#Basis proof
50 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
well you want to see if X is spanning and linearly independent
for the spanning part, I suggest you try showing that you can write 1, x, x^2, x^3, ... etc as lin combos of polynomials in X
I get that, but since the polynomial is n-dimensions I don't know how I can do it without saying "it follows clearly that"
It works for that
okay
oh I get u
it's an idea of proof yes
if you manage to show that, you've shown all polys can be written as a lin combo of polys in X
@meager path
Sorry yes I am reading, I am just doing what you said to see if I can establish a pattern ๐
There doesn't seem to be a pattern. The only other thing I can think of is the binomial formula
I was half way through that before I posted because I realised that if I have 2 basis and I add them, it isn't necasserily a basis as 2 linearly inde sets added isn't necasserily linearly inde. I.e. it didn't seem to work
Ill post what I did
so far anyway
my idea is to split spanning and lin indep, so that it's easier to work through
R[X] is infinite dimensional
and then for spanning to split the reasoning for each monomial X^d
yes, that is the problem ๐
maybe it's doable your way but it sounds like a huge pain
I don't follow you
you're trying to prove everything at once with your induction
indeed. I thought about doing them independently but Idk what would be different except I would do it twice. For n=1, it is obvious that the spanning set is lin indep
but also i think daddy_pi is right, your induction wouldn't show the proposition at hand
the proposition you're showing is for all n, X_n is a basis of R_n[X]
ye it doesn't work
it will only work for finite polynomial spaces
I am just lost for ideas...
let's come back to this idea, shall we?
ok
for all n, the polynomial X^n is a linear combination of vectors of X
ok
Ye that's clear
now let's do strong induction, let's suppose we can write X^k as linear combinations of X for all k<d, and we wanna show X^d is also a lin combo of X
(are you fine with strong induction ?)
Induction works to show the set is spanning
yeah I'm only focusing on the spanning part right now
ok
reiterating my question @meager path
np
@meager path you back ?