#I am not getting the final part of my partial fraction
79 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
<@&286206848099549185>
It's just B/x²
not Bx+C, x² has no complex roots
How is k defined?
Assuming R > 0
Please explain
Hmm first time encountering something like this
Wanna see the question?
ye
Can you explain why R < 0 won't work
so k doesnt matter
So let me get this straight.
bacc
Other way
x^2 + R = 0 has real roots if R <= 0
then you need one constant
but if R > 0 you get complex roots
Right. Ok. Let's assume that I have (x²+a)²
and you need to do Cx+D
This person is now confusing me
Mb
He just showed you that for positive R there are no real solutions
but complex
Just the graphical method 😭
it's good
the thing is
x^2+R is not reducible if R > 0 so we need now a linear term in the numerator if we apply partial fraction decomposition
Ooohh... For positive R.... Kkk
Thank you
I understand
Just. Clear this up for me k?
clear this up?
Is this correct?
The main doubts
how is a defined
A constant
wow
Real constant
is it real?
ok
then you need to do two cases
if a >= 0 you don't need the linear term
else you do
Riiiight
Assuming a is a negative, we won't get any real roots. So we simply keep the numerator a constant
not necessarily integer
it can be a real positive number or 0
then you can reduce it x^2-a^2 = (x-a)(x+a)
Am I correct?
Is this correct?
@thin venture
no
if you have complex roots you need a linear term in the numerator
not constant
ye
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Post marked as solved by @swift orbit.
Use .unsolved if this was a mistake.
I now understand
If a >=0 then the factors can be further broken into (x²-a) = (x-√a)(x+√a)
And each can have a numerator as a constant