#help-43
1 messages · Page 5 of 1
Right
|sin2x| will be π/2
Yup
|sin4x| will be π/4
Yes good
Now?
Now you try to find it for cos4x in the similar way
Same
Yes
I guess answer should be π/8
No
If two functions of same period are added then the period of resulting function is also same
I don't think
I think it's correct. Let me check
Yh mb
It's half of it
@deft tangle Has your question been resolved?
@deft tangle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone explain these points how they find order of it
@deft tangle list the elements and compute their powers
do u have trouble computing powers?
@deft tangle Has your question been resolved?
@deft tangle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @deft tangle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
number of discontinuity of 1/log|x|
so at x=1,-1 will not be there
log(x), what’s the restriction of x?
what is the domain of log(x)?
@vivid siren Has your question been resolved?
x=1,-1
x=-1,-1 rest all R
Nope, you clearly miss something
And -1 is an illegal term to plug in log(x)
@vivid siren Has your question been resolved?
we have mod
so
logx can not take negative numbers but log|x| can take
Correct, what else is an illegal term to plug in log(x)?
Log0?
Correct, but I expect OP to respond instead
Ahh sry my bar
@vivid siren Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vivid siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hints please
if it passes through the origin, plugging in x=y=z=0 should help you
wait no ok
?
yeah
it's good to remind ourselves that you can write the equation of a sphere as:
(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2 + (z-z_0)^2 = r^2
where x_0,y_0,z_0 and r are all constant
(x_0,y_0,z_0) is the center of the sphere
r is its radius
yeah
now comparing this form
with this one
i see
doesn't some term feel... out of place?
something that you would never see even if you expanded this?
x_0^2+y_0^2+z_0^2=r^2
yeah it's weird
that's if the center is (0,0,0)
wait
no ok
I get what you did
you're trying to find a link between the coordinates of the center and the radius
but we know neither
so
expand this
see if there's anything from the other equation that would never match
and deduce what it implies on a,b,c
(well we already know c = 0)
( x^2 + x_0^2 + 2xx_0 + y^2 + y_0^2 + 2yy_0 + z^2 + z_0^2 + 2zz_0 = r^2 )
Tom
with minuses
Tom
ok, and to be simpler
$x^2 - 2xx_0 + y^2 - 2yy_0 + z^2 -2zz_0 = \text{some constant}$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
now, with that said
Tom
x=y=z=0
also what happened to z_0^2
$$
x_0^2 - 2xx_0 + y_0^2 - 2yy_0 + z_0^2 - 2zz_0 = r^2
$$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
$$
x_0^2 - 2xx_0 + y_0^2 - 2yy_0 + z_0^2 - 2zz_0 = r^2
$$
Tom
$$
x_0^2 + y_0^2 + z_0^2 = r^2
$$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
yes
again
that won't help us
because we know none of those 4 constants
at least that will not help us yet
we have to find the center of the sphere first
ok so?
that's where we start looking back at the original equation
and comparing
yes
$$ax^2 + 2y^2 + 2z^2 + 2bxy + 4x = 0$$
is the same as
$$x^2 - 2xx_0 + y^2 - 2yy_0 + z^2 -2zz_0 = \text{some constant}$$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
i did not get your point
?
one equation we made by general way
one we are given so what we are comparing
we got nothing??
a=1
and we are given its equation
If I wrote that 2x + ay = 1
and I knew that x + y = constant
I should be able to find a and the constant, right?
don't you have it now?
2x + 2y = 1
2x + 2y = 2constant?
and what is the constant equal to?
equal to 1
i am saying for value of a
no
so 2x+ay = 1 becomes 2x+2y = 1
that is wrong
you wrote it yourself
isn't x+y = c the same as 2x+2y = 2c?
i didn't bother giving a name to my constant
if that's what bothered you then sorry
2x+ay=1
x+y=constant
2x+2y=2 constant
(2-a)y=2constant-1
the constant will affect the value of a no?
