#help-42

1 messages · Page 157 of 1

dreamy wyvern
#

and they do

alpha = 82.69 - 60
= 22.69

#

therefore the airplane is flying at a ground velocity of about 496 km/h on a bearing of about 023 degrees

#

BUT i don’t get the part with the alpha

#

this is my attempt

#

idk why i can’t send photos of my textbook tho

#

can someone explain

calm coralBOT
#

@dreamy wyvern Has your question been resolved?

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

blazing wadi
#

Is f(n) from Naturals to Reals such that f(n) = 1/n a continuous function ?

glass heart
#

what do you think

velvet osprey
#

what topology does N come with in this case?

#

without that we cannot hope to discuss the continuity of any function with domain N

calm coralBOT
blazing wadi
# velvet osprey !xy

well nothing I was just confused my book stated that functions can be continuous at isolated points of the domain so I got curious and thought of this

rigid kettle
#

You are doing topology?

blazing wadi
rigid kettle
#

hmm

#

well you can just think for now about the continuity statement

#

I believe the "forall" statement within it becomes vacuous

blazing wadi
warm warren
#

i mean if u pick the discrete topology on N

#

any function will be continuous

blazing wadi
glass heart
#

I am assuming this is just at the start of analysis and words like "topology" are new to you? I assume you have probably only seen the eps delta definition of continuous?

velvet osprey
glass heart
#

or maybe the limit definition?

blazing wadi
glass heart
#

why dont you write out the definitions you have seen

blazing wadi
glass heart
#

yes

blazing wadi
warm warren
#

whats the V thing

blazing wadi
glass heart
#

the first definition is the clearest here imo

#

we have A=N

#

lets say c=1

#

what happens if we choose delta = 0.5

blazing wadi
#

umm hello ?

glass heart
#

wdym no f(x)

#

which x in A satisfy |x-c| < delta ?

blazing wadi
blazing wadi
glass heart
#

ok so only x=1 satisfies the condition

#

does x=1 also satisfy |f(x)-f(c)| < eps ?

blazing wadi
#

yes

glass heart
#

so that means that (i) is satisfied

blazing wadi
#

ok

#

But didn't the others say that it isn't continuous

glass heart
#

no

blazing wadi
#

also still what does continuity on isolated points of domain mean

glass heart
#

the point c=1 is isolated

blazing wadi
glass heart
#

there are no "nearby" points

#

they were asking for more information

blazing wadi
#

Oo

glass heart
#

on what "nearby" means. you could put another topology on N and then c=1 might not be isolated

#

anyway

glass heart
#

the point here was that by choosing delta=1/2, the only x that satisfied |x-c| < delta was x=c itself

#

that wont be the case if c is not isolated

glass heart
blazing wadi
#

ic

blazing wadi
glass heart
#

well if the function isnt defined at that point then the point isnt in the domain

blazing wadi
#

Anyways Thanks alot @glass heart catthumbsup catlove

#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @blazing wadi

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

glass heart
#

its not like that is a rigorous definition

#

the limit definition also still works

blazing wadi
#

Hm

glass heart
#

but limits at isolated points are weird

#

thats why I chose (i)

blazing wadi
glass heart
#

well yes

blazing wadi
#

soo how does the def hold

glass heart
#

so you are kinda talking about nothing

blazing wadi
glass heart
#

well ok, works was maybe bad wording

#

.reopen

calm coralBOT
#

blazing wadi
#

So what's the right wording

glass heart
#

like your image said, the limit def is just for limit points

#

for isolated points you just say that the limit is not defined, so in that sense its not unequal to f(c)

#

or something like that

#

the point is, isolated points are weird

blazing wadi
glass heart
#

cause we just found out that any function f:N->R is continuous

#

in what world is that not weird

#

I would call it weird

rigid kettle
#

truly, what it really is, is 'point with no neighbourhood to speak of is not a discontinuity"

glass heart
#

the whole point of continuity in the end is to say something how the function behaves at nearby points

blazing wadi
glass heart
#

if there are no nearby points then what are you talking about

rigid kettle
#

You only have point being not continuous if you can find a neighbourhood around it which contradicts the continuity statement.
sortof. i think

#

Its just the nature of the definition

blazing wadi
rigid kettle
#

yes its consistent

#

its not consistent with the natural language perhaps

#

but its far more convenient to define it this way

#

and the same goes for vacuous statements in general

glass heart
#

in the end isolated points dont matter

#

its much more of a funny quirk

rigid kettle
#

(look up what "vacuous" means)

glass heart
#

no function that people care about has isolated points in its domain

#

in the context of analysis

#

so why put extra effort into rewording the definition so that it excludes those points

rigid kettle
#

It also still fits in with "not lifting pen off paper" definition of continuity if you consider that you teleport whenever you have discontinuities in the domain

#

So f : R - {0} -> R with f(x) = 1/x is continuous

#

At 0, you teleport from minus to plus infinity, casually speaking.

