i don't get how the third is correct. isn't this basically saying 3x = 27y instead??
#Which relationships have the same constant of proportionality between y and x as the equation 3y=27x
exotic seal
summer deltaBOT
exotic seal
<@&286206848099549185>
steep glacier
The third one is saying $y=(1/9)x$, e.g., from the first item in the table, $1/3=(1/9)(3)$.
visual crescentBOT
Calculustache
exotic seal
oh so it's bound to look like that on a chart?
like y is 9 for every x?
I just started relearning constant of proportionality from a looong time ago, i dont remember anything. but i remember some graphs reversing numbers. This must be why
<@&286206848099549185>
just cuz idk how old this is (i went to sleep)
oh same guy!! thank you
:)
steep glacier
From the chart, it follows the pattern of x being nine times larger than y, so y=(1/9)x, instead of y=9x.
exotic seal
so.. is the chart incorrect or correct?
sorry im still trying to grasp the concept
because don't we want it to be y=9x?
steep glacier
The chart doesn't have the same constant of proportionality as the equation.
exotic seal
oh -- so x should be at 9 instead and y should be at 1 if it were correct
khan just made a mistake -- basically?
steep glacier
X would be at 1 and y would be at 9, because y would be 9 times x.
exotic seal
The chart doesn't have the same constant of proportionality as the equation.
how does the chart not have the same constant of proportionality as the equation then? (you might have to try to explain this to me like im 5)
exotic seal
X would be at 1 and y would be at 9, because y would be 9 times x.
from what im getting on the chart x is already at 1 and y is at 9
steep glacier
Oh, I thought you were talking about the table (4th option)! The chart (3rd option) is correct.