#help-42
1 messages · Page 161 of 1
@kindred folio comeon youre here arent you hs
circle of the three midpoints
Of a triangle
And the perpendicular feet
And the midpoints of H to each side of the triangle
Naijie would say 'trivial'
.close
Closed by @frozen rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @frozen rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
the qn btw
have u tried asking in evan chen discord
they are quite the geo gods over there
ah
its really inactive
i think im almost done btw
if u post the problem im sure someone will help u
im almost done ty tho
all i have to 证 is MDQ similar to XHA
And were done
ya u orz i can never understand the geo problems with like more than 3 shapes lmao
Closed by @frozen rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi i have another question
for this one, i don't really understand the function
(2(n+1)(3n+2))/ n^2
how exactly should/could I be using this function to solve this problem?
any help is appreciated !
so
they give u the approximation of the integral with n subintervals
in a riemann sum
how many intervals do u want to have?
is that ado pfp
umm i dont really know if im being honest
yes
infinite subintervals, rught?
yes
k
yes
Closed by @viral badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $S$ be a set . Prove that the law of composition $ab=a$ for all $a$ and $b$ in $S$ is associative. For which sets does this law have an inverse
What a wonderful world !
so I have to show (ab)c=a(bc)
you should apply the law of composition one more time
that should do it
write
*right
just realised
cool
now when does it have an inverse
hmm
ab=a
We start by post multiplying across by b^{-1}a^{-1}
so we have 1= ab^{-1} a^{-1}. \implies 1= ab^{-1} \implies a=1
so a must be 1 for it to have an inverse?
not necessarily
the law has an inverse if ab=ba=1 where 1 would be the identity element
however by defining the law this way, right inverses are not possible when there are 2 or more distinct elements as ab=a and ba=b
ah yes
I forgot that both right inverses and left inverses must exist
Thanks
.close
Closed by @blazing coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have two questions:
- can a group consist of 3 arguments? a set and two operations so (S, *, +) for example
- if yes then can a vector space be represented as a group then with (V, +, *F) where *F is just my notation for scalar multiplying with a field F
No
a group is just a set with one operation
i see
But i mean you could say
Something like
Vector space with addition is abelian group
yes. all rings (R,+,*) are abelian groups (R,+) endowed with a multiplicative operation *
and a square isn't a rectangle?
i havent gotten to rings yet
And a group is onlky if you restrict your attention to addition
Well
but she wants to know about groups
Because this clearly isnt a group
okay what about (V, *F) using my notation for the *F
oh is it because *F isnt defined as an operation
Yes
for any ring R, it holds the axioms of a group and is therefore a group
so when we use (V,X), we always mean X is an operation acting on set V and not on any other set
really?
No
A group has one operation
Ring has two
It is a group with addition alone
But that removes part of structure
clearly
Consider the ring of real numbers under canonical addition and multiplication, (R,+,*).
- R has additive identity 0
- R is closed under addition
- R has additive associativity:
forall a,b,c in R. (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) - R has additive inverses:
forall r in R. exists -r in R. r + (-r) = 0 - R has additive commitativity:
forall a,b in R. a + b = b + a
R is therefore an abelian group under addition.
Technically, the ring R is the tuple (R,+,-,*,/,1,0)
/?
because inverses are a function on the set
Yes. It's an involution
there may be many elements of the set satisfying the identity axiom, we need to specify which we want to identify as the unit
Or -
No?
Are you crazy?
Only one element can
I think this is only true in abelian groups?
e1 = e1 + e2 = e2 + e1 = e2
^
commutativity required here
Let me lessen my "yes" earlier. Any ring does have a group embedded in it (see category theory).
I'm now too scared to comment if it is a group, or if it just has group-ness.