#

(small and negative x, large and negative y) going to (small and positive x, large and positive y)

rigid kettle
#

but this is just kinda very casual cus i think i can think of some silly examples where this might break down

#

typical analysis

rigid kettle
glass heart
#

I hope not

rigid kettle
#

eg. f(x) = rand(x)

#

for some fixed random generator

#

yeah crazy shit

blazing wadi
#

euclidean topology?
I'm out

rigid kettle
#

euclidean topology just means the usual thing on R

glass heart
#

"normal way we measure distance"

rigid kettle
#

which is your usual definition

rigid kettle
# blazing wadi

So take exactly this definition and you will find f : Q -> R with f(x) = denominator when x is in simplest form
And f is not continuous

blazing wadi
rigid kettle
#

maybe

#

idk, was just thinking of example that jumps around

blazing wadi
#

It's continuous on irrationals and discontinuous on all rationals

rigid kettle
#

i dont think ive written that down then

naive meadow
blazing wadi
rigid kettle
#

ah 0 if x irrational

#

yeah

blazing wadi
#

Yup

#

anyways good time talking to you all catthumbsup
have to go now

#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @blazing wadi

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

gentle kelp
calm coralBOT
gentle kelp
unkempt drift
#

it's easier if we focus on one part at a time

gentle kelp
#

b c an d yes

#

for b i tried doing it and got an answer -1 + root(2)

unkempt drift
#

cool let me check that using Desmos

#

unfortunately that's not correct

#

your work that you crossed out is on the right track

unkempt drift
gentle kelp
#

did i do some small error somewhere

unkempt drift
gentle kelp
#

lemme check quickly

unkempt drift
gentle kelp
#

idk what i did i still get x+y = 0

unkempt drift
#

yeah -2kax-2ay=2ax+2kay indeed gives that

#

that's why

#

wait

gentle kelp
#

i think the equations should be correct

unkempt drift
#

okay they are correct

#

and yeah okay now I get x + y = 0

unkempt drift
#

and k can't be negative so k = -1 + sqrt(2) only

gentle kelp
#

so b should be correct

#

how do we do c

gentle kelp
unkempt drift
#

and then as k increases, the 1st circle moves to the right

#

the 2nd circle moves downwards

#

since the radius of both circles is fixed

#

that means as k increases, the circles move farther and farther apart and don't intersect after the critical value k = -1 + sqrt(2)

gentle kelp
#

so what do we write as set of values

unkempt drift
potent lotusBOT
unkempt drift
#

I'm counting tangent as not intersecting

gentle kelp
#

hmmm

#

now how do we do d

unkempt drift
#

because it follows that the area is continuously decreasing as k increases

gentle kelp
#

so at max k we will have max overlapping area

unkempt drift
#

for all k > -1 + sqrt(2)

gentle kelp
#

at 0 k we will have most overlapping area?

unkempt drift
gentle kelp
#

how to find area tho

#

im confused

unkempt drift
#

draw a sketch first if you haven't already

gentle kelp
#

i drew one

unkempt drift
#

a sketch specifically for k = 0 though

gentle kelp
#

yea i did that

#

so we can subtract area of triangle from area of sector

#

and that x2 should be the answer

unkempt drift
gentle kelp
#

but i dont understand how we will

#

get the area of sector

#

oh wait its in terms of a

#

ahhhh

unkempt drift
#

yeah

#

in fact you can use area similarity, so you can let a = 1 first

#

then multiply that answer by a^2

gentle kelp
#

i dont have that in my syllabus tho

unkempt drift
#

really?

#

I know this is a particularly clever way of doing it, but

gentle kelp
#

i got maths boards tmrw lol

unkempt drift
#

you don't have something like this?

gentle kelp
#

no

unkempt drift
gentle kelp
#

ty man

unkempt drift
#

the important part is the centres, (0, a) and (-a, 0)

#

and the radius being a

#

so changing a just is an enlargement/dilation centred at the origin

gentle kelp
#

is the answer

#

a^2/2(pi-root(3))

calm coralBOT
#

@gentle kelp Has your question been resolved?

unkempt drift
#

the triangle is right-angled

#

right-angled isosceles, in fact

gentle kelp
#

oh i mistekenly used the equilateral formula

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tough star
calm coralBOT
tough star
#

is there a fast way to check if a rational function like this has even/odd symmetry?

#

like for a function like this

#

the exponents alternate between both even and odd, so it doesn't

#

is there a similar trick we can use with rationals?

mortal orbit
tough star
#

i see

#

nice

#

ty

calm coralBOT
#

@tough star Has your question been resolved?

