#boundary of a complex set shaped like a semicircle
42 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
What are your thoughts on it?
it would be natural to me to include said base, but it also seems to be a bit more complicated than i might expect to include this base
You should follow your natural instincts
if it brings about any differences, this boundary is being found to take the integral over the boundary of that set as a contour
is there no convention?
wdym
because i imagine that the contour integral over the boundary with and without that base of the semicircle would have varying answers
when taking the boundary of a complex set such that it plots to. semicircle, is there a convention for whether or not one includes the flat portion of that semicircle in the boundary set
or would it be simply the curved portion
to me it seems that one would take it to be the former but it also seems that it would be a bit more convoluted to calculate that set
this is my exact set
the complex numbers such that the imaginary part is greater than 0 and the magnitude is between 0 and R exclusive
So what would the boundary be without the base then?
correct
so i suppose it would require that the base is included
indeed
lest the set is not Closed
okay
Yay
well also not yay bc that makes it a bit harder
but Oh well
i got my answer. thank u
$\partial X=\overline{X}\setminus X^{\circ}$
SWR
interior of the set
no worries
thank u for ur help

.solved
