#help-43
1 messages Β· Page 21 of 1
ok right
so it looks like you didnt make any algebraic mistakes here as such
but the IH you've written out is not going to be of much help
is the IH my assumption or prove step
i think you may need to assume it works for two adjacent values of n
cause the sequence $a_n = (3n+1) \cdot 7^n - 1$ obeys a 2nd-order recurrence relation
Ann
(rather than 1st as you would see with a*b^n + c or whatever)
so ur saying to make multiple inductive hypothesis?
im trying to avoid saying the words "strong induction" cause that would seem to go against the instruction to use "mathematical (weak) induction"
but yes basically
Closed by @trail crater
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
"onesidky"?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i don't quite understand the direct transition from step one to 2
on the U matrix, he "pulls 2 out" by multiplying the top row by 1/2
to counteract this, you would multiply on the left by the diagonal matrix [ \mat{2 & 0 \ 0 & 1} ] which corresponds to the elementary row operation of multiplying the first row by 2
cloud
he similarly "pulls 3 out" of the second row and combines the two effects into a single diagonal matrix
how does this pulling and all work actually i am new to the idea , ive dealth with matrix multiplication in school but never this way
just not intuitive to me
can you elaborate
so if you were to multiply any matrix by the matrix
[ \mat{2 & 0 \ 0 & 1} ]
that would have the effect of multiplying the first row by 2, and otherwise leaving it unchanged. so for example,
[ \mat{2 & 0 \ 0 & 1} \mat{1 & 1/2 \ 0 & 3} = \mat{2 & 1 \ 0 & 3} ]
cloud
and in general if you do any elementary row operation to the identity matrix, then that generates what we call an elementary matrix, which has the effect of performing that row operation when multiplied
yeah he got into elementary matrices
so to factorize a matrix, we can "multiply the first row by 2 and also divide it by 2" in order to really leave it unchanged, the same way as we can both multiply and divide a number by 2 to leave it unchanged
we just applied the division by 2 directly to the matrix and the multiplication by 2 in the form of an elementary matrix
how did gauss think of it intuitively though
like manipulating the identity then multiplying it by a matrix
to perform the row transformation
is this a thing to be learned in a lecture or to be thought ourself π
well that may or may not be how it's presented in lecture, just the way i like to think of it
it's sort of similar to the way that the LU decomposition itself is found
does matrix multiplication get more intuitive as we move forward in linear aljebra
yes, you get more perspectives on it
Closed by @raw portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi Im confused the answer for b) says y=-5t^2 only
Closed by @analog sleet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't get why the underlined part matters here.
More specifically why is the minimal polynomial sq and not q
cause q doesnt necessarily kill all of T?
range(qT) survives
s needs to kill that
Closed by @carmine garden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Isn't this statement that "pi is the twice the smallest positive solution to cos(x) = 0" directly equivalently equal to saying that pi is the ratio of any circle's circumference and the diameter of it?
how do u show the implication
depends how you define cosine. this form is preferred because cosine can be defined without circles
they r tautologically the same statement because both define Ο but id like to see how u show if a then b and if b then a
for example, the unique solution to c''=-c, c(0)=1, c'(0)=0
directly equivalent?
direclty equivalently equal
wait what the fuck does "equivalently equal" mean
Because the input of cos(x) is taken in radians which are defined using circles
what do u think directly equivalent means by the way
The original statement implies pi is a straight angle.
This implies that pi = (half circumference)/radius = (2 * half circumference)/(2 * radius) = circumference / diameter
trivially the same statement = directly equivalently equal like the fractions five upon six and 10 upon 12
cos(x) = base/hypotenuse
<@&286206848099549185>
identical, equal with 3 lines instead of 2
(i think...?)
? That would just mean equivalent
very equal
Certainly, we can show that cosine(x) = a summation, but his is not directly equivalently equal
??
What 
very equivalent*
cause it's infinite summation
Still makes no sense
Still not making sense
@warped oar did u just make it up?
no
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
make up what
@soft bobcat and @strange ermine saying the same things
npcs
Your question
the definition for very equal
what is it
about the inifinte polynomial sum of cosine
i don't rlly agree
the infinite sum is by definition strictly equal to cosine
so both way around the equal sign, they are very equivalent π
This is my definition.
i was talking abt the Taylor Series but nvm
solid for geometry
oh wait u r 15 my bad
solid...?