?
that is why i am saying a=2 could be wrong
no, it's correct
because if a is not 2
then something that varies = something constant
as you wrote with (2-a)y=2constant-1
different constant diffferent values
which you assumed
it doesn't vary
but each constant will vary
????????????????????
then it's not a constant?
bro i don't know you are making confusing me on a tiny thing
and i am not getting your final point
if you want me to test on solving linear equations
no, I want to test you on identifying constant coefficients
"the equation of a line is 2x+ay = 1"
"the equation of that same line is "x+y = c"
"find all constants"
you have two equations
that describe the same object
so we should be able, by manipulating both equations
to find out what's missing in each
2x+ay = 1
x+y = c
2x+2y=2c
(2-a)y=c-1
you are doing two things
finding the value and showing the lines same
i know the equations of same slope will be same
they will only differ by a constant
but i am saying you that the value of that constant will affect the value of a
what it is told?
I literally created a question statement for you
you did not say it earlier
so i said that it will vary
solving equations and saying same line repersentation
I thought it was pretty implicit
okay so what you wanna do it with same
and when I rewrote it
yeah, because your values are incorrect
in the original problem, you said
a = 1, b = 2
let's rewind
$$ax^2 + 2y^2 + 2z^2 + 2bxy + 4x = 0$$
is the same as
$$x^2 - 2xx_0 + y^2 - 2yy_0 + z^2 -2zz_0 = \text{some constant } ( = r^2 - x_0^2 - y_0^2 - z_0^2) = 0$$
how did you find second equation?
.
no
yes
????
so if it passing through origin they should removed
??????????
I can't understand you
same to me
rafilou is not not born in 2003
well yes
yes we found it because it passes through origin
ohh got it
r^2-r^2
you said earier it is useless?
no
I didn't think about how it could be useful beforehand
it is helping me as you can see
$$ax^2 + 2y^2 + 2z^2 + 2bxy + 4x = 0$$
is the same as
$$x^2 - 2xx_0 + y^2 - 2yy_0 + z^2 -2zz_0 =0$$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
a=1?
now, to find a,b
try again
you should think about manipulating one equation or the other
yes
b=0
its alr
ok now
$$2x^2 + 2y^2 + 2z^2 + 4x = 0$$
is the same as
$$x^2 - 2xx_0 + y^2 - 2yy_0 + z^2 -2zz_0 =0$$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
let's go find the center?
a=2,c=b=0
what can we simplify immediately here?
on the first equation
x^2+y^2+z^2+2x=0
np
which book did you read for 3D?
Closed by @vivid siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Right angled triangle, the lines are bisectors, no further info on the subject. I need to find the angle BDA
I'm short on time too
@charred parcel Has your question been resolved?
@charred parcel Has your question been resolved?
I still need help
Do you have the ab, bc and ac lengths
no
Closed by @charred parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
x^2 = 9^2 + 6^2
notice how all radii of the circle have the same length, is there a different way you can draw the radius to potentially find it's length?(Purple Relapse gave a good hint)
I think first is 15
yup :)
yeah, that's why it's moreso to the left than the second problem
@neon coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i rushed my hw but does this make sense?
sorry for any bad hand writing i have school in less than 30 it was really rushed 😭
Looks good to me
The only thing thats not 100% clear is your justfication for why sinx>cosx for pi/4<x<pi/2 and cosx<sinx for 0<x<pi/4 but whether that's needed in this case might depend on your teacher/curriculum
It is correct though.
okay that’s great cause my notebooks already packed and everything but i’ll ask my teacher since it’s only high school calculus
and ty!!
.close
Closed by @wild hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if I draw a circle with taking 5i as center then only point which lines on its circumference will be C?
what does $I(z)$ mean?
Ann
Would be best to confirm but I imagine it means the imaginary part of z, particularl since one of the given answer choices is correct with that guess.
C
ok then all speculation is useless
if you do not know the meaning of all notation used in the question then you should not be doing it
Closed by @deft tangle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I start this problem? Should I give random numbers like a=b=c=d=0?
A^5-A^3=I
A^3(A^2-1)=I
A^3=I
Or A^2=1
😫 😫
even for ordinary numbers it would be wrong: from xy = 1 you CANNOT say that x=1 or that y=1
also $A^5 - A^3 = A^3(A^2 - I)$ not $A^3(A^2 - 1)$
Ann
the equation $A^3(A^2 - I) = I$ is still useful though
My bad first wrote I
Ann
So A^3=I
because you can in fact see that your marked answer "an invertible matrix" is correct
A^2=I
no you're overthinking it
the statement $A$ is an invertible matrix'' means there exists a matrix $B$ such that $AB = BA = I$''.