Like if a square is a rectangle, or if it just has rectangle-ness
Closed by @edgy leaf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Yes, you're right. I'm being crazy here. I was thinking of left-groups.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, is there a video explaining how to check derivative and integral using fx991 es plus?
that's the silver one correct
no, the black one with green buttons
a quick google search gives this
in either case, you wanna input your polynomial, use a placeholder value of x, and crosscheck by inputting that x in your derivative
same logic applies w limits in an integral
well i found a video of another calculator and its output is a table of
x fx and gx
fx being the calculator and gx being what i think the derivative is
but theres no x button on my calc
that's the ex classwiz
thats whats being used in the vid, not what i have
ya
look at the top left, shift integral button gives d/dx
and alpha right bracket gives x
that helps checking one point, but not a table
you want a table?
ya
.
go in mode i think it should be 9
mode table
top right
i don't remember the plus i use the classwiz as well
its mode 7 for me
yeah okay
if u want 2 functions tgt you will have to go in setup (shift mode)
but that doesnt compare my derivative to the calc's
look for table
i don't get what you mean
let me clarify something
@unreal isle
lets say you have 3x³ - 2x²
do you wish to check your derivative in general i.e. 9x² - 4x
or do you want a table where you input an x and it immediately gives you the dy/dx value
do you wish to check your derivative in general i.e. 9x² - 4x
ik how to do that already
so e.g. u wanna confirm ur derivative of let's say 3x³ - 6x² + 3x
youd do shift integral button, 3 alpha right bracket cubed .... and so on
right arrow to x = blank, then input a value of x of your choice
then use the same value of x in your worked out derivative. if the values match, congrats you're correct
same holds for integrals, so long as you use a valid value of x you can check by just inputting placeholder limits
only one value?
to confirm, yes
so for instance you manually worked out your derivative expression to be 9x² - 12x + 3
and preferably not 0\1\-1?
depends on whether the expressions gets undefined there
and then youd cross check the calc value w the value u get by manual substitution
a neat trick, you can do shift rcl (bottom left of the function keys) to STORE a value. follow these steps
press 2. then equals to. then oress shift rcl and then right bracket. you should see smth like stored to x. now if you do X and press equals, you'll see it's 2.
so if your expression is long you can store a value of x and write in terms of x
after pressing right bracket i see ans (right arrow)X
perfect now try doing alpha right bracket (i.e. X) and press equals
i think itll be easier to write it down
that way you just have to change your stored value of x and not have to retype the whole calculation for lets say if u want the value at 3 now
oh
up to you, but yeah the 991 series cant give expressions, it can give you a value to crosscheck, to answer your primary qs
yep so u type it out in terms of x once, then u can change your x, up arrow to go to the expression again and equate again to gey the new value of the expressions at the new x
if the domain of the function is spreaded to 2 zones, would you check one value for each one?
x>0, -5<x<-1
also no to check if your derivative is correct you have to just use one value of x, granted the same value in both places, provided that d/dx is defined at that x
so if your d/dx worked out to have a fraction like 1/x you wouldn't use 0
the domain doesnt matter if you're just checking if you're right
cos the polynomial is the same
"so long as it is defined at that x"
if you're just checking if your derivative is correct for a specific polynomial
you just have to take that polynomial
find the derivative yourself
use the calc to find the value of the derivative at a placeholder x
not only polynomials
use that same placeholder in your derivative
mainly not polynomial
any expression in x
and crosscheck
Closed by @crimson swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My question is how to prove the following function is quasi-concave. f(x1,x2) = x1 * x2 in R^2++. My linear algebra is shaky and i'm having trouble trying to go from the definition of quasi-concavity to proving this specific function is quasi-concave for the positive quadrant of R^2. If possible I would appreciate it if someone walked me through the standard steps to show this
@shrewd belfry Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> any lads here know about convex optimization? 🥲
what's the definition of a quasi-concave function?
for quasi-concave its this but for -f
the image is for quasi-convex
if -f is quasi-convex its quasiconcave
sorry last part its missing, the set has to be convex too
so for ur problem, u have $\text{img}f=(0,\infty)$, meaning u want to prove that each of the sublevel sets
$S_\alpha = {x \in (0,\infty)^2 : f(x)\ge \alpha }$ are convex
Bob the Builder
yep
for $\alpha > 0$
Bob the Builder
but then $f(x_1,x_2) \ge \alpha$ is the same as saying $x_1x_2 \ge \alpha$
Bob the Builder
can u picture the set of $(x_1,x_2)$ in $(0,\infty)^2$ that satisfy this?