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

spiral knoll
#

Hello, I need help with this

calm coralBOT
spiral knoll
#

I'm so lost

naive meadow
spiral knoll
#

so 4(x+4)/x+4 + 12/x+4

naive meadow
#

There's one more immediate simplification here

spiral knoll
#

x+4?

naive meadow
#

Well we have $\frac{4(x+4)}{x+4}+\frac{12}{x+4}$

potent lotusBOT
#

Buzzing Hornet

naive meadow
#

What's the really obvious way to simplify this expression

spiral knoll
#

cross canceling?

naive meadow
#

Not quite

#

How do you simplify $\frac{a}{b}+\frac{c}{b}$

potent lotusBOT
#

Buzzing Hornet

spiral knoll
#

add it

naive meadow
#

Yeah exactly

#

Which gets you...?

spiral knoll
#

so 12+4(X+4)/x+4

naive meadow
spiral knoll
#

then cancel x+4

#

?

#

or no

naive meadow
#

No, we can't cancel the the x+4 since our expression is $\frac{12+4(x+4)}{x+4}$

potent lotusBOT
#

Buzzing Hornet

naive meadow
#

That's all we're going to do with the numerator for now

#

What about the denominator?

spiral knoll
#

27/x+4 and 9(x+4)/x+4

naive meadow
#

So how can we simplify that?

spiral knoll
#

and combine

#

so 27 +9 (x+4) / x+4

naive meadow
#

So now we have $\frac{\frac{12+4(x+4)}{x+4}}{\frac{27+9(x+4)}{x+4}}$

potent lotusBOT
#

Buzzing Hornet

naive meadow
#

What's it look like the obvious thing to do here is?

spiral knoll
#

ya

#

cancel?

naive meadow
#

Exactly

#

Which gets us?

spiral knoll
#

16/36

#

4/9

naive meadow
spiral knoll
#

oh

naive meadow
# spiral knoll 16/36

We have something that looks like $\frac{\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)}{\left(\frac{c}{b}\right)}$

#

What's the simplification we should make here?

potent lotusBOT
#

Buzzing Hornet

spiral knoll
#

I honestly forget I remember learning it but

naive meadow
#

Well, do you remember how to divide by a fraction?

spiral knoll
#

no

#

thats so bad that idk how to do that

naive meadow
#

Ok so I will remind you then that $\frac{a}{\left(\frac{b}{c}\right)}=a\cdot\frac{c}{b}$

potent lotusBOT
#

Buzzing Hornet

spiral knoll
#

oh like the keep change flip thing

#

I remember that now from when we were multiplying and dividing

naive meadow
#

Great

naive meadow
naive meadow
spiral knoll
#

ya

naive meadow
#

How can we use it

spiral knoll
#

so do 12+4(x+4)/x+4 times x+4/27+9(x+4)

naive meadow
#

Right

#

And how can we simplify that?

spiral knoll
#

cross cancel

naive meadow
#

Yes

#

Which gets us?

spiral knoll
#

12+4/27+9

naive meadow
#

Where did the x+4s multiplied by the 4 and 9 go

spiral knoll
#

dont you just cancel them?

naive meadow
#

I will point out that $\frac{a+bc}{c}$ is not necessarily equal to $\frac{a+b}{c}$

potent lotusBOT
#

Buzzing Hornet

spiral knoll
#

oh

naive meadow
#

Or I guess that's not quite the error you've made

#

Regardless, if we're adding things in the numerator and denominator, you can't just cancel them

#

We can only cancel things if we have $\frac{ab}{ac}$

potent lotusBOT
#

Buzzing Hornet

spiral knoll
#

oh

#

ok

#

So is it 12+4(x+4)/27+9(x+4)

naive meadow
spiral knoll
naive meadow
spiral knoll
#

12 +4x +16

naive meadow
#

Uhhh

#

I was more thinking something along the lines of $ca+cb=c(a+b)$

potent lotusBOT
#

Buzzing Hornet

spiral knoll
#

then gcf

#

4(x+7)/9(x+7)

naive meadow
spiral knoll
#

so 4/9

naive meadow
#

Right

spiral knoll
#

okk thanks sorry for taking so long

#

very helpful

#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @spiral knoll

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vital chasm
calm coralBOT
vital chasm
#

i need help on part b

#

i mean its 1

#

but how do i formally prove it

drifting seal
#

is it supposed to be floor(sqrt(x))

vital chasm
#

yes

drifting seal
vital chasm
#

yes

drifting seal
#

ok so have you shown it’s an upper bound

vital chasm
#

yes i can show that

#

wait

#

yes sure

#

its a upper bound but idk how to show its the supremum

drifting seal
#

what properties of the floor function do you know

vital chasm
#

all

#

its real analysis ofc i know most

#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vital chasm

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

drifting seal
#

🤔

#

if you know all of them then what’s the confusion

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rapid beacon
calm coralBOT
rapid beacon
#

I want help verifying this proof

#

oh one mistake, please ignore the (N+k)/(N+k+1)

