umbral plank
is it really 2 or is that just a flaw? think about it, if you add 1 orange to a pile of 1 orange you get 0 oranges. this is because the oranges sit out for eternity ,eventually evaporating into nothing. in the opposing dimension of math there is many thing summoned into nothingness just to evaporate.
therefore, if x=every number/solution known to man
then x=0
but what is 0, exactly?
post what you think
edgy aspenBOT
umbral plank
yes
gilded hill
In physical reality, matter and energy are conserved. Even if an orange were to "evaporate" over time, it would transform into other forms of matter or energy rather than ceasing to exist. Therefore, adding one orange to another does not result in zero oranges; rather, it results in a redistribution of matter.
umbral plank
but would you still consider that matter an orange
or even millons of oranges
so does x=infinity
gilded hill
Your question is philosiphical than mathematical. In science, an object is tied to its composition and structure, whcih can change over time due to various reactions and such.
tired hamlet
can we actually just dispose of the concept of math the closer the universe trends towards entropic decay
/j
gilded hill
so does x=infinity
what is x?
umbral plank
x=every number/solution known to man
umbral plank
can we actually just dispose of the concept of math the closer the universe tren...
debatable
gilded hill
That statement in itself doesn't make any sense. You're conflating existential philisosphy with mathematical logic.
umbral plank
but with this theory mathematical logic doesn't exist because x=0
and x =every number/solution known to man
gilded hill
As I said, that statement is contradictory and it doesn't really mean anything. You're making a metaphysical statement rather than a mathematical one.
Maths is built upon a set of rules called axioms that are inherently consistent. They define how numbers and operations should behave; your statement that the variable represents all numbers and 0 at the same time is silly in a mathematical sense.
astral current
matter cannot be created or destroyed 🧐
agile cliff
matter cannot be created or destroyed 🧐
the energy of matter cannot be created or destroyed actually, what about antimatter colliding with matter
hushed coral
someone tell the guy about formalism
unborn fiber
I’m only in calc I so take my opinion with a gran of salt. Math is like a logical framework we can use to model phenomena. You can’t model any phenomena if your most fundamental assumption is that everything turns to nothing and everything is equal to everything else. Math cannot be reconciled with this idea because making predictions/modeling at any level with this assumption is meaningless.
wise yarrow
I’m only in calc I so take my opinion with a gran of salt. Math is like a logica...
This is a good way to think of it, but let me interject some of my own opnions into it.
Math is like a logical framework we can use to model phenomena.
This is indeed true, and should be the key takeaway of the discussion. But math is even more abstract than that.
Math is just a set of ideas. That's it. Those ideas are useful if
Those bullets are not requirements, but they're helpful. And if your system is inconsistent, then it's even more useless.
You can say that everything turns into nothing, but such a model is useless because you can't apply it to anything.
There is no truth in math in that you're not going to find evidence that math exists in the universe. It's just a tool that we can use to great benefit.
OP's idea is basically, "Should I really be hammering nails? Nails contain iron, and I need to increase my iron intake, so I should be eating nails, not hammering them."
dusky lark
wow
gloomy sky
This is a good way to think of it, but let me interject some of my own opnions i...
what is bro yapping about the answer is 8
gilded hill
what is bro yapping about the answer is 8
I agree with JeffLegendPower on this one
crystal bear
is it really 2 or is that just a flaw? think about it, if you add 1 orange to a ...
On the most pure levels math is nothing but logical, adding 1 orange to another orange in math makes two oranges, because the oranges are perfectly identical, and have no extraneous variables effecting them
gloomy sky
On the most pure levels math is nothing but logical, adding 1 orange to another ...
nuh uh
dusky lark
math isn't biology so the oranges would never evaporate
wow
i sound so epicc
wheeeeeee
umbral plank
guy its just a philosophical theory that i made cuz i wuz bored
dusky lark
guy its just a philosophical theory that i made cuz i wuz bored
yay finally you admitted to it being philosophy but not meth
*math
odd knoll
is it really 2 or is that just a flaw? think about it, if you add 1 orange to a ...
eventually evaporating into nothing
then the original 1 and 1 oranges that you added together would become less. So it would go from1 + 1 = 2=>0.5 + 0.5 = 1=>0 + 0 = 0.
dusky lark
🥵
wispy pawn
someone mathmatically tell this guy to stfu
like as complex as possible
i need this guy to go out of his way to get 3 phds in every field of math to solve dat shit
agile blade
.close
wide hedge
