#inverse matrix
gritty sinewBOT
wheat scarab
im pretty sure X is 2x2
how do we assume it is
tacit wedge
nevermind, i think the only way to solve it though is using matrix algebra
but then again any theres no size of x that can be used in the products
wheat scarab
nevermind, i think the only way to solve it though is using matrix algebra
how
its fukin w me
soft olive
but then again any theres no size of x that can be used in the products
i would probably name all of the numerical matrices A, B, C, etc for the sake of the algebra
then use standad matrix algebra methods to solve for X
once you solve for X you can plug in all the matrices into your expression
tacit wedge
yeah thats what i meant because if you try to assume matrices like [[a b][c d]] you run into dim errors
soft olive
well you can figure out what size X must be from context, but doing it entrywise is still more trouble than it's worth
wheat scarab
how do u close the thread again
soft olive
.close or .solved