Bob the Builder
i think so
do u know how to then prove that its convex?
hmm so using the definition of convexity directly on that set?
yeah u could but that might be a bit messy algebraically
in this case i think it might be easier to realize the set is bounded below by the function $x_2 = \alpha/x_1$ and prove that the function is convex
Bob the Builder
do u know abt any other results abt convex functions besides just the definition?
i mean not at the top of my head theres so many lol
ok well ofc u want to use one to prove that $\alpha/x$ is convex on $(0,\infty)$ quickly
Bob the Builder
yea
ig u can assume that or prove it (what i had in mind is ||by showing the 2nd derivative is negative||)
but thats pretty much it
ahh alright i see, i guess assuming it works, its pretty standard i think.
Thanks for the help!
.close
Closed by @shrewd belfry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
What have you tried so far ?
You can just try with successive values of q i.e 1,2,3 ..etc
Until you get 1 as a remainder
You can't solve 4 unless you solve 3
@royal ingot
Ok cool , is the other question clear ?
Think of a way to simplify that term
dont forget that $4^{14} \equiv 1 \pmod{29}$
<rajel />
Np, btw where are you from
Your math seems familiar
Tunisia ?
yeah I also thought you were from there lol
I forgot also algeria and tunisia study like us
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @royal ingot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
dont rlly understand where to start here. my oriuginal thought was to use the idea of that if abs(an) converges, then an converges, proving that answer choice A was right but i guess that was wrong :(
well you know the radius of convergence is at least what, and at most what?
based on the given info
ohhh i did nott think at all about it being ceneterd at x=4
so radius of convergence at x=3
now what does divergence at x=9 tell you
that its not convergent at x=-1
no, you can't be sure of that
ohhh yea
the radius of convergence could be exactly 5
and then it might converge or diverge at the endpoints
at x=-1
yep
bc i cant test forr it
you can't say for sure about x=-1
ohh ok
in tthe radius of convergence so its convergent there
what if the radius of convergence is exactly 3
then it could converge at 7 but diverge at 1
in the guaranteed radius of 1 to 7 so it must be convergent there
yep good
you know the radius is at least 3, and the distance from 2 to 4 is only 2 so it's inside the interval of convergence for sure
so what's the right answer?
B
yep correct
@ancient cipher Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have no idea how to do this someone pls help 🙏🏻
,tex .maclaurin
riemann
Use the first one with -x^2/3 instead of x
Right, but what would x and x^2 become?
Would it just be -x^2/3 for rhe second term and -x^4/3 for the third?
maclaurin/exp
So what about the summation notation?
What about it
How is it written for this function
Doesn't change if you do the substitution correctly
(-1) x^(2/3 • k) /k! ?
No
Sorry if the answer is evidently wrong i just started learning this an hour ago 😭
-x^2/3 = -(x^2)/3
This first expression is the same thing as the exponent in your question
Should review pemdas while you're at it
the sigma notation is just a way to succintly represent the maclaurin series. they're functionally identical. so yes, if you use the sigma notation, you should sub -(x^2)/3 into it
So each term gets multipled by the (x^2)/3 in the series and the sigma notation has the same substituted in for x with no other changes?
each term does not get "multiplied" by -(x^2)/3, it's just that whenever there's an x in the series, it gets replaced by -(x^2)/3. So the first term, for instance, remains unchanged (because it's 1), the second term becomes [-(x^2)/3]/1!, the third term becomes [-(x^2)/3]^2/2!, and so on. not precisely "multiplied" by, rather "substituted in"
yes for the sigma notation. I mean you can just think of it as expanding the sigma; to demonstrate why the sigma notation = maclaurin series.
disregarding the sub-in for now, sigma just means "add this expression, with increasing values of the index, k". If you expand sum(0 to inf) x^k/k!, you get: x^0/0! + x^1/1! + x^2/2! and so on this is more of an aside to your question, not directly relevant
which is identical to the maclaurin series
Oh okay, that makes so much more sense now, thanks!
