#help-42
1 messages · Page 160 of 1
yes
ok lets go back to log(a-x)
log(a - x) = f(g(x))
you already identified g(x) = a - x
so we have log(a-x) = f(a-x)
so what does f(x) = ?
Log x
1/x
-1
-1/(a-x)
This s
yes, do you understand why now
Yes
ok if d/dx log(a-x) = -1/(a - x) then what is int 1/(a-x) dx
-loh(a-x)
Okok
$\int \frac{1}{x} \dd x = \log |x| + C$
Acman
$\int \frac{1}{-x} \dd x = \log |x| + C$
vamprem
no
Where is the negative sign
it should be in front of log
It should -logx
yes
Why showing wrong
i dont understand what youre asking
This
yes i see that picture
i dont understand what youre problem is
the picture is not correct
Where is -
you didnt write it ....
yes
.close
Closed by @steady dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
gm people
i was typing
but got busy with soemthing else
so theres this question https://math.stackexchange.com/q/442654/1126252 thats in my part B workbook
its easy
but uhh i terribly misread this (somehow) as the following:
The integral part of the least positive value of a for which the maximum value of $4x^2 - 4ax + a^2 - 2a + 2=0$ on $\left[ 0,2 \right]$ is $3$ is
rak³en
There's already help avaliable at the link.
Is there a factoid for "Don't use polite greeting, just state the question already"?
yes, but i just like to use a polite greeting
anyhow so yeah this is the main question
what i have tried is complete bs
i have 0 idea what to do here
<@&286206848099549185>
ok wait so
uhhh
what's that =0 doing there
@pure breach are you sure you meant to put the =0 there
or did you mean something like this
Let $f(a,x) = 4x^2 - 4ax + a^2 - 2a + 2$ and let $$A = { a > 0 : \max_{x \in [0,2]} f(a,x) = 3}.$$ Find $\floor{\min(A)}$.
Ann
@pure breach is this what you meant
by accident that happened
and yes
roots are useless
completing the square seems like the way to go
youll get (2x-a)^2 + g(a)
you need to compare f(a,0), f(a,2) and f(a,a/2) (the latter only assuming a/2 falls in [0,2])
thats for minimum no?
but if it doesnt? we need that case too do we not
then you dont
and only look at f(a,0) and f(a,2)
whichever is bigger
actually
you're right, x=a/2 will only ever give a local min
oh and there cant be a middle value
we're in fact guaranteed to not want that
so just f(a,0) and f(a,2) is what we need here
no its a global min since its the vertex
and we dont have to look at anything between 0 and 2 because quadratic is either increasing on decreasing if the vertex isnt there
and if it is there then we know 0 and 2 cant be the roots
so again its simply decreasing after 0 til vertex and increasing after 2 (actually vertex)
yes
.
this should be your takeaway
f(a,0) = a^2 - 2a + 2
f(a,2) = 16 - 8a + a^2 - 2a + 2 = a^2 - 10a + 18
hmm i think f(a,0) > f(a,2) almost always?
well not almost always
solving that gives me
8a>16
a>2
and if its below it gives me a<2
wait no
you want max{f(a,0), f(a,2)} = 3
i just set f(a,0)=3 and f(a,2)=3 separately
then solve for a
and whichever gives me the max
sure
Closed by @pure breach
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im struggling with point D
what is the height at D?
hm is it zero?
yes
if you go a bit to the left it's +1 and if you go a bit to the right it's -1
so it cannot be a local maximum or minimum
right right
question now is whether it's a saddle point
can it be a saddle point?
you tell me :p
well Fx and Fy needs to be zero
that's also true but idk if that's going to be particularly helpful
or actually yeah it's helpful
what is Fy at D?
how do we check fx fy values from a graph is where im confused at
hint: note the countour line on which D lies
itss on y line
yes but how did you know that the value at D is zero?
the y line has zeros on it lol
oh its zero aswell
indeed
now let's check Fx
think about what happens if you go a bit to the right and a bit to the left of D
x line is in the 0 aswell but D isnt on the x line
it would change values
yes, in what way?
left it would get bigger right smaller
yes
Closed by @tropic moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help, I will let you know what I've done so far
I think they want you to find the generating function for the recurrence and then plug in n=20
Like how
It's for high school math btw (Jee Advanced)
I don't know recurrence functions yet
you can convert the above recurrence to a linear recurrence relation by setting b(n)=[a(n)]^2
Oh ok mb
better learn them then
I have jee advanced in 8 days and it wouldn't be in my best interest to learn much right now...
