#help-42
1 messages ¡ Page 165 of 1
Yes
I was a student once, too.
Not math student
I am about to join engineering
I am an design engineer
I see
Like machines??
I am engaged in drawing up drawings in the field of advanced technologies
bye
@brittle basin Has your question been resolved?
i think it was
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
so
im doing transformations basically
i dont understand what it means they are constants and how to find them.
so like
when x = 0 y = -3, x = 3đ/4 y = 2
and solve for a,b and c
also the maximum magnitude of the sinusoidal is 3
so that means a = 3
yeah i thought so for a
or -3
one of those two
c = -1 cause the graph is shifted by 1 unit downwards
c shifts the graph up or down
well right off the bat you can see that c = -3, it was shifted downwards by 3
if c was 0 the sinusoidal would go 3 units up and 3 units down at its peaks
the other guy said -1
im confused to what to listen to
it is -1
How can u confirm it's -3?
the magnitude of peaks is decided by the coefficient of sin
nevermind yeah it's -1, i didn't take a and b into consideration
c is supposed to be central axis, a is amplitude and in the parenthesis is supposed to be the period
as its transformations
i am not sure what you mean by central axis
example
say the top one is
2
and the bottom is -2
(y axis)
yes
the midpoint/central axis is 0
yeah we call it central axis at my school for some reason
(ymax+ymin)/2
thank you
what does the yman-ymin/2 solve btw
as i remmeber it did something
im writing these down to remember them
oh amplitude
mb
You got b?
nope and i did c wrong i just realised lemme fix it
Put x=0 and get b
no i said i made mistake
its -1
i corrected it above as well
c = -1
No I mean at x=0 the value is -3 right?
yes
You equated it here to 0
Here
Is it right . You know the answer?
what the...
yeah i mean it makes sense
thank god i just realised this problem is with horizontal shift
the ones on the test tommorow are with period which is simple its just 2Ď/b
@frail folio Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frail folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am i tripping on taking mod m on both sides means n is a multiple of m
where are they taking mod?
im taking mod
if n^3 is a multiple of m you can do that
why if
isnt that implied
taking mod m both sides nets us n^3 is congruent to -n^3 mod m
why are you taking mod tho?
because i can
then yea, if you take mod on both sides, then it implies n^3 is a multiple of m
m*
but then these are the solutions
how is that possible
yea
Closed by @vital chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you dont need mod at all i guess?
ye
no n^3 is cong to 0 mod m doesnt imply n is 0 mod m
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help in this question
this is my work so far
(can start from scratch if required to)
nah you are doing alright
ohk so what do i do from here?
Hmm I have a different solution
yeah?
Assume a solution of the form r^x
ohk is that because of the range given
You will get a quadratic equation with complex roots that will break down into a sin and cos term hopefully
it's because of how the equation looks
how is ur intuition that good đ
also i didnt understand..after assuming it how do i get the quadratic eqn?
but isnt r^x a non-periodic function
$r^{x - 1} + r^{x + 1} = \sqrt{3}r^x$
jewels!
@left wren
oh
So this turns into $r^2 - r\sqrt 3 + 1 = 0$
oh alright let me try this
jewels!
So you get $r = \frac{\sqrt{3} \pm i}{2}$
jewels!
yeah i got till there
So this is e^(i*pi/6)
So take $f(x) = A \sin \left ( \frac {\pi x}6 \right ) + B \cos \left ( \frac {\pi x}6 \right )$
jewels!
so our function is
f(x) = e^x*(ixpi/6)
oh
the specifics aren't really important now
so period is 12
yeah
oh man
i thought of assuming the function as well
but then i was like how would i proceed from there and then stopped
thank you
.close
Closed by @spice venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@left wren thx bro
i didnt really help with that
its fine u still responded
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
!msgdelete
The original post of this help channel has been deleted, and it will abruptly close and possibly lock. (This is irreversible.) Please claim a new channel, and don't delete the first message of any future channel you claim.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, just wanted to ask if this is correct
Confused with âat the point c(10)â like it doesnât expect me to plug 10 into sin or cos right?
the point c(10) is for t=10 yes
@lone sparrow Has your question been resolved?
so is this answer wrong?