In this term, [-(x^2)/3]^2/2!, would it be acceptable to write it as [-(x^4)/9]/2!?
wouldn't it become positive?
Yes, i forgot to make it positive when i copy pasted the expression
but yeah its fine otherwise
And to approximate f(0.3) id just plug 0.3 into x for the first 4 terms right
any reason 4 specifically?
@molten lichen Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I did not understand the step where they wrote C-{0} is open
@deft arrow Has your question been resolved?
{0}, a set composed of a finite number of points (one point), is closed
the complement of a closed set is always open
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Problem: ABCD trapezoid. BC and AD are the bases. AD = 25, BC = 15, AB = 6, CD = 8. Find the radius of circle which passes through A, B and touches CD.
How to solve this? I was thinking about circle theorems but it didn't work out. Or maybe I couldn't )
Any hints for solving this?
My drawing
<@&286206848099549185>
@odd belfry Has your question been resolved?
@odd belfry Has your question been resolved?
are there any more info given?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If $A = B \cup C$ is an open set and $B \cap \overline C = \overline B \cap C = \varnothing$, then $B$ and $C$ are open sets
Open as Open Sets in Topology
Halex
uhh i am an idiot but
shouldnt u mention the metric space
so whether its euclidean or arbitary
The Real Numbers, I am the idiot not you
I havent even taken a formal course in real analysis, fym
but anyhow
so this an euclidean space
uhhh open set so ur given that two sets together make up an open set, and the intersection of their complements is a null set
right
$\overline B$ stands for closure of $B$
Halex
oh shit
nevermind
hmm
yeah okay i can see why this should be true
but i cant help u write a proof
because i cant do proof writing at all
If I get the idea I think it's okay
well this is a very poor way of thinking about it
but imagine it in R^2 (for visualization purposes)
clearly B and C have no common elements (or common limit points)
now the the A's boundary (so closure of A - A) should therefore be the union of the boundaries of B and C
since this boundary is not in A
therefore it could not have been in B or C either (as B,C \subset A)
and since they dont share elements we can map each limit point in the boundary of A to a limit point in the boundary of B and C
I think I can formalize this without alluding to the boundaries
ofc please do, i have 0 background with this except the definitions, i could be just a mad man rambling
basically, suppose you're trying to locate an open neighborhood around x in B
the claim is that you can simply use the one you locate in A (i.e. B U C)
suppose for the sake of argument that you cannot do this; this means that you have a neighborhood around x that contains elements from not only B, but also C
surely there's some way to prove that x is in the closure of C now
btw what i said, is it correct?
it's basically saying that you have two blobs, and they're separated yeah?
yeah 😂
thats the photo i made in R^2
@quiet island Has your question been resolved?
What
agreed, I think that's wrong. if B is not open, there is some x in B for which every neighborhood of x contains points outside of B, not just some
I think you use T4 axiom and separability here
it's already given that B and C are disjoint, so there ought to be two disjoint open sets, U containing B and V containing C
A itself is open, so each x of B begets a basis element K containing x that's a subset of A
now we know that K does not intersect C (why?), so it must be the case that K lies entirely in B, and hence B is open
...don't think I needed to bother with U and V lol
@quiet island Has your question been resolved?
@quiet island Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where should I start learning more math on my own after I just finished AP Calculus BC?
is there anything you particularly liked?
Everything except polar tbh
polar coordinates?
yeah
I'm not familiar with ap so you'll have to help me out here
It covers all of Calc 1 and a lot of Calc 2
in a completely different direction, did you do much about vectors?
I know how to do vectors yeah
I think it you want to pursue pure maths, it'll be useful to investigate vectors in a lot more general sense
not just pure maths, maths in general
I'm gonna go into engineering probably
That being said, I don't remember what the book is called but some like "linear algebra done right"
ah ok
do you care about the maths being used in engineering?