#

and assume its all just less than |a_(n+k)|

#

<@&286206848099549185> jesse

#

right now I think its wrong but im not sure how wrong... like theres just one mistake to fix

calm coralBOT
#

@rapid beacon Has your question been resolved?

calm coralBOT
#

@rapid beacon Has your question been resolved?

rapid beacon
#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @rapid beacon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hearty tusk
#

lowkey vague question though how do i convert integral to sum or sum to integral? ive never understood how to do it

sleek basin
#

like a taylor series?

drifting seal
#

$\int_a^b f(x) \dd{x} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k = 1}^{n} f\left(a + \frac{b-a}{n}k\right) \cdot \frac{b-a}{n}$

potent lotusBOT
sleek basin
#

oh yeah there's that

hearty tusk
sleek basin
#

so you're just confused on what's going on here?

#

i can help if so

hearty tusk
#

like when the sum is lowkey complicated i js cant convert it to integral

#

i have an ex

velvet osprey
drifting seal
#

send it

hearty tusk
#

this is like one of them

calm coralBOT
#

@hearty tusk Has your question been resolved?

drifting seal
#

you can see clearly that b-a = pi/4 and match

#

but they have the shift of pi/6

#

the pi/4 k/n is precisely the x term

#

wherever you see the delta k that’s your x

#

then you’d think a = pi/6 here but we know b-a = pi/4 so it can’t be

#

which means a = 0 works though

#

and the pi/6 is just an annoying shift to throw you off

#

then the 4/pi comes from the fact that our 1/n in the sum is missing the pi/4

#

most of these questions are just about process of elimination tbh

hearty tusk
#

i lowkey get it its js matching with the standard equation right

drifting seal
#

there are multiple equivalent representations

hearty tusk
#

gotta remember that thing

#

thanks 🙂

drifting seal
hearty tusk
#

yea

drifting seal
#

it comes straight from the riemann sum

#

remember how you do finite approximations

#

you add increments from the left endpoint and evaluate there

hearty tusk
#

left endpoints?

drifting seal
#

like in the interval we’re integrating

hearty tusk
#

why left though

drifting seal
#

Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing—and saving your progress—now: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/ap-calculus-ab/ab-integration-new/ab-6-3/v/rewriting-definite-integral-as-limit-of-riemann-sum

Given a definite integral expression, we can write the corresponding limit of a Riemann sum with infinite rectangles.

P...

▶ Play video
#

watch this

hearty tusk
#

kk imma review it

#

thanks!

#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hearty tusk

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

granite dust
#

is my reasoning right?

calm coralBOT
glass heart
#

no

#

bases dont contain all lin independent subsets

#

take for example S1={(1,0),(0,1)} in R^2 and B={(1,0),(1,1)}

granite dust
#

oh

calm coralBOT
#

@granite dust Has your question been resolved?

granite dust
#

is this sufficient?

quick talon
#

Concise, clear and very true

granite dust
#

ty

#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @granite dust

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

viscid cobalt
calm coralBOT
viscid cobalt
#

I forgot the steps

#

To solving this

#

Help

velvet osprey
#

step 1 is to subtract 2 from both sides

#

then make the lhs into a single fraction

viscid cobalt
#

No

#

I can't subtract

#

2 from both sides

#

It's not how we do it

#

In class

velvet osprey
#

deviating from in class methods is forbidden?

viscid cobalt
#

In this case yes

velvet osprey
#

what a stupid restriction...

viscid cobalt
#

There's a simpler method

#

That I forgot

velvet osprey
#

this is the simple method.

#

but if we are not allowed to use it then i guess you have to break it down into two cases: one where x-3>0 and the other where x-3<0

#

and in each case multiply both sides by x-3 but mind the inequality symbol

dull wagon
#

you could multiply both sides by (x-3)^2 and use wavy curve

velvet osprey
#

or that

#

OP does not remember which method is the one and only that's allowed in his class

#

we cannot really help with that

#

@viscid cobalt you have now been offered 3 different starting points of which you have rejected 1

viscid cobalt
#

Thanks

#

Ig

#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @viscid cobalt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

calm coralBOT
eternal shard
#

looks okay, maybe elaborate 4) what exactly you demand

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fringe hamlet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

worn hedge
#

What happened to the parts I highlighted

#

When they differentiated

calm coralBOT
worn hedge
#

Nvm

#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @worn hedge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @woven ice

