#Exponent 3^x-2=6^5x+3
132 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I donโt know how to solve this ๐ญ and have test next block
6= 3*2
OMG๐
Itโs fine lol
Oh ye
I thought it was that easy too then I saw a whole page of work ;-;
I'm not home right now I can do it in 5 mins
Oh ok
I'm home give me a min
Kk
15 mins later
Saint gone to meditate
Like ln(3) times x-2= log(6) times 5x+3
ye, or we can change it in terms of 3 and 2
same thing
i was simplifying it in terms of 2 and 3
in place of log 6 and 3
so further it can also be simplified
So like (3 times 2)^(5x+3)
ye , but like, all is same
I think my log way is simpler but idk
main in taking log
Show me your work bro
here also, we would take log
Or ln ๐
i do work inside my brain ๐
Sad
My friend sent me their work but I donโt understand
ln or log are same , like property wise, base doesnt do much here
15
plz charge your phone ๐
cz base doesnt do much ๐
Mhm
Heโs a freshman taking 9th grader calc bc ;-;
Nice
Heโs around my level idk
I'm trying ๐ญi thought i could do it but turns out it's more difficult than I though
You can set it in terms of log
๐
Itโs fine I have his work I can beg him to help me

Do you understand log properties
Write it in terms of log properties
This is review ;-; I canโt remember
Log(a^b)=b log(a)
where a > 0 ๐
Okay bro we know
lol, jk
How tf would some log equal zero though
if a = 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
Ok guys wish me luck on the test ๐ป
Just say lim a>0
all the best bro
Approaches
It's only solved with ln/log?
You could probably solve it with annoying algebraic manipulations but idk
log base 1 ๐ค
what?
Nothing
anything
yo is it a must to use log
btw , hows your calculus bro
if we r not allowed to use calculator
idk
@uncut plaza
Really easy
well, i have a problem
i m over, but this prob doesnt solve
would you like to help it
:3
I love you ๐ป๐๐
๐you too smart pookie
x = negative of logarithm base 128 of 40
which differs greatly from this
prolly due to rounding
using this answer we get the RHS equal to 0.02379
and LHS = 0.04820
โน๏ธ
using this, LHS = 0.03856
and RHS = 0.03856
yeah no the first one is correct
god knows what arithmetic error i did here
that's weird lmao, the manual calculation came out more precise than the supposedly infinitely accurate algebraic calculation
OH IM STUPID
NAH IM DELETING THAT ๐
okay so i entirely forgot my brain at home yesterday
ggs
the error in question was that i applied the log a + log b = log ab rule, but i accidentally did log(a) + b = log(ab)
whoopsies
yh that was supposed to be negative i forgot to put the -ve there
-0.96 is the answer
~0.14 off is prolly a rounding error