There's a shortcut for solving linear recurrences with constant coeffecients
If you want I could teach you
characteristic polynomial first then ye
I did originally see the AI solution yea
But for say I don't do this and instead my method (which seems valid enough for me) my answer doesn't match
It should ideally match, wait I'll check
for that 4 in gp series formula it ^19 which I took in the next step but wrote ^18 before
recursive functions grow at a rate similar to the golden ratio. find the coefficient of growth
yoooooo high school math man chill
What's the answer, 21?
try the characteristic equation? mayhaps more intuitive
Also you're not allowed calculators in JEE advanced, then how'll calculate the sqaure root of that large number?
I didn't I just ignored 7/2^19 and 1/2^20 cuz binomial expansion
and they gave fractional part anyway
Hmm fair
there’s a nice component where by each term appears to be +-10 from a perfect growth of 4x from term to term
where if you just manually calculate first like 6-7 terms by hand you identify it
regardless you’ll realize each term is simply 2 less than a power of 2
this expansion takes the form of 2^(n+3) - 2 i think
the giveaway here is that the answer in a non calc exam is asking for a 2 base log (implying 2^x growth normally) and it’s a greatest integer function which means it’s probably modeled similarly to that growth
this means the answer is that the 20th term of this sequence will be 2 less than the 23rd term of the sequence, which means my intuition would guess the answer is 22
Shouldn't there be a +14 at the end
And also shouldn't the alternating sum start from 4^20?
I did the same calculation as in this method and ended up with a(20)^2 = 2^42+2
@knotty jay Has your question been resolved?
yea true
yea cuz I messed up signs I kept -14
aight mathematically I'll check it all
ty
Closed by @knotty jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
4/b
@halcyon crown Has your question been resolved?
Do you mind translating it into English? I think that would best option for you get help.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello guys, Iam solving this diff equation. Iam trying to find the particular solution
The problem is, that Iam not sure whether I should write *e^((4/3)x) or 4e^((4/3)*x) after the bracket
@umbral onyx Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone xeplain how do i find the gradient for this
its using the m= tan theta rule
what can you say about the blue angles
@crystal breach Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello!! So I have this assignment right? It's about practical maximum and minimum problem for derivatives. And I'm COMPLETELY stuck. Any help would be greatly appreciated
(My main problem is that just don't really know how to start with solving B)
How do you calculate the volume
by applying the formula for volume of a prism/cuboid
2x times x times y
And that equals?
2x^2y
Ah yeah
Now calculate the surface area
yeah you substitute the y and then you just start moving stuff till it becomes the Area that matched the equation
thanks alot
.close
Closed by @wet badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
did GPT generate this problem for you 
@noble narwhal Has your question been resolved?
no
it just rephrased it lol
<@&286206848099549185>
Problem is jibberish
even q1?
well... hm
solve in Q[X] the equation: (X² + 1)P + (X² - X + 1) Q = X - 1
like
we need to find all possible solutions
P and Q
show the book you got the question from
screenshot the original page with the exercise
ok
i mean at least Q1 is sensible as-is in that the solution set isn't empty, but based on how Q1 plays out Q2 is a weird followup
no you can ignore Q2
i mean there's no screenshot it's just a written question
then screenshot that
but it's written in my notebook and its exacltly like how i wrote it here
qustion 2 is a mistake its not supposed to be here
i think the question makes sense
like
i feel like it's possible
but i dont know how to find the answer
bezout couple for A and B and then multiply by X-1?
you know how to do euclid algorithm for polynomials?
@noble narwhal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for part b of this question after plugging into the equation i found 18xz^t^2-3xzt^2
but the scheme says 9xz^2t^2 im confused on how it came to this
should it not give 18 instead of 9 or is the second partial differentation not included for some reason?
<@&286206848099549185>
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
<@&286206848099549185>
@lethal heart Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@lethal heart Has your question been resolved?
@lethal heart Has your question been resolved?
