#help-42
1 messages · Page 155 of 1
cosine law.
I mean the name
cosine law
In triangle ADN, x^2 / 4 + y^2 - xy cos(x)= 36
Why is it 36?
So In triangle ADN, x^2 / 4 + y^2 - xy cos(x)= AN^2 ??
And why do we x^2 devide by 4?
Isn't cosine rule like this:
c = root(a^2 + b^2 - 2ab * cos(angle ab))
Ohh, I now get it. Sorry for stupid question😁😁 @plucky walrus
But I still don't understand why we don't multiply xy * cos(x) by 2.
Oh, I again understood😂😂😂
Yes, solving. Just want to finish solving and then close the chat. Sorry for keeping the chat busy.
No problem
@plucky walrus I solve till this point by subtracting, canceling etc.
Now I am here. Can you give a hint what to do next?
First page
Second page
I am here D, I sent the first and second pages to show how I got here
@odd belfry Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@odd belfry Has your question been resolved?
@odd belfry Has your question been resolved?
Multiply by 4
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i just want to double check something for part a, can i just write my solution out as f is defined as:
...
0 -> 1
1 -> 2
2 -> 3
3 -> 4
4 -> 6
5 -> 7
6 -> 8
7 -> 9
8 -> 11
...
then do i just show that this is bijective?
You'll be there a very long time
lol
You have to describe it with some kind of formula, you can't list out infinitely many values by hand
not really sure how to write that out as a formula though theres not an easy way that Z maps to S
like it gets messed up w negatve values and im kinda stuck there
You can do the same thing for negatives that you did for positives
Divisibility doesn't care about positive/negative so the pattern is exactly the same
You just have to work out how to write it formally
You may find it easier to define it recursively (that may or may not be allowed but it's definitely how I'd choose to do it)
in this case it seems easier to write out the first few mappings in a way where we can easily see how it continues
as it stands u do need to rewrite the pattern to involve negative integers
It does say explicitly though, I'd say writing a ... on either side wouldn't really count as explicit
meh its one of those cases where writing a formula seems really painful and takes a bit away from the spirit of the exercise
and you rather go to bed and stop thinking about it and hopefully it will go away
||f(n) = n + 1 + floor(n/4)|| now I think it's good
if we let $k=4a+b, \quad a \in \mathbb{Z}, \quad b \in {0,1,2,3}$ \
then say $f(4a+b)=5a + (b+1)$ does that work?
nilo
Yep I think that works
then i just show its bijective and that completes the solution right
Yeah exactly
what does the floor() notation mean? sorry not familiar w that
floor(x) is the integer that verifies floor(x) <= x < floor(x)+1
ah ok
in you're case floor(n/4) = "a"
@limpid geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @limpid geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
i cant tell if thats right because i keep getting 0 the computational way, i wil show in a bit
I applied this where a is in C
I don't understand the last step
but you have zbar, not z
1/zbar = z/|z|^2=z which is analytic
i thought i did some 💀
so the integral should be 0
Closed by @eternal shard
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help to comprehend this question. what is it asking you find?
What is the side of the square?
So you are given some information about each diagram
Well the squares, individually, have an area of 1 unit squared
and then you know that the overlapping area
has the same area as the non-overlapping areas
That's what the beginning part of the question tells you
and with that alone you cannot find x
but then they give you more information
for each of the diagrams
This was the extra info for a
And the diagram is not to scale
Do you have an answer key for these problems? I'm just curious
no
Okay
Other than comprehending the question I haven't really seen a problem like this before
Since the diagram isn't drawn to scale
we want to look closely at the given information here
perhaps they're equal seections?