Ann
in fact AB = I implies BA = I for matrices, so just one direction is enough
here, you have $A \cdot A^2(A^2-I) = I$
Ann
thus $A^{-1}$ exists.
Ann
A^2(A^2-I) would be B?
yes, that's what plays the role of B for us
my point is that we don't care a lot what B is exactly, just that it exists
Yeah. That's nice
So should I check option A,B?
Even it was not multiple choice question but
hmm
i actually don't know if you could extract any info about symmetry or skew-symmetry here.
Thanks ma'am ☺️
i think you couldn't. if a matrix A satisfies A^5 - A^3 = I, then any conjugate matrix to it will satisfy the same property -- but (skew) symmetry is not preserved under those
@deft tangle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @deft tangle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I know if I’m getting min or max in optimization questions? The process to the solution seems the same unless I’m missing something
-
Find two numbers who’s sum is 60 and their product is a maximum
-
Find two numbers who’s difference is 40 and their product is a minimum
Use the first derivative test
I just differentiate both and I find the answer so I’m not sure what the difference would be
Like for 1 how would I find the minimum product instead
AM GM
maybe thats not the method here
What topic are you guys learning in school
Pretty sure it's a calc qn
oh
Yeah it’s Calc
So you solve for the stationary points
Find the nature of the points
And also evaluate the end points
So for the 1st qn
a+b=60
and we're optimizing a•b
So we optimise b•(60-b)=60b-b^2
We find stationary points:
60-2b=0
b=30
So in this case there's only one stationary point
But in some cases there might be two
Oh ok gotcha thanks so for that question there wouldn’t really be a minimum product
Yea
So to figure out if finding the derivative will get me the max or min I have to graph it?
Ooh ok I think I get it now
you can use the second derivative test (which could potentially be inconclusive)
or consider slopes around your location
The latter of which is the first derivative test
Gotcha thank u that makes sense now
Just relearnt curve sketching so forgot about how it worked
Thanks everyone
.close
Closed by @obtuse remnant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does this proof make sense ?
uhm...i'm not sure
how do you make the jump from "smaller than 1 + 2^(-k-1)" to "smaller than 1"
No
To further elaborate what @worldly hatch already pointed out:
By IH we have s_n < 1, okay. Now s_(n+1) < 1+1/2^(n+1). Still okay, but not helpful. This doesn't mean that s_(n+1) < 1 though and you don't get the the induction hypothesis back.
Another mistake that you did is even if you were showing correctly that the infinite series is less than 1/n+1 for all natural n. This would not mean that the series wouldn't eventually be 1
I never said that I said the series converges at 1
1 is the limit
When n goes closer to infinty
Series convergence (in ana 1) is defined to be the limit of the partial sums?
Ok now this talk is a bit too advanced
Also you wrote "Since the series converges at 1"
if you just want to prove the statement, you don't need to talk about post highschool math
you could even choose to show, by induction, that the sum is equal to 1-1/2^n, which is smaller than 1
yes, 1/2^(n+1) is half of 1/2^n
so you only remove half of the difference with 1 with each term
Sure so instead of saying that the series is less than 1 I can say that the series is 1-1/2^k
Which means ,
yup
And proven ?
By induction
I guess before I say that the series is 1 - 1/2^k I have to explain why can you tell me how I would say that like fluently so that someone can understand , english is not my first language
you did induction yeah
I mean if you prove by induction you don't need to know why
but a way to prove it is to notice that (1-1/2)(1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + ... + 1/2^n) = 1-1/2^(n+1)
Wait can I say like since the sum is less than 1 it is equal to 1 - 1/2^k then follow through with the steps I showed you
the steps you showed should come first since saying the sum is less than 1 is what you want to prove
for n = 1, the sum = 1-1/2 = 1/2, is base case
then from your induction, for all n, the sum is 1-1/2^n
so for all n it's smaller than 1
Umm I'm lost
why?