3 x 3 = 9 the pdv wrt y is 0
@lethal heart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Rajvir
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If CP = x , then what x value would give us the maximum area? I tried but i think i need derivative, but you shouldn't use derivative here
you want to maximise the area of NOPM?
or ABC?
I’m pretty sure they want to maximise area of NOPM. Area of ABC is the same (90*70/2)
first, we need to find the height of the rectangle right?
and i thought if we can use Thales' theorem, the one that Thales of Miletus used to calculate the height of the pyramids
like x/60 = OC/92.2 = OP/70 ?
or like (x/2)/30 = AN/76.2 = MN/70 ?
and then maybe putting everything equals everything something like that
the very fast solution is "fold the triangle onto the rectangle to show the rectangle is at most half the area of the triangle"
hm
ok
the slower solution is "make an expression for the area of the rectangle in terms of x"
and the find what value of x maximises it
and it's here where there's a problem since you can't use derivative in this problem
ik it's quadraticc but can't seem to know how would i know the max without derivative, by completing the square and looking for the coordinates of the vertex?
yeah
ok
thanks
i guess that's what i needed to be clarified
i'm gonna work on it from here
there would be no need to complete the square btw
as in, not fully to get the vertex form
just -b/2a is needed
Closed by @idle jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
Suppose ( X_i ) are independent ( N(\mu, \sigma^2) ) random variables for ( i = 1, 2, \dotsc, n ).
Will
[
\frac{ \bar{X} - \mu }{ S / \sqrt{n} }
]
always be ( t_{n-1} ) distributed?
Beluga
Sample standard deviation
ah hm. nevermind then
If it was $\sigma$ then it would be standard normally distributed and not just normally distributed😉
Beluga
@warm stone Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@warm stone Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This problem is impossible, right? D must not include 1 or 3, but if this is the case, then you cannot add two rectangular regions together to get set R.
@empty dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A minimal spanning tree with no injective edge function is still unique if the duplicate wheighted edges with unique vertices either both close cycles (all can be added) or neither closes cycles (all can ne added)
Is my assumption correct?
@dapper bramble Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dapper bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
here
the negative sign
was my attempt at correcting for the absolute value of cosx when it is negative
so i replaced cosx with -cosx inside, i just moved out the -1 outside the integral
when i asked wolfram alpha it said the volume should be 2pi^2
that makes me think i've gone wrong in many places
because i dont understand how i can rid of the -4pi in my result without changing the 2pi^2 as well
i might have found what i did wrong
verifying on paper rn
nvm still stuck
I'm sorry whats the original problem here
this integral near the bottom?
yes sorry, it's to rotate cos(x) around the y-axis, im using the shellmethod
0<=x<=pi
i think i found what went wrong, at least changing it gives me the right answer
alright
why is there a c 
idk im bad at integrals and idk when it appears tbh
isnt this a definite integral
definite integrals dont get a C
yes ok and when i calculated it i put it as 1
now the -1 and +1 cancel eachother
and i get the wolframalpha answer of 2pi^2
this might be a dumb question
but why dont definite integrals get a c?
i get that they are called definite
so in that sense they should be sure of themselves
no flimsy c
+C shows up when for antiderivatives
when theres multiply answers
"family of solutions"
definite integrals where they exist are just a value
not a function
well, i guess im being pretty general here
but thats the loose idea
i think that's good for me
and for initial value problems
that's when the c is important
that's what i'm solving for
in an initial value problem
I feel like those would usually show up in a differential equation?
oh yeah
those usually have indefinite integrals, youre looking for antiderivatives
so for sure you'll pick up a C or so somewhere
it can happen in different ways
yea, if you wind up with two LI solutions
then any linear combination of them is also a solution
what does LI mean?
i guess im introducing too much theory
like for y'' = -y
we really find two solutions
so each one gets a constant
we are maybe getting off track 
i only watched org. chem tutor video on it a long time ago, i remember there were 3 different cases
and i think it was for second order differential equations
hmm maybe youre thinking of harmonic oscillator
were definitely off track now haha
yea, we can manufacture this being necessary
we're on-track in the sense that i need to learn this stuff too, off-track to the original question, i basically started a new track
idk if that is allowed
idk how much you wanna just talk about random stuff tho
yea i dont think it really matters
for me this isn't random it is on my exam
you get how we get r?
