#help-42
1 messages · Page 143 of 1
between 1 <x < 10, the orange is on top, then that means that function is greater than the blue one
at x=10 it switches
so its orange? cus the lower limit is 1 and upper is 10 and we dont count when it switches
what is "its"
are you asking if this sentence is correct?
bro i meant upper function the equation is intergal( upper function - lower function) for area between curves
idk which one is the negative
ok ty
@untold tapir Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to find n so that En is a natural number. The possible answers are in the thickened parenthesis. I got this far but I'm not sure what to do from here
you can write the numerator as ∑k(k+2)
hmm, and after that?
∑k^2 = n(n+1)(2n+1)/6
2∑k = n(n+1)
so you get
n(n+1)(2n+7)/6
numerator simplifies to n(n+1)(2n+7)
demnominator is n(n+1)(n+2)
so you get 2n+7/n+2
now you can put values of n
hmm let me give it a try
sure
is it okay like this?
yeah
woooo! Thank you once more 
no worries
.close
Closed by @balmy sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no ideas once more
what’s the sign of a_n
maybe try to upper bound the integrand
yeah
@balmy sentinel Has your question been resolved?
like this?
uhh right
then I might just no know how to do what you suggested
what does upper bounding an integral mean again
waiiit
if i start with sin(nx)
you're upper bounding the wrong quantity
yeah
that's more like it
like this right?
yeah correct
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Hello, im getting cosphi=sqrt(3)/4
Given cube ABCDA1B1C1D1 where ABCD is the base. Given point M midpoijt of BB1, point N midpoint of A1B1 and point K, midpoijt B1C1, find the cosine of the angle between the planes (ABCD) and (MNK)
I see this is angle HMD, where H is the midpoint of NK
Open a new one
Good question
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@eternal shard hi
@still terrace Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Asking for AB midpoint coordinates
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what would i use as a comparison for problem 20?
write some terms down
then it might tell you immediately how you might estimate it
1/1^1
1/2^2
1/3^3
1/4^4
1/1^1 + 1/2^2 + 1/3^3 + 1/4^4 + ...
if you compare it term wise
you can always choose 1/2^k
and argue with the geometric series
for 21 i can use 1/n right
as a comparison
hm
1/sqrt1+1 = 1/sqrt2
i looked at these
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBxYQ0TJxYM&ab_channel=TheOrganicChemistryTutor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZtAgihok5s&t=55s
This calculus 2 video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the limit comparison test. It explains how to determine if two series will either both converge or diverge by taking the limit of the ratio of the two sequences to see if it equals a positive finite number. Examples and practice problems include series that can be simplified and...
This calculus 2 video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the direct comparison test. If the big series converges, then the smaller series must also converge. Likewise, if the small series diverges, the big series must diverge as well. That's the basic idea of the direct comparison test. Typically, you need to compare the series you'...
I watched through both of these
uhm
You just need to make 1/sqrt(n^2+1) smaller by making the denominator bigger
if the big series converges then the smaller one should converge as well
if small series diverges then big seriesi diverges
bigger
hey
oh
how can you make the denominator bigger
what's bigger than n^2+1 for sufficient n
i dont know what does the sufficient n part mean
(the goal is to rid the +1)
it does mean that we only care that the inequality works not for a specific n
like
you could have an inequality
that starts working if n = 10000 and bigger
or n = 4
the point is you just have to assure that such n exists
your series have infinite terms which mean n goes to infinity
so when using comparison test, you need to find inequalities that certainly work out for large values of n
for all but finitely many n!
most of the times removing the constant and adding a factor does the trick
like
n+100 <= 2n for example for some n at some point will be true (or large amount of values of n)
pikiop
yea or nicer 4n^2 due to the square root
now try to show why
it works
why 1/sqrt(n^2+1) >= 1/sqrt(4n^2)
how does the 4n^2 happen due to sqaure root again?
icic
both work but i still wanna see if you can show it
im just curious
am i able to do 1/sqrt(n^2+1) <= 1/sqrt(n)
what do you think
yes
prove it
ok
try to derive a true statement
1/sqrt(n^2+1) <= 1/sqrt(n)
since both sides are positive what could you do
i just know that 1 become negilible in the statement
and
i just know the behavior of 1/sqrtn when compared to the original function
can i get a example
example of what?
of a true statement being shown, likw how id prove it
you should try to prove adonis' inequality
do easy problems to buid skill to do harder ones
prove that this is true?
one has n^2 +1 on the bottom while the other one just has n
making it smaller
that's not really enough to give a "proof"
uhh
and he probably meant 1/sqrt(n^2) instead of 1/sqrt(n)
no
oh i see
he was responding to this
1/sqrt(n) is a p-series you can compare to because p > 1 making it divergent comparing it to a larger thing 1/sqrt(n^2+1)
she asked that lol
yea i missed it
1/sqrt(n) is larger than 1/sqrt(n^2+1) so that doesnt show it diverges
you have to find a smaller series
dct: show it converges by finding a greater convergent series
show it diverges by finding a smaller divergent series
like
sum f(n) <= sum g(n) where the sum of g(n) diverges, but sum of f(n) might just be small enough converging maybe
so you have to find instead a smaller diverging series
@green cosmos Has your question been resolved?
