#genuinely finding it hard to find anything wrong with this

85 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

ashen elkBOT
velvet rover
#

I don't know if I successfully added gravity into quantum physics

#

yes I know the map on here is on a very specific situation but I do believe it should be a basis of getting a grasp of how it should behave

#

i added wheelers equation to fix the approximations issue

#

I would like to test this Theory but I don't have a particle accelerator in my backyard

#

or the ant man suit

ocean gate
velvet rover
bright nexus
#

yeah looks like u solved physics

#

i dont know why we didnt think of this before

#

wym

#

oh ur being serious

#

mathametically you can do whatever you want and add whatever potentials you want

#

it'll just make stuff harder to solve

#

physically, adding the potential of a single proton will be insignficant on the system (usually) because its weak

#

this isnt what is meant by reconciling GR with QM

#

you dont just add a potential and its all magically fixed

#

its "fixed" by quantum field theory

#

as long as you keep your units right ur good

#

what about it

#

whats the h operator

#

lol where are you getting these from

#

you know i can see the file names

#

lol

#

fair enough

#

oh theres alot you can talk about

#

like nobody knows what the capital H is

#

we use that for a general hamiltonian

#

i know you said here its wheelers

#

yeah but you have to write it down lol

#

and its in tensor notation

#

so you'd have to make everything else in tensors

#

yeah add a couple more

#

lol that was a joke

#

this is enough to piss ur teacher off tho

#

gl

static peak
#

that can still be material for a shitpost

#

shitposts are no longer shit today

bright nexus
#

i think this shitpost is cursed enough because everything clashes

#

but

static peak
#

there exist 300-page shitposts that I can send you

#

and you can truly appreciate it

bright nexus
#

remove the wheeler part and the tensor parts so it works

#

making everything into tensor form would be annoying lol

static peak
#

.close since this isnt a problem

ashen elkBOT
#
Solved

Post marked as solved by @static peak.

Use .unsolved if this was a mistake.

static peak
#

theres some bangers in those 300 pages but I gotta find the PDF first

#

let me see if I can find it

bright nexus
#

look up string theory on arxiv if u want some good shit

bright nexus
#

what did this professor do tho

#

lol what

#

woah

#

give me more lore while i find u a shitpost

static peak
#

was his last name einstein

#

lol

#

youve seen it

#

it truly is

#

print a book hmmm

bright nexus
#

add all these up

image.png
static peak
#

👀

bright nexus
#

good luck explaining it tho

#

H_out term is especially cursed

#

tensor products in a sub index power

static peak
#

honestly I wouldnt know how

#

but you need to get the subscript as long as possible

#

imagine you come up with a different notation to "truly contain its genius" and it just swaps the subscript and the math

bright nexus
#

lol

bright nexus
#

page 81

static peak
bright nexus
#

this is kinda nice tho

#

lol

static peak
#

2

bright nexus
#

mega generalized uncertainty relation

#

even hbar has subscripts

#

good luck

static peak
#

gl

bright nexus
#

show us

#

this is a latex exercise at this point

#

maybe too cursed

#

damn he just dipped and removed all evidence