#help-42
1 messages · Page 120 of 1
Forgot to remove roots when copying my bad
AkitoLite
I mean you just solve them 🤷🏻♂️
we know that the leading power has a coefficient of +ve to both of them, so the y value must decrease as x decreases in large values and increase as x increases
since we have 2 critical values (starting with the first one), that means the curve cuts and touches the x axis
$x=0,x=1$ \
$1>0$ therefore we have $x(x-1)^2 \ge 0$ at $x \ge 0$
It is also obvious from pure looking at it that ANY negative value of x will result in a negative value of the expression. Because we have x(f(x))², so even if f(x) is negative, it will become positive, and the x=-ve will cause it to be negative as a whole
@torn surge you can try solving for the other one aswell 🙂
AkitoLite
@torn surge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I get help
sure
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
:)
I wanna know what I need to write on my paper all the acceleration formula
what
Not every
Like the equations of motion you mean or what?
it usually boils down to F=ma or dv/dt, and the suvat equations
I don't get what this teacher is teaching me
I just write things down in my paper
But I don't get it 😭
theyre doing (change in velocity)/(time for that change to happen)
Can u explain how to calculate them
say i have velocity v1 at t=t1
and velocity v2 at t=t2
my (average) acceleration between those two times would be (v2-v1)/(t2-t1)
Its similar to how you would find velocity from displacement and time
I meant like when I get to my exam and I'm question with 50km/h I don't how to calculate that and the teacher told me to use v and t
You won't be asked to find acceleration from just 1 velocity
Thats not possible
they may say 'blah is travelling with velocity u and experiences uniform acceleration a, after t seconds what is blah's velocity, then its just u+at [suvat equations]'
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
I'm studying the 3 dynamics laws but i feel that's not the context to use them
ive been summoned
@oak elm btw thanks
I meant it in the sense of finding the acceleration if there is a general force acting, eg in centripetal force
usually youre given either a force, a function for displacement or velocity, or some information to use the suvat equations. As a generalisation for formulae you might have for accelerations
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
No
clikc the ❌
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $L_1$: $X = \lambda (0,-1,1) + (4,2,1)$, $L_2$: $X = \lambda (0,1,2) + (4,-2,-4)$ and $A = (4,2,1)$.
Find a point $B$ that belongs to $L_1$ and $L_2$, and a point $C \in L_2$ such that the triangle $ABC$ is right-angled at $A$.
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
@simple musk Has your question been resolved?
@simple musk Has your question been resolved?
@simple musk Has your question been resolved?
What did you get for B, C?
For B, you need to solve (4, 2 - x, 1 + x) = (4, -2 + y, -4 + 2y)
For C, you need to write the parametric: (4, -2 + t, -4 + 2t)
Write vectors BA, CA and make the dot product zero
@simple musk Has your question been resolved?
@simple musk
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey guys, i need help, to verify whether or not these 25 derivatives are correct.
the first column is the function, and the 2nd is the derivative.
@cyan knot Has your question been resolved?
Looks all good to me. I'd represent derivative number 18 as -cot(x)csc(x) though.
alright, thank you. ill take note of that 🙂
Closed by @cyan knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\textbf{2.} Let
$A = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \ 0 & -6 \ 4 & 5 \end{pmatrix}$
and
$B = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \ k & -k \ 3 & k+1 \end{pmatrix}$.
Determine all values of $k \in \mathbb{R}$ for which there exist infinitely many matrices $X \in \mathbb{R}^{2 \times 2}$ such that
$AX = BX$.
For each of these values, find all matrices $X \in \mathbb{R}^{2 \times 2}$ that satisfy the equation.
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
AX = BX
AX - BX = 0
(A-B)X = 0
,, \begin{bmatrix} 2 - 1 & 1 + 1 \ -k & -6+k \ 4 - 3 & 5 -k - 1 \end{bmatrix} = A - B
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
,, A - B = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \ -k & -6+k \ 1 & 4 -k \end{bmatrix}
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
,, (A - B)X = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \ -k & -6+k \ 1 & 4 -k \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x_1 & x_2 \ x_3 & x_4 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
,, (A - B)X = \begin{bmatrix} x_1 + 2x_3 & x_2 + 2x_4 \ -kx_1 -6x_3 + kx_3 & -kx_2 -6x_4 +kx_4 \ x_1 + 4x_3 -kx_3 & x_2 + 4x_4 -kx_4 \end{bmatrix}
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
,, \begin{cases} x_1 + 2x_3 &=0 \ x_2 + 2x_4 &=0 \ -kx_1 -6x_3 + kx_3 &=0 \ -kx_2 -6x_4 + kx_4 &= 0 \ x_1 + 4x_3 -kx_3 &=0 \ x_2 + 4x_4 -kx_4 &= 0 \end{cases}
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
- x1 = -2x3
- x2 = -2x4
- -k(-2x3) -6x3 + kx3 = 0
- -k(-2x4) -6x4 + kx4 = 0
- -2x3 + 4x3 -kx3 = 0
- -2x4 + 4x4 -kx4 = 0
3.1) 2kx3 - 6x3 + kx3 = 0
3.2) (2k-6+k)x3 = 0
3.3) 3k - 6 = 0
3.4) 3k = 6
3.5) k = 2
looks good
6.1) (-2+4-k)x4 = 0
6.2) -2+4 = 2
6.3) 2-k=0
6.4) 2 = k
6.5) k = 2
so either k is 2 or k is NOT 2
k = 2 or k ≠ 2
u can check this by just substituting something thats not 2 for k
and seeing if its true
You need infinitely many solutions for AX = BX... Why would k be neq to 2?
^
I need help and hints
I am trying . . .
i don't really undertand where k neq 2 comes from
idk
and also u can save a bit of trouble for urself by checking the minors of A-B
You assumed AX = BX here, and solved for a "k" that always satisfies it
That is, k = 2 gives infinitely, many solutions for AX = BX no matter the X
(A-B)∈R^(2x3)
whats the dimension of the minors? 1x2?
determinant is only for square matrices doe, wdym
ye
i meant by checking the 2x2 minors of A-B
idk i also started lin alg only recently but i recall that u can check that A-B is rank 1 by inspection for (A-B)X to be true for infinitely amounts of X
which then can be solved by checking the determinants of the 2x2 minors
idrk whats happening geometrically since im a bot but algebraically its just finding when A-B is of rank 1
wdym bot
sorry, its just colloquial slang from where i live that describes a person being bad/poor at something
im just saying i havent learnt enough to see whats happening geometrically
so i can't really give an explanation of why im checking for it other than the fact that i've just been taught to do it as such
australia
A-B being rank 1 after plugging k = 2 and rrefing(?)
🤔
ur 2nd column is a multiple of 2 of ur 1st column
okay
u know rank is 0, 1 or 2
since A-B is not trivial 0 matrix
we know its 1 or 2
ur 2nd column must be a multiple of the first to satisfy having infinite solutions
so that they are linearly dependent
rank = dim(column space)
its not 2 bec col 1 is lin dep col 2
. . . so?
im just saying u can check urself whether its k=2 or not
beacuse it satisfies rank 1 of A-B
U essentially solved k=2 but u aren't sure whether its k=2 or k =/=2
hence i tried to provide a way to self-check
I need to find X
- x1 = -2x3
- x2 = -2x4
- -k(-2x3) -6x3 + kx3 = 0
- -k(-2x4) -6x4 + kx4 = 0
- -2x3 + 4x3 