so other than comprehending the question i have to admit i dont exactly know how to solve this, but it looks fun
and there is a language barrier for me
im not entirely sure what "symmetric about" mean
i assume that means the diagram looks the same on both sides of the line
and we know the squares share a vertex
unfortunately the ydo
that's given to us
so it is safe to say they share at least one vertex
I'm trying to imagine how
actually even though the diagram isnt drawn to scale
i suppose it would look very much like this diagram
because in the image it is symmetricaly
about that line
sorry i wrote imagine instead of image
i mean we do have a right angled triangle
and
and
we know its area
it's almost to scale
thats not particularly relevant
maybe if we could describe the area using a system of equations it could be, but again i dont know how to solve this
if someone else has better ideas/know how to solve this and want to help Green
please do so
he is the original problem asker
the area of all three colours is the same
^
I think for this one, based on the given diagram, each colour has the same area given by the problem statement. Because by the additional fact that it’s symmetric about the line AB, I think it’s safe to say that the line AB splits the purple area into two congruent right triangles. Then find the area of the purple region and blue region in terms of x and equate them.
and you know that the squares are both area 1
that's how we can know the area of the triangle
so we can try to figure out the area of the purple
The way i solved this is by finding the total coloured area in 2 seperate ways and equating them
1 equation
ok nvm
can you find the area of the purple as a function of x?
It’s symmetrical about the line AB. Says in the problem statement
maybe ((1-x)(1) / 2)*2
Which ends up 1-x?
That’s correct. Now find the blue/pink area in terms of x
do you just do 1-(1-x)*2
= 1-(2-2x) = 1+2x?
That’s not the blue area. Use the fact that the blue area + purple area = square
So they overlap?
The squares overlap to form the coloured regions of equal area
Then how do we find x just from the area of say blue? is it like trapezium?
I think you did it wrong. Blue area should just be ||1-(1-x) = x||
Use the fact that blue area + purple area = square. We already know area of square is 1, and purple area is 1-x
so you mean the blue area is just the obviously blue area, not including the overlap?
Yes
then how do we find x from that weird looking shape?
By equating the two areas. Blue area = purple area
You found the purple area here btw
This is why he is equating them
look at the top half of the square with blue and purple. You can see that the purple area is a trapezium. We just need to find the top side of this trapezium because height and bottom side are already known
i think its more a pentagon. are you referring to just one side of the symmetry
Yes just one side of symmetry
how do we find the top side
Ok, try and angle chase. Use the fact that the line of symmetry creates an angle of 45 degrees in the bottom left corner of the trapezium
so can we just draw a virtual line down there and make an isoceles triangle so we just subtract that
Yes, we can do that too
Remember that the height is 1/2 here for the isosceles triangle and the trapezium
wdym 1/2 here
You can see that the length of the blue line is 1/2, right?
Yeah and then double it back
Im still not sure for C or D. I think for c you will need diagonal but i dunno how it works
I think for c you can use the fact that the purple region is a square with its diagonal being x
From right angles I think
Then use Pythagoras theorem on one of the the triangles (the top or bottom one)
What do you do after that?
Also like it part b the line of symmetry cuts the purple region into two triangles with angles of 45 degrees either side
Since it is a square I drafted this plan that uses a but then im stuck
You can find what x is by equating blue area with purple area again
Use Pythagoras theorem on the top triangle of the purple square. Then you find what ‘a’ is in terms of x
The triangle is created by the line of symmetry btw
So we just find the area of the blue which is 2 trapezims gotten from
(a+1)/2 * (1-a)
will this work?
Yeah this should work, or you can even use the fact that blue area is 1-purple area. So 1-purple area = blue area = purple area and so purple area is 1/2
Actually I think this applies to all the problems lol
Now D's like really confusing
I think you should draw a straight line down from the point in the square between blue region and purple region
Or you can draw from the same point I mentioned before a segment onto the top left corner of the blue/purple square. You can three triangles, of which the bottom and left triangle have equal area. And the dimensions of the top triangle can be found from a right angled triangle
where do i draw the line?
Down the bottom left corner of the pink square
what is the best method to approach this (the easiest)
Sorry I meant bottom left corner
I think this method might be bit easier
You draw a line segment from the same point again to the top left corner of the blue square to create 3 triangles. The left and bottom triangle have same area, so we just need to find the area of one of them and the top triangle
Or maybe just this method is easier ngl
can you illustrate it. i dont understand
Im sorry. I cannot illustrate atm, but you see the point in the blue/purple square. Draw a vertical line down it
It creates a rectangle and two triangles in the blue region
Which point?