this requires the limit comparison right?
because 1/sqrt(4n^2) cannot be proved by the direct comparison ytest
like it doenst fit into the rules
show it divierges by finding a smaller divergent series while 1/2n is greater
what question are we discussing?
are you sure? 
i keep thinking about the question
prove that this works
how do i prove it?
uhh
yes
because 1/2n
is greater
you can only find a greater convergent series
dct: show it converges by finding a greater convergent series
show it diverges by finding a smaller divergent series
you find a divergence by a smaller divergent series
1/2n is divergent
(well, the fact that n >= 1 should give you that n^2 >= 1, thence "larger denominator smaller fraction")
isnt it n^2+1 <= 2n^2
2n
i mean
I mean u reverse it so the < changes direction then whatever is inside that sqrt can be compared
RHS is in turn <= 4n^2
You could equally work with getting sqrt{2} * n and all the subsequent steps, which get you the same conclusion 
.close
Closed by @green cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
simple algebra equation
What have you tried
im ot sure how to answer the question
I tried y2-y1/x2-x1
I need help thorfinn
Yeah what did you get
-12.5/18.5
Just do (25-0)/(0-35) to find gradient. Simple
im saying the x and the y intercept
So did you get the gradient
Closed by @inner urchin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi so like I figured out my answer for the angle of this question, but I'm debating whether the general equation should be πn or 2πn since one revolution of tan is π, I'm unsure though.
,tex .unit circle
hayley (now with real hay!)
you can either leave it like that and use 2pi n, or notice that if you used pi n instead then solutions (1) and (3) become the same (and similarly with solutions 2 and 4)
Closed by @clear stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
isnt tan π periodic
yes
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with this boolean algebra problem
this is the whole question
I think the expression for the network in figure 7 is WXY(Z+Z'(S'+V))
but I'm having trouble showing the second expression is equivalent to the first one I came up with
the closest I can get applying the properties is WXY(Z'(S'+V)+Z(SW+X))
am I doing something wrong or is there something wrong with the question
<@&286206848099549185>
@simple bridge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @simple bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I reflect this graph across the Y axis?
I want to reflect the blue graph across the y axis
replace all instances of x with (-x)
that just gave me the green graph
actually not quite
I see
this is working
gotcha
ight now how do I rotate it?
er
how did I even graduate high school without understanding graph transformations 
maybe I'm not ready to rotate it yet
@lean aspen Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lean aspen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok
How do I reflect this graph across the Y axis?
I want to reflect the blue graph across the y axis
negate every x
that just gave me the green graph
actually not quite
I see
this is working
gotcha
ight now how do I rotate it?
er
what you did was only negating everything
Sub all x with (-x)
more specifically, if you want to reflect f(x) through the y-axis, then you need to plot f(-x). your mistake is instead plotting -f(x)
ok
@unborn plover Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Look at #14
The book says that the answer to this example involves (m-n), but how does M suddenly become positive?
,rotate
does the book say (m-n)(X-Y)^3?
Yes
i dont think u have done anything wrong
see u wrote m(X-Y)^3 as -m(Y-X)^3
but in the book method they did, n(Y-X)^3 as -n(X-Y)^3
it doesnt change the answer, just diff methods
urs is correct too
Doesn't it?
(-m) + n ≠ (m-n), because
(-10) + 5 = -5, but 10 - 5 = 5
(m-n)(Y-X)^3 = -(m - n)(X-Y)^3, does this make sense
u have literally wrote the same thing 😭
there is prolly some miscommunication
Have I? The - is in a different place (kinda) and there's a plus between m and n
Piyush
Yes
ok thats good
so if we multiply (m-n) on both sides we would get --
$(m-n)(X-Y)^3 = -(m-n)(Y-X)^3$
Piyush
$now, (m-n) = -(n-m)$
Piyush
$so, (m-n)(X-Y)^3 = (n-m)(Y-X)^3$
Piyush
Huh
The answer in my book doesn't switch m and n places
oh?
see the left hand side😭
no no, its ok
I forgot my x-y is also on the other places
😭
So if we were to rotate them both, it's correct
yess😭
.close
Closed by @zealous loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You too
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help, I am a bit sick today … so please be patient with my responses I might be very distracted…
Let ( P ) denote the ( \mathbb{R} )-vector space consisting of all polynomials over ( \mathbb{R} ) in the variable ( x ).