Are you trolling again philosopher
he's 15 bro
I believe he is the orange propic guy called Mathematician
Yes.
please dont spam if youre not helping
anyways, was ur question answered @warped oar
The definition of cosine(x) is base upon hypotenuse
Is the answer to my original question "yes"
A definition of cosine is based upon hypothenuse in a right triangle, yes.
Your original question makes no sense
At least redefine the term "equivalently equal"
consider it means identical
i think
cosine(x) can be showed to be equal to a certain summation, but 'tis not that easy
and what
So I think my question has been answered
You should send a screenshot or picture of your original question as it is written so we understand it better
it is actually equal to that summation
This was a question of mine
for now, just in keep in mind that cos x is base or adjacent over hypothenuse
u'll discover other definitions later on
okay, thank you very much π
and y'all
he means adjacent, but it seems clear in his head i think
Yeah adjacent is a better word
yes
But anyway tomato tomahto
Closed by @warped oar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can I have a hint, I really doubt I need to find the Linear transfromation here
I mean If I have to it would be $\begin{bmatrix} \cos(Ο/180) && -\sin (Ο/180)\ \sin (Ο/180) && \cos (Ο/180) \end{bmatrix}$
geometrically, what does minimal polynomial even mean?
wai
It maps to the 0 vector
you can a linear combination of the operator raised to various powers, with the highest power. being monic
oh, now that I think of it, what i wanted to do might not be correct. Sorry
v=e1
Okie, will try to work with that
so I get T(e_1)=e_1+e_2
T^2(e_1)=2e_2
T(e_2)=-e_1+e_2
T^2(e_2)=0
e_1,T(e_1) are LI
so T^2(e_2) is not
so the minmal poly is x^2+2=0
ok, looks like I made a mistake
what am I doing wrong
ooh\
T(e_1)= ( \cos(1),\sin(1))
T^2(e_1)= (cos(1)-sin(1), 2 cos(1) sin(1))
or to express it better
T(e_1)= cos(1)e_1+ sin(1) e_2
Yea, I thik I got it
thanks
.close
Closed by @carmine garden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
IS GETTING THE AREA OF THIS POSSIBLE??
Try breaking it down into simpler geometric shapes first
i did but...
Like a rectangles and triangles if that helps
I do not know if the lines are 90 degrees
i also dont know if they are parallel
what
thats a bit stupid
Unless the diagram is drawn to scale
Then we can approximate it
@unique hill Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @unique hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Completely lost, don't know how to start
try similar triangles
do you know intercept theorem
how tho
no
try sliding the line with x+6 closer to the other one
do you know ratios between parallel lines?
that wont change any distances
just use intercept theoremm
He said he dosent know
wait tthe pic i am sending is loading
nope
5/6 = 12/x is intercept theorm I tink
ok hold on lemme check this theorem out
Indeed, it is useful
However an alternative is @short ferry 's way
alternatively, you can slide the lengths like this without rotating. Since you didnt rotate them, the angles stay the same and you got 2 similar triangles
x / 12 = 6 / 5
nice one
ohhhhh i see
very nice method, didn't even consider that
yeah, interesting
if a / b = c / d, then they are equal to (a + c) / (b + d) as well
funny little theorem which is a consequence of this
Closed by @charred sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys
you can see that WA's graph has a y axis with very very small values
so seeing it from Desmos's perspective
you won't be able to see a thing
but if you zoom in on the y axis
surely enough, you'll see the very small but negative y values between 0 and 5
fun fact you can scale the axes on desmos and get the same thing W|A is showing :)
Closed by @dawn palm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't understand a)ii)
the theorem/series that allows you to make the expansion makes assumptions on x.
What is the answer??
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
I got x=2
@velvet moon Has your question been resolved?
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #βhow-to-get-help for instructions.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! Iβm new here π
iβm a teen but Iβm not very good at math and am falling behind drastically in this subject! I need help!
you can just follow the bot message above and post your question now
we can't really help you in any more general way
but we can recommend places for self-studying
such as khanacademy
if you have a specific question you'd like us to help with, you're welcome to post it here
can yall help me with a question ?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #βhow-to-get-help for instructions).
all of them are
read #βhow-to-get-help for instructions. there are four channels which are free rn.