The bottom left corner of the pink/purple square
ok what do i do with that
First find the area of the rectangle, then the bottom triangle and then the top triangle. At least that’s how I did it
All in terms of x
I drew the line but i cant find the retangle
Draw the line to the top as well
Continue it
Did you find the dimension of the rectangle?
For the two triangles, first find the dimension of the bottom triangle and then use the fact that the top triangle is similar to the bottom triangle
no i cant find it
For the rectangle, we just need to find the top side of it. You can see that there is an isosceles right angled triangle with hypotenuse of x. From there you can find the top side
how do you know the hypotenuse is x. i dont understand
Next to the blue line, do you see that at the top there’s a right triangle with blue+purple that has a hypotenuse of x?
I'll label the parts so you can refer to them
Okay thank you so much. Look at triangle ACD first
You can find what AC is and then the other part of that side of the square (which is a dimension of the rectangle)
how do you find AC?
Triangle ACD is a right angled isosceles triangle with hypotenuse x, so you can find AC in terms of x
how do we know this? do we just assume CAD=90
Yes, we can assume this because we drew a line perpendicular to the base that passes through D
so we use pythagoras after that
but how do we find the area of the blue rectangles and thus find the area of the purple
Yes
You mean blue rectangle and triangles. And also we know that blue area = purple area and blue area + purple area = square = 1. So blue area is just 1/2
yes but how does the vertical line AF apply in this scenario if we already know the value of blue and purple.
in other words how do we find x
We find the individual areas of the blue region in terms of x and we add them together
The individual areas are the rectangle and two triangles created by vertical line AF
how do we do that
First find the dimension of the blue rectangle
would that be AC * 1 = AC
We know AC is in a pythagoras relationship with x right
Yes, that’s right
Oh wait you mean 1-AC. Look at the rectangle left of the blue line
I didn’t mean that rectangle, I meant the other one. The left one
Find the area of the top and bottom blue triangles
I dunno what you mean. do you mean GAEF
Yes I mean that
What do I do?
Find AC, then find AG. Then you know what the area of that blue rectangle is
Whole blue rectangle = GAEF
You can find AC since ACD is a right angled isosceles triangle in terms of x. Then you find what GA is and this area GAEF
And then how does that help finding x
Okay, then find the area of the two blue triangles. First see that they are congruent, and then find the dimensions of the bottom triangle
how do you do that
You get an equation where you find what x is
if they're congruent how does thatt help
I’ll show you later. First we will look at the bottom triangle. What is the height of it?
What is DF?
We are looking at triangle DFG btw
?
So you first found the area of rectangle GAEF. Now look at triangle DFG
Sorry I meant triangle DFG
how do you find the area
can you show me how you would find out the area
by writing out the solution
Find DF first. Notice that DFE is an isosceles triangle
Ok, area GAEF = (1-x/sqrt(2)). Area DFG = (1-x/sqrt(2))(x/sqrt(2))/2 = area ABD. Adding all this together, we get the the total area of the blue region is 1-x^2/2. However we know that this area is also 1/2, so we get that x=1
lemme first see about these solutions.
Okay
@kind swallow Has your question been resolved?
@kind swallow Has your question been resolved?
@kind swallow Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @kind swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Limit ( z ) tends to 0 ( \left(\frac{\sin z}{z}\right) ).
Andy
@brittle sail Has your question been resolved?
do you need to do an epsilon delta proof?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
you mean to 1?
oh nvm
are you allowed to use taylor here?
Closed by @brittle sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
nice
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
0 < sin(5πx) ≤ 1 became 3/2 ≤ 1/10 + (2/5)n ≤ 2; can anyone explain how this was done?
