#Continued Fraction Pi
66 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Also another question, how in the world does this work
the arctan makes sense
but mine dosent seem like arctan
3.14234234234 = π ?
no it approaches pi
see the website
it has a playground
to test
it
this is another continued fraction, but its not as fast as mine
not sure how these work
thats why im confused
23 terms already is very accurate
or precise
I cant get a clear answer
anywhere
i hope some of u can like
help
what does this have to do with a circle
even chatgpt
isnt helping
e
what exactly is your confusion here
i don't necessarily agree with that sentiment
like the idea pushed by 3b1b, that every instance of pi is related to a circle
it's probably true, but sometimes it's kind of a waste of time trying to find some kind of connection a circle
yeah i agree
but humans are like that
we want to understand things using what we already know
and thats waht i wanna do
so i can intuitively know whats happening
well, an answer would be that arctan(1) = pi
and that the taylor series of arctan is universally convergent, i.e. its continued fraction form at x=1 will approximate pi
arctan 1 is pi/4
but is that arctan continued frac?
when i tried googling i got a ton of stuff
this
and this
none were what i was doing
so the website tells you a number that's close to pi?
it uses the continued fraction thing i made
to approximate
it generates pi
Both of these formulas are well-known and can be found on Wikipedia. The first one is from the article about tanh(x), and it does not converge to pi. The second one is from the article about pi. Both can be proved from differential equations.
The first one converges to 4-8/(1+e²)
huh
okay
i tried finding one
and i got the first one
🤷♂️
thx tho
but also what does it have to do with circle
The connection is rather lengthy. Generally it goes through derivatives of trig functions. Like arctan(x)'=1/(1+x²)
And trig functions do have something to do with a circle 🙂