In that case, Linear Algebra is probably a good place to start, it kinda melds your brain into thinking about mathematical objects in a more general sense
if you liked calculus, looking at different sorts of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) is a good place to start, they come up a lot when you're doing physicsy stuff
Do I need Calculus 3 before ODEs?
Good question, depends where you're from
If I remember correctly Calc (insert number here) doesn't have a set syllabus
some places do ODEs in Calc 3 though
I don't know like multivariable calculus
multivariate calculus is not needed for ODEs
it helps in some places but absolutely not necessary
in fact, if you look through the left hand side in the channels list
scroll to the early university section
and type all the names of the channels into google or Wikipedia and see what you like
they're all pretty much accessible from where you are now
Haha nice okay
Thanks for the help
oh, groups, rings and fields in advanced are also a possibility
in which case I'd look at groups or fields first
Before like linear algebra?
you can look at them side by side
the main object in linear algebra (linalg) is called a vector space, and they're objects "vectors" connected to a number system "fields"
so they come hand in hand
one also has groups which can be visualised on a vector space
open your own channel
how
then keep it there
Okay thanks
delete this please
Do you have any video or book recommendations?
for?
Linear algebra and fields
"Linear Algebra done right"
I don't know about group theory
I learnt that at uni and through a fatass textbook i don't particularly recommend called Fraleigh
Abstract Algebra
(I'm probably slightly biased)
lol okay
So you don't recommend that one?
Linear Algebra done right is the name of a good Linalg book
I personal didn't like Fraleigh's Abstract Algebra, it was very heavy
Okay cool I found it
Do you think I can just learn through like videos?
depends on your person, I like watching videos and doing problems so if you can find a resource I don't see why not
but you'll want someone else's opinion on that question
I'm no teacher
for linear algebra i highly recommend "essence of linear algebra" by 3blue1brown on youtube
it's a high-level overview of the topic with nice animations
lol he's a classic youtuber in the math scene
in general introductory linear algebra courses tends to be split into two types, a more "computational" approach and a more "proof-based" approach, so what videos and textbooks are recommended depend on which type of course you're going for
sometimes people do a proof-based course as a second course after the computational one
I think I'd probably prefer computational
for now
in terms of computational linear algebra lectures, gilbert strang is a famous professor in that regard, and there are several different semesters of recorded lectures of his on youtube
if you are interested in following them, there is also associated coursework (e.g. homework and exams) on mit opencourseware, and he has also wrote a textbook
the textbook i used for computational linear algebra was "elementary linear algebra" by anton
also in terms of videos, khan academy has a few but they seem a bit sparse and it also doesn't have exercises
Khan academy is overrated ngl
hehe agreed
it's recommended a lot mostly because it's more comprehensive than any of the competitors
although I did use it to learn about Laplace transforms
but it kind of fizzles out once you get past courses offered in high school
I'm technically still in high school
presumably you're wanting to learn about maths beyond highschool
Yeah
well once you are done with ap calculus you're sort of moving beyond what high school can offer
unless you want to make a move sideways and learn ap-level stats (which is actually not a bad idea itself)
I've heard it isn't too hard
yes it is. i have a stats exam tomorrow and I'm not liking it
(that's me getting biased again)
AP?
I'm at uni
high school-level stats is pretty easy in terms of calculations (since most of the time your calculator does them for you!), the main difficulty is conceptual
but also statistics shows up everywhere so it's worth knowing to some extent
(unfortunately)
I know some concepts of statistics just not really how to calculate it
Like standard deviation or smth
Is it wrong of me to have an undergrad math role because AP Calc is technically college credit
no it's fine
in ap stats, usually you learn the formula for something, calculate it by hand once to get a feel for it, then press the "calculate this quantity button" on your calculator every time after
The AP test was today and we aren't doing anything more in class
because the main thing is being able to know when to apply a concept and how to interpret it
Okay cool
I know Bayesian probability as well
.close
Closed by @prime locust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how come i got this wrong?