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

nimble harbor
#

I have interesting integral problems that I can't solve at all 😭 . Plz help

eternal shard
#

post

nimble harbor
#

one sec

#

Define ${f_n (x) = x + \frac{x^2}{2} + ... + \frac{x^n}{n}, x \in [0,1]}$. Solve for
[\int_0^{\frac{1}{2}} \frac{(1+f_{n-1}(x))^{n+1}}{(1 + f_{n}(x))^n} \dd x]

potent lotusBOT
nimble harbor
#

one person suggested that it is the absolute version of ln(1-x) expansion

sharp narwhal
#

i think you can simplify f_n(x)

nimble harbor
#

i find it interesting that ${\frac{\dd}{\dd x} (x + \frac{x^2}{2} + ... + \frac{x^n}{n}) = 1 + x + x^2 + ... + x^{n-1}}$

potent lotusBOT
sharp narwhal
#

and the rhs is geometric series

#

then integrate both sides

nimble harbor
#

?

sharp narwhal
#

$$ f'_n(x) = \frac{x^n - 1}{x - 1} $$

potent lotusBOT
#

mumford

sharp narwhal
#

what is absolute version?

nimble harbor
#

oh wait

#

😭

sharp narwhal
#

ah alr

nimble harbor
#

still

#

what do i do with this

#

ln(1-x) only holds if it is till infty, no?

sharp narwhal
#

yes

nimble harbor
#

but the question is to n

#

🥹

nimble harbor
sweet stag
#

whats the question?

nimble harbor
sweet stag
#

so we need to evaluate the integral?

nimble harbor
#

ye

sweet stag
#

okii

nimble harbor
#

so..

#

any idea

#

on what do i do next

#

😭

#

@sharp narwhal

sharp narwhal
#

not sure

#

could try u = 1/2-x

#

or do long division

#

after all it's just polynomial/polynomial

#

could also test different values of n and find a pattern

nimble harbor
#

ok

#

i cant find

#

😭

#

@eternal shard , any idea?

eternal shard
#

i took some notes but i dont think i found something

nimble harbor
#

damn

#

thanks for helping tho, everyone

#

👍

#

i give up

#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @nimble harbor

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jaunty monolith
calm coralBOT
nimble harbor
#

question is

#

?

jaunty monolith
#

like a(x-h)2+k

nimble harbor
#

ok

#

do u know how to complete teh square

jaunty monolith
#

i forgot

nimble harbor
#

so u add another number that makes it a square

#

in this case, we compare it to (x+2)^2

jaunty monolith
#

so like (x+2)(x+2)?

nimble harbor
#

I think u should review completing the square 😭

calm coralBOT
#

@jaunty monolith Has your question been resolved?

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

plucky walrus
#

??

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

noble narwhal
calm coralBOT
eternal shard
young olive
# noble narwhal
  • Split the square into 4 sides
  • Parametrize each side
  • compute the integral for each (annoying but doable)
noble narwhal
#

which one is the first side

noble narwhal
noble narwhal
#

??£

#

which one is it?

young olive
noble narwhal
#

ok thank you

young olive
noble narwhal
noble narwhal
young olive
noble narwhal
#

ok

young olive
#

just know all integrals will combine to give -2πi

noble narwhal
#

we've only talked about index

#

winding number

young olive
noble narwhal
#

oh ok, so i rewrite as 1 - 1/z and then what

#

i dont get the next step

#

@young olive

young olive
#

The integral of "1" part is simply 0

#

The -1/z part is the spicy bit

#

Its residue at z=0 is just the coefficient (-1)
Winding number around 0 is 1 (since we loop once)

#

integral = 2πi × (residue) × (winding number)

#
  • residue -1
  • winding number 1
#

use this formula to work out the final answer!

#

that's literally it
the residue is just the coefficient when your function looks like (something)/z at the special point
the rest is just applying what you know about winding numbers!

noble narwhal
#

oh ok thank youuu

#

👍

#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @noble narwhal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

delicate quest
calm coralBOT
plucky walrus
#

Use the identity sin(x+y) = sin(x) cosine(y) + cosine(x) sin(y)

#

And cos(x - y) = sin(x) sin(y) + cos(x) cos(y)

ancient grotto
#

!nosols

calm coralBOT
#

As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.

#

@delicate quest Has your question been resolved?

delicate quest
#

Am confused about the 2nd last step

#

Where I divided through by cosx

#

It's like dividing one side of an equation by 2 which completely changes it right

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

viral isle
#

Am I doing those correct?

calm coralBOT
viral isle
#

<@&286206848099549185>

rigid shell
#

you should wait a little longer before asking helpers

#

in 5 and 6 you put local maxima and minima in disjoint points of the function

viral isle
#

At 0 and 6 for 5 and 7 for 6?

rigid shell
#

it is not a mistake, but for example the point in 5. at x=1 is a local minima as all points of the function sourrounding it are greater

calm coralBOT
#

@viral isle Has your question been resolved?

viral isle
#

So we just leave it alone?