The ( \mathbb{R} )-linear transformation ( T: P \to P ) is defined as ( T(f) := \int_x^{x+1} f(t) , dt ).
\begin{itemize}
\item[(a)] Show that if ( f \in P ) has degree ( m ), then ( T(f) ) also has degree ( m ).
\item[(b)] Prove that ( T ) is injective.
\item[(c)] With ( P_n \subset P ) the ( \mathbb{R} )-subspace consisting of the polynomials of degree ( \leq n ), show that
as a map from ( P_n ) to ( P_n ) the transformation ( T ) is surjective.
\item[(d)] Prove that ( T: P \to P ) is bijective.
\end{itemize}
Emmaaaaa
Question statement
(a)
Proposition for every natural number $m$ we have the following statement hold, $f\in \mathcal{P}$ is a polynomial of degree $m$ such that $Tf$ has a degree of $m$ too.
Base step: $m=0$ then $f$ is given as a constant polynomial of degree $0$, let $c \in \mathbb{F}$ be some scalar such that $f(t)=c$ thus $T(f)=\int_x^{x+1}c\text{ dt}=c(x+1)-cx=c$. This verifies the base step.
Inductive hypothesis: for some natural number $m\in \mathbb{N}$, and $m>0$ we have the following statement: $\deg{p}_m=\deg T(p_m)$ where $p_m\in\mathcal{P}$ is a polynomial of degree $m$
Then for $p_{m+1}$ and some scalar $c\in \mathbb{F}$ we have
\begin{align*}
\deg{T(p_{m+1})}=&\deg\bigg(\int^{x+1}_x ct^{m+1}\text{dt}\bigg)\\=&\deg \bigg[t^{m+2}\bigg]^{x+1}_x\\
=&\deg\bigg[t^{m+2}\bigg]^{x+1}_x\\=&\deg\bigg(\sum^{m+2}_{j=0}\begin{pmatrix}
m+2\\j
\end{pmatrix} x^{m+2-j}-x^{m+2}\bigg)\\
=&\deg\bigg(\begin{pmatrix}
m+1\\1
\end{pmatrix}x^{m+1}+\begin{pmatrix}
m+1\\2
\end{pmatrix}x^m+...\bigg)\\=&m+1
\end{align*}
It is clear that our induction implies the inductive hypothesis thus the transformation $T$ indeed preserves the degree of polynomial $p$
(b) Let $p$ be any polynomial then $T(p)=P(x+1)-P(x)$ where $P(x+1)$ is a horizontal shits of the polynomial $P$ that said by the polynomial identity, the sum $P(x+1)-P(x)=0$ if and only if $P$ is the zero polynomial. hence we can conclude conclude that $\ker T={0}$, immediately it follows that $T$ is an injection.
Emmaaaaa
(c) By the dimension theorem:
\begin{equation}
\dim \text{dom }T=\dim \text{im} T +\dim \ker {T}=n<\infty
\end{equation}
By our conclusion of $(b)$ it shows that $\ker T={0}$, the injectivity ensures the surjectivity of $T$ which implies that $T\in \text{bij}(\mathcal{P}_n)$
(d) Observe the transformation $T$, for some arbitrary scalar $c\in \mathbb{F}$ and $p, q \in \mathcal{P}$ we have:
\begin{align*}
T(cP+q)=&\int^{x+1}{x}(cp+q)(t)\text{dt}\=&c\int^{x+1}{x}p(t)+\int^{x+1}_{x}q(t)\=&cT(p)+T(q)
\end{align*}
Which shows that $T$ is linear. Furthermore $\forall{p}\in P_{\deg{p}}\subset\mathcal{P}$ we know that $T:P_{\deg{p}}\to P_{\deg{p}}$ is surjective, hence $T\in \text{Bij}(\mathcal{P},\mathcal{P})$
Formalization: $V_n$ are some vector spaces such that we have $\mathcal{P}=\bigcup\limits^\infty_{i=1}V_n$
Assume the induction for $(a)$ for finite case, we claim further that the mapping $T:V_n\to T(V_n)$ is an isomorphic mapping preserving the degree polynomial, that is, in particular for every $p\in V_{n+1}$ there exists some $q\in V_n$ such that for some scalar $c\in \mathbb{F}$ we have $p(x)=q(x)+cx^{n+1}$.
