#Help wihere the random constant come out?
59 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
is this the answer that was presented to you or is part of the development of the answer?
answer that is presented to me
they integrated 1/ax+b and got that
i was wondering where the 1/a lnk came from
even if it did cancel out
this is the question
the only thing that i can think of is that they used the literal antiderivative of 1/(ax+b)
well i mean it could just be 1/(ax+b+c) or something
wdym
that is (1/a)(ln(ax+b) +C)
they just set the constant to look like ln(k)
then distributed the 1/a inside the parentesis
well yeah
the book author chose to write the constant in a different way
ln(k) = C
and what about 1/a?
form this
when you solve for the antiderivative you get a 1/a factor
so you get (1/a)C = (1/a)ln(k)

i mean when you evaluate it its (1/a)ln(ax+b) +C but ig you can take out 1/a
well if you differentiate (1/a)ln(ax+b) +C you get 1/ax+b
wait how?
you set the integral of 1/(ax+b)
ok
then you multiply by a a/a factor so you get 1/a times integral of a/(ax+b)
?
so you have in the integral argument the derivative of the ln(ax+b)
then you solve the integral wich get you the ln(|ax+b|) and then you multiply this by the 1/a factor
now this is the kind of not skiping any steps way
in your book they just merged the (1/a)ln(k) into one constant since it doesn't really matter
i mean its the same thing just your way is more rigorous but my way in the textbook is more intuitive?
so in many books or developments they just leav it as C
ok ok
yep, btw i dont get this
the derivative of ln(ax+b)=a/(ax+b)
ok
in the ontegral we have just 1/(ax+b)
ah ok i see
fair, cya
bye
the example you provided is a definite integral