#solve for range of k.
84 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
"y can assume all real values", means that the range of y should be R (the reals). Do you know how to determine the range of that function?
(Correction I said "domain" once, I meant range)
@glad void use the discriminant?
What have you tried? Or where are you currently?
i first factorised the denominator
and found that x cannot be 1 or -3, or else the denominator is zero and y would not be a real number
Ok good, so you know the domain of y
That will give you roots (zeroes) of the function, but I don't think it will help with the problem
sorry for interrupting, but i think if we make discriminant greater than or equal to zero then that should do it
well i did that and got k<= 0 or k>=4, but idt its complete yet
You want to determine the range of y in (-inf, -3), (-3, 1) and (1, inf)
Those ranges together will give you the range of y
why is there infinity here tho, im confused a little
y can be anything except -3 and 1 so that's why
R = (-inf, inf), removing the poles X = -3 and x = 1, you end up with that domain
ok
And for each of the subdomains you should check what the function does at the boundary, and what it does in between
So take the limit from both directions for each of the boundaries. Thinking about this, having determined the zeroes is helpful here. Maybe a pole can be removed
For the insides you want to check for minima and maxima, unless you already know the range is (-inf, inf)
could you explain what a pole and a subdomain is? I am not sure
Poles are the zeroes of the denominator, when it is equal to zero. So the singularities of the function. x = -3 and x = 1
got it
are these coordinates?
No it's a set
oh
(-inf, -3) is the set of all numbers between -inf and -3
icic
Not sure if subdomain is the correct wording but I meant the 3 sets that form the domain
You don't really need to solve, calculate what the function does at those boundaries
Well you do need to solve for which k that is
Is this a bonus exercise?
yes
its more challenging than i thought
cuz we just got into the topic of the nature of roots and using the discriminant
You can use the information from the discrimant
i got k<= 0 or k>=4 using the discriminant
for the numerator to have a real root
but here the root does not need to be real, just the value of y
in this case can't k be anything, say (-inf to inf) so long as x isnt equal to -3 or 1, y will have a real value
Well what you do know is, if there are no roots, y is never zero and thus the range is not R
oh yea if there are no roots k is not R
Yes
i got k ∈ (-∞, -1] ∪ [9/2, ∞)
i referred to a worksheet involving solution set
nvm scratch that
yea
Well now first check where the poles go to
Sorry, I'm not really sure what is the best way to go forward
the poles are the values when you set the discriminant to zero right
No when the denominator goes to zero and thus y goes to -inf or inf, unless it is a removable singularity
oh
wait but isnt the solution just k<= 0 or k>=4 since the numerator needs to have real roots
and the discriminant of the numerator is k(k-4) >= 0
for the roots to be real
Hm
and ultimately for y to be real
ok i think i need to sleep now its getting quite late
ill attempt this question tmr
thx for the help @glad void
and @lethal granite
If you have root, and the singularities goes to -inf and inf, then R has the whole range
I will try to work it out
Have a good night
u too
These are all asymptotes
Maybe I made some sign mistakes...
Yeah the k < and > 9/2 should be flipped
Also in the graph for x < -3 or x > 1 it is still possible for it to go through 1, but eventually it will go to the asymptote y = 1 again.
To summarize:
- function is a rational polynomial
- degree of numerator and denominator are the same and we have a horizontal asymptote at y = 1/1 = 1
- function has to intersect y = 1 or the range cannot be R
- since we have a horizontal asymptotes at +-infinity we have to look at the poles, the vertical asymptotes. Determine these, they are x = -3 and x = 1.
- If the limits between them (positive left, negative right) have opposite signs, the range will be (-inf, inf). Determine these ks. (1)
- For the other cases the intersection with y = 1 has to be in the regions that should span the whole range. Determine for which k and x, f(x) intersects with y = 1. (a)
- One of these cases is that the negative left and positive right asymptotes have opposite limits. Normally you would need to check the ks and determine if the intersection (a) is at x < -3 or x > 1. (*Wait this is not true, the left and right always span everything except y = 1, so it's enough for there to be a intersection) But it turns out these k are the same as (1).
- Another is when the negative left and positive right limits have the same sign but opposite to the positive left and negative right limits. For this the intersection (a) has to lay between (-3, 1). It turns out that this isn't the case, the only intersections take place in the left and right region when - 1/2 <= k <= 9/2
So your answer will be the ks determined at (1)
I guess that is it, can someone validate? 👼
(1) the left limits flip at k = -1/2, check which is which. The same for the right limits with k = 9/2.
Turns out the middle region spans R when k < - 1/2 or k > 9/2. (THIS IS THE ANSWER)
(a) when determining the intersection, it turns out there are no intersections for k in {-1/2, 2, 9/2} the first and last come from x in {1, -3}. The intersection is at x = (-k - 3)/(k -2).
Well that was fun, learned some algebra, about rational polynomials and it's asymptotes. Not sure how you should do this when you just learn about the zeroes. Unless there is a big shortcut...