Note that \begin{align*}
\deg{T(p)}=&\deg{T(q)+cT(x^{n+1})}\
\leq& \deg T(x^{n+1})\=&\deg\bigg(\frac{1}{n+2}\bigg(\begin{pmatrix}
n+2\0
\end{pmatrix}x^{n+2}-x^{n+2}\bigg)+\begin{pmatrix}
n+2\1
\end{pmatrix}x^{n+1}+\begin{pmatrix}
n+2\2
\end{pmatrix}x^n+...\bigg)\=&n+1
\end{align*}
Showing that $T$ indeed preserves degree hence an isomorphic mapping. Hence bijection
Emmaaaaa
I actually don’t know if it’s necessary to use transfinite induction nor did I know how to use it properly but I felt it wasn’t sufficient to conclude for d so I added the formalization part in which I don’t really know if it’s needed
uh
I have to review everything properly
so first of all
this equality is not well argued
it might be true, but the way you wrote it there's no way to verify
then
This I'm not sure with your reasoning
first of all P could be any constant polynomial
and even then you have to prove it in more detail
c) is alright
d) is all over the place, the "formalization" is messier than the original argument
it's alright to reprove that T is linear, but in the same time:
-
- it's already assumed that T is linear in the question statement
-
- if you did want to prove that T is linear by yourself, you should have proved it earlier, in question (a) or (b), when you explicitly used linearity to show the results of those questions
so this part is misplaced or removable entirely
A little more rigorous proof to show that T is surjective is enough for (d)
such as: $\$
"Let $p \in \mathcal P$. If $p = 0$, then $T(0) = 0$. Otherwise, we let $n = deg(p)$. since $T:\mathcal P_n \to \mathcal P_n$ is surjective, there exists $q\in \mathcal P_n \subset \mathcal P$ such that $T(q) = p$. Therefore $T:\mathcal P \to \mathcal P$ is surjective."
rafilou is not not born in 2003
@fluid swallow Has your question been resolved?
yes I actually don’t really know if I can prove the infinite dimension case so I added the formalization part… let me read line by line
I am sorry I am bit sluggish I had a fever
it's alr
I didn’t read properly today I got so rushed 😭😭😭
Should I expand the integral and then argue the degree?
Let me see if I can fix tonight or else I fix it tomorrow
no I mean for question a), this is where the induction hypothesis comes into play
your polynomial of degree m+1 isn't just cx^(m+1)
it's cx^(m+1) + q(x) where deg(q) <= m
so
That’s how you linked to it, I was thinking about it like I should use hypothesis
Let me fix it now
deg(T(p)) = deg(T(cx^(m+1)) + T(q))
keep that T(q) in the corner while you do the calculations you did before
and finally when you get around that line
Yes, that sounds much better… 🥰🥰🥰
You’ve always been a hero 🥰🥰
the T(q) and the other x^m, x^(m-1)... terms
are negligible for the degree
and so the degree is m+1
by the way, I'm just noticing but in your computations in (a)
you reasonably get rid of constant coefficients
because they're in factor of the whole polynomial
but now that you have T(q) aside
mmh
Ok I have an alternative to solve those problems
just compute deg(T(cx^(m+1))) in the meantime
(so we're not computing deg(T(p_(m+1))) yet)
so now no need to amend the rest of the computations
and after that
just say deg(T(p_(m+1))) = deg(T(cx^(m+1)) + T(q))
T(cx^(m+1)) has degree m+1
T(q) has degree at most m
you have your result
That’s clever I didn’t think of it 🥰🥰🥰
yeah so linearity is already at the heart of question (a)
and that's also why we're doing a proof by induction
Yes, i feel like my argument has been so convoluted in many way…. I will take a screen shot and sleep for now I am a little bit too headachey I will send you messages if that’s fine in the morning 😭😭
if the point of the proof (induction hypothesis) isn't used in your proof, start questioning why you're using it in the first place
True, I was thinking of using it but I just felt I didn’t know how it is related
Is it fine if I send you message in a couple of hours, I don’t know if you’ll be busy by then 😭😭
uh it's alright
@fluid swallow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I quite literally have no idea where to start on this
Ps: the chinese wordings translates into "Based on this diagram" so it isnt important
form a triangle
How form
Closed by @mild hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to compute the integral $$I = \int_{e^{-\pi/2}}^{e^{\pi/2}} (\sin^2(\ln x) + \sin(\ln(x^2)))dx$$. I figured I'd just write the sines in term of Euler's formula, get a super easy integral with the logarithms cancelling out, and then just do it. Apparently, that doesn't work.
Here's what I did:
$$
I = \text{Im}\left[\int_{e^{-\pi/2}}^{e^{\pi/2}} e^{2i\ln x} + e^{2i \ln x} dx\right]
$$
$$
I = \text{Im}\left[2e^{2i}\int_{e^{-\pi/2}}^{e^{\pi/2}} x dx\right]
$$
$$
I = \text{Im}\left[e^{2i}(e^{\pi} - e^{-\pi})\right] = \sin(2)\left[e^{\pi} - e^{-\pi}\right]
$$
The correct answer, however, is
$$
I = e^{\pi/2} - e^{-\pi/2}
$$
I'm very confused about where I messed up, because it looks alright to me.
avipi
ok im done
It looks like you should have gotten pi/2 in your exponents when you evaluated the integral
I don't understand.. the integral evaluates to x^2/2, the 2 next to the exponential cancels it out, and the squaring removes the 2 in denominators of the exponents, right?