65/2197
I don't see anything wrong really
what fact ?
that t=10
like if i were to compute a tangent plane at a given point, id plug that in
curvature just doesn't depend on time here
o rlly
it's the same whatever t
that curve c(t) is an helix so the curvature being constant sounds alright
Closed by @lone sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with 8. B)
I wa stuck for a while
this is what I have done
idk why its sending a file
required for a perpendicular bisector:
- perpendicular
- bisector
do you know how to show either?
sorry I can't open the HEIC
okay, based on the gradients are they perpendicular?
yea
if so, we have the perpendicular down and just need the bisector part
prove that the line they gave you bisects (splits in half) AB
otherwise it's just a line perpendicular to AB and not a perpendicular bisector
yes, but there's a simple way to show that it does
think about how you would do it, then read this: ||Show that M is on the line||
utiliise the Mid point?
yes!
No I canât help you
,av sizzly0376
well you need to know that the perpendicular bisector goes through the midpoint
yea
is (2,1) on the line y=3x?
as an example ^
Well the M is one point, but I need another point
no
you need two points to define a line, but you can check if a point is on a line a different way
||plug the point into the equation and see if it's true||
yeah that is the correct equation
and it's the same as the one they asked you to show (if you do a few steps)
Yeah
Do I need to rearrange this equation so it matches x-3y+9=0?
but I dont think that will work
yes
it would work, but I don't think it was the intended way to solve the problem
it wont work because it would be then 1/3x -y +3 = 0
which isnt the same as x-3y+9=0?
@restive harbor Has your question been resolved?
@next hound I have another question for 8. c)
ok
am i on the right track
since c lies on the y axis, i know x coordinate of c is 0
I don't think so
why did you calculate the distance between A and B?
you want to make the distance between C and A equal to the distance between C and B
it says it is equisdistant from a and b
yes, read my message directly above for what that means
the distance between A and B is irrelevant
alr I get it
a) M = (x1+x2/2, y1+y2/2)
b) Show m1m2 = -1, and then use y - (y1+y2/2) = m2(x-(x1+x2/2))
c) x = 0, d(AC) = d(BC) so therefore d^2(AC) = d^2(BC) or in other words, (2-x)^2 + (2 - y)^2 = (1-x)^2 + (5-y)^2, from there plug in x, find y, coord of C is (0,y)
d) to find the coords, do system of equations
y = 5 and x - 3y + 9 = 0, so basically just plug in y = 5 and solve for x, and that's ur coords -> D(x,5)
@restive harbor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help? i dont know what to do here
@steady nebula Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Quick question, If I'm solving a lagrange multiplier system and I get only one point how do I know if it's a minimum or maximum point?
Will I have to resort to using hessian matrix?
u could compare with other values
that ur trying to minimize/maximize
i think lagrange multiplier gives a necessary condition
Actually I just noticed something, I think in the context of the function I'm maximizing/minimizing I can say that it doesn't have a maximum
the function is f(x, y)=x²+2y²
the restriction is 3x+y-1=0
So this function doesn't have a maximum point (just from looking at it)
And the constraint isn't bounded
So for those reasons it shouldn't have a maximum point right
What do you mean the constraint isnât bounded
But you canât take every point on the line you need it to intersect with f
sorry I don't understand
Do I need it to intersect with f?
Closed by @agile jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
!da2a
No need to ask âCan I askâŚ?â or âDoes anyone know aboutâŚ?ââitâs faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
@agile jetty
<@&268886789983436800>
The hell
Hi! Welcome to mathcord. We cannot allow people to practise academic dishonesty on this server. Sorry!
Why did you ping me
Closed by @wide chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
parent function
Is there a sign missing here?
yea i think so
<@&286206848099549185> can someone help me
y=f(x-1)+3 ---> you are plotting the parent function offset to the right (x axis) by one and offseting +3 unit upwards on y-axis
I think the sign missing is an = as in your starting X is 1
yea f is broken ingore it
lol
my teahcer mesed up
i know but how to draw i know the rules
bro can someone ehlp em
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
can someone help me
Easiest way if u already know where u want to go
Is to draw the parent function first
and then translate each significant point
thats done for me
Great
i just dont know how to draw the trnaformed grpah
even though i memorized all the rules
bruh
@scenic grail
(-2,4)
dont do f
k second 1 then lol
Any important point will be where its easy for u to identify the function
(-2,4) on the parent function is important cus its the end of the function on the left side
So u can translate that one first
Did u get that
naw
Yeah.
but how would i draw it i dont have a drawing tool
But I would follow this.
