#Infinite limits

167 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

gritty chasm
#

Can someone explain limits at infinite?

spring leafBOT
lime sorrel
gritty chasm
#

I know that higher exponent on top (than the bottom) means it’s +/- inf

lime sorrel
#

ohh

#

ok

#

Basically you can consider three cases

#

The first is what you mentioned

#

Basically when the function in the numerator grows faster than in the denominator then as x approaches to infinity so does the limit

#

Basically in polynomials when the degree in the numerator is higher than in the denominator then that is the case

gritty chasm
#

okay but what if it’s something like 6x^3/3x^2?

lime sorrel
#

what about it

#

what do you think happens

gritty chasm
#

it approaches positive infinity

lime sorrel
#

yes

#

also

gritty chasm
#

do you not divide 6/3?

#

in what cases do you divide the coefficients

lime sorrel
#

6x^3/3x^2 = 2x

#

and 2x obv goes to inf

gritty chasm
#

ok

lime sorrel
#

only then

#

the quotient of coeffiecients is the limit

gritty chasm
#

oh

#

what if the numerator exponent is lesser than the denominator

#

is it 0

#

or something

lime sorrel
#

,,\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{a_0x^n + a_1x^{n-1} +... + a_n}{b_0x^n + b_1x^{n-1} + ... + b_n} = \frac{a_0}{b_0}

terse bobcatBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lime sorrel
#

The reason why this works is

#

if you factorize the dominant term x^n

#

everything with lower degree will go to 0

#

and what remains is a_0/b_0

#

does that make sense?

lime sorrel
gritty chasm
lime sorrel
#

basically there is a theorem for this

#

but to prove it to yourself

#

consider factorzing always the dominant term

#

and see what happens

gritty chasm
#

but wait do the signs of the coefficient determine if it’s positive or negative infinite right?

lime sorrel
#

yes

#

the sign of the dominant term

gritty chasm
#

ok

lime sorrel
gritty chasm
#

I think those are the basics but how does limits at infinite work on stuff like 1/x or e^x, or e^-x?

lime sorrel
#

basically you ask yourself what happens with the function as x grows bigger

#

and when you have something like this

#

,,\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{x^{100}}{e^x}

terse bobcatBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lime sorrel
#

Then you are thinking in terms of which infinity is grows bigger and faster

#

and you can keep in mind any exponential function will always dominate any polynomial

#

if x goes to infinity

#

this means

#

e^x at some point becomes much bigger than x^100

#

so it eventually resemble something like ~ 1/x which means it goes to 0 here

gritty chasm
#

sorry but how does that work on like 1/x? if x at some point becomes larger than 1

lime sorrel
#

i meant

#

the limit behaves like 1/x

#

which means

#

x^100 is so small in comparison to e^x

#

like 1 is very small in comparison for x

#

for very big x

#

i could also take

#

100000000000/x

#

still that would go to 0

#

eventually

gritty chasm
#

is this kind of like the other rule where if the numerator is small than the denominator it equals 0?

lime sorrel
#

yes

gritty chasm
#

oh that makes sense

lime sorrel
#

,w plot x^(100)/e^x between 0 and 700

lime sorrel
#

ok the y-axis is messed

#

but basically

#

at some big x

#

like here 200 or 600

#

x^100 become relatively small to e^x

#

like 1 would to x

#

ratio wise

#

,w plot y = 1/x between 0 to 700

lime sorrel
#

this is what i meant by behave the same

#

that they go both to 0

gritty chasm
#

okay and for (x^2 + 3x)/(2x - 5), how would you solve this if x -> inf

would it be positive infinite since ^2 > ^1? and since there’s no negative symbol, I’m just making sure

lime sorrel
#

yes

#

that's it

gritty chasm
lime sorrel
#

if you have to show it

#

no

#

thats tricky but

gritty chasm
#

oh

lime sorrel
#

the numerator would go infinity and dominate the denominator again yes

#

how ever the denominator becomes negative

#

so it would be -infinity

gritty chasm
#

do you ever need to integrate or find the derivative when a limit of x approaches +/- infinity?

lime sorrel
#

idk about integration but for limits there exists L'Hopital where you take the derivative separetly from numerator and denominator when you have cases like 0/0 or inf/inf (notice -inf/inf or inf/-inf is also allowed)

gritty chasm
#

ok and last thing when the powers are equal you subtract their coefficients right

gritty chasm
#

oops I meant divide

gritty chasm
lime sorrel
#

if you deal with polynomials you can do that

gritty chasm
#

ok

lime sorrel
#

that technically would work in cases like this too

#

,,\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{4e^{2x}+x^2}{3e^{2x}+e^x+\ln(x)}

terse bobcatBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lime sorrel
#

it's be 4/3

gritty chasm
#

so I’m assuming the limit 4/3

#

yea

lime sorrel
#

yes

#

but still be careful

#

you can use this more of like what you expect the outcome to be

gritty chasm
#

ok when the numerator's power is lesser than the denominator, the limit always equals 0 right?

#

idk if it’s alwayssss but most of the time?

lime sorrel
#

here you would factorize e^(2x) and then you can argue that an exponential dominates a polynomial and more any logarithm

lime sorrel
#

more of

#

not lesser

#

you mean

#

if it's slower growing

#

basically if the numerator just cant keep up with the speed

#

of the denominator

#

if that makes sense

#

imagine it like a race of functions

#

the faster growing dominates at infinity

gritty chasm
#

what if you have x -> inf for something like 4x^2/2? would it just be infinite

#

positive

lime sorrel
#

well yes, why are you doubting this simple example?

#

also you can try to simplify before considering the limit

#

to make it more obvious

gritty chasm
#

I just don’t wanna get easy and simple ones like those wrong

lime sorrel
#

well it's a parabola

#

clearly any parabola goes to infinity

#

depending on the sign of course

#

just ask yourself

#

what happends with your function as x goes bigger

#

and then draw a conclusion

#

and most functions we know how they behave

gritty chasm
#

in like a basic polynomial expression like 5x^6 - 2x^3 - 3, would you primarily focus on the 5x^6, and would you focus on the operation of 5, or operation of 6?

lime sorrel
#

yes

#

x^6 is the dominant term

#

and the coeffiecent 5 is positive

#

hence +inf

#

done

#

the rest can go to hell haha

gritty chasm
#

what if it was -5x^6?

#

😭

lime sorrel
#

then you basically reflected the function

#

logically

#

at the x-xis

#

so now it goes to -inf

#

x^6 is the dominant again

#

coefficient is negative done

gritty chasm
#

yea and I’m assuming if it was like 5x^-6, you would focus on the 2x^3?

#

it’s - 2x^3 so -inf?

lime sorrel
#

if you had 5x^(-6) - 2x^3 - 3

#

yes

#

dominant term

gritty chasm
#

ok I think I understand everything

lime sorrel
#

x^(-6) goes to 0

#

so it's even less impacting

gritty chasm
#

okay thank you for your time and help I think I’m done now

lime sorrel
#

very cool

#

.solved