on for a year online, only chat gpt could locate it in the web
you should try
you could approximate points such that the dimensionality of the window is expected to be less than n in the neighborhood of the points
Fonte: arXiv https://share.google/6TSnxc6YuhUsR24xU
We consider the problem of estimating a structured multivariate density, subject to Markov conditions implied by an undirected graph. In the worst case, without Markovian assumptions, this problem suffers from the curse of dimensionality. Our main result shows how the curse of dimensionality can be avoided or greatly alleviated under the Markov ...
good luck
it could be better for comparison
but it feels like a defeate
it's subsituted by density per dimension
having a mesurement of uniquness by dimension is not bad either
no
it's just n times an elementary computation
if the time scales more than linearly then it is more convenient doing it per feature
and it does
density in hyper-space is more complex than n times density in a line
the computations will be fine
you would have had to do n operations per operation on the vector anyway (n operations on the n components)