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

blissful field
#

I just started antiderivatives and got slapped with "integral of (ax+b)^n = 1/a * ( (ax+b)^(n+1) ) / (n+1) )

blissful field
#

so i kinda get how they like

#

assumed that r = ax+b

#

then integrated r^n

#

but where did the 1/a come from

tawdry flame
#

It’d be useful to write the integral with the dx at the end

#

Because as you integrate r^n you need to replace dx by dr, a function of r

#

That you get by differentiating r wrt x

blissful field
#

mhm yeah

tawdry flame
#

What is dr/dx?

blissful field
#

a?

tawdry flame
#

Yes

#

dr/dx=a means dx=dr/a

#

So the integral becomes

#

(1/a)(r^n) dr

#

1/a is a constant so you can separate that and integrate r^n as usual

#

Then substitute r=ax+b

#

If that makes sense

blissful field
#

werent we taught that we shouldnt consider dx/dy or anything like that as a ratio

#

as something divided by something

tawdry flame
#

I suppose you could since in many cases it behaves like a fraction

#

Or ratio if you like

blissful field
#

yeah fraction

#

okay hmm

tawdry flame
#

It is not a fraction but it behaves like one

blissful field
#

alright

blissful field
tawdry flame
#

$\int{(ax+b)^n dx}=\int{r^n (\frac{1}{a}) dr}$

potent lotusBOT
#

pianist

blissful field
#

yeah makes sense

#

theres another rule

#

but i didnt really try to figure it out by myself yet

#

but its the

tawdry flame
#

Yes?

blissful field
#

idk its weird but it says the integral of f(x)^(n) * f'(x) dx is like- integral of f(x)^n

#

which is f(x)^(n+1) divided by (n+1)

tawdry flame
#

Yes, and the integral you provided earlier is an example

blissful field
#

isnt that kinda hard to see

tawdry flame
#

$\int{f(x)^{n}f’(x)dx}$

potent lotusBOT
#

pianist

tawdry flame
#

Make the substitution $r=f(x)$

potent lotusBOT
#

pianist

tawdry flame
#

Then tell me if you can, what the integral becomes (with no x’s but only r’s)

blissful field
#

gimmie a sec, my pen disappeared

tawdry flame
#

(And dr)

blissful field
#

OOOH it turns into integral of r * (r with a dash ontop of it) * dx which is dr/f'(x) which is (r with a dash ontop of it) so they cancel out! so we're left with integral of r^n dr

#

the latex-less of me is

#

annoying

#

ik

tawdry flame
#

Dw

#

I suppose you do a lot of latex since you’re an undergraduate

#

But thats okay

blissful field
#

wait no what does that mean 😭

tawdry flame
#

You are in uni are you not

blissful field
#

no- im in second year of hs

#

out of three

tawdry flame
#

Oh i see

#

I’m in the first

#

👍

blissful field
#

of uni?

tawdry flame
#

Hs

blissful field
#

oh

tawdry flame
#

$\int{f(g(x)) dx}$

blissful field
#

is that- is that a test

#

whats that

tawdry flame
#

If you let f(x) = x^n

#

Wait

blissful field
#

oh you're giving me the general formula of how we integrate stuff like that

#

yes take your time

tawdry flame
#

Yes but im having a brain fart

#

I think

#

$\int{f(g(x))g’(x)dx}=\int{f(g) dg}$

potent lotusBOT
#

pianist

tawdry flame
#

I think

#

But to be honest

#

No one uses these general formulas

#

It’s easier to do the substitution

blissful field
#

bc-

#

wtf is that

#

oh i got it

tawdry flame
#

If you fix $f(y)=y^n$

potent lotusBOT
#

pianist

tawdry flame
#

Then the statement becomes $\int{g(x)^ng’(x)dx}=\int{g(x)^n dg}=\frac{1}{n+1}g(x)^{n+1}$

blissful field
# potent lotus **pianist**

no no this is the same thing as be- wait a minute... if we have g(x) then- why do we even integrate to begin with- isnt that the point of this type of integration? bring the function back to un-differentiated form

tawdry flame
#

Some functions are not integrable, but yes

blissful field
#

i mean i see how this doesnt work

blissful field
#

this is a bit hard to see

potent lotusBOT
#

pianist

blissful field
#

like noticing the differntiated and normal forms of a function yk

tawdry flame
#

Then the integral is easy because of that formiula/substitution

#

You dont have to physically integrate g(x)

#

If you let the whole thing, $g(x)^ng’(x)$ be say $S(x)$ then we are just saying that $\int{S(x)dx}$ turns out to depend only on g(x) and n

potent lotusBOT
#

pianist

blissful field
#

WHT

#

Oh.

tawdry flame
#

That you don’t need to find out the integral of g(x)

#

But only g(x) itself

blissful field
#

yeah

#

but wait so

#

the not so easy questions

#

is going to look like a function raised to n times the derivative of the function but- like multiplied

#

not in seperate parenthesees

tawdry flame
#

Uh

blissful field
#

yk what nvm

#

yeah yeah

#

ik

#

tysm for helping me

tawdry flame
#

Not sure if i understand

blissful field
#

i really appreciate it

tawdry flame
#

Np

blissful field
#

have a good day

tawdry flame
#

I’m just killing time since i cant sleep, Gn

#

Do .close when you’re done

blissful field
#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @blissful field

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

blissful field
#

hey! ive been asking questions here for like two years

blissful field
tawdry flame
#

Yh

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

plucky walrus
calm coralBOT
plucky walrus
#

Angle CAB > angle DAB.
Prove that minor arc(DB)/DB < minor arc(BC)/BC

velvet osprey
plucky walrus
#

If I prove this, I can prove that limit x->0 sin(x)/x = 1

#

No trignometry allowed.

velvet osprey
#

....

