Is there a faster way to solve this improper integral?
#quicker way to solve this problem?
dreamy salmon
slender zodiacBOT
dreamy salmon
Question basically is at top
next jay
I think you forgot to add as n approaches infinity
At the top
But otherwise it looks good
That’s what i would have done
Don’t know any faster way to go about it
dreamy salmon
Don’t know any faster way to go about it
I wrote it as t approaches infinity
And i see thank you
next jay
On a few limits you didn’t like 1. and 8. b
dreamy salmon
On a few limits you didn’t like 1. and 8. b
Oh bc it was so mich rewriting i wanted to save it for the end
Quick question btw do u know when u use u sub are u suppose to redefine ur intervals?
next jay
I see ok
dreamy salmon
Bc ive never heard of that before
next jay
Yes and no
Redefining intervals just means you have whatever u is equal to, and you plug in your intervals in to the function that u is equal to.
In doing so you don’t have to sub back later
However since you are subbing back for u, redefining the intervals is unnecessary
Personally I think redefining is easier and quicker, cause sometimes you have some annoying functions to deal with in the end
dreamy salmon
So for like #3 i couldve put the interval from 110 to 10t+50
For the first one
And i wouldnt have to sub u back
Interesting
next jay
Not for improper integrals
Usually for improper you want to be subbing back since you have a variable as one of your intervals
Works either way but still
burnt axle
.solved