Shift the graph to the right one unit and up 3.
So are you asking for someone to draw it for you?
no but i cant do it myslef
it doent work
What exactly are you not understanding?
i cant draw it
(There's an amazing tool that mankind has had for years, maybe even decades, specifcally for drawing; you might of heard of it - a pencil)
buddy i dont ahve one next to me
other wise i would have done it ages ago
Are u on cellphone or pc?
pc
(there are graphing calculators)
That explains it.
(but beyond that idk what else I can say)
Why were you attempting this without having a utensil to actually graph with?
becuase its online
idk
naw but my whole summer course is online
i use my head
It doesn't matter
proving is too hard\
Online art classes are useless if you then don't proceed to do any art yourself
Maths is no different
Geometry (and by proxy function graphing) even more so no different
?
Alternatively use paint tool on computer
Doing math without a visual doesn't help train intuition as well as with a visual
This is what I was getting at
ASCII art it if you are desparate for a drawing tool
It doesn't suffice to read without practice
("desperate*" ik but still) damn imagine using ASCII art in an exam as a last-minute resort 
an exam what the hell is an exam
Other approaches:
- Go to the beach and write in the sand
- Rearrange your next meal into the diagram
- Take strands of your hair and arrange them into the diagram
Closed by @leaden pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My original idea was to let $A_1 \cap A_2 = t+U; t\in V, U \subseteq V$
wai
but you don't know that to be true
you're trying to prove that A_1 \cap A_2 is the translate of some subspace of V
you can't just assume it
hmm, okay
What I also thought of was
let $x \in U_1; y\in U_2$. We then have for any element in the intersection $x+v=w+y$
wai
from the question, some vectors in V
wydm, I'm just saying for any vector in the intersection, this equality is true
thats a weird way to phrase it
you need to show that either $A_1 \cap A_2 = \emptyset$, or $A_1 \cap A_2 = v + U$ for some subspace $U \subseteq V$
higher!
yes
like what you've written here is not logically correct
x + v might not equal w + y for arbitrary elements x in U_1 and y in U_2
v already used
and they might not live in the intersection
$A_1\cap A_2=x+U$ for some $x,U$
ăăąăăă¸ăŁăłă
Lemme think of another proof then
the correct phrasing is: for any $a \in A_1 \cap A_2$, there exist $x \in U_1$, $y \in U_2$ such that [ a = x + v = w + y ]
yes, that's what I meant
so you should say what you mean
Is this a good place to start 
well thats kinda just the definition of the intersection A_1 \cap A_2
so you can't not use it
if A_1 \cap A_2 is empty, theres nothing to do
so you should just assume otherwise
say t \in A_1 \cap A_2
use that to "unify" the definitions of A_1 and A_2
What I got so far, $\exists x \in U_1 , y\in U_2$ st $v+x=t; w+y=t$ . Adding them, $v+x+w+y=2t$
wai
which doesn't really help
what's the relationship between t + U_1 and A_1?
t+u \in A_1
okay but how exactly are t + U_1 and A_1 related
t+U_1=A_1
t+U_2=A_2
okay so with that
you can rephrase the question
Suppose $A_1 = t + U_1$ and $A_2 = t + U_2$ for some $t \in V$ and some subspaces $U_1, U_2$ of $V$. Prove that the intersection $A_1 \cap A_2$ is a translate of some subspace of $V$.
can you guess which translate this should be?
t
what goes in the place of ???
I have no idea, shouldn't I find that first
hmm
well you should be able to guess without having done the proof
like take the trivial case for example, when t = 0
,, A_1 \cap A_2 = (0 + U_1) \cap (0 + U_2) = {???}
what goes in the place of ???
then it's U_1 \cap U_2
so what should it be when t isnt 0
t+ U_1 \cap U_2
yes
so you should try proving that
like this should be the picture you have in your mind
But say I didn't know that, I'd want to be able to explcitly find it , no?
well
if you didn't know that
i don't have high hopes for you being able to solve the problem
Okie, lemme try to prove it then
so now I just prove each set is a subset of the other?