Got it, thank you guys! I donβt have any specific questions but thank you π
ok in this case you can .close this channel
@foggy ruin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi all, again me
How did he take a square root of 2 in this method, from where did he get it at all? Thanks!!
he wants to get it in the form 1/(t^2 + 1)
so looking at the denominator of the original, t would have to be the square root of this:
yea, that general form (he ends up with a scale factor but that's fine)
could you maybe explain please why does square root of 2 help?
it's not that it helps or hurts, it's just necessary if you're gonna get the denominator in the form t^2 + 1
you basically pattern match and say, ok i have (something) + 1
so t^2 = (something)
and therefore t = sqrt(something)
and since the something has a 2 coefficient out in front, sqrt(something) will have a sqrt(2)
Closed by @runic verge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello you great math fellows.
I need some help regarding a calculus/linear-algebra problem please.
So let say we have a cylinder with the equation x^2 + y^2 = 2 in R^3 (where z is free), and a plane like x+z=4.
So their intersection result an ellipse, and I like to find the equation of the ellipse, but I don't know how?
I just found the x in terms of z from the plane, and plugged in cylinder equation which gives us a perpendicular cylinder to the original cylinder. I'm not sure how to find the equation of the ellipse (the intersection of plane and the cylinder)
Any hint is appreciated.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
What does "x in terms of z" mean? There's no z in either of your shapes
Oh, sorry, there was a type, I fixed. the plane is x+z=4
You mean that?
maybe we can start by finding the angle between the plane z = 0 and x+z=4
then trig for the major axis lenght?
Yes sir, the equation of the green ellipse.
If you wanna find a parameterization, on the xy-plane it's a circle with radius 2, so you can set x = 2cost and y = 2sint. Now the z-component you would take the equation x+z=4 and solve for z.
So overall z = 4-x = 4-2cost
Oh wait, you asked for an equation, actually
Thanks, and how to find the equation of the ellipse in cartesian? in the std form of (x-h)/a^2 + (y-k)/b^2 = 1 ?
Well the thing is the ellipse is on the plane and not cartesian plane
soo 
Unless you are asking for the projection, which I dont think you are asking for
The projection of ellipse should be the circle I guess?!
Yes
So, no that doesn't help actually. I'm thinking to rotate the plane and the circle for 45 deg, as the angle between the plane and xy plane is 45, then finding the ellipse will be easier I think(no sure), and finally rotate back the ellipse once it's found. But I don't know if it's even logical.
Might as well rotate the parameterization with a rotation matrix I guess
If we see (2cos(t), 2sin(t), 4-2cos(t)) as a vector function
converting this to cos t , and equating all
like if you want that equation form
i found my new love btw , parametric equations , thanks anti algebraist
The correct equation should be (sqrt(2)cos(t),sqrt(2)sin(t),4-sqrt(2)cos(t)) as I calculated(I hope I did it right).
oh yeah just read your question again
the radius is sqrt 2
I rotated it with R_y matrix around y-axis
Then I think you can insert the components into the ellipse equation.
did you want this type of equation?
Yes, first I like to solve it without rotating if it's not very devil in calculation. let's see. And yes, rotating along by y axis could help I suppose.
Oh, how did you do it?
used your parametric equations and eliminated t
finding the locus of your parametric thing
Not, really, but it looks very cool.
what are you looking for exactly ?
maybe just an ellipse in the xy plane with the dimentions of the ellipse you cut?
Well that's like the green one, but scaled down a bit?
No, that's the exact ellipse.
The ellipse in standard form.
Well it doesnt look like
uhh like the xy ellipse?
https://www.desmos.com/3d/n52amddhcd
Maybe we are using vary coefficients?
he wanted the equation for the circle having radius sqrt2 , we assumed he wanted for the radius two
oh . but this is 3d, uhhh
you do that but with radius sqrt(2)
The radius is sqrt(2) by x^2+y^2=2
Yes, so z is also involved I believe. pretty interesting.
No worries, some days ago I did 6+2=7, this is fine.
i mean yeah its on R3, its along the x+z plane
is this any specific problem you need it for
or a thought exercise
Well 6+2=7 mod 1
amen
This is just very interesting. I have to do this. Than you great fiends and math fellows helping me regarding this, really appreciate it. It seems I have to study some more calculus regarding this, and I'll do(to forget it again).