I asked if my proof should look like this you are talking about proving the 1-1/2^k is in fact true for all n
So are you making me prove two induction statements in one or ?
you want to prove $S(n) = \sum_{i = 1}^n \frac{1}{2^i} < 1$ for all n
Yes
so you can prove S(n) = 1-1/2^n for all n
For some reason the statement says 1/2^i
it follows that S(n) < 1 for all n, since 1-1/2^n is smaller than 1
Melo
by induction $S(n) = 1-\frac{1}{2^n}$
But don't you have to say where S(n) is positive or something like that
Melo
so S(n) < 1
hmm the exercise doesn't ask if S(n) is positive, but since it's a sum of positive terms it obviously is
so you can say it if you want
Alright now I just prove this which is a much simpler proposition
And I already did
So thank you for your help I can finally sleep
It's 1 am
@sly badger Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sly badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is this E??
they are all multiples of 3 so you would assume they are kept 100%
what do you mean by "they are kept 100%"?
@quartz yoke
alternatively: what can you place next to a multiple of 3 in the octagon?
another multiple of 3?
I was thinking like 3 - 12 and 1 - 9 and 5 - 6 and 2 - 8 wouldnt that work?
oh right 2-8 doesnt work
but you get the idea how are they not used? 3 and 6 and 9 and 12
5 & 6 don't work
well you got it right, the only thing that can go next to a multiple of 3 is another multiple of 3
so you would need to fill the entire octagon with those
but you don't have enough for that
so you cannot use them at all
cant I use the 4 multiples of 3 then the other 4 I use the rest?
@quartz yoke Has your question been resolved?
no
because a multiple of 3 would have to go next to some non-multiple of 3
and you cannot have that
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay so I was solving a question and got the answer wrong but then realized I would have gotten it right if it was 2x + 15 and that made me question that when you do lets say 180 - x -10 do you distribute the ("-") so it becomes 180 - x + 10 or it's just 180 - whatever the angle is
Oh so it's 180 - (2x -15)
Ohhh
you're removing both 50 and 10 from 180
hi
not just 50
is this not just no solution or am i tweaking
Good night then 😃
?
What's no solution
x
That's a part of the question not the question itself
nvm
Aight bye
Closed by @dire rivet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$z^3=-i$
Correct?
@shadow igloo Has your question been resolved?
@shadow igloo Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
no
😭
shw ur work
Only this is right
,rotate
Can u explain what you've done
No
oh well I will fix it alone
damn
Closed by @shadow igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
what?
Can you read the messages above? PLS
It doesn't appear there was any trolling here.
It looked like they really wanted to help. (Though we don't support giving away solutions.)
It is common practice to ask for work and reasoning.
If something like reasoning isn't provided as requested, there is less room for response.
Not sending messages isn't considered trolling, compared to intentionally spouting nonsense.
Okay the fault is always mine
Now I go out of the discord that perhaps it is better
Bye
if u just wanted the solutions i could've provided u that
Noone is saying its your fault here. If you have concerns, you are free to ping mods.
But please don't freely give away worked solutions.
idc
when did i?
It sounded like you were planning to.
I remember that guy being in here since a long time, why did he get such a sudden mood swing lol
I'm sure he knows how it's done here
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $X$ be a set, $\mathcal{B}(X, \mathbb{R})$ the set of bounded functions from $X$ into $\mathbb{R}$ and $\forall f \in \mathcal{B}(X, \mathbb{R}), \ ||f||=sup_{x \in X} |f(x)|$.
Given this norm, show that $\mathcal{B}(X, \mathbb{R})$ is a Banach space.
tm
so i have to show that for all cauchy sequences in B(X,R), it converges
but how i do that 😭
idk how to start
Mama les e.v normés
Soit fn une suite de cauchy de B(X,R)
Construit sa limite éventuelle
Vérifie que la limite est dans l'ensemble de départ et que la suite converge la bas
mais si c’est de cauchy elle est bornée nan?
Bah tu as que pour a,b entiers |f_a(x) - f_b(x)| <= ||f_a - f_b|| et donc que c'est cauchy dans R
Et ducoup (f_n(x))_n converge
ahhh mais nan t’as mit la norme mb
j’avais pas vu mdr
oui
ça doit pas être difficile à montrer que c’est borné
Tu l'as déjà fais
.
ah oupsie
mais ça ça vient d’où mdr
|f_n(x)| <= M
Oui ça utilise le fait que R est complet
rah ouais on peut pas faire de manière intrinsèque
Et ducoup avec f_n cauchy tu as ce truc
ui
la norme est continue donc on peut c’est ça ?