Can you provide context
i have to find a, where a is [3/2;2]
i can send you some of the work done, but it's not on english
the writer then does this
and then whaterver happened to sinus
i know that n came from the period of sinus function but i'm confused about how everything was done
@rare bluff Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
<@&286206848099549185>
Hey
Okay so in this question
we take the square root of a number only positive and not negative
So given inside the log the term is a sin function
The range of it is between 0 and 1
But log value value less than 1 would be negative
So the sin term term has to be 1
@rare bluff
Thanks, i'm just thinking
so then we say that sin5pix = 1? and solve for that
my main question was just how 0 < sin(5πx) ≤ 1 became 3/2 ≤ 1/10 + (2/5)n ≤ 2
So here, we are finding a general solution of sin 5pix=1
Here, they’ve taken General solutions of sinx as 2npi + x
Alright it has to be n*pi +(-1)^n x
The general solutions they considered would be if n is even
Closed by @rare bluff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The answer is given (d)
What I got didn't match any options, but was closest to (a)
I am getting abccb
which will make the pattern acbbacacbbacacbbacac
@sweet pike Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Maximize and minimize:
sin(x) (2cos(x) - sin(x))
-inf to inf
k
...
.close
Closed by @plucky walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
why did you open in the first place...
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
show parts a and b and the entire question
f(x)=x^3 - x^2 - 6x
Closed by @elfin gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
... not sure i like being called "sweetie" by a stranger, but you're welcome.
thank you for the clarification.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@whole hinge hello i awake from logic slumber
how is the suggestion true
if we do the contrapositive then \sigma must be unsatisfiable, does that get used here
What exactly do you not get?
${{\Sigma}_1};\alpha$ is never satisfiable for any finite $ {\Sigma}_1$
reg
assuming you havent yet proved compactness theorem
they are essentially going for a proof by contradiction here.
For sake of contradiction, they assume that neither Sigma; a, nor Sigma; -a have the property that every finite subset of them is satisfiable. That means that there is some unsatisfiable finite subset of Sigma; a and there is some finite unsatisfiable subset of Sigma; -a
the first subset will have to include a (otherwise it would be subset of Sigma and hence satisfiable) and the second one will have to include -a for similar reason
so they just named the subsets: Sigma1; a and Sigma2; -a
i can latex it if it's hard to read
Oh and importantly, it's not any, it's some
yes that is what they claim
but couldnt it be that when we check E;alpha and E;-a for different truth values of their sentence symbols
for whatever E1 you choose
one configuration satisfies E1;a but E;a fails because the rest of E is false
like whenever E1;a is satisfied, E-{E1};a is false
for all E1
they chose E1 such that E1; a wouldnt be satisfiable
ye im asking how can you be certain such an E1 exists in E
MathIsAlwaysRight
oh and we're negating it because we're going for a proof by contradiction
so we will assume that the result (i.e. the above statement) is false, and eventually derive a contradiction
Once you negate this, you should be able to see why under this assumption E1 and E2 are guaranteed to exist
,texsp There exist finite $\Sigma_1 \subseteq \Sigma$; $\alpha$, $\Sigma_2 \subseteq \Sigma$; $\lnot \alpha$ such that both $\Sigma_1$ and $\Sigma_2$ are unsatisfiable.
^answer
MathIsAlwaysRight
this should be the correct negation, now if you add a to E1 and -a to E2, they're obviously still gonna be unsatisfiable
waait isnt this different from saying
either E;a or E;not a is satisfiable
if this statement is true then your statement is also true
if this statement is false then how can you be sure your statement is true (without compactness theorem)
they never mentioned anything about E;a being satisfiable
it says every finite subset of E is satisfiable
and then you are supposed to show that the same is true of at least one of E;a and E;-a
so you are supposed to show exactly this
we have to prove
either E;a or E;~a is satisfiable
(which implies that every finite subset of E with either a or ~a satisfies)
the negation of that would be
neither E;a nor E;~a is satisfied
isnt what you wrote the same as the sentence in brackets, different from what we have to prove
wait
either E;a or E;~a is satisfiable
This is actually a stronger statement
sorry i misread the question
happens lol
xD
do you still need help
yess and we take their union?
noo ty i misread the question
Yeah, the union should help with the contradiction part
Try and see if you can find a contradiction
the union tautologically implies both alpha and not alpha
and we know the union can be satisfied
Yeah, that works
Yep, since its a finite subset of E
np
@rain rover Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rain rover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,w (1,2,-1)x(1,0,-3)
why are you doing these calculations
every point in L1 is at a constant distance to Pi of sqrt(6), i.e. L1 is paralel to Pi
@glad parrot
Pi: x + 2y - z = 3
,, \frac{|k+3 + 2 +3k|}{\sqrt{1 + 4 + 1}} = \sqrt{6}
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
,w sqrt(6)*sqrt(6)
and so the directional vector of L is lineraly dependant of the normal vector of the plane PI
?