Math bless us all.
π»π€π€
.close
Closed by @untold pelican
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im tryna solve this by graphing it into demos, the assignment was talking about using the change of base formula. im confused on what y2 is going to be, i think the notes i took are confusing me, what would be y2 or am i wrong on both of them?
yes
the log only applies to the 3
so it would be (log3)+1?
yes
so y2=(log3)+1/log5 ?
no you should only divide the log part
yes
ive been reading it as log5^(3+1) not (log5^3)+1
thats on me
thank u very much
what did i do wrong in this
nvm i think its cus no parentheses on x-1
.close
Closed by @ruby lava
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I hate geo
I donβt even know where to begin here
Closed by @glacial pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi guys, just wanted help for this particular question.
What I've tried:
Calculating the area of the hexagon by dividing it into two trapeziums and getting a total area.
Dividing the hexagon into equal triangular slices based on the edges (40 deg).
Where I'm stuck: I have no idea how to get to the area of the square or the circle. It feels like there is not enough information given to get it.
Would appreciate any help or hints towards the right direction!
@rocky shadow the circle is tangent to the hexagon right
So draw the radius at the tangency point and what can we say about the triangles formed?
but can we really say that if we dont know if its drawn to scale?
Its inscribed
So internally tangent
ah
okay so since since its the tangent, we can say that thats the radius of the circle?
What can we say about the angles in the red triangle?
what can we say about the relationship between orange and green?
There the same angle
OH
Do you know why?
since the length opposite the hypotenuse is the tangent on the hexagon side
sorry that didnt make sense
the longer length is the tangent to the hexagon side
yeaaa
yay nice
thats a better way to describe it
Now can you solve?
You might want to use the ratio of sides in a 90-60-30 triangle
nice
thank you man
Np
Yes
.close
Closed by @rocky shadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
I need help urgently
Hello
How do I solve this to get the answer
It's it's probably really easy and I tried it multiple times
But I get stuck
At the last part when I have to put everything together
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
show your work
what are you finding difficult the multiplication?
I know
maybe recheck your work a bit, your method is correct
just try rewriting the the whole calculations again neatly
Do I times the three binomials
Or do I cancel them out or are you even allowed to cancel them out if there is a subtraction sign
no you can not cancle
cancel*
only when there is multiplication
for example x+3/x the x can not cancel
but (x+3)(x)/x the x can cancel
Oh ok
@tribal tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tribal tinsel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can I find the length L in terms of R
without using trigonometry
you need trigonometry
without sin, cos, etc.
yeah you need those
not necessarily
use their taylor series
lol
wait sin = 1/csc
you could try approximating the polygon as a circle
but that won't be an exact answer
what is "a"? the area of the small triangle?
oh wait are you given the length of a already?
No I am only given the radius
oh okay
and the fact that the inscribed polygon is a decagon
the answer is this
but I cant use trig
only geomtric constructions
and triangles' similarities perhaps
ah yes the decagon is constructible with a ruler and compass
okay you should have said that from the very beginning
but thanks for clarifying
did you not read the Wikipedia page then?
I think all polygons are constructible with ruler and compass
7-gon is not
In mathematics, a constructible polygon is a regular polygon that can be constructed with compass and straightedge. For example, a regular pentagon is constructible with compass and straightedge while a regular heptagon is not. There are infinitely many constructible polygons, but only 31 with an odd number of sides are known.
?
yeah and there's another version here
read the page: it has the steps
ok I will, but one thing
if the polygon was not a decagon how would I find L(r) for the polygon also
Holy moly gauss is goated he figured out how to draw the 17-gon
is there a general "method"
You should try to figure it out
like a hexagon is very easy because the angles are 60 30, 90
Itβs a good exercise
but a decagon is harder
Consider triangles
From the centre of each polygon, draw lines to each vertex
How would you describe the angles and the side lengths?
the method for the decagon works for polygons with 2 * F(n) sides
where F(n) is the nth Fermat prime
3, 5, 17, 257, 65537....
I doubt so
you can find general methods for specific cases
but not every constructible polygon at once
that's the one with 7 sides
so no
"the regular heptagon is not constructible with compass and straightedge but is constructible with a marked ruler and compass"
In geometry, a heptagon or septagon is a seven-sided polygon or 7-gon.
