#quadratic
56 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Low
we can use b^2 - 4ac right
what class / math topic is this question from?
is this intro to proofs? number theory? olympiad problem?
or some kind of calc class
oly problem
i guess
i saw it on a server
yeah thought so, had that kind of vibe
ok
maybe we can prove that it’s >0
by using some asymptomatic ways
What do you think
doubt it, since the question is working with a hard bound on x,y
I can prove asymptotically that there must exist a big enough N such that x,y>N has no solutions, that's not too hard
the difficulty here is working with the given condition x,y>3
see below
Ok
Ok but we need to prove for N = 3 , right
so your idea was actually pretty good, because the realisation hit me that as long as we can find a numerical value for N, even if N is greater than 3 we can just manually check all the smaller values as long as N is small enough. So asymptotic approaches do work
Suppose $x+y = N$.
Then as $x,y \geq 4$ by assumption, we have that $xy \geq 4(N-4)$.
Now rearrange the equation to obtain $2(x+y)^2 = (xy+1)^2+1$. Then:
\begin{align*}
[(4N-16)+1]^2+1
&\leq 2N^2 \
&\vdots \
14N^2-120N+1 &\leq 0 \
N &\leq 5.78
\end{align*}
But $N \geq 8$, which is a contradiction. $\blacksquare$
HChan
damn this was a fun question.
also fuck you I had work to do that was 2 hours of my life I'm not getting back
Thank you!
Where did you get this question from?
@torn sentinel maybe i need some explanations
first xy=> 4(N-4) by am gm, right
Then, i don’t understand how do u get ((4N-16) + 1)^2 + 1 =< 2N^2
could u give more details
No
@torn sentinel i just get the problem
Find every positive integers such that $(x^2 - 1)(y^2 - 1) = (x + y)^2 - 1$
Low
The initial problem
the method I used to solve the other problem can be repeated here
the only solutions in the positive integers are x=2,y=3 / x=3,y=2
fun problem
@torn sentinel
It is am gm, just a slightly different version of it
could u prove it ?
two ways to prove this, either with calculus or with number theory:
First fix a positive integer N.
Then if x+y=N, xy=x(N-x).
Furthermore, we can WLOG assume that x <= y, so we in fact only need to consider x(N-x) for values of x between 0 and N/2. Furthermore as x>3, we can further restrict the domain to 4 <= x <= N/2.
Proof 1 (number theory):
AM/GM tells us that the number xy is maximised when x is close to y. Conversely, this means that xy is minimised when x is the furthest away from y, and since y has to be between N/2 and N, the furtherest away from y that x can get is x=4. Thus the minimum of xy is achieved when x=4 and y=N-4, done.
Proof 2 (calculus):
The quadratic equation x(N-x) has roots at 0 and N, so its global maximum is at x=N/2. But then the quadratic is increasing for 4 <= x <= N/2, and so it follows that the global minimum of the quadratic is found on the endpoints. Thus the minimum is at x=4, y=N-4, done.
Ok i see
How do u get ((4N-16)+1)^2 =< 2N^2
direct substitution
where do you get these from?