#Combinatorics

30 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

cinder crescentBOT
hollow topaz
#

What do you understand? What have you tried?

upper portal
# hollow topaz What do you understand? What have you tried?

I think it can be solved by binomial expansion
I've tried to reach to the left side of the equations by expanding (x+y)^n.

I've also tried to prove it for a determined value for n (for example n = 4 or n = 5). it seems right but don't know where to start the proof

hollow topaz
#

The title says combinatorial proof. Do you just mean that the topic is combinatorics, or do you actually need a combinatorial proof?

#

Expanding it would work, but that would give you an algebraic proof. (It's also much harder.)

#

The combinatorial method is to pose a new question that is answered by both sides of the equation, and therefore they must be the same.

upper portal
hollow topaz
#

Oh. So you haven't learned combinatorial proofs?

upper portal
#

Combinatorics

hollow topaz
#

Heh, I just noticed the typo that the sum should be k=1.

upper portal
hollow topaz
#

Wait

#

It's fine

#

Unless this is actually the wrong question.

upper portal
surreal yarrowBOT
#

Soroosh
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

hollow topaz
#

Oh, the typo doesn't matter, lol

#

I understood the question without even noticing

#

To do this algebraically, you need to write binom(n,k) using factorials

#

Same with the other one

upper portal
hollow topaz
#

Show your work

upper portal
# hollow topaz Show your work

I rewrite it, it seems it leads me to a really messy equations which is hard to simplify. and it if continue the factorial farther and taking common denominator and .... it really get messy (really no space will be left on the whiteboard, lol)

hollow topaz
#

One of those should be 2n-k

upper portal
hollow topaz
#

I'm not sure that expansion the sum with a ... is helpful

#

This algebra is really messy and I'm not sure how it's going to get better... That could just be a blind spot on my part

upper portal
hollow topaz
#

I'm really surprised that you haven't learnt combinatorial proofs. This is a classic one. The combinatorial proof is two lines.

upper portal