its a possible direction
Let $\alpha \in A_1 \cap A_2$. Then $\alpha \in t+U_1 \land \alpha \in t+U_2$. Thus $\alpha \in t+ U_1 \cap U_2$. Therefore $A_1 \cap A_2 \subseteq t+( U_1 \cap U_2)$
wai
Thus ...
why
thats the thing you're trying to prove in the first place
justify
Let $\alpha \in A_1 \cap A_2$. Then $\alpha \in t+U_1 \land \alpha \in t+U_2$. Let $ x \in U_1; y \in U_2$. Then $t+U_1 = {t+x \mid x \in U_1}$. Similarly $t+U_2 {t+y \mid y \in U_2}. Let $z \in t+ U_1 \cap U_2. so ${t+z \mid z \in U_1 \cap U_2}$Thus $\alpha \in t+ U_1 \cap U_2$. Therefore $A_1 \cap A_2 \subseteq t+( U_1 \cap U_2)$
\
Let $\beta \in t + U_1 \cap U_2$. Then $ \beta. \in t+U_1 \land t+U_2$. Therefore $ \beta \in A_1 \land \beta \in A_2$ so $ \beta \in A_1 \cap A_2$
wai
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
whats with the "Let x \in U_1" and "Let y \in U_2"
here as well
you can't just state the result you're trying to prove the prove the result you're trying to prove
you need to justify
That's by defn
right
i mean clearly not
wait, lemme rephrase myself
$\beta \in t+ U_1 \cap U_2$. $t+U_1 \cap U_2 = {t+z \mid z \in U_1 \cap U_2}.$
wai
$t+U_1 = {t+ x \mid x \in U_1}$. $t+U_2 ={t+y \mid y \in U_2}$. $t+ U_1 \cap U_2 ={t+z \mid z \in U_1 \land z \in U_2}$
wai

just take an element and do something with it
$\beta \in t + U_1 \cap U_2$ means $\beta = t + u$ where $u \in U_1 \cap U_2$, i.e., $u \in U_1$ and $u \in U_2$
so $\beta \in t + U_1$ and $ \beta \in t + U_2$
you don't have to contort your proof to write out sets over and over again
theres also the other direction
you should try writing it without faffing around with set notation
That is $\alpha \in t+U_1 ; \alpha \in t+U_2 \implies \alpha \in t+( U_1 \cap U_2)$
wai
yes you need to prove that
Let $\alpha \in t+U_1 ; \alpha \in t+U_2$. Then $\alpha -t=x ; x \in A_1; \alpha - t=y;y\in A_2$. Thus $ \alpha -t \in U_1 \cap U_2$. So $\alpha-t+t= \alpha \in t + U_1 \cap U_2$
wai
seems good
pretty much
.close
Closed by @blazing coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(b)
I was thinking ${(1,0,\dots)+ U}, {(0,1,\dots) +U}....$ could be a basis
wai
hmm
you need to exhibit a family of vectors in F^â which satisfy the following properties:
- they are linearly independent (in the sense of any finite subfamily being bonafide LI)
- no two of them differ in only a finite number of positions (i.e. no two differ by an element of U)
the set containing the set of these vectors aren't the same though, right
there are a bunch of different ways to do it but they do require being comfortable with describing stuff in words precisely
sorry what
${(1,0,\dots)+U}, {(0,1,\dots)+U}$
wai
these are the same set
but also you're off base
$e_1 + U$ and $e_2 + U$ are the same thing.
Ann
got it
i'm using $e_k$ here to mean the sequence with a 1 at the $k$'th position and 0s everywhere else
Ann
even worse $e_1 + U = e_2 + U = U$ because $e_1$ and $e_2$ themselves both lie in $U$.
Ann
Right
so in F^â/U these would both be 0
The way I like to think of quotients:
two vectors in V/U are the same if you can get from one to the other by adding some element in U
(Where addition is done in V but forget about that part)
hmm, so constructing the basis would be a bit challenging here
hmm,so what i want is a list of linearly independent sets of the form ${v+U \mid v \in F^{\infty}}$
right
wai
wouldnt it be easier to show that F^inf/U is not finite dimensional? as in for any finite set of vectors in F^inf, show there is an element of F^inf not in the set of vectors + U
That's very similar. That is, use your generation method to generate a linearly independent set
Or, if you have a lin ind set, then you probably used a generation method to get them
You're talking to me?