(en dehors de l’origine)
jcrois
jdis que de la merde je confond avec différentiable
<@&268886789983436800>
Non je voulais dire la valeur absolue mais en vrai tu as un truc comme ça : |f_n(x)| <= ||f_n|| <= M
Il veut quoi lahuiss
mdrr gros scam sa mère
ui mais où on passe à la limite la 😭😭😭
dans la valeur absolue ?
bah c’est grâce a ça nan?
Oui
Après la convergence tu fais avec epsilon
le passage à la limite ?
ahhh
ui
donc att
faut montrer que ça converge
et que ça limite c’est dans B
les étapes pour montrer que c’est complet
Que ça converge dans B ouais
oki
la prochaine fois j’éviterai de prendre un exercice du gourdon quand jcommence les espaces complets ..
Tu peux faire un truc avec les fonctions lipchitz bidules aussi, ça forge bien ça
Lipschitzienne
alors alors ça avance cet exo ?
L'inspecteur est là tm vite, finit le boulot
purée j’étais parti manger 😭😭
le truc de la distance 1-lipschitzienne ?
ez ça
la c’est bon
tm
est-ce que rafilou approuve la preuve ?
c’est a dire ?
(f_n) c'est une suite de fonctions
(f_n(x)) ?
voilà
pour x dans X
oui c'est mieux
erreur d’inattention 😔
il manque le quantifieur pour x ici
oui, et c'est là que ça va devenir chaud je pense
jcrois voir de quoi tu parles mdr
le passage au sup?
$|f_n(x)-f(x)|=|f_n(x)-f_m(x)+f_m(x)-f(x)|$
tm
ou alors je suis fou
o le con
et je viens de capter mais
je me disais |f_m(x)-f(x)| c’était borné dcp ça passe
non ça c'est bon
eh oh je fais pas 4 erreurs par ligne quand même 😔
oui ça ça reste le problème
on passe a la limite alors
donc en fait pour majorer |f(x) - f_n(x)|
pour f_n ou f_m
ui ui
autant commencer de:
$$\forall x\in X, ,\forall m,n\geq N, ; |f_n(x)-f_m(x)| < \varepsilon$$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
bon de ça effectivement
n --> + inf ?
ah rip
Puisque c'est vrai pour tout x dans X
on en déduit alors que f_n - f est bornée
ui
(bon ça en vrai c'était un peu couru d'avance)
et ||f_n - f|| <= epsilon pour n >= N
bon bah on a gagné
1-0
mais on a pas construit f pour que ça soit la limite de f_n ?
oui mais f c'est la limite simple de (f_n)
C'est juste un nom i bet
la limite point par point
a faut aussi montrer la convergence en norme
rah ouais relou les espaces complets en vrai
si t'as convergence simple et convergence norme infini, alors oui les deux limites sont pareilles
d'ailleurs t'as même convergence norme infinie -> convergence simple
ui c’est sur
mais ayant juste convergence simple
aucune raison qu'on ait convergence en norme infinie
exemple: f_n(x) = delta(x,n)
uh c’est quoi ça delta mdr
delta étant symbole de kronecker bien sûr
c’est 0 si x=n et 1 si x≠n ?
c l'inverse
donc bref f_n converge point par point vers 0 (f_n(x) -> 0 pour tout x)
et pourtant
la norme de la diff c'est toujours 1
avec la norme sup
oui norme sup/infinie
hmm je vois
bon jvais jouer a rocket league les maths c’est fini ce soir mdr
merci 🙏🏼
.close
Closed by @fair raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
🚗 ⚽ 🚙
bonne soirée xd
Mesure la norme pour faire des aerials
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i know how to get 1, and infer that because its an absolute value function, the reverse sign of that -1 must also be a critical number. I dont get how x=0 came about though
x=0 the derivative doesnt exist so it counts as a critical point
is there a way to recognize that? or should i just always plug in x=0 to check
in this case you can recognize it by the fact that its absolute value
okay cool
if its some random piecewise function then you could check first if its continuous at that point by seeing if the limits are equal and also check that the derivatives are equal
thank you
np
.close
Closed by @cosmic geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$D\cos(x)^\frac{1}{x}$
Chicken Jockey🐔
Pls help me !

What's ur question?
What is D?
