#how do i figure out 30-2x10+5
1775 messages ยท Page 2 of 2 (latest)
6,3 and one half
$y=mx+b$
ImOakley
well we identified our b as being -1
$m=\frac{1}{2}$
ImOakley
and our m being 1/2
that oh must be so satisfying
so b = -1 m = 1/2
no
??
b is the y intercept
m and c arent related they are separate properties of the line
what does this mean
yes, b=-1 and m=1/2 are true statements. you just need to compose these.
yes and we get our equation of the line
this is where we started lol
we actually started WAAAAAAAAY before that
i was wondering where we started. i've been trying to backread but there's a lot.
wdym
from here
is your goal to yield something of the form y = mx + b here?
i mean the slope scenario
oh okay lol
wait it's been 1 hour ๐ญ
??
how do i compose
allow me to backread to catch up properly on what your actual goal is here.
put those into the equation y=mx+b
y=21โxโ1
21?
m is not 21.
or y=1/2โxโ1
you got it
BRO
indeed, if you plug in an x value to this, you will get the height of the line above the x axis at that point.
seems like the equation of the line was the friends we made along the way :D
but good job though
bc u didnt explain the fundamentals
i just wanted to understand the fundamentals
huh we did though
poorly lol
is there anything in particular here you feel like you have not internalized properly? i can try to help.
which fundamentals
i just wanted to understand the basics like why we put things in the order we do and what they mean and represent
and the letters
the letters are just variables
remeber our original equation we worked with?
where we solved for x and got x = -5
do you understand what y = mx + b is actually a statement about?
no'
there isnt really a reason for putting operations in order its just that when it gets to algebra we use notation like 5x and stuff so if by convention we added before multiplication it would be very confusing to do 3+5x
okay, good. so, this equation associates, with any given x value we plug in, a y value.
which is why we have brackets in case we need to add before multiplication
for what purpose
right, i'm getting there.
consider our example derived earlier. y = x/2 - 1.
plugging in, say, x = 1, we will get out y = 1/2 - 1 = -1/2.
we can plot this like this.
y is not equal to x.
oh wait they r not equal i see
except for one value. but we can get to that later.
anyway, yes. this is a procedure which can get us a y value from an x value.
if we do this for every possible x value, we get this.
i actually drew the y in the wrong direction here, my mistake.
so where they meet?
where what meets? i do not follow.
oh, sure. there is certainly a sense in which this is the part where the x=1 line meets with the red line.
anyway. you can certainly verify that, for any x value we put in, we get out the height of the red line above the x axis. you can try it.
for instance, for x=2, we see that y = x/2 - 1 = 1 - 1 = 0.
so, y = x/2 - 1 uniquely describes this red line.
the reason "y = mx + b" is so important is that, by choosing the correct m and b, you can describe any line this way unless it is vertical.
yes its flat
so it would be 0
okay. so, let's consider this line for now:
we want a procedure to turn any x value we want into the y value of the line at that x value. for instance, if we plug in 3, we want how high up this point is.
so, consider this: for the case of x = 0, what should our procedure give us?
well. i've got to go for about an hour, i'm afraid.
what do you mean turn into?
take this, for instance.
we would like to know how high up our line is above x = 3. we want a procedure that takes 3, and lets us get how high the line is. this is what i mean by turning the x value into the y value.
(i do really have to go now. i'll be back later.)
if you understand, try to answer this.
(for the particular line shown in the image.)
pemdas
we're over that now, i think.
if we had to go up to 3 it would be 3?
well. we want to see how high the line is, at x = 3. if you look at the graph, that is not 3.
oh its like 1 and a half
@muted cobalt
or like 1.3 or 1.4
however you wanna put it
correct. yes.
so, what we're looking for is an equation which will take any x value like this to the correct y value. in this case, 3 to 1.5.
so, let's start with x = 0. what should the y value be there?
0?
not true. that would imply that at x = 0, the line goes through y = 0. you can see, however, that the line does not pass through that point.
oh
wait am i supposed to look at the number zero or still at 3
oh
yes
i dont get the question, if its at 0 would the other also not be zero
or ru asking me when it meets the line
u mean when it meets the red line?
sure.
3
how is the red line x = 0
i dont get that
the red line is not itself x = 0, no.
the red line is what we are working towards describing. i am simply asking, when it passes through x = 0, how high is it?
yes.
this is what we are trying to get.
i get it
we are trying to get an equation which will tell us the answer for any number, not just 0.
so, we have that, at x=0, the line is at y=3. understand so far?
you can see that, if we just consider the slice of the grid where the x coordinate is 0, the point the line passes through is at the y coordinate 3.
yes.
ok
for every such slice of the grid, there is only one point that touches the line. we want this point for every possible x coordinate.
at 0, the point is at the y coordinate 3.
so, if we're clear on this.
yes
notice that if you move the x coordinate over by 1, the line's height changes by the same amount every time.
what is this amount?
which one
if we instead changed from looking at x=0 to looking at x=1, the height we measure would change.
for instance, what's the height of the line at x = 1?