The heptagon is sometimes referred to as the septagon, using septa- (an elision of septua-), a Latin-derived numerical prefix, rather than hepta-, a Greek-derived numerical prefix (both are cognate), together with the suffix -gon for Greek: Ξ³ΟΞ½αΌ°Ξ±, romanized: gonΓa, mea...
yeah, there are lots of really clever constructions that approximate well
or they marked the ruler, which is not allowed
that would be called a neusis construction
such an interesting topic tho
and thats why there is galois theory in algebra
Closed by @solar folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this does not give you a vector space since multiplying by zero gives you a matrix not in V
really?
it doesn't say a and b have to be nonzero
Closed by @next epoch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
which is the largest non-negative integer value from that list of options?
then you've made a mistake
Yes this one is cursed
!show
I remember
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
yea
Yeah its hella cursed
oh π
ok important question: does {} mean fractional part or are those just brackets
just brackets
if its fractional part they will mention
i lost track
of what u guys were talking about
like u were saying negative numbers cannot be raised to fractional powers??
negative numbers can be raised to fractional powers, but you wind up getting complex numbers out of it.
and you have to deal with branches.
it's a mess.
not always
yeah
even then (-1)^1/3 does have a real solution, but it's not the principal solution
(-2)^1/3
the principal solution is exp(pi i / 3)
broo why tf will u think of putting a value back in the limit
when it says largest value π
Closed by @forest token
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/principal_root
(mathematics) A complex number which, when raised to the power of n, yields the radicand of its nth degree radical, and which has the greatest real part among all such numbers, and positive imaginary part in case of equality of the real parts.
.reopen
β
just the first thing google pulled up
π
.close
Closed by @soft bobcat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain to me how this equals each other, this is putting it in geometric series form a/1-r
They don't equate one another
those... don't look equal. context?
you sure this is from GPT? :P
I'd recognize that output among thousands 
ok and show your work?
,rccw
my bad lol im being gaslighted by gpt
Hint: $$\frac2{4x+3}=\frac23\times\frac1{1-(-4x/3)}$$
you want it in powers of x+1 not x
Oh you're right I misread
it's much easier actually: $\frac{2}{4(x+1) - 1} = \frac{-2}{1 - 4(x+1)}$
Ann
a/b = -a/-b
.close
Closed by @hexed hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The inequality should flip to x <= - 4. But I can't understand what I'm doing wrong.
in general going from (x-a)(x-b) β₯ 0 to some combination of x β₯ a and x β₯ b and then trying to figure out which one should "flip" based on arcane rules is a bad approach
Okey, what is the best approach. Been struggling with these inequality where there is something like |x^2 + ax + b|
You did the wavy curve wrong
x>=3 and x<=-4
But you wrote x>=-4
you should draw explicit wavy curves/number lines for every single case and do the sign analysis thing
Closed by @atomic aspen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to factor this
well
have you tried anything
you can start off by factoring each term as far as you can
ok, but then i get to the exponents, and i can't understand why the exponents are simplified like this : 3/4 + 1/4 and not the other way around
i mean like 3/4 - 1/4
What is your first step?
?
?
?-?
2 =/= 1
It isnβt simplified to -1/4
omg i am so tired sorry, -1/2
Go to sleep then >.<
i just want to understand this and then i will do ahaha
$5x (3x + 2)^{-\frac{2}{4}} + (12x + 8)^{\frac{3}{2}}$
πͺ Greenie The Power Queenie πͺ
Okay so you've simplified -2/4 to -1/2
$5x (3x + 2)^{-\frac{1}{2}} + (12x + 8)^{\frac{3}{2}}$
πͺ Greenie The Power Queenie πͺ
What next?
ok then (12x + 8)^3/2 becomes (4(3x+2))^3/2
yes
πͺ Greenie The Power Queenie πͺ
then (4^3/2(3x+2)^3/2) becomes 8(3x+2)^3/2
then i can factor taking out the lesser exponent
$5x (3x + 2)^{-\frac{1}{2}} + 8(3x + 2)^{\frac{3}{2}}$
πͺ Greenie The Power Queenie πͺ
and i cant understand why when factoring, the exponents become 3/2+1/2 instead of 3/2 - 1/2
In order to combine these, we need the two exponents to be the same
I'm not sure what you mean by this
Can you write down what you've got?
