#Need to prove.
sage sunBOT
limber reef
Well it's a 60° right triangle you don't eve need math for this
If M and K are mid points and it's 4 sided shape. With 2 different angles, the division speaks for its self
It's a triangle so 180° for both ABC and ADC
Close the 60° legs in on its self and you will sit right nice and tight in that D pocket. Not one for just giving answers away, but I hope that was a good enough explanation. Lmk if you need me to keep going. But if you look at the question it says nothing about making you 3 points using math
There's no formula specified to use, so technically this is a VERY argueably point. If I sign a contract with you and find a loop whole because YOU forgot to specify, that's not my problem
merry wagon
Well it's a 60° right triangle you don't eve need math for this
Where's the 60° right triangle?
limber reef
Mbk
I'm an ironworker, that got high 90's on all trig exams. I eyeball my rigging to look just like that every day because that is the strong 2 legged bridle angles you can lift with
limber reef
Where's the 60° right triangle?
Open to discuss further, and just trying to help here, but that's an ° I'm very familiar with
And if I'm incorrect because I just free balled it i apologize and would love to help actually break it down
merry wagon
How could we prove that M is a right angle
limber reef
How could we prove that M is a right angle
If they are both mid points and we have absolutely no dimensions however can see there are 2 different angles on this parallelogram. Then from where I'm standing, unless we are gunna pull out a tape measure, I see more supporting factors to validate my answer than information to disprove it?
Now if there was even 1 dimension given other than the markings on wall k & m to show its 2 equal sides, I would approach it differently
And to boot, the cross section from A-C does completely the triangle half way through showing 3 equal sides even though it's not identified
If I was handed these prints. I would tell my boss the same answer I'm give here, and if it's wrong because there is a skew or some other variable. Than that is something that needs to be identified on the print notes because any illustration to do with math is is to be approached with the perspective of it straightforward U.N.O.
I'm all ears tho on a different approach if I'm wrong. I'm old enough to humbly admit a mistake and use it as a learning opportunity rather than an argument.