let me explain it
bro please you don't need wa for this
lmfao
sir, if every point in L1 is at a constant distance to Pi
then L1 is parallel to Pi, agree?
yep
ok, now
if the line L1 is parallel to plane Pi
then the normal vector of Pi
where will it point towards?
and the direction vector of the line where will it point towards?
dont you see they are clearly orthogonal?
its not for me lmao, maths is a matter of writing also, not only calculations
i just want to be sure your paper isn't just full of numbers
but also text explaining why you doing this calculations
ok srry, I just have done a lot of similar problems like this and I directly link some ideas together, if you guys havent practiced as many of this problems it may seem like I am jumping without actual reasoning
i see, but keep the redaction as part of your work cuz its the most important either when you are in a math channel or when exam
ok, for a sec I thought nobody was watching tho
|4k + 5| = 6
i) 4k + 5 = 6 ==> k = 1/4
ii) -4k - 5 = 6 ==> -4k = 11 ==> k = -11/4
L : X = k(1,0,-3) + (3,1,0)
L : (k+3,1,-3k)
Pi : x + 2y - z = 3
,, \sqrt{6} = \frac{|k+3 + 2 + 3k - 3}{\sqrt{1 + 4 + 1}}
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
6 = |4k + 2|
i) 6 = 4k + 2 ==> 4 = 4k ==> k = 1
ii) 6 = -4k - 2 ==> 8 = -4k ==> k = -2
L : X = k(1,0,-3) + (3,1,0)
L : (k+3,1,-3k)
k=1:
(k+3,1,-3k) = (4,1,-3)
k=-2:
(k+3,1,-3k) = (-2+3,1,6) = (1,1,6)
L1 : X = k(-6,2,-2) + (1,1,6)
L1' : X = t(-6,2,-2) + (4,1,-3)
.close
Closed by @simple musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Assume that the probability of having a boy or a girl is equal.
You know that the Janssen family has three children and that one of them is a boy.
Calculate the probability that the other two children are girls.
Draw a tree diagram
Assume that the probability of having a boy or a girl is equal.
You know that the Janssen family has three children and that one of them is a boy.
Calculate the probability that the other two children are girls.
Draw a tree diagram
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@ornate cape Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is example 5
This can be restated as if C is a simple closed path that doesn't pass though the origin. or encloses the origin, then $\int_{C} F \cdot r=0$
Wondering what the contrapositive would look like
if $\int_{C} F \cdot r \neq 0$ , then C passes via the origin or C is not a simple path, or C is not a closed path?
What a wonderful world !
the original question includes the path possibly enclosing the origin too
What a wonderful world !
What would the contrapositve be though
If $\int_{C} F \cdot r \neq 0, then \text{ case (i) } C doesn't enclose the origin ;case 2: then C passes via the origin or C is not a simple path, or C is not a closed path
Does this work?
u can use green theorem ?
If $\int_{C} F \cdot r \neq 0, then \text{ case (i) } C doesn't enclose the origin ;case 2: then C passes via the origin or C is not a simple path, or C is not a closed path
If (\int_{C} \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r} \neq 0), then:
\begin{itemize}
\item Case (i): (C) does not enclose the origin.
\item Case (ii): (C) passes through the origin, or (C) is not a simple path, or (C) is not a closed path.
\end{itemize}
What a wonderful world !
oop
$\int_C F \cdot dr = \int \int_D (\pdv{Q}{x}-\pdv{P}{y}) dxdy$
This is meant to be the contrapositive
yea, I know
tm
tm
so the difference is 0
no, I get that
but Trying to determine what the contrapositive is first
oh k
solving with contrapositive ?
Want to see if that helps
wait
If (\int_{C} \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r} \neq 0), then:
\begin{itemize}
\item Case (i): (C) does not enclose the origin.
\item Case (ii): (C) passes through the origin, or (C) is not a simple path, or (C) is not a closed path.