No
How do I solve the question?
f(x) = cos^1/x
ln(f) = 1/x ln(cos(x))
I can translate into latex
$f(x) = \cos^\frac{1}{x}
\ln(f) = \frac{1}{x} \ln(\cos(x))$
Chicken Jockey🐔
$\frac{f'}{f} = \frac{-1}{x^2} \cdot ln(\cos(x)) - \frac{\tan(x)}{x}$
╰ 𝕃 𝕌 ℂ 𝕀 𝔽 𝔼 ℝ ╮
Multiply both sides by cos(x)^{1/x}
$\frac{f'}{f} = \frac{-1}{x^2} \cdot \ln(\cos(x)) - \frac{\tan(x)}{x}$
Chicken Jockey🐔
$\cos(x)^\frac{1}{x}\frac{f'}{f} = [\frac{-1}{x^2} \cdot \ln(\cos(x)) - \frac{\tan(x)}{x}]\cdot \cos(x)^\frac{1}{x}$
Chicken Jockey🐔
Then?
$f' = [\frac{-1}{x^2} \cdot \ln(\cos(x)) - \frac{\tan(x)}{x}]\cdot \cos(x)^\frac{1}{x}$
Chicken Jockey🐔
Great, u have reached ur goal
Thanks
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @shadow igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm looking for primes p such that n^4+1 is divisible by p^2 for some integer n
that would mean n^8 is congruent to 1 mod p^2, so the order of n is 8
so 8 divides phi(p^2)=p(p-1)
so the smallest candidate for p is 17
does that make sense?
oh that only works for n coprime to p^2 but for the other n we have n^4 congruent to 0 mod p^2 so those don't work
why don't you take order of n as 4 instead of squaring it
the order of n can't be 4 because n^4 is congruent to -1
oh my bad lmao
no worries
@reef bronze Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @reef bronze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey all, this is how I started things off but am not sure how to compute the determinant on the last line (since it's a block matrix), thanks for your help
If $A$ is a block matrix of the form $A = \begin{bmatrix}B~0 \ 0~I\end{bmatrix}$, where $I$ is an identity matrix, then $\operatorname{det}(A) = \operatorname{det}(B)$.
ucheo
I thought of trying to use the following property
Let me know if it's suitable here
Theorem: The determinant of an upper triangular or lower triangular matrix is the product of it's diagonal entries
Because
Yes, in this case that works. In particular, the determinant of any identity matrix is 1 Since $\begin{bmatrix}I_n~0 \ 0~I_m\end{bmatrix}$ is itself an identity matrix, its determinant must be 1.
Isn't the matrix simply diagonal actually?
ucheo
This is what I have
I think it SHOULD work?
Yeah, looks correct
@quartz yoke Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tiny gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this?
Dropping perpendiculars from the point into the x and y axes might help
Do you know that the equation of a circle is (sin theta, cos theta)
Nah @charred finch method is better
idk what that means
im kinda lost
am i supposed to find the angle first
The y coordinate gives the value of sin(theta) and the x coordinate the value of cos(theta).
Hence theta = 360° - 53° = 307°
What?
Mb
i have no clue what any of that means
we did not go over any of this in class
what is sin and cos supposed to be
U mean u want to know what are the sin and cos functions or the value of them in this case?
do i put sin and cos (307) into the answer boxes?
Yes
i did and it said it was wrong?
Honestly, the last step is not necessary
U need to simplify it
We get tan x = 4/3 right
Do u know how this came?
0.8/0.6
Suika
Hence $x=360^{\circ}-\theta$
Suika
$\tan{x}=\tan{(360^{\circ}-\theta)}=-\tan{\theta}$
Suika
Hence $-\tan{\theta}=\frac{4}{3}$
Suika
Tan theta is -4/3
From that, we get sin theta is -4/5 and cos theta is 3/5
Honestly, I'm shit
Ask someone else to explain and forget whatever I said
No, cos is 0.6 and sin is -0.8
thats so dumb
i know how to do this with a protractor how i am i supposed to do it without
On the unit circle like here we the x values are cos(x) and the y values are sin(x)
@limber spade Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @limber spade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Proof
Derive the formula for $\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4$ using the identity $x^5 - (x-1)^5$.
