Please give me step by step proof. <@&286206848099549185>
#Prove this as false... [I couldn't]
naive flame
floral raptorBOT
prime harbor
0/0 is indefinite
more or less undefined
if 0.0...01 is zero, then you cant exactly divide with it
as you have established in z=0=0.0...01
naive flame
if 0.0...01 is zero, then you cant exactly divide with it
but what if you do it before proving it.... Its like double slit experiment @prime harbor.... There is a different answer before proving it and after... What are your thoughts mate???
prime harbor
it's not the double slit experiment in the sense that there is a definite value equivelent to 0/0
also both have been proven to what they are
double slit = light is ambiguous that it behaves like both a particle and a wave (i dont see how this is related)
the 0/0 is undefined and indeterminate in its part because it has been proven to be so
naive flame
Oka what is 0.0000001/0.0000001 (infinite no. of zeros)
prime harbor
for the most part in the "proof", emphasis on " ",
prime harbor
Oka what is 0.0000001/0.0000001 (infinite no. of zeros)
undefined
as you have established that 0.0 repeating 1 is 0
wait do you have a background on limits
perhaps it would be better to relay it that way
naive flame
what woud would you do before proving it...
prime harbor
$
prime harbor
we have no proof for 0! = 1
the factorial can be defined as the number of ways a thing can be arranged or combined
nCr, nPr
combinatorics stuff
so basically, you have zero things
you only have one way to arrange those zero things
ergo, 0! is 1
simple enough
naive flame
1 = 0.001/0.001 = 0.00001/0.00001 = ...
naive flame
i dont see where youre going
till infinity
prime harbor
you see, that's where limits come in
naive flame
you see, that's where limits come in
???
prime harbor
wait do you have a background on limits
.
prime harbor
???
it deals with infinitesimals
i.e. very small quantities
close but not quite zero
naive flame
close but not quite zero
hmmm
prime harbor
the 0/0 has been proved through contradiction using limits
naive flame
the 0/0 has been proved through contradiction using limits
??
prime harbor
you even somewhat used limits in your proof
you claimed 0/0 = 1, while also 0/0 = 0
and somehow concluded that 0/0 = 1 =0
which is false
as zero is not one, nor one is zero
therefore, the logical conclusion is that 0/0 is not equal to zero, nor it is equal to one
it is undefined
naive flame
it is undefined
okk
frozen wing