Oh,I overlooked the x, sorry. One minute
But I do see the other mistake. It's your handling of sin^2
oh
It looked fishy to me because the two terms in the integrand are different but you evaluated them to be the same
hmm
got it
then i'd need to break it up into 2 integrals, one real part and one imaginary
eh
thanks!
i think i have it now
.close
Closed by @echo birch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this some known binomial identity?
Yeah
[
\sum_{i=0}^{d} \binom{2d - i}{d - i} = \binom{2d + 1}{d}.
]
Explanation:
By substituting (k = d - i), the sum transforms into (\sum_{k=0}^{d} \binom{d + k}{k}). This matches the identity:
[
\sum_{k=0}^{n} \binom{n + k}{k} = \binom{2n + 1}{n},
]
which holds for non-negative integers (n).
Boas
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @spark warren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
I think I can cook up a proof
what's your definition of e^z
If $z = x+iy$ then $e^z = e^x \cdot (\cos y+i \cdot \sin y).$
okay then isn't this kinda just apparent
unless you want to prove everything from scratch
cos(y) + isin(y) is surjective into the unit circle
and e^x is surjective onto R_>0
why wouldn't it be
like sometimes, there are ppl who say you need to use the definition in order to be mathematically correct
and i was thinking kinda isnt that just stating things

well e^x cos and sin are defined in real analysis
you should have their properties available to you
that's why i said unless you want to prove everything from scratch
ok i was misunderstanding you mb
in which case you have to dig up whatever definitions of e^x cos and sin you are using
and then that's like a whole different can of worms
i see
i am just anxious
like i was thinking what if i was asked to prove something like that
am i allowed to use facts
then you assume the well known properties of e^x cos and sin
the real versions not the complex versions
oh ok i see
i see see
ok well then it's obvious
can i still show you what i had in mind
what did you have in mind though
you're not gonna prove properties of e^x cos and sin on the spot
that's like a whole slew of lemmas from real analysis
i mean this is tautological
the fact that you have log|w| is under the assumption that e^x has an inverse
which already presupposes that it is surjective
similarly for arg(w)
ok i needed this clarification, and by tautological you mean that it's meaningless true?
to even begin writing those things down, you need that e^x is surjective onto R_>0, and that cos(y) + isin(y) is surjective onto the unit circle
otherwise the expressions log|w| and arg(w) are meaningless
or at the very least their properties are meaningless

.solved
Closed by @eternal shard
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anybody here know how to do 1's and 2's complement
I have some questions because something is bugging me
I'll post my work in a second
isn't that the end step?
It mentions that in the case of positive integers, the remaining bits are identical to the binary expansion of the integer
well if that's the case, then "1's complement" for a positive integer isn't really taking the complement of anything, just writing it as is in binary
or am I reading it wrong?
mm not quite no
complement means the bit flipping thing
like specifically the way negative integers are stored
btw you might not wanna draw your long division symbol as a root sign
positive integers are stored in the same way whether you're going 1's comp or 2's comp
hmmmm
ok
so then what would it be
?
I flipped the bits
but that doesn't make sense anymore
like at all
all I did was make 22 (positive) into -23
that's what one's complement does on a positive* value?
.close
Closed by @orchid palm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800> spam
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, good day! I just wanna know what epilson delta is.. and can't I just solve this normally lol
you can solve it normally yea
but if the instructions tell you to use eps-delta, then you should probably use eps-delta
@gilded pendant Has your question been resolved?
what's eps-delta?
eps is a common abbreviation for epsilon
have you tried le google?
le wikipedia?
le (insert any relevant online source that will provide you an answer within a few minutes)?
(https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Calculus/Calculus_3e_(Apex)/01%3A_Limits/1.02%3A_Epsilon-Delta_Definition_of_a_Limit)[Epsilon-Delta Definition of a Limit]
Are you
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
how does it work

I dont understand em
see my rant above
it says page not found tho
nvnm
nvm
let me re-link the link
nevermind
discord and its stupid hyperlink
it's fine now
thank you!
um...
this is ivt
I'm unfamiliar with the m and the f(c)...
is the f(c) just the x?
<@&286206848099549185>
also is m jusy a given?
@gilded pendant Has your question been resolved?
Usually the notation of f(x) allows x to be substituted for any other variable "name" like c in the inner example. This one demonstrates finding the coefficient c from the result of m.
I think this m refers to the value possible for all X, and value possible for all Y.
Or actually, the function results.
f(a), f(b) ... f(y), f(z), the parameter name is declared as the one within the parenthesis.
f(x) and g(x) refer to different functions, their names are f and g.
It's all about the notation.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
Can someone help me understand this DE?