• Identity: $x^5 - (x-1)^5$
Helpful information
• Summation formulas:
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} 1 = n$
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} x = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^2 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}$
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^3 = \frac{n^2(n+1)^2}{4}$ [1]
-
Step 1 Expand $(x-1)^5$
• Using the binomial theorem:
• $(x-1)^5 = x^5 - 5x^4 + 10x^3 - 10x^2 + 5x - 1$ -
Step 2 Simplify $x^5 - (x-1)^5$
• $x^5 - (x-1)^5 = x^5 - (x^5 - 5x^4 + 10x^3 - 10x^2 + 5x - 1)$
• $x^5 - (x-1)^5 = 5x^4 - 10x^3 + 10x^2 - 5x + 1$ -
Step 3 Sum both sides from $x=1$ to $n$
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} (x^5 - (x-1)^5) = \sum_{x=1}^{n} (5x^4 - 10x^3 + 10x^2 - 5x + 1)$ -
Step 4 Evaluate the left side of the equation
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} (x^5 - (x-1)^5) = (1^5 - 0^5) + (2^5 - 1^5) + \dots + (n^5 - (n-1)^5)$
• This is a telescoping sum, so all terms cancel except the last one:
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} (x^5 - (x-1)^5) = n^5$ [1] -
Step 5 Evaluate the right side of the equation
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} (5x^4 - 10x^3 + 10x^2 - 5x + 1) = 5\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4 - 10\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^3 + 10\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^2 - 5\sum_{x=1}^{n} x + \sum_{x=1}^{n} 1$ [1]
• Substitute the known summation formulas:
• $5\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4 - 10\frac{n^2(n+1)^2}{4} + 10\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6} - 5\frac{n(n+1)}{2} + n$ [1]
• $5\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4 - \frac{5}{2}n^2(n+1)^2 + \frac{5}{3}n(n+1)(2n+1) - \frac{5}{2}n(n+1) + n$ [1]
- Step 6 Set the left and right sides equal and solve for $\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4$
• $n^5 = 5\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4 - \frac{5}{2}n^2(n+1)^2 + \frac{5}{3}n(n+1)(2n+1) - \frac{5}{2}n(n+1) + n$ [1]
• $5\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4 = n^5 + \frac{5}{2}n^2(n+1)^2 - \frac{5}{3}n(n+1)(2n+1) + \frac{5}{2}n(n+1) - n$ [1]
• $5\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4 = \frac{30n^5 + 75n^4 + 110n^3 + 60n^2 + 5n}{30}$
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4 = \frac{6n^5 + 15n^4 + 10n^3 - n}{30}$
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n^2+3n-1)}{30}$
Someone pls explain how we reached from second last to last step in this photo
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4 = \frac{6n^5 + 15n^4 + 10n^3 - n}{30}$
• $\sum_{x=1}^{n} x^4 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n^2+3n-1)}{30}$
Salik
where did you copy and paste this from
anyway this looks like they did some factorization magic
From google
Ya but I don't know what happened afterwards
First I solved in notebook then I reached the second last step
But couldn't know how to factorise
Then I searched on Google and it showed no factorization step
It just gave direct answer after the second last step
well ok like
Idk what happened in this
Like how do I factorise it?
so you understand all of the other stuff here and your issue is specifically about how to factorize 6n^5 + 15n^4 + 10n^3 - n
Yes and then finally get the last step after factorization
n can be factored out right away as you can hopefully see
after that, i would try the rational root theorem to get some nice roots and thus nice corresponding factors
What is this rational root theorem 😭
https://www.cuemath.com/algebra/rational-root-theorem/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_root_theorem
The rational root theorem (rational zero theorem) is used to find the rational roots of a polynomial function. By this theorem, the rational zeros of a polynomial are of the form p/q where p and q are the coefficients of the constant and leading coefficient.
In algebra, the rational root theorem (or rational root test, rational zero theorem, rational zero test or p/q theorem) states a constraint on rational solutions of a polynomial equation
a
n
x
n
+
...
I am from India
Never heard of this
you can also google it :PPPPP
Hmm
the rational root theorem says that if a polynomial has integer coefficients then its rational roots will only take a specific form
which can help you either find them all in a not too big search space or be assured that if you didn't find any then you couldn't have done so anyway
@quick jewel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can some1 help me with this???
,rccw
what are you asked to do w this
i cant read that sry whats the denominator
also that fraction bar is so short...
Wait
$f(x)=\frac{4x+1}{x^2-kx+k}$
Ann
you need brackets in plain text
anyway
what are you asked to do with this
I was meant to do delta > 0