okok
(3x+2)^-1/2 * (5x+8(3x+2)^3/2+1/2) instead of (3x+2)^-1/2 * (5x+8(3x+2)^3/2-1/2)
Right
So let's take it in two steps
but if you're subtracting a negative exponent then you'd end up adding it
for example (2^4)/(2^-2) = 2^(4-(-2)) = 2^6
We want to make it so that the second term has a factor of $(3x + 2)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$
πͺ Greenie The Power Queenie πͺ
Right?
yes
ok yes
and when you factor out a term from an expression, you divide the rest of the expression by that term
right?
$(3x + 2)(3x + 2)^{\frac{1}{2}} = (3x + 2)^{\frac{3}{2}}$
πͺ Greenie The Power Queenie πͺ
Are you happy with that?
yes
oooooh ok
So what do we need to do next?
(3x+2)^-1/2 * (5x+8(3x+2)^2) the it becomes like this
ok so i-ve got the rest figured out, but i couldn't figure thatΓΉ
You're alright now then?
Closed by @dark pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Just to clarify, when you take out a factor from something, you have to divide the rest by that factor. If you're dividing by (3x + 2)^(-1/2), you have to subtract the powers, and when you subtract -1/2, you get +1/2
.reopen
β
ok because it would be like this right? -(-1/2)
$\frac{(3x + 2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}{(3x + 2)^{-\frac{1}{2}}} = (3x + 2)^{\frac{3}{2} - (-\frac{1}{2})}$
πͺ Greenie The Power Queenie πͺ
Yep
ok now i understand it better, thanks a lot
Np
so now i close this with . close right?
Yep
Closed by @dark pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yes
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If, A + B + C = Ο
Prove, sin2A + sin2B + sin2c = 4sinA sinB sinC
Letβs try simplifying
Alr
We're starting with a sum, and ending up with a product
So we probably want to use the sum-to-product identities
i went from rhs to lhs using this too
my initial approach wasnt helpful
notice c = pi - (a+b)
[ \sin(\pi - (A+B)) = \sin(A+B)]
and
[ \cos(\pi -(A+B)) = -\cos(A+B)]
k
Wait isnt the first one supposed to be -sin (a+b)?
Oh noo wait
Sorry its in 2nd quadrant
@elfin abyss Has your question been resolved?
No
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
Miss is that a command?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yeah you'll need to use it keep your channel open
Greenie can u dm me pls?
Dm pls

@jagged blade Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
wth
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1+1=
it
2
<@&268886789983436800> im not gonna bother trolling back with this one
Pls help me
no
do not invade random help channels to ask for help
you have your own, wait patiently
.close
Closed by @sturdy hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Ok π mb sorry
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me with this?
what have you tried?
using variables
you might need to elaborate what you're trying to achieve with that?
cause like the equation already has variables lol
right, so how are you trying to isolate it?
but doesnt work
okay, what are a and b
how do i write swuare root
you could do sqrt(...)
but 1-x^2 = (1-x)(x+1)
right, so that makes sense
so you let a = 1 - x and b = 1 + x, or something like that?
okay, and the other root is b?
you could do (...)^(1/3) if you want to do cube root
or like uhh
yeah
I'd suggest multiplying it out as a first step
cbrt() would be a reasonable notation
i actually think their substitution is much easier, so they don't have to worry about distributing inside the radicals
cause they'd end up with (ab) * (a + b) = 2
Or alternatively, $\sqrt[3]{1 - x^2}$ is actually what you're looking for
πͺ Greenie The Power Queenie πͺ
Maybe try substituting (1+x) as a and (1-x) as b?
^^ this is what i thought was slightly easier
I think that's what he's done already
he's tried this
After this step though, you're probably gonna have to undo it
right, so i guess a = 1 - x and b = 1 + x is probably better
Mmm?
@sleek wind still here?
ye
if you tried a = 1 + x and b = 1 - x, what would your equation become?
I'm reading all of this, I'm in form 1 nd.. sorry, I'm not here to help but is this what I'll have to suffer through in the future?? Cuz I need a headsup so desperately right now.
still wont work
or we can switch ab to the side
we will have a+b = 2/ab
Finding a relation between a and b might?