\end{itemize}
no my bad
What a wonderful world !
Is this right
its the contrapositive ?
I'm asking
i would just say, If ( \int_C \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r} \neq 0 ), then ( C ) passes through or encloses the origin
tm
why u took different cases
oh yeah
fair
it either passes though the origin, or encloses the origin or is not a simple path or is not a closed path
This will be much harder go show , IMO
wait, I 'm confused
(\int_C F\cdot dr \neq 0) implies C either:
- Is a closed path enclosing origin (with net winding), OR
- Passes through origin (making integral undefined)
tm
now it’s good
Closed by @blazing coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks!
no, only the winding matter
not the curve simplicity
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So I have $\int_{0}^{1} \int_{0}^{x^2} \frac{y}{x^5+1}dy dx$
What a wonderful world !
so $\frac{4}{2(x^5+1_}$
What a wonderful world !
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
which i elemenatry tyo integrate
don't know why I chose to do this
thanks
.close
Closed by @blazing coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@honest flume Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @honest flume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
yo
i have a big algebra 1 EOC coming up and i dont realy remember any of it
could someone hop in a call that i can screenshare it?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Draw an angle with the given measure in standard position 1. 260 degrees 2. -750 degrees
Hellooo
Can you use a protractor or no
Yeah ig
I js need rhe draw it
I js got back from spring break n forgot how to do all of this 💀
Chat gtp messed up the drawings
He
Yes*
Dude
<@&286206848099549185>
For one you will have to draw a straight horizontal line then another line will make the angle, for the first one you need to add some more to the protractor since it stops at 180, the second angle you need to make a few 360 rotations before you arrive at how much it actually is, the minus is just for the direction of the rotation(+ve counterclockwise, -ve clockwise)
Try your best and send your attempt, if it’s correct then congrats, if not I’ll tell you where you went wrong
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
Alr
@meager sparrow
? Like this
Oh ok
You used the protractor right?
Close, 3 complete loops
I just eye balled it
Not bad, although should be even closer to the negative y axis
Ah ok
Since that would mark exactly 270
Actually you’re correct
Alr on the test Ikk use a protractor
Yeah 2
O damn
Alr lemme try that out
The circle goes the other way right
Thanks
Anytime
No
It goes round and round that’s correct
Oh
How much left after that?
So I never take my pen off?
30 right?
Yeah
No no nobody would bat an eye for that dw
Oh
Since it’s negative go the other direction
Right or left?
You (conventionally) start from the positive x axis going in the direction of the positive y axis
since you have a negative sign you should go toward the direction of negative y axis
Got it?
Not quite
O
You correctly went with direction
Ah
So flip it around?
No just translate it to the right
Hooray
Although since im very precise guy, this is more like 45°, you should make a bit closer to the x axis than this
Yeah

Ill use a protractor on the test
?
You know how a clock works?
Yes
Yeah
So
Positive angle is from 3:00 then go backwards in time
If you have a negative sign
Then from 3:00 and go with the clock
That’s what they mean when they say counterclockwise (because it’s really counter-clock-wise)
And this is clockwise
Anytime
Np
You can close with .close
Asidr from that i should sleep
Closed by @limber lagoon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Gn
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone explain to me this question
find the probability of each difference that you get when you roll 2 dice. then add up those probabilities to get the expected value
what does "of each difference" mean?
I don't understand how I should do it
say you roll a 6 and a 6. the difference is 6-6=0
6-5=1, etc
so there are 5 possible differences
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
wait
why 5 not 6
Closed by @gleaming frost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
aaa
sorry but I have other question
should I calculate it like first dice - second dice (and count the nonnegative difference) or like greatest dive - smallest dice
doesn't matter cuz its nonnegative difference. So if x and y are the values of the dice, then difference = |x-y|
so what you wanna find is what's the probability that the difference is 0? is 1? 2?, etc.
oh then there are 6 expected values and I should calculate the probability for each one that would be 1?
because the 36 option would be nonnegative?
or I have misunderstanding?
there are 6 expected values yes, but out of the 36 pairs, count which pairs have each difference
0 = 6 pairs
1 = 10 pairs
2 = 8 pairs
3 = 6 pairs
4 = 8 pairs
5 = 2 pairs
yes but 4 = 4 pairs actually
so the expected value is 6/36 + 10/36 + ...
yeah I understand then the final result will be 1? 36/36
wait no
before u sum each fraction, u need to multiply each by its respective difference
so 0x6/36 + 1x10/36 + ...
