Calculus

[dusky folio]

Open it to see the problem pleaseeee

[dusky folio]

Heres the pic

[cedar frost]

f(x) = x (0<x<1), 2-x (1<=x<2)

0 elsewhere

[dusky folio]

🤍

[dusky folio]

Can i extend it by doing steps

Like find slopes or shit like that

[cedar frost]

Yup

Find slope for 1st part which is 1

So f(x) = x

For second you should check intercept or just extend graph so it gives you line and do the same

[dusky folio]

Ohk thanks bruh really really appreciate that

I will do it tomorrow and send pic here or in dm to confirm it

Is it okay for u?

[cedar frost]

Yeah sure

[dusky folio]

Big W for u🤍

[cedar frost]

[dusky folio]

@concinnity_ yooo bro

Can u see if my method is right

[frail vapor]

Thats an overly complicated way of doing it, but it is correct. Also I think you should write f(x)=x, x in [0;1] and f(x)=-x+2 for x in [1;2] and not (1;2] since x=-x+2 for x=1 so the function is still well-defined and the graph doesnt indicate that x=1 isn't included in the second part of the function.

[dusky folio]

Ohh okk broo thanks

[cedar frost]

Yup agree Vladimir