#

the fuck do you MEAN no trig allowed.

#

feels like you are bullshitting

plucky walrus
#

No.

velvet osprey
#

how are you gonna get any relationship between arc lengths and chord lengths if you do this stubbornness thing where you forbid yourself from using any trig

#

plus if your goal's to prove lim sin(x)/x = 1

#

that's a trig function right there

plucky walrus
#

It's just an inequality.

velvet osprey
#

the sin(x)

#

you're trying to do trig without doing trig

mellow harbor
# plucky walrus

I mean $\overline{CB}$ is longer than $\overline{DB}$ by the fact that $\overline{AD}$ intersects with $\overline{BC}$ inside the circle.

potent lotusBOT
#

@mellow harbor

mellow harbor
#

Which then implies that $\angle CAB > \angle DAB$

potent lotusBOT
#

@mellow harbor

velvet osprey
plucky walrus
#

Yes.

mellow harbor
#

Oh you want the comparision for arcs, mb

#

Can you use the arclength formula?

plucky walrus
#

theta R
How will one find CB and DB in terms of theta and R?

mellow harbor
#

Yes that one

velvet osprey
#

knowing him

#

How will one find CB and DB in terms of theta and R?
which angle is theta again?

#

also i am sorry to disappoint but that WILL involve trig.

plucky walrus
#

A general angle.

mellow harbor
#

$\because r_1 = r_2, \theta_1 > \theta_2 \implies r\cdot\theta_1 > r\cdot\theta_2$

velvet osprey
#

no, which angle in your diagram are you calling by the name theta?

potent lotusBOT
#

@mellow harbor

plucky walrus
#

theta = angle DAB and theta + beta = angle CAB

mellow harbor
#

Coolios then, does this work? @plucky walrus

velvet osprey
#

ok right theta = angle DAB

#

in that case $DB = 2r \sin(\theta/2)$

plucky walrus
#

Yes.

potent lotusBOT
plucky walrus
#

This proves that DB < CB

#

No.

velvet osprey
#

fym no

plucky walrus
#

arc(DB) < arc(CB)

velvet osprey
#

what exactly are you NOing at

mellow harbor
#

this isn't chord length formula

plucky walrus
#

Yes.

#

Let's assume that I can prove that DB < CB.

dense lagoon
#

just read this log lol why is anyone even asking to prove this without trig

velvet osprey
#

arcDB / DB < arcBC / BC is equivalent to arcDB / arcBC < DB / BC

#

if y'all are gonna compare angles to angles and lengths to lengths

#

you'll have proved that arcDB / arcBC and DB / BC are both less than 1

#

which tells us nothing of their relationship to each other

velvet osprey
mellow harbor
#

Why is everyone just ignoring the arc-length formula 😭

dense lagoon
mellow harbor
#

Then what other query do you have?

plucky walrus
#

What have you proved?

plucky walrus
velvet osprey
#

your REAL goal is to prove the limit of sin(x)/x as x->0 is 1, yes?

#

@plucky walrus

plucky walrus
#

No.

velvet osprey
#

bruh ok

plucky walrus
#

I should not have told that.

mellow harbor
#

Would you agree that $\overset{\frown}{CB} - \overline{CB} > \overset{\frown}{DB} - \overline{DB}$?

dense lagoon
#

how about this i just thought of something

plucky walrus
dense lagoon
#

as central angle subtended increases, the rate at which the 'arc length' increases is faster than the rate at which the 'chord length' increases

#

so we can say if a bigger central angle is subtended, the ratio of arc/length is bigger

plucky walrus
#

I don't think so.

velvet osprey
#

also i think you meant CB not CD?

potent lotusBOT
#

@mellow harbor

mellow harbor
#

Yea, sorry mb lol

velvet osprey
#

but nonetheless i do not see how one could derive this

dense lagoon
plucky walrus
#

Nah

mellow harbor
plucky walrus
dense lagoon
#

its a thought

#

which might be true idk

#

any thoughts?