Not sure where 5 and 0 and Q(t)/10 is coming from
it comes from the rather verbose line above.
flow rate of liquid entering = 5 L/min
concentration of substance in liquid entering = 0 kg/L (fresh water)
flow rate of liquid exiting: 5 L/min (same rate as entering)
concentration of substance (salt) in liquid exiting: current concentration of salt in the tank = (amount of salt)/(volume of tank) = Q(t) / 10L
I'm confused where 0kg/L is mentioned
fresh water means no salt
Ohhh it's just the rate of 5L/min coming in
Also, how did they come up with the equation for dQ/dt?
(rate of change of amount of substance in the tank) = (rate of substance entering the tank) - (rate of substance exiting the tank)
(rate of substance entering the tank) = (flow rate of liquid entering the tank) * (concentration of substance in liquid entering)
(rate of substance exiting the tank) = (flow rate of liquid exiting the tank) * (concentration of substance in liquid exiting)
I see
Could you also explain the part about where t = 0?
I don't understand how they decided to use Q(t) > 0 and subbing that as Q(0) = 4
Q(t) is an amount of substance, it can't possibly be negative
and Q(0) is the initial amount of salt in the tank, which is 4 kg
that is from plugging in the initial condition to the equation
Kind of confused why they are subbing numbers for a function
the equation has to be true for all t, so if you substitute in the initial condition that allows you to solve for the integration constants
So Q(0) = 4 and t = 0?
yes, substituting that in enables you to solve for C
Closed by @astral mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
We have scholar mate instead
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me understand the approach my teacher made in solving this question.
I assumed you were to find the area between y=3x^2 and y=4-4x, then subtract that area by the one between 8x^2 and 4-4x
But the answer took a very different approach that I hardly understand
just to be clear, this is #2, right?
@wind vault Has your question been resolved?
Yes
I don't really have the time to look through all the work carefully at the moment, but the general approach is to split the integral based on the x values where curves touch, and subtract integrals of the lower function from the higher function (since you're working in non-negatives)
oh, I'm really glad that my answer was able to help despite not really looking at the problem itself
.close
Closed by @wind vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
(of course, it's always good to be aware that this assumes your functions are integrable and C^1 or smtg i think)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, can someone help me with 65 and 66?
,rcw
,rcw
,rcw
and at 66 I need to find the images of the functions
at 65 I need to find m in R, so functions are monotonous on I
idk what to do next
any ideas?
@hardy venture Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> - sorry for tag
Ehhh, isn't it just for any m greater or equal 2, its monotone
but how do I write this mathematically
we aren’t allowed to use tools like this in class
😕
Maybe say for function |x-m| there exists vertex on x=m s.t for all x less then 2 in I \in (-infty, 2) there exists vertex in I
It's just a demonstration to show you
For the range, ehh for a) it depends on y=|x| so we rewrite that into y, then f(0) = -1, f(y)_{y \to infty} = 1, while f’(y) > 0 S.t strictly increasing on [0, infty)
[-1, 1)
That's amazing
What have you tried ma'am?
nothing so far
oof
I missed the last 3-4 classes
that s the reason I have no idea how to solve them
I went to a hackathon
:)
@hardy venture Has your question been resolved?
@hardy venture Has your question been resolved?
please use ,rccw for one counterclockwise rotation of 90° instead of three clockwise rotations of 90°
but u can sketch the graph (in your mind, without drawing that out on paper)
that's sth u can do in tests/exams
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a linear transformation T:$\mathbb{R}^3$ -> $\mathbb{R}^3$ and a matrix A with respects to a basis B. Does that mean that both the input and the output are coördinates of the basis B? Because up to now everytime there was only one basis in my book it said 'with respects to a basis B (considered twice)'
Jolqn
*a matrix A of the linear transformation T with respects to a basis B
yes both the inputs and outputs are coordinates with respect to B
Closed by @tacit basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I have a math exam today and I am having really bad trouble understanding which ones I need to worry about. He sent me an email. I need help on mostly everything. I DONT expect a lot of help I just need help understanding which math questions I need to do and work on. I’d also need help on my word problem questions, this is simple grade 10-11 math but I SUCK as I barely paid attention. I’ll be sending pictures of my word problem questions, I need help understanding how to do it more.
I reckon qn 28 is the simplest
Would you help me with the simplest question and the hardest?
So in the drawing the actual parts are 5 times longer than that in the image
As shown by the scale 1:5
So if we are given the length of an actual part we can calculate it's length in the drawing by dividing by __
I’m lost
So for example if a part of 5'' were drawn, the actual length of the part would be 5''*5=25''
In this case we're trying to find the drawn length of the part given it's actual length
So we want to reverse the multiplication by 5
How would we do that?
25?
Yes
so the answer is 25?
Have you heard of division
Yeah
Its fractions that mess me up and word problems
would it be 3? Like 15 divided by 5?