@gleaming frost Has your question been resolved?
Why this step?
the formula for expected value is = each possible outcome x its probability.
Oh okay
ye
Closed by @gleaming frost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I tried using the power to change everything, but that didn't work and im confused 😓
what you have to do is plug in x^6 in the place of x in the series
nothing else should change
that's it?
yes
I can just treat it like function notation?
it is a function composition, yes
Closed by @wheat wyvern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do this question
I need help olcing the solution
huh
the general solution
are you tryna differentiate that?
also open a new channel lol
thats a differential equation
oh
and I want to solve the general solution
srry idk multivariable calc
!helpers
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
<@&286206848099549185>
ok thanks ca
sorry
do I go to another channel
wait
yes make your own channel
this will only clutter stuff up
anywaus
i think you should find the decay constant first and foremost
im confused on what you're trying to find
i did
like you found n
d i do it correctly
but why did you relate it to 1/2
because we're finding the halflife
yeah i was gonna ask
but n is the half life...
HUH
no 💀 thats not how that works
$N(t)=N_0 e^{-\lambda t}$
you have 1000(1/2)^(t/n)
parabolicinsanity
😭
i mean their way technically works
in terms of base of 1/2
is
not base e
The e is there because its a solution from
yea so the n IS the halflife?
the differential equation for decay
in this case it would be
$\dv{N}{t}\propto N$ 
parabolicinsanity
just dont do it that way because its exponential decay so we always pick e as the base
i'm telling you changing bases will change your decay constanf
but i got a negative answer
keep it e and re do
okay
can i learn the proper way pls
do it in terms of e
the equation i gave
its pretty easy, just N(100)=100g
so the lambda is negative because it's decay?
yes
im just a little surprised because i have never seen anyone use ½ as base for decay 
lowkey
thats what we were taught
😭
like whenever half life
weird
do base = 1/2
oh wait i think i know what
o rlly
why would you need it
idk because halflife so i hoguht we do that
parabolicinsanity
bruh
so like
i CAN solve it like thqat
but it's not t/n
it's nt?
oh
only no of particles
for half life set $N(t)=\frac{N_0}{2}$
parabolicinsanity
yes
anyways
1/4th of part 2
first solve for N(100)
im still going 
caught up?
huh
just set N(t) =½N_0
no you use that to find the half life
lambda and half life are related
what
i'll show how
$N(t)=\frac{N_0}{2}=N_0e^{-\lambda t}$
parabolicinsanity
parabolicinsanity
oh
then take the natural log
$\ln\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)=-\lambda t$
parabolicinsanity
if i did it this way would this lamda work for all values
all values of?
like
the way you solved for it
kambda would be half life rigt
its related to half life 
but like if i did it this way, would this lamdba be usable to find N(t) where t is any number
lowkey
so for a tims t
you can find N(t)
okayy
have yiu found the half life now?
for any function then if i have to come up with the equation myself it would always be N(t) = N_0(e)^-lambda(t)?
ya i used the lambnda
for decay yes
becauase its the solution to the differential equation for decay
so you have to use it
okyayy
wait so like when do we use this and when do we use e
😭
ugh that looks disgusting but perhaps it could be used
Bri
just that e as a base is thd gold standard in a way
We were taught that since Gr 11
ngl
I like that way better
But like
Does it always work
its for decay
you have to use it for decay
because its the solution to the ODE for decay 
What’s ode..
thats why i've been insisting
ordinary differential equation
the rate od decay proportional to no. of undecayed atoms yada yada
$-\dv{N}{t}=\lambda N$
parabolicinsanity
sorry its just what it literally is, i dont have much more to say
its true for decay and growth so idk up to you but e is the gold standard
i guess you've not gone through it, which is weird so just rememver that sticking to e is the proper way
🙇
Closed by @patent phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

@vagrant oak