What was your equation?
if the wind is 90, then with the wind the plane flies at 240, and against it flies at 60, which is 4 times slower
which doesn't match the given numbers
i started with 300(150+x) = 200(150-x)
then 75,000+300x=30,000-200x
then 500x=-45,000
not quite
Remember distance = rate * time
Since the plane flew 300 miles with wind and 200 miles against wind in the same amount of time, you want to solve
300/(150 + x) = 200/(150 - x)
oh so i accidentally multiplied instead of dividing
yes
Closed by @lethal sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, I am pretty confused about dependent variables and independent variables. Can anyone explain me briefly about it.
This math and science video tutorial shows you how to identify the dependent and independent variables so you which data to plot on the x axis and on the y-axis. It contains plenty of examples and practice problems such as word problems. It shows you if the dependent variable and independent variable is x or y and it discusses the relationship...
I understood this video.
But I got another question that why is y is a dependent variable and x is an independent variable? Why can't x be dependent and y be independent?
Why is it so fixed
?
if you were to plot time on the y axis and distance on the x axis, and the variable changing is time, then x becomes the dependent variable in that case. it's just a matter of convention since mostly y = f(x)
But how is x dependent here.
time is the factor that you are changing, x is the one that depends on it then
Time changes according to distance.
Yeah sure
you should look at it from the perspective that okay take the equation s=d/t
it depends on what your experiment was doing.
Case A: you take a ball and you track the distance at a range of different times.
here, the variable YOU'RE changing is time, and the variable that changes as a consequence is disntance
Case B: you take a ball and you track the time it takes for it to cover a certain range of distances. here, the variable YOU'RE changing is distance, and the result that changes is time.
the dependent and independent variables change.
now at the end of the day, you could put any one of the variables on any access, however "most" functions conventionally are given as y in terms of x.
So, the dependent and independent variables r changeable according to our convenience but in general people conceder x as independent and y as dependent. Right?
yep, conventionally
also the dependent and independent variables are not "changeable" per se
that could be misleading
you cant just choose which is which, you have to consider what the data shows
Closed by @royal dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@fringe copper Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, over here why isn’t the answer B) ? I thought if f’’(x)= + (concave) then that’s where f’(x) is increasing
[the answer is D)]
@ me when someone answers thanks !
can you plot f'(x)
no
May God reward you if help me
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
@bleak thistle Has your question been resolved?
@bleak thistle Has your question been resolved?
@bleak thistle Has your question been resolved?
It's not necessary for f" to be positive for the function to be increasing
f' > 0 is the necessary condition
You can check the above by drawing slopes to the graph and checking where the slopes are positive
No I mean like since f(x) is concave which means f’’(x)= + and since f’’(x) is positive (f’’(x) is the derivative of f’(x)) so f’(x) is increasing at the interval ]-♾️,2]
Is my reasoning wrong?
It’s asking for f’ so
Oh no my bad then
You're right
The answer is D) doe so 😭
Hmm i also think it should be B
so is the answer key wrong
if it asked for f(x) increasing then the answer would be D)
Right?
@bleak thistle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Did you also have other doubts @bleak thistle
Wdym
Oh are you just verifying if the answer key they've given is wrong by asking other helpers
yes
Nvm then continue

show the answer key to the problem
It’s quesyion 42
It doesn’t show the answer
Just the letter
yea then they're wrong
typo in question or answer key
how though? They’re right to exclude 2 because 2 would be a critical value in f’(x) idk
Yeah probably
Well I found something on Math Stack Exchange, was not actually aware that ] ___ [ denotes an open interval... Then it would be a typo.
You learn something new everyday eh.