Yea
Uh ok
Never heard of a grade before
Apparently it's a measurement of slope based on Google
grade I’d say for us is like a slanted form
So we want to convert this grade from a unit of in/ft
idk how to explain really
yeah it’s 12 inches
So uh how many inches are 32 feet
384
Yea
So 7/32 in/ft = 7/384
Then we multiply by 100 to get the percentage
So 7/384=700/384%
From here we do long division
Or if you're allowed to, a calculator
What’s the “/“ for?
Division
Alright I kinda figured
I got 1.822916667
Haha I forgot to add “%” so now I have 182.2916667
Yea nice so 1.82%
Yea
Wait, I kinda realized 7 is inches, 32 is the feet. 32 feet X 12 inches = 384% so we would need to do 7 / 384 % . So the 7 inches ontop stays there until we can divide it
No 32 feet= (12*32)inches=384 inches
The 384 isn't a percentage either
Anyway you do have the answers right
Does the answer key come with workings or something
What do you mean by that?
Do you have the answers to these questions
Because this looks like an assessment book
Oh nvm
Yea it literally says there that there's an answer key mb😭
😂😭yeah there is answers but I second guess myself so bad and I do need help understanding as trying to understand on my own IS ASS.
.close
Closed by @civic pine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone try solving this problem that i made(uses derivatives specifically implicit differentiation):
7x^2 + 4y / x^2 - 5y = 0
Somehow i couldn't solve my own problem lmao
like to find dy/dx?
yea
like the part after deriving all of it which turned to
14x^3 - 35xdy/dx + 8xy - 20ydy/dx + 14x^3 + 4x^2dy/dx - 70xy - 20ydy/dx over (7x^2 + 4y) = 0
= 0
that and add = 0
Denascite
yes
it got me confused on this part
first i thought of multiplying both sides to remove the denominator and factor out the y primes and divide both sides by the numerator that is inside the parenthesis
is that correct or no?
wait why is your denominator (7x^2 + 4y)
wait actually now that u mention it
omg i forgot
the denominator is (x^2 - 5y)^2
mb
👝
anyways it should be:
14x^3 + 4x^2yprime - 70xy - 20yyprime - 14x^3 - 35x^2yprime + 8xy - 20yyprime and the denominator is (x^2 - 5y)^2
what should i do after it?
mind your brackets
it should be
$\frac{14x^3 + 4x^2y’- 70xy - 20yy’ - 14x^3 + 35x^2y’- 8xy + 20yy’}{\left(x^2 - 5y\right)^2}$ technically
blahaquil
after that?
so u move all since all y' were factored out?
well some have the y’ factored out yea so u don’t move those terms
like
you’ll have (something)/(x^2-5y)^2 + y’(something)/(x^2-5y)^2
dang i dont get it
like in normal implicit differentiation after you get the form with yprimes
what do u normally do
usually after getting the y primes u factor them out and divide the remaining values to the other side
yea
wait I’ve been going as if that’d be on one side only
yea multiply
by the denominator
what
so y'(something)/(x^2-5y)^2 = 0
u multiply both sides by (x^2-5y)^2 and after that u divide both sides by (something) and answer would be y'= (x^2-5y)^2 / (something)?
actually nvm that's wrong
hmm o wait nvm i get it
u multiply both sides by (x^2-5y)^2 ?
@steep juniper Has your question been resolved?
@steep juniper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can you get started with this?
This seems like an Olympiad question?
If so, then there is almost certainly a slick solution
Typically, for questions like this, the exact number of sides do not matter provided they satisfy some property, which in this case is probably 1 mod 4. So I would first try an analogous problem using a pentagon, and then prove that as long as you have 1 mod 4 the ratio of white vs black is the same. Finally, consider the case where we let the sides go to infinity, and we can see that in the case of a circle, it would have to be 1/2.
But I could be completely off base!
It’s from a Olympiad qualification comp, USAMTS
Will try this thanks
keep in mind point B with the pentagon as well
@nimble portal Has your question been resolved?
@nimble portal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @nimble portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Recursive → Explicit
how would i write the explicit formula for the sequence given recursively.
write the first few terms you will see a pattern
its always plus 3
otherwise you can replace n+1 with n and n with n-1
so you get an = an-1 + 3 does that ring a bell
@final salmon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @final salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain to me how you can use double integrals to calculate the average value for a function, theoretically.
I mean if you have a region $D$ with area $\mathrm{ar} , (D)$, then the average value of your function over $D$ would be
[ \frac{1}{\mathrm{ar} , (D)} \iint_D f(x, y) \dd{x} \dd{y} ]
neon
So we get a value from the integrals and then divide by the total area?
yes
Closed by @somber swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
lets say we have a set of data, set A, and a set of coefficients, set B. Now consider the following:
(B1)(A1) + (B2)(A2) ... + (Bn)(An) = C
Now, elements of set A are both negative and positive. additionally, the elements of set A are extremely different, as in A1 could be -0.71 and A2 could be 732,000,000. also, the value if C is already known, meaning the goal is to find a set B that would make the equation true
in theory, elements of B should add up to 1, basically meaning each BnAn is the "percentage" of C thats made up from An, but because An can be pos or neg, not sure how this would work
Now, to add the last layer of complexity, this equation needs to hold true add up to C with a small error for multiple different scenarios while keeping set B the same. In other words, A(B)=~C1, and A*(B)=~C2
how would you determine set B to always roughly sum to C with the least uncertainty?