like, we assume a form of the solution
normally you have something like $y'' + by' +ay = 0$
jan Niku
no tbh i dont get how we get r, when i tried this on my first go at this exam (which i failed) i just tried to memorise
and you assume that $y=e^{rx}$
jan Niku
because i didnt start studying early
so, we want to find r. If we can find r, then we have the solution, its here
you plug it into the diff eq here
we get $e^{rx} \qty( r^2 + ar + b) = 0$
jan Niku
its nice that e^rx is never 0; we can just divide both sides by e^(rx) and we get something really familiar
$r^2 + ar + b =0$ like you have here
jan Niku
kind of
is it okay if i ask you to slow down?
lol its all good
im with you here
i can assume that y equals that
i dont really know why we are assuming that
well, lets guess this form
and see if we can find solutions
if we can, then nice
if not, then okay, try something else
we plugged it in and got this, i dont see how we would get this
jan Niku
how about $y'' = \dv[2] x \qty( e^{rx})$
jan Niku
i think i see how we get it now, but im bad at this so
let me try this one still
nah its good to go through step by step
i think it is r^2e^(rx)
yea, thats right
so $y' = re^{rx}$ and $y'' = r^2 e^{rx}$
jan Niku
you can substitute them into $y'' +ay' + by = 0$
sure
and confirm we get what yo usaid there
jan Niku
so good to $e^{rx} \qty( r^2 + ar +b) = 0$?
jan Niku
and okay to divide by e^(rx)?
mm and yes but i get that since we have that base
it can never be 0
it will always be some positive number
yea if r is imaginary we have some concerns
rotates or something
but, lets hope its not
ok!
so now were just solving $r^2 + ar + b = 0$
jan Niku
oh yeah lol just a quadratic
yea
which we still need to be sure of this
so we gotta make sure that a^2 - 4b > 0
if r^2 has a coefficient
we can just divide it away
we can change the letters
i was worried to use c 
i didnt want to introduce more issues
lol!

let me take photo
we can speak in general too
okay
so, no imaginary solutions
damn i dont understand that
like i dont get why we want this
because we'd like real solutions for r
for you, you see that and go, we dont get imaginary solutions
for me, i dont see why we would get either real or imaginary
how do you determine that
also very nice cat picture
on your profile
jan Niku
looking at this we have a worry about the square root
right if it becomes negative
normal anxiety is if we are taking a square root of a negative number
i get we get solutons that aren't purely real
so, we just want to make sure we arent taking the square root of something negative
if thats something we can make sure of, then theres nothing else that can make it imaginary
so we just enforce p^2-4q > 0
we actually dont get to choose 
oh
oh wait that's what you meant
by this?
like, this is the problem
im just trying to be clear which solutions were talking about
you are manufacturing this "solution-case"
these kind of methods where you assume a form of the solution and go blundering forward
usually involve a few loops of having to introduce additional restrictions
and then you end up with cases
im getting sleepy lol
lol np ty for putting up with me
i dont usually talk like this i dont think
anyways
what were we doing 
in general i mean
sure, yea
i was just curious about 2nd order differential equations
ok so
i did all the steps we went through
and
the quadratic
at the end
and got two real solutions for r
is that what we're saying happened in this case?
yes
yea
ok
the double root is a bit of a concern
say theres one root r1
we might want to write $y = c_1 e^{r_1 x} + c_2 e^{r_1 x}$
jan Niku
but thats just $y = (c_1 + c_2) e^{r_1 x}$
jan Niku
we've only found one solution
that doesnt seem good
we just make up another one
$y = c_1 e^{r_1 x} + c_2 x e^{r_1 x}$
jan Niku
oh yeah i remember one of my tutors
tryign to remember why that x was there
why the hell is it there, we made it up
we needed one more
its a way of manufacturing another solution
because we had two unknowns?
but the solution works
so it wasnt a random manufacturing
this is differential equations course?