#

cuz im led to believe that an increase in radius of curvature would lead to an increase in arc length. just seeing how much 'curvier' an arc is

mellow harbor
# plucky walrus What you said isn't any proof

I mean if you really really wanna go that route, I won't help you do this but you can construct a rohumbus for each triangle you have (because they're already isocelas) and you can use half of the area of that rohumbus to get the area of the triangle from wher you can use heron's formula to reverse calculate the third side and soothe your heart

dense lagoon
#

can we just consider the arc/chord ratio as an increasing linear function

mellow harbor
#

Or you can use the determinant formula and make an inverse matrix

mellow harbor
dense lagoon
mellow harbor
potent lotusBOT
#

@mellow harbor

dense lagoon
#

yea

#

i mean clearly he has some plan in his mind

mellow harbor
mellow harbor
potent lotusBOT
#

@mellow harbor

mellow harbor
#

Since @velvet osprey mentioned it

dense lagoon
#

ic

dense lagoon
#

will be hectic though

mellow harbor
#

that's why I said I am out but you can do this if you want to lol

dense lagoon
#

honestly ill give it a go when im free

velvet osprey
dense lagoon
#

where do i put my result when im done with it btw

#

ill prolly just dm him

mellow harbor
#

he can do it

calm coralBOT
#

@plucky walrus Has your question been resolved?

plucky walrus
#

I will see this.

#

Thanks y'all

#

.close

calm coralBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @plucky walrus

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

mellow harbor
#

I'll send you a desmos graph because I feel bad for you

#

Where should I send it @plucky walrus

plucky walrus
#

graph?

mellow harbor
#

Yes

#

interactive garph

plucky walrus
#

ok

#

Why do you feel bad for me?

mellow harbor
#

so I felt that was rude

#

sorry weird phrasing lol

plucky walrus
#

ok, no problem

calm coralBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

proper ocean
#

HELP????

calm coralBOT
proper ocean
#

WDYM ITS

nimble harbor
#

,rotate

potent lotusBOT
proper ocean
#

Y+ 3X =11

distant fog
#

Yes

#

What you want my man

proper ocean
#

HOW DID

distant fog
#

How did what

proper ocean
#

QUESTION B

distant fog
#

Yeah what to do with question b?

remote mural
#

what do you even have to do ?

proper ocean
#

FIND AD

#

LIKE HOW

#

Y = ⅓X + 1 FOR AB

#

IGNORE THE PENCIK

#

D (0,y)

distant fog
#

That looks 0,4 to me

proper ocean
#

gradient of AD is -3

proper ocean
#

I WAS WRITING

#

,rotate

potent lotusBOT
#

Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.

proper ocean
#

,rotate

potent lotusBOT
proper ocean
#

OKAY SO

#

WHAT

distant fog
#

Soo hmm

#

What have you tried so far

#

To find equation of AD

proper ocean
proper ocean
#

I KNOW THAT

distant fog
#

,rotate

potent lotusBOT
distant fog
#

,rotate

proper ocean
#

X =0
y = ½x + 1

#

For D

potent lotusBOT
distant fog
#

Well dang

#

I dont know man

#

All i can say is that you have nice hand writting

#

Better than my

proper ocean
#

WHY ARE YOU HERE THEN

#

BSGDIDISJE

#

Dear prime my apologies

distant fog
distant fog
proper ocean
#

Aren't u in college

distant fog
#

What made you thought i am in college

proper ocean
#

<@&286206848099549185>

distant fog
#

I am in 9th dang

proper ocean
#

🙏🙏🙏

proper ocean
distant fog
proper ocean
#

Same gng🙏

#

I already finished my syllabus

distant fog
proper ocean
#

Im doing grade 10 add maths

#

🙏🙏

distant fog
proper ocean
#

FUCK COORDINATE GEOMETRY

#

BRO GRADE 9 MATHS VS GRADE 10 ADD MATHS IS WAY HARDEE

distant fog
proper ocean
#

OMH

proper ocean
distant fog
proper ocean
#

No

distant fog
#

Ok i guess

proper ocean
distant fog
proper ocean
#

me rn

#

Someone help

proper ocean
#

Im gonna

#

Tweak

unreal isle
calm coralBOT
# distant fog You should ask this to chatgpt

Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).

unreal isle
#

alright

#

hello

#

first off i need you to calm down

proper ocean
#

HELP

#

SO

#

Okie

proper ocean
unreal isle
#

thank you

#

now

proper ocean
#

Tech vs daq

#

Tech f4

unreal isle
potent lotusBOT
#

Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.

proper ocean
distant fog
#

Then i guess use gemini

proper ocean
#

,rotate

potent lotusBOT
unreal isle
#

he's in 10th grade

proper ocean
distant fog
#

I was joking 🙏

proper ocean
unreal isle
#

anyways ignore him OP

#

alr so q16?

proper ocean
#

Yes

unreal isle
#

have you done any work?

#

i think i saw some up there

#

would love if you could reshare

proper ocean
#

,rotate

potent lotusBOT