No
So you'll need to change each vector in infinitely many components, to generate more @blazing coyote
we can do this case by contradiction tho, so we dont need to give a generation method
Yea, that was my next thought, but not sure how to formalise it
Ah like, we can just show such a list exists, but don't actually construct any vectors? Yeah that would work and not give a set
like in the first basis element, all elements in v are 1, in the second all but one elements are 1 and so on
We can construct an infinite LI set. I did think of one, it's not too complicated.
would this work
Yeah I think it does!
${(1,1,\dots)+U},{(0,1,1,\dots)+U},\dots}$
wai
Then two 0's, then three 0's, etc?
so here the zero vector would be {0} right
all of these are the same
they all only differ in finite elements
Well, none of them are in U
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #âhow-to-get-help for instructions).
yes, but they are still the same
hmm, but a basis must exist
recall anns tip
you need to exhibit a family of vectors in F^â which satisfy the following properties:
they are linearly independent (in the sense of any finite subfamily being bonafide LI),
no two of them differ in only a finite number of positions (i.e. no two differ by an element of U)
ooh, okay
so I need something like all positions which are multiples of say 2 are 1
then all positions that are multiples of 3 but not 2
you can just say all positions that are multiple of 3, of 3 but not 2 doesnt change the LI
fair yes
let $e_n$ be that vector in $F^{\infty}$ with $1$ at all positions that are multiples of $n$. We then haave the basis ${e_n+U}; n \in \N$
does this work
wai
Does this work
i think it does, but i found it easier to prove by choosing specific n instead of all n
you can't call it a basis unless you show that it is one
Okay, in that case an infinite list
so I have to show $\left {\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \lambda_i e_i + U \right}\neq {0}$ for any values of lambda
wai
Can I have a hint
what?
you have to show every finite linear combination equalling 0 has all \lambda_i = 0
so I sum up to arbitrary n here?
so you're looking at every finite subset of this list to be LI
yes
even if you did, the definition of basis says that you need to check every finite subset
ok so as @dire gulch suggested, a proof by contradiction is probably easier
Couldn't we use induction?
if N is infinite then the power set of N is also infinite
you can't do induction on infinite things
also you don't really have a nice strict ordering on P(N)
if $B$ is the set you are claiming to be a basis, then you need to show that:\
1)it is spanning\
2) $$\forall S\subseteq B: |S| < \infty(\sum_{b\in S}\lambda_b b = 0 \implies \lambda_b = 0 \forall b\in S)$$
Herbert
this is the definition of a basis
it suffices for lin indep though
yeah, you need to justify that: becuase subsets of lin indep subsets are lin indep
ah okay so i guess this is strictly wrong then
you won't find a basis for F^infty/U
Okay, so I proceed with this?
don't attempt this
So I proceed by contradiction?
for a finite number n?
Finite number of terms
that was wrong
instead of talking all n take a nice subset of all n, that should make this easier
use the result of this exercise
you've seemingly already picked a sequence
@blazing coyote Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @blazing coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
have to eat now
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You were playing a game JToH when you were the victim of a mug by a mugger. The neighborhood you live in can be represented as a simple undirected connected bipartite graph. Your house is at vertex 1, and both you and the mugger are there.
You then take turns playing the following game. The mugger goes first, choosing an adjacent house v from his current house u and burning the edge (u,v).
Then, you move to an adjacent house and keep the edge intact.
The goal is for you to get to house n to corner the mugger. Devise an algorithm to determine the answer to this question efficiently, assuming optimal play from the mugger.
@idle geode Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What in the world am I getting wrong here
That's my full answer
I keep doing this question again and again, and this is my answer
${-(2x+1)(x+2) = -(2x^2 + 5x + 2) = -2x^2 - 5x - 2}$
k
also your denominator should just be $(x + 2)(x - 2) = x^2 - 4$
south
if you do $(x + 2)(x - 2) - (x - 2)(x + 2)$ that's just zero
south
the way you achieved it is not
but anyway just remember that for next time
I just care abt my numinator
yes!
