#Never understood this subject.

43 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

royal aspenBOT
quick fog
#

Does it make sense to you how the table was set up?

#

p can either be true or false, q can either be true or false

#

These 4 are the only possibilities we can have

#

Both p and q true, p true but q false, now p false and q true or both false

#

No other possibilities. So our table needs these 4 rows

#

Does that make sense?

#

Now for each of these four cases, we give the truth value of them under some composition, like p -> q

#

If both p and q are true, then p implies q is defined as true

#

Nope, that'd be $\leftrightarrow$

warped fjordBOT
quick fog
#

aka "equivalence"

#

We define these compositions using truth tables

#

A -> B is defined like this:

#

You can often give them nice interpretations

quick fog
# quick fog

If the premise, A, is false, then that implies anything; A -> B will always be true.

#

If the premise, A, is true, then A -> B is only true if B is also true

#

Here is a common way to visualize this:

#

A: "It rains", B: "I take an umbrella with me". Now A -> B is "if it rains, I take an umbrella with me".

#

Now, we look at if I lied with that statement.

#

A and B both true: I take an umbrella with me and it rains. So I didn't lie. A -> B is true

#

A true, B false. It rains but I didn't take an umbrella with me. So I lied. A - >B is false.

#

A false, B true It doesn't rain and I still take an umbrella with me. Well, I didn't lie, I only said I will take an umbrella with me when it rains, since it didn't rain, I can do whatever. A -> B true

#

A false, B false. I don't take an umbrella with me and it doesn't rain. Well, I didn't lie. A -> B is true.

#

@sturdy trail

#

~ is the negation

#

It makes true out of false and false out of true

#

Ok, so the first three columns, up to q -> p make sense now?

#

Ok, now v means "or"

#

A v B is true if A is true or B is true (or both are true)

#

A v B is only false if A and B are both false

#

$\wedge$ means "and". \ $A \wedge B$ is true if $A$ is true $\emph{and}$ $B$ is true. So if e.g. $A$ is true and $B$ is false, it will be false.

#

Then we have everything defined. You should probably practice, e.g.

#

filling that table out

#

As for the question, $\equiv$ means "equivalent". Two statements are equivalent if they always have the same truth values.

#

So e.g. for the first thing in the problem, you compare the third column to the fourth column. If they have the same values everywhere, then they are equivalent

#

Yeah

#

So the first statement, $p \rightarrow q \equiv \sim p \rightarrow \sim q$ is false