2 and a half
yes. and then x = 2?
2
so, you can see that every time we change our x by 1, we change our y by -1/2.
does this make sense?
yes
very good. so, we know that at x = 0, y = 3.
and we know that adding 1 to x adds -1/2 to y.
so, from this we get the final equation: y = 3 - x/2.
does this make sense so far?
from which
well, we know that when we plug in x = 0, we get y = 3.
and we know that adding 1 to x will subtract 1/2 from our answer.
hence "- x/2".
i get the concept
this is the equation that can tell us how high up the line is for any x value we plug in.
that's fair. but just imagine it this way.
i get y = 3
if we looked at, say, x = 5, we know that every time we increase x by 1, we need to add -1/2 to the answer.
if we do this 5 times, we add -5/2 to the answer.
x = 5, and we have -5/2. i hope you see how this is -x/2.
hm?
cant u just start at 0 and say y is 3
thus 3
why do u have to subtract if u start there
well, the point is that yes, at 0, y is 3.
yes
y is something else at other values.
yes.
ok
if you wanted to find the value at x=5, you would start with 3, and then subtract -5/2.
you can see how if we take y = 3 - x/2, and plug in 5, we get y = 3 - 5/2.
understand?
whats x/2 again
a half?
x divided by 2, yes.
or "-1/2x" if you prefer to phrase it that way.
the subtracting thing and composing
is the main issue
i get if we start at +
its 3
0*
then we go down to 1 and its 3.5
2.5.
well, consider this:
so ur removing a half every time
yes.
when x is equal to 0, x/2 is also 0.
so y = 3 - x/2 just evaluates to y = 3.
ok but when we areat 5 and get 0.5 how would we write the equation
or know how to write it
y = 3 - 5/2 = 3 - 2.5 = 0.5.
y is not 3 tho
or ru writing from the start
like the whole thing
or just the last one
oh wait u are writing the whole thing
how is this sill going
it is at x = 0, and then for every x after that there's a contribution of -1/2 to the answer.
hence we just add -1/2 * x to 3.
heav is explaining to them what an equation of a line is now 
i'm working on it. we're getting somewhere.
yeah
alright. is it intuitive why we have y = 3 - x/2 now?
me?
yes.
if this continues for long enough then maybe ironvril will be doing quantum mechanics tomorrow
don't worry, now that we understand lines we can do the next obvious step, multivariable calculus.
okay, really though.
now some terminology:
idk
no, i mean just, what is x divided by 2 if x is 0?
half of 3 would be 1.5
i'm not talking about y right now.
yes. and if x = 1?
yes.
do you see how this is what we need to subtract from 3 to get our y position, at any given x value?
since it decreases by 0.5 every time x increases by 1.
@regal sentinel dedication is real bro
I have a admission test next week bro
is this a question
yes?
okay. good. so, this describes our line.
yes
that value, 3, where x = 0. we call this the 'y intercept'.
it is where the line crosses the y axis, at x = 0.
yeah where the lines meet
and the value -1/2, we call this the 'slope' or 'gradient'. it is how fast the line is changing.
as we increase our x value.
often, you will see the general form of this as 'y = mx + b', where b is our y intercept and m is our gradient.
here, b was 3, and m was -1/2.
if we set these values differently, we can describe any line like this, unless it is vertical.
understand so far?
yes.
so in our case a half
indeed. negative one half, since our line went down as x went up.
4

that is indeed the y intercept. what is the slope?
1?
not quite. when we increase x by 1, y does not increase by 1.
for instance, this would imply that at x = 1, y = 5. but that is not what we see on the graph.
how do i determine
you saw last time that when we increased x by 1, we increased y by -1/2.
what happens with this line?
wait
it was easier cuz there were lines on the last ones
isnt it the same like 0.5 how can u tell
there are on this one too. it's a bit more zoomed out.
just look at x = 1. what's the y coordinate of the line there?
you correctly identified that at x = 0, y was 4.
what is it at x = 1?
i can zoom in a little for you if you need. it is not 4 at x = 1.
how can u tell
i did lol
do you know where x = 1 is?
do u count the small boxes
you do not need to. just look at the y axis, where the numbers are.
there is at the bottom.
nope.
well 6
right. we started at 4, and got to 6.
what is the slope here?
yes.
every time we increase x by 1 here, we increase y by 2.
so, what is our full equation for y? we know it starts at 4.
b = 4 y = 2
yes. very good.
this fully characterizes this line, you can plug in an x value to this and get the correct height.
here's another one:
b = -1 m = one and a half
indeed. can you do the equation?
you should say it like that.
as in, y = (whatever).
can you do that for this line?
new one?
the blue one.
can i do what for it
make an equation for it of the form y = mx + b.
you did it for the one before that, if you recall.
i did?
this one is not 4x + 2. the last one was.
this one?
no.
this one.
you've plugged in m = 4 and b = 2 here.
but this is not true for this line.