Alright thanks sm
Yeah I understand now
Closed by @scenic briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo can anyone pls assist me with part ii and iii i genuinely dont know what to do do i diff again or some or like?
how did you do part i?
i let x = x0 as thats the point of intersection then equated and then diffed both sides
oh that's a nice method
oh is that not how i was meant to do it?
ah then it must be using $(1 - \cos^2 (x_0))^{1/2} = \sin x_0$ then
south
I didn't think of that haha
it's a compliment, take it
ah ok fair (i may have used other sources)
you just need to eliminate the possibility $\sin(x_0) = \sin(x_0 - \alpha)$ then
south
sorry im not following
so u square rooted and sqaured and made the sin into 1-cos
so its root sin^2(xo) = sin x0
wait nah i donrt get it sorry lmao
so $1 - \cos^2 x_0 = 1 - \cos^2 (x_0 - \alpha) \implies \sin^2 x_0 = \sin^2 (x_0 - \alpha)$ right
south
south
you want to eliminate the case with the positive sign
hmm ok i get those parts but how does the 1-cos^2(x0) = 1-cos^2(x0-a)
oh wait
my faukt
i see
one min
hmm do we ignore the positive case due to the domains they gave?
specifically the domain of alpha
cause that would imply that sin is periodic with period alpha
so alpah is > 0 and less than pi but thats still in the first two quadrants and sin is +ve in those
yes, the period of sin is 2pi, but alpha can't possibly be 2pi
oh ok
so...
since xo - alpha is the period of that equation, and sin's period is 2pi u have to add a -ve...
becuase...
uhm
errrr
sorry im kinda slow at trig graphs and stuff
$\sin x_0 = \sin(x_0 - a)$ implies that $\alpha$ is the period
south
that's the definition of a period, so if the period of a function is T, then $f(x) = f(x - T)$
$f(x) = f(x + T) = f(x + 2T)$ and so on also
south
hmm ok so alpha is the period, which is within the domain of 0 and pi but sin's period is 2pi , i dont see whereh the negative comes from is it coz we need alpha + xo or something or
so f(x - T) means you translate the graph of f(x) right by T units
so if f(x) = f(x - T), the y-value doesn't change if you move the point (x, f(x)) by T units to the right
mhm
wait sorry but we only know this for x0, hmmm
there actually is a value of alpha that isn't 2pi
it's the reflection across x = pi/2, wait
@ashen imp Has your question been resolved?
@ashen imp Has your question been resolved?
@ashen imp Has your question been resolved?
@ashen imp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that sin(x) + cos(x) >=1 for x â [0, pi/2].

Derivatives
Ew
Ew but better
cos(x) = root(1 - sin^2(x))
sin(x) + root(1 - sin^2 (x)) = K
sin(x) goes from 0 to 1.
Let sin(x) = p.
K = p + root(1 - p^2)
p â [0, 1]
p^2 + (root(1-p^2))^2 = 1
p^2 + root(1-p^2) ^2 + 2 p root(1-p^2) = 1 + p root(1 - p^2)
(p + root(1-p^2)) = root(1 + p root(1-p^2))
p and root(1-p^2) are positive because p â [0, 1].
So root(1 + p root(1-p^2)) >= 1
(p + root(1-p^2)) >= 1
sin(x) + root(1-sin^2(x)) >= 1
sin(x) + root(cos^2(x)) >= 1
sin(x) + cos(x) >= 1
I see Philosophy driven solution
Is this correct?
If you're completing the square, then shouldn't the the coefficient of the p root term on the RHS be 2?
Tbh, for a question like this my first instinct would be to try to express the sum as a single triogonometric function (which is rather easy here)
Yup. That doesn't change anything.
Didn't I do same the same?
I suppose but I meant more in a sense where we can avoid roots and stuff, just play with the amplitude and angle
@mossy cipher Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1-2x+3x^2-4x^3+5x^4-...
I need to find the series sum and convergens
So my first thought was it looks like derivative of e^x?
try integrating the series
not the right one here
How can I integrate it?
When x is negative, this is equivalent to $\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} (i+1)x^{i}$
wai
Now you can use perhaps the root test to check for convergence
But my question is can we find the sum of this series?
power rule for integrals....
well just integrate 1 dx, -2x dx, 3x^2 dx separately
see what you get
x-x^2+x^3-x^4
again
yeah and do you see how that's a geometric series
Mayhaps you can put this in a geometric series form?