if you finish it you'll be able to convince yourself
you will probably see techniques that allow you to do things like this if you are talking about second order differential equations
but its a long story
unfortunately this course is over
oh
so no more lectures for it, at least not until after summer
i need to do re-exam
if i fail in june i will go in august
if nothing else i can ask my math tutors about that technique, if you are feeling tired/want to do something else
dont be afraid too
but it is probably a severe detour
i wouldnt midn
mind
im actually curious about this stuff
unlike from when i first took the course
like just understanding
we found one solution, right
why that x would appear
$y_1 = c_1 e^{r_1 x}$
if we found the same solution twice
jan Niku
but $y_2 = c_2 e^{r_1 x}$ is not another solution
jan Niku
c1 is arbitrary right
some constant
so $y_1 + y_2 = (c_1 + c_2) e^{r_1 x}$ is really just $y_1$ again
jan Niku
its some arbitrary constant times e^r1 x
like c_1 + c_2 = c_arbitrary
yea
yes im okay with that, im just trying to remember
uhh
where we got the c_1 and c_2
we went over
we just went a little fast im gonna scroll up
theres not much to remember
say you have some y that solves the diff eq
try showing that cy solves it, too
well that'd be (cy)'' + p(cy)' + q(cy)
but derivatives are linear, the constant can come out
c (y)'' + pc(y)' + qc(y)
do you see what happens?
sorry im trying to follow
sorry im prolly going too fast again
the important part is that, if y is a solution to some differential equation
then so is cy
some constant multiple of y
c is just scaling y
yea
and its not crazy to show or some wild theorem
you can just plug cy directly in
factor out the c from each term
and thats it
so, thats why c
if y is a solution, so is cy, for any c
there are mutliple reasons why im having a hard time following, but i think the biggest one is just, we had different c's
for other situations
or wait
arbitrary c
was additions of non-arbitrary cs?
or
idk
we write c_1 and c_2 and such but its really not that important, theyre just arbitrary
ok they are all arbitrary
yea and if you get more comfort with this stuff you'll be able to feel out when theyre necessary
wanna keep going?
you can see why this doesnt work out
and after that
like okay wait so
we only got one r
and r is found
by that stage
and then, with these problems, often an initial value
thing
so i plug in x and y
sometimes
but like you say
c_1 and c_2
i cant solve for them
that way
like two unknowns
still
and one equation?
you can solve for one constant given one piece of information
but i dont get how another x would help tbh
well, we dont have this weird solution combining problem
am i wrong in saying that
we cant solve for the two unknown c's
because we have one equation
and two unknowns
is that a bad way to understand
why it is a problem
its maybe more correct to not think of the constants as unsolved
they're there because were trying to include all solutions
if were given more information about the situation, then we can pick out individual solutions
that is how im thinking
like
if we are given a point
an x and a y
then we cant solve for the c's
right?
you can solve for one
oh, here, well
we havent found all the solutions in what you posted just now
theres really only one constant
so that we can "solve" with one piece of information
damn i dont really get that part about there only really being one constant, you did explain earlier that c just scales y, but in all these problems there is a c_1 and c_2 right?
its because we can rewrite it as $(c_1+c_2) e^{r_1 x}$
jan Niku
c_1 + c_2 is just an arbitrary constant, a single one
but then what is the problem
with the double root
if we can solve for that big boy constant anyway?
theory tells us that our equation should have multiple solutions
and it does have multiple, it is just the same one twice
one twice is just one
this actually is not that interesting and is just algebra
once you have as many pieces of info as you have constants, you just get a system of equations out
this doesnt work because of the combining thing weve been doing, like here
you cant write one solution as two
because it will always end up just being equal to the one solution by itself
im not saying this to talk down on myself
but i swear i have a lacking sense of logic
let me paint you a picture and i wont be too long
i see i get a double root, and i think, ok, we only have one solution here
my mind doesnt wander off and think
"i should try to manufacture another"
i accept the one i got
and im happy with it
yeah thats it
i dont understand the need for this 2nd solution
you said
theory
theory tells us we should have 2
were using the work second pretty loosely
its probably more accurate to say second half
you can get it in a few ways
or, you can just remember to multiply by x
its not too hard to derive it
i kinda wanna know where that x comes from
you'd just say $y_1 = c_1 e^{r_1 x}$
jan Niku
and let's assume that $y_2 = u_1 (x) y_1$
jan Niku
same thing as normal, we plug this into the ODE
do you want to do it?
