#why can't wolfram solve this
96 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Im just trying to see the values of a b and c where both the quadratic formula and phytagoras therom are equal to 0
@velvet steeple
Ok, so Wolfram still wouldn't be able to solve that
How do I solve it
There is no one answer
Which is why it can't solve it
There are an infinite number of answers
What do you mean real solutions?
Real solutions would mean that b^2-4ac > 0
These formulas are too complicated to try to solve
you're trying to solve for 3 unknowns with 1 equation
given that a, b, c are part of the real numbers set, there are an infinite amount of solutions (more specifically, the real numbers set includes numbers from {x | -∞ < x <∞} so there are infinite solutions for the equation)
So b^2-4ac is greater and equal to a^2+b^2-c^2
Because a^2+b^2-c^2=0
@velvet island
given that b^2-4ac > 0 that would imply that b^2-4ac will always be positive but we're trying to compare two different equations meant for two different purposes
We're trying to find the values of a b and c where a^2+b^2-c^2=the quadratic fromula
didn't you say the values were 0 somewhere or am i going insane? 😓
i mean i can do a proof by induction tomorrow and see how that comes out?
for when a, b, c = 0 it's true
Technically
A b c don't all have to be 0
And you can't divide with 0 so a ≠0
So two values
Have to be the same
C^2 has to be anything but 0
So that a^2-c^2=0
i swear somewhere someone said that we set a b and c to 0 😭
If a^2=c^2 then b has to be 0
So a=1
C=1
and b=0 or am I wrong
Because 1 is the only value bigger than 0 where they are equal it can also be -1
Wait actually
b=0
And a and c are everything but 0
But a must =c
well traditional pythag states that c = sqrt(a^2 + b^2) so given those values:
So that's true
But what about a=1 and c=1 and b=0 in the quadratic formula
It would translate to 0±square root of -4ac/2a
well quadratic formula produces two solutions which are the roots of said parabola
Ye because we know x=0
For quadratic
So it would mean
1 is wrong
Because that doesn't give the value of zero when subbed into the quadratic formula
So for this to be true b must =0 c must =0 but a≠0
So it has to be a non real solution
For a
Or
Or a=-b where b=-a
And c=0
@velvet island
Look here's a vase it works in
Wait
What if
Wait
It has to be-(-1)
But the problem is its not true for both cases of the quadratic formula
So we need to find a case for a b and c to be equal for both cases of the quadratic formula
@velvet island
Is that possible
[a,b,c] = [-1, -1, 2]
[a,b,c] = [1, 1, -2]
more answers probably exist
Do they work if you plus or add in the quadratic formula
one is plus, one is minus
You mean these are the first values which are correct
Oh ok
That we have found
[a,b,c] = [+-sqrt(1/2), -a, 0]
Another solution?
Which solutions are the plus in ± and which are the - in ±
Then how is -1 here =a
Is it because c≠0