It is but terms are alternative sign
and
yeah so the common ratio will be negative
So what?
^
Just slap a (-1)^n in front
knief
No
word
if we can do this directly then why asked me to do integration
Because its clever
.
It makes you think đŁď¸ (closed form is easier to find)
What is the purpose of this integration
to find the sum bruh
x-x^2+x^3-x^4
^
I am asking this
You can easily just use the geometric series here, then differentiate your result
$\dv{x} \left(\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n - 1} x^n\right) = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n - 1} n x^{n - 1}$
knief
And how we will get sum of it which is asking 4th time
I know the sum but I don't know when it has (-1)^(n-1)
$\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} -(-x)^n$
knief
left side before the derivative
You are not understanding my problem
no youâre not understanding
Do you think i don't know the sum of x+x^2+x^3
i moved the (-1)^n and x^n into one
What one?
ratio is -x
So we can take it out of sum?
$(-1)^{n - 1}x^n = (-1)(-1)^n x^n = (-1)(-x)^n$
knief
no
You are explaining wrong algebra to me
right..
I know such things
what does this mean then
I am not stuck there
where are you stuck?
x/(1+x)
yep
take the derivative
Fine
we integrated before, so now you have to differentiate back
Yes right
yep and one more thing, radius of convergence = ?
đĽ
nice
so here it will converges only when |x|<1
sure
yay you got it!
For radius of convergence what will be an?
knief
just the coefficient on the right here
well that isnât quite the original series is it?
Yes radius is1
n=0 to infinity
(-1)^n
Okay so radius is 1 now should I have to check it over x=1
1-2+3-4-5
$\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} (-1)^n (n + 1) x^n$
knief
Good
...
.
yea let x = 1 and x = -1
I see
well
What?
it goes to infinity
itâs a joke (sort of)
Is that my goat knief? đĽđ
,w zeta(-1)
maybe
I don't think we need zeta here?
if you let x = -1 the (-1)^n and (-1)^n becomes 1
so you have the sum from n = 0 to inf of n + 1
or just the sum of the naturals
which diverges
donât worry about this lol
.close
Closed by @brittle sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
â
divergent
Which one?
we want to know if it converges or diverges
saying it "oscillates" isnât precise
could be taken to mean it alternates
which tells us nothing about convergence
it diverges by the nth term test (limit of terms is nonzero)
Closed by @brittle sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What I did was re-write this as $v_m + \sum_{i=1}^{m-1} \lambda_i(v_i -v_m)$
wai
This is obtained by setting $\lambda_m=.1-\sum_{i=1}^{m-1} \lambda_i$
wai
We this is a translate of the subspace generated by $\sum{i=1}^{m-1} \lambda_i(v_i -v_m)$
wai
.1?
why did 0.1 (one tenth) come into this?
your notation is off i think.
maybe you meant that A-v_m is generated by the vectors v_i-v_m for i from 1 to m-1?
Let me retype it
but then you confused "generated by" with "consists of"
This is a translate of the subspace spannedby $\lambda_i (v_i -v_m); 1â¤iâ¤m-1;\lambda_i \in F$
Well, that's a clunky way to express it
wai
you should have dropped the lambdas
this is like saying R^3 is generated by xi, yj and zk for x, y, z in R instead of saying it's just generated by i, j and k
my bad
yes
okay, I think I'm done
Thanks!
.close
Closed by @blazing coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
<@&268886789983436800>
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do u make this jump
distribute sqrt(u)
u can just bring out the half from du??
yes, it is still just a 1/2 multiplier
.close
Closed by @terse shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When building a high-rise building, you first need to dig a large hole to pour a foundation. A person stands 2.4 meters from the edge and sees just the far corner of the hole. How deep is the hole? The distance between the person's eyes and the ground is 1.8 meters.
I need help
it also helps to write out the 1.8 m measurement
Do you know similar triangles?
Okay, you will have to use it here to determine the depth of the hole
Yes, but you have to be careful because they could have the same size and still be called similar. You mean ânot necessarilyâ the same size
yes
Okay do you see that there are two triangles you can make? What do you notice about their angles?
90 degrees
uhh, the 1.8m distance mentioned in the problem is not what you have marked in this figure
its the (almost) height of the person
yea, the equation is right
so irs 21