theres some product rule type stuff
im very slow if there is the product rule
or we can just look at what happens
i would prefer to look at it
if that's ok
like in practice i will probably just remember to multiply by x
but i wanna see where it came from
we sub it into the diff eq
what we get is $u''_1y_1 + 2u'_1y_1' + u_1 y''_1 + p(u_1'y_1 + u_1 y_1') + q(u_1 y_1)$
jan Niku
man algebra 
ok now i feel bad i didnt know it would be this gruesome
the trick is to spot the original ode in here
i can accept after doing the product rule correctly
since we know $y_1 '' + py_1 ' + qy_1 = 0$
jan Niku
maybe stuff cancel
and yeah we get something that looks kinda like that
we end up with $2u_1 ' y_1' + u_1''y_1 + pu_1' y_1=0$
and that's what y_2 is equal to?
jan Niku
this is easier than it looks
we know y1
its just a first order equation
we gettt
$u_1 ' \qty( 2 y_1 ' + py_1) + u_1 '' y_1 = 0$
jan Niku
i feel like im in the weeds but im basically choosing the weeds over just accepting a random x teleporting into an equation for, what is to me, no good reason
$\frac{ u_1' (2 y'_1 + py_1) }{ -y_1 } = u_1 ''$
jan Niku
this is seperable
so $u_1 ' = \int \frac{ u_1' (2 y'_1 + py_1) }{ -y_1 } \dd x$
jan Niku
should the RHS not say u''?
wait wait wait!!
haha
plz answer that
;~;
this!
oh wait maybe i did screw this up 
what happened to u''
hold on
well here lets do it like this
let u_1 ' = v
$\frac{ v (2 y'_1 + py_1) }{ -y_1 } = v'$
jan Niku
$\frac{ v (2 y'_1 + py_1) }{ -y_1 } = v'$
so v' = u''
oh god ok
$\frac{ v (2 y'_1 + py_1) }{ -y_1 } = \dv{v}{x}$
ok yes that's seperable still
jan Niku
$\int \frac{ 2y_1 ' + py_1 }{ -y_1 } \dd x = \int \frac{ \dd v }{ v}$
jan Niku
classic separable business
how do we get dy now
the left hand integral?
you can try to work it out, if you want
it just ends up being $\int -(2r_1+p)$
jan Niku
okay o_o
jan Niku
it looks like that, huh
i like the way it looks you made a really nice integrating factor and i think you did a very good job of it
man i have a horrible feeling something went wrong 
look im super tired
i can help maybe at another time
i think im not going to be super helpful right now
sorry to have wasted some of your time
i dont feel it was wasted
Closed by @fickle flume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
i need hint on how to do this
I will translate
P is a point on 9 point circle of triangle ABC, connect AP and draw the perpendicular line to AP at P which meets BC extended at Q. Let X be on PQ such that XA is perpendicular to AQ. If H is the orthocenter of ABC, and D and M are the midpoints of BC and AQ respectively provs that's HX perpendicular to DM.
btw the diagram has extra points labelled and im gonna use them
is this an oly problem or are the chinese kids too cracked 🤔
So firstly DG is diameter of nine point circle as AH is height and thus AH perpendicular to BC and thus AK perpendicular to BC, since GKD is 90 then DG is diameter
i am a chinese kid and this is an oly problem
ah i see
"原题是基本的几何题" 😭 一点也不基本
theres a lot to use
but i didnt want diagram to be too cluttered
i need help changing XH perpendicular DM into smth nicer
progress so far, i think 最后结论 might be useful
15m
<@&286206848099549185>
我等
Another thing I got was APCQ concyclic with M center
i have some stuff to use w.r.t the 9 pt circle
But the center seems not important in this question
am stuck
倒角 time
I also got that triangle XAP is similar to GDP since (in angles) XAP = AQP (similar) = PKA (AQKP conyclic) = PDG (PGKD concyclic)
And XPA = DPG = 90
essentially this
this isnt my first diagram btw the first one was smth i attempted for 1h and then gave up
(it was messy af)
anyone?
@frozen rampart Has your question been resolved?
@frozen rampart Has your question been resolved?
@frozen rampart Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frozen rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Closed by @frozen rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Okay
dude ngl i have no clue how to prove it
sad


anyone?