Yea then it should be B
Closed by @bleak thistle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
f(1) + f(2) + f(3) = 3
so the only possibility is 0,1,2
f(1) can be 3 choices
f(2) can be 2 choices and f(3) can be 1 choice
so wont it be 3x2 = 6
that's the number of ways to permute 0,1,2 yes
then you have to multiply this by the number of ways to permute the others
yep looks right
thanks man
yw
Closed by @spice venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the straight line with the equation y - 2x = 7 is the perpendicular bisector of the line AB, where A is the point with coordinates (j,7), and B is the point with coordinates (6,k)
find the coordinates of the midpoint of the line AB
Do you know how to find the slope of a perpendicular line?
the gradient?
would i need to rearrange into y = mx + c
y = 2x + 7
the gradient is 2
@exotic turtle Has your question been resolved?
@exotic turtle Has your question been resolved?
Hi! To find the point both lines cross, we will have to find values for j and k… first, we know the slope of the line created by A and B has the inverse slope of the original line, since they are perpendicular… the inverse slope of 2 is -1/2.. we can use the rise over run formula to find j and k: -1/2 = (k-7)/(6-j) … then solving for j we get: j = 2k - 8 … choose some value of k, i chose 1, and get the associated j value, i got -6… then write a formula for the line created by A and B using point-slope form… then set both equations equal to each other and solve for x, and then plug in that x to find the corresponding y value… that’ll be your midpoint! Let me know if this makes sense… I sent some pictures of my work as well:
thank you very much
of course! I hope it was helpful in understanding😸
@exotic turtle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @exotic turtle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I tried to recreate it as well as I could:
What's the measure of segment AE?
mBD = 30m
Angle BAC = 20 degrees
Angle DEC = 44,15 degrees
let me see i wonder if this is even solvable
is that decimal degrees or is it really 45°15' btw
not that it's a big difference but figured i'd ask
also hm i dont think there's enough info actually
Wdym
does it mean like 44.15
44 degrees and 15 hundredths of a degree?
or is it 44 degrees and 15 minutes?
anyway whatever it is
well if AB and DE are perpendicular to BD, doesnt that mean AE is parallel to BD and it should be a square???
and who said angles BAE or AED are right?
OP didn't even draw them as such
@surreal ferry the decimal thing is not nearly as big of an issue
the bigger issue is there's still not enough info
oh yeah okay i see where i got wrong it's just that AE isnt straight theoretically
if the triangle was isosceles it would probably define it
are you 110% sure you didn't miss any other data
it would if AB and DE were the same length and i thing we could try finding there length to then know the height of A and B
are you saying its not a line
just that it's not parallel to BD
Yeah that
it has a slope
do you know anything about triangle CEA
Nope
There is nothing fully defining this problem so there is no answer
did chatgpt manage to solve it
it just guessed lmao
Yeah
if we assume but i dont like assuming
the guess isnt even right lmao
Yeahh..
if we knew c was the midpoint it would be easy to find AB and DE, and then to find AE
Do you have the actual problem
It was an exam problem so no but thats exactly what the question was
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
just sayin'
yes it was very wrong lol
i would be curious to see the answer once you get back your exam
was this problem on your geometry exam
Yep
so you don't have its statement written in full
Wdym
like you don't have it on paper where you could reread it
No I don't
and you could have forgotten some length or angle or other info
you can bound the answer between around 30m-88m
I reread it so many times I think I got every info right but idk
Could be that
can you tell me why?? just curious
you can tell by the image the slope of AE if it was a line was negative
and assuming the image isnt totally wrong you can use it to bound it
by saying that the angle between BAE is less than 90 ??
yea
Closed by @surreal ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.


}
put the ) after the whole expression
yep
write your answer
$S_n=\frac{a_1}{1-r}$
yoboiqimmah
1/1+0.75
i prefer keeping it as a fraction
Should be 4/7?
yep
ok
Is there way to do the ones with the form of ar^k?
find a1 at first by plugging the initial value for example
5(2/3)^k-1 the first term would be 5(2/3)^0=5
and r is just the difference being 2/3
Closed by @meager sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Wording is wrong should be ratio
My mistake
It’s all good
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m not sure how to visualize this, the first de Morgan’s law
Like “the intersection of the difference” is uh
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m not sure how to visualize this, the first de Morgan’s law
Like “the intersection of the difference” is uh confusing
what you drew does not match what you wrote
Yeah I know
I’m asking about the correct diagram
oh
Yeah
well, start with A
then remove the parts included in (B U C)
if you aren't sure whats included in (B U C), use the definiton
its everything thats in either B, or in C
does that help?
