#Is it possible for the convergence of a sequence to be undecidable?
14 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
trigonometria
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
If I got your question right, any sequence of numbers either have a limit or doesn't have one. So, any series is either convergent or divergent.
Yes. But are there cases where (in theory) we cannot prove if a sequence converges or diverges? In other words , can the convergence of a sequence only be provable by tools we do not have?
you have just given an example of that with those Mersenne primes. We dont have a tool to prove that it is a finite set right now. But this sequence is well defined. It is either convergent or divergent.
When I say tools I mean , whatever foundational system S we are working in , if it can handle basic arithmetic , we can not prove that it converges or diverges inside S .
This , now, seems obvious that such sequences have to exist otherwise S proves itself consistent, which contradicts Godel's incompleteness theorem. But I am still interested in a specific example.
I don't think you can have a specific undecidable sequence, but i can prove that an undecidable sequence exists
not exactly your question but every Goodstein sequence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodstein's_theorem) eventually converges to 0, which is a fact that is true yet unprovable within Peano Arithmetic
In mathematical logic, Goodstein's theorem is a statement about the natural numbers, proved by Reuben Goodstein in 1944, which states that every Goodstein sequence (as defined below) eventually terminates at 0. Laurence Kirby and Jeff Paris showed that it is unprovable in Peano arithmetic (but it can be proven in stronger systems, such as second...
you can also do something akin to Chaitin's constant:
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ChaitinsConstant.html
A Chaitin's constant, also called a Chaitin omega number, introduced by Chaitin (1975), is the halting probability of a universal prefix-free (self-delimiting) Turing machine. Every Chaitin constant is simultaneously computably enumerable (the limit of a computable, increasing, converging sequence of rationals), and algorithmically random (its b...
let $\Omega_{U}$ be (some) Chaitin's constant.\
let $a_n = n$th digit of Chaitin's constant in binary (so $a_n \in {0,1}$).\
let $f(x) = 2x-1$. we then have $f(0) = -1$ and $f(1) = 1$\
consider the sequence of partial sums:
$$S_n = \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{f(a_k)}{k}$$
artemetra
since the exact value of Chaitin's constant is undecidable, the converge of this sum is undecidable as well and hence the convergence of the sequence of partial sums