(this isnt an hw problem or anything, just an intermediate step im trying to figure out in a personal coding project. im currently taking linear algebra and also differential equations and it seems like it involves matrices so feel free to use matrices and if i dont understand a symbol or a transformation then ill just ask)
(also, if this should be put in one of the early uni/advanced math categories, since my end goal is coding whatever method to find set B, then lmk to move this)
@silver blade Has your question been resolved?
@silver blade Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
what does "set B to always roughly sum to C with the least uncertainty" even mean
"the goal is to find a set B that would make the equation true in theory, elements of B should add up to 1,"
how do you even know such a B exists without giving the range of A and value of C
for simplicity, just set n = 3
if you have 2 sets of A's and 2 C's, its not possible for a set B to sum exactly to C in both scenarios, since B is the same in both scenarios. so i meant having the least total % difference between what actually is summed and what C is
in theory, it would have to exist, no? lets say A1 is 500 and A2 is .5, and C is 1. then B1 = .01 and B2 = 1. the difficult part is finding those values when you introduce a 2nd set of A and value of C. it wouldnt be perfect, but that goes back to finding the least % difference between what AB sums to and what C actually is
what do you mean "it would have to exist"
you said the elements "should add up to 1" but your example it doesn't
Sorry yea that was wrong
In that example it should be B1 is .001 and B2 is 0.999, and they get as close as possible to 1
thats a simple system of equations. but my confusion starts when you add another series of A and another value of C
would you need to normalize A and C first?
you'd have to even first define the problem coherently
you can do that by presenting a coherent n=3 example
and conditions on the vector A and the number C
{A}1 = 723, -3.4, 1386
{A}2 = -682, 4.7, -986
C1 = 7.6
C2 = -4.3
(A1.1)B1 + (A1.2)B2 + (A1.3)B3 = C1 + error1
(A2.1)B1 + (A2.2)B2 + (A2.3)B3 = C2 + error2
What is {B} with |error1| + |error2| ≈ 0?
@silver blade Has your question been resolved?
@silver blade Has your question been resolved?
@silver blade Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can this question be done using modulo?
if so then how
What are the possible values of (...)² mod 3
0,1
Ok
So show that if x or y is different from 0
what does that imply? i dont understand
Then there exists a solution (x',y',z') where at least one is not divisible by 3
i rlly suck at proofs, mind showing me how? 😭
But yeah, forgetting about the solution (0,0,0) is kinda bad
I tried infinite descent on it, and thats the only way i could do it
but took a long tim
so I wanted to try this method but dont understand how
It is linked to infinite descent though
no way to do it w/o it?
Suppose one of x,y,z is not 0
Let a,b,c be the 3-adic valuations of x,y,z
Then taking d = min(a,b,c)
And x' = x/3^d, y' = y/3^d,...
then x'² + y'² = 3z'²
If x' or y' is not divisible by 3
Then x'²+y'² is not 0 mod 3
Otherwise, both x',y' are divisible by 3, but z' isn't
So LHS is divisible by 9
But RHS isn't
end of proof
=> 3 | (x^2 + y^2) => 3 | x and 3 | y => (3x')^2 + (3y')^2 = 3z^2 => x'^2 + y'^2 = 3z^2/9 = 3z'^2 (where z' = z/3 < z assuming none are zero)
Closed by @clever plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
got it, ty <3
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\int f(x)$ dx
SELVATOR
I tried $\int 2f'(x) - f"(x)$ dx
SELVATOR
I got $\int -xe^x -3e^x$ dx
SELVATOR
@random escarp Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@random escarp Has your question been resolved?
We have f(x) = (1-x)e^x
And f''(x) - 2f'(x) + f(x) = 0
We need that integral
<@&286206848099549185>
use integral properties then integration by parts
,tex .int sum
riemann
Doesnt work
We dont have F(x)
that's why i said integration by parts
I think we need to use that expression from a
have you learned that yet
U mean \int f(x) + g(x) = \int f(x) + \int g(x) ?
this is just sum rule i stated above
If $F'(x) = f(x)$, then $\int f(x) dx = F(x) + C$ by fundamental theorem of calculus
riemann
Yes
How to use it here in our case
use $a(b-c) = ab - ac$
riemann
on this
this is called distributive property
.
xe^x - \int e^x ?
,w int x e^x
looks right
Closed by @random escarp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello how do i derive cube roots above?
