Proving trig identities. LS = RS

[weak skiff]

why don't to simbply rhs in terms of sin cos

it will work

[quasi blaze]

I'm not sure how that works, although thanks for letting me know! I'll look into it once again.

[weak skiff]

there's also a way iwth lsh

[quasi blaze]

oh gotcha gotcha, that itself makes sense too!