Would this be correct?
I’m mainly trying to get the diagrams correct for myself… it’s not attached to a problem
Issues with the definition
yea, that looks good to me
no worries
Great
hmm i think you might be missing something here
what happens if $a \in A$ but $a$ isnt in $B$ or $C$?
jan Niku
Then it’s this
well, kind of
can i try to describe it in a way that might be confusing 
lets say i have two pockets
what happens if i take everything out my pockets thats not in my left pocket
and combine it with everything in my pockets thats not in my right pocket
i am famously bad at coming up with examples and metaphors so dont sweat it if its not helpful 
Then you have nothing?
well, you have everything
at least, everything that was in your pockets to begin with
Mmmm
since stuff in your right pocket is excluded in the second, but not the first
and visa versa
its kind of like your problem
you start with everything in A, except whats in B
and combine it with everything in A, except whats in C
well maybe this metaphor isnt helpful
or at least as clear as i thought
i honestly think its maybe better when youre just starting
to start with the venn diagram and check each region
Yeah probably
sometimes its helpful to draw multiple
like when its complicated like in this problem
do each difference separately
then do the union on a third
A union B means you shade in two circles
It means everything in A, or in B
Ty
alright
Lol
you recognize this
Very fun
its $A - ( B \cap C )$
jan Niku
jan Niku
but i guess you are doing demorgan
Yeah I’m just trying to get a better understanding of these cause
They were just meaningless signs before
So it’s just the same thing lol?
these are, yea
Hilarious
sorry im comin off a 11 hour shift so im not so sharp
Closed by @timid acorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm trying to find the intersection between 2 lines in 3d, given
$L_1$ contains $Q_1(-3, -1, 5)$ and $Q_2(-9, -7, 2)$
$L_2$ contains $P_1(16, 17, 12)$ and has direction vector $d = [3, 2, -1]^T$
i can get the direction of $L_1$ and get both lines to parametric form,
$\begin{bmatrix} -3 & -6s \ -1 & -6s \ 5 & -3s \end{bmatrix}$ and $\begin{bmatrix} 16 & 3t \ 17 & 2t \ 12 & -t \end{bmatrix}$,
and rearrange it to a single matrix,
$\begin{bmatrix} -6s & -3t & 19 \ -6s & -2t & 18 \ -3s & t & 7 \end{bmatrix}$,
but i have no idea what to do with it - the examples in my textbook are extremely sparse and skip over most steps. i assume i need to reduce it in some form, but what to do with it then, to find the intersection point?
amber
i feel awkard about pinging for help but i really dont understand, <@&286206848099549185>
if anybody can help i'd appreciate a ping
as i cannot keep this chat focused
@atomic slate
yes
So here, I’m not sure about the conversion from those 2 matrices to the simpler 3 x 3
But I have another method that might help
ok
So 1st we find the direction vector of L1
And then we represent the line in symmetric form
And here we can take any point either Q1 or Q2 as x1 y1 z1
And then we replace a b c with their direction
And then from symmetric form
where x y and z are what?
x y z are variables
ok
As you need those variables to represent the line
So now you just switch them to parametric form as shown below in the image
And then you represent both the lines you have in that parametric form
so $\frac{x+3}{-6} = \frac{y+1}{-6} = \frac{z-5}{-3}$
amber
Yep precisely
i already have parametric form for both lines
$\begin{bmatrix} -3 & -6s \ -1 & -6s \ 5 & -3s \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 16 & 3t \ 17 & 2t \ 12 & -t \end{bmatrix}$
amber
And y from both sides
And z from both sides
So you basically get 3 equations in 2 variables
Solve and 2 of them as you need 2 equations to solve 2 variables
this is the parametric form i got before coming here, i dont understand what im supposed to do with them and xyz