1.5.
you have those right. you just need to put them into y = mx + b.
y = 1x - 0.5
oh
also, b is not -0.5 either.
y = 1x - -1
it is directly between 0 and 1.
so 0.5
i thought -1 bc they meet there before
0
also no. that is at x = -1.
y = 0.5 - 1
you're missing x.
oh
and at least 1 number there is wrong.
y = 0.5x - 1
0.5 is correct for m.
yes bc it meets at 0.5
yes. so what is the correct equation?
y = 0.5 + 1
hm?
you are missing x again and no.
please, list out for me. what is m and what is b, here?
yes.
yes.
it is not 1.
a slope of 1 means that when we increase x by 1, we increase y by 1.
increase x by 1 here. what does y increase by?
1??
0.5
yes.
y = 0.5x - 0.5
not - 0.5.
y = 0.5x + 0.5
- 0.5 would mean that b = -0.5.
this is 0.5x - 0.5.
yes4
this is 0.5x + 0.5 (in purple).
alright. let's try this, then.
y = 2x + 2
y = 6?
not 6.
it is not 0.
??
it is still not 6.
you got it.
can i say dat
you can.
and it's the correct thing to say.
x = 2 does fully characterize this line. good job.
well. i suppose i'll leave it there, for now. i hope you learned something, maybe.
oh, sure. do you know order of operations?
well. things in parentheses come first.
for instance, (10*9) + 1 = (90) + 1 = 91.
and 10 * (9 + 1) = 10 * (10) = 100.
then, exponentials come before other things. 2^3 + 1 = 8 + 1 = 9.
then, generally, multiplication, division, addition, subtraction.
some are easy like 7.1 is 7
ik that
no i cant lol
okay. well. you have subtraction and multiplication. which one do you do first?
that sure is a string of things you did.
you do 2 * 10 first, yes.
to get 30 - 20 + 5.
you do this, as i understand it, from left to right. 30 - 20 = 10. 10 + 5 = 15.
do you understand this?
you should do strings of subtraction and addition from left to right i believe.
oh
just do the first step, 2 * 10 = 20. you get 30 - 20 + 5.
30 -2 x 10 +5
30 -2 x 10 +5 2x10 = 20 30-2 = 28?
or do u solve them first
before adding
in that case
30 - 2 x 10 + 5.
yes.
lets goo
do you need help on any of the other ones?
6.2 is roots right
it is.
so how many times you have to time somethinb by itself
not quite.
these are square roots, so they're all about multiplying things with themselves once.
sqrt(16) is asking, what multiplied with itself is 16?
4 - 3?
yes.
= 1
it is.
6.3
this is multiplication.
yes.
8
hm?
3x + 7 = 5x -1
do you know how to do things like this?
5x + 7 = 7 -1
i'm not quite sure what you did there.
12 = 6
that is not a true statement. you seem a little confused also.
i can walk you through how to solve it if you want?
yes
okay. so, the general principles are:
you can add or subtract something from both sides of the =, and it will still be true.
with any number u choose?
yes.
you want your answer to look like x = (some number). you want to get all the numbers on one side, and all the variables on the other side.
even if its not in the equation
yes. it won't be false, so long as you're doing the same things to both sides.
yes
so, 3x + 7 = 5x - 1.
you can eliminate "3x" by subtracting it from both sides.
try it.
-3 3x + 7 = 5x - 1 -3
hm? no, you've done something strange here.
specifically, you are subtracting 3*x from both sides.
3x + 7 - 3x = 5x - 1 - 3x.
understand?
you subtract it from both sides.
to get this.
yes. now.
3x and -3x cancel out to 0.
so you get 7 = 5x - 1 - 3x.
do you understand this?
how does it cancel out 0
anything minus itself is 0.
3x - 3x = 0.
you can do addition in any order, so this is the same as "7 + 3x - 3x" if it helps.
wouldnt it be -6
ok
what is 3*x
x multiplied by 3. we don't know what x is yet.
but we do know that x*3 - x*3 is 0, no matter what it is.
bc 5-3 = 2
yes, and this holds true even if you multiply all of those numbers by something.
yes
so. 5x - 1 - 3x simplifies to just 2x - 1.
so we have: 7 = 2x - 1.
understand so far?
yes
1x 7 = 2x - 1. 1x
1 = 2x 1
8= 2x 2
hm?
8= 2x + 2
2x - 2
no. that is what happens if you subtract 1.
2x - 0
yes. which is?
2x?
yes.
ok
so, we have 8 = 2x.
yes
right. now, we can remove the 2 from 2x by dividing both sides by 2.
8/2 = 4 = 2x/2 = 1
2x/2 is not 1.
2 divided by 2 is 1
2/2 is 1, yes.
we don't. but consider this.
what happens if you multiply something by 2, and then divide it by 2?
u get half
not quite.
that is half
you started with 2. you got 2.
yes
yes?
right. so we have 4 = x.
what now
x = 4 is your answer.
right. you seemed quite confused on the steps here.
i would suggest trying some more of these.
yes
i dont know them 100%
not familiar
it seems you struggle a bit with just arithmetic that involves variables in general.