In what sense is it suffering?
-a + 2
bro i'm ngl, just cube both sides it'll make things easier
you know the expansion formula for (a + b)^3, right?
ye
1-x^2 (___)^3 = 8
Is this is ryt then u will get a quadratic eqn ,so 2 roots?
right
so expand the stuff in the cube, simplify
distribute the (1 - x^2) into that expansion
etc
I think something useful to note would be that 2 can be written as a^3 + b^3
So we have ab(a + b) = a^3 + b^3
So we have a^3 - a^2b - ab^2 + b^3 = 0
oh i see an (a-b) in there
Not sure if this is going anywhere though
a^2(a - b) - b^2 (a - b) = 0?
so (a+b)(a-b)(a-b) = 0
I can also eyeball 1 solution straight off
right, the only solutions could be if a = b or if a = -b
which should be enough to justify that the eyeballed solution is the only one
Ayyy we did it
idk if papaya is still here :(
So we have
1 + x = 1 - x -> x = 0
or
1 + x = -1 + x -> no solutions
Prove that x=1 is not a solution, divide both sides by 3th root(1-x^2). Rewrite (3throot(1+x)+.....) as a fraction so that we only have 1+x+1-x=2 on the numberator so now we have 2 same numberator on both side
?
The proof that x = 1 is not a solution is very short lol
If x = 1, then the LHS = 0
And the RHS = 2
This is my way to solve it
0 =/= 2
Yess I know
How are you going to rewrite it as a fraction?
But we need to prove since we want divided both side with number that different from 0
we never needed to divide both sides by that quantity
Try to make the numerator have form a^3+ b^3 by multiple both by a^2-ab+b^2
cause you'll end up having to cube both sides and then multiply it back over anyway, and then expand
might as well just cube both sides
$\sqrt[3]{1 + x} + \sqrt[3]{1 - x} = \frac{2}{\sqrt[3]{1 - x^2}}$
πͺ Greenie The Power Queenie πͺ
$\frac{1 + x + 1- x}{sqrt[3]{(+x)^2} - \sqrt[3]{1-x^2} + \sqrt[3]{(1 - x)^2} = \frac{2}{\sqrt[3]{1 - x^2}}$
Alexis_Fx
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Damn
sorry guys
Rajvir
We have succeeded
is this the answer?
Chat
tysm guys
No
No. He just turned up now lol
oh ok
I was helping a person solve smtg
It starts here
$\frac{1 + x + 1- x}{\sqrt[3]{(1+x)^2} - \sqrt[3]{1-x^2} + \sqrt[3]{(1 - x)^2}}= \frac{2}{\sqrt[3]{1 - x^2}}$
Alexis_Fx
This is what i mean
how
Sorry im on phone rn so i typing slowly
ah yes
$a = \sqrt[3]{1 + x}$
πͺ Greenie The Power Queenie πͺ
$a^3 = 1 + x$
πͺ Greenie The Power Queenie πͺ
Oki
goated
And then we did some rearranging and factorising
If you're happy, yes
.close
Closed by @sleek wind
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
β’ Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
β’ Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
β’ After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
β’ Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
β’ Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #βhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
very quick functions question.. for the transformations if the parent function's values are -2 would the -5 only mean it transforms downward by 3 units or by 5?
think of the transformations relative to the original function sqrt(x)
so -5 would represent the function translating down by 3?
yeah, it's relative to the original function you were given 
the question is just stating the tranformations done
it's not clear if f(x) and g(x) are both transformed versions of the original function sqrt(x), or if g(x) is a transformed version of f(x)
i didnt include the original question π maybe i shouldve wait
" Describe the transformations to the graph of the reciprocal parent function,
to produce the function g(x)=-\frac{1}{2}(x+1)-3"
oh wait
;emme just take a ss
huh. but that's not the same as the question you initially provided 
noo the question i originally provided was me just trying to figure it out
if sqrt(x) is your parent function, then you ought to say that g(x) is translated to the right by 4 units, and down by 5
hm, they haven't said what the parent function is 
the wording makes me think they want you to describe the transformations that you need to apply to f(x) to turn it into g(x) 
it sounds like you have the same idea
yes i think so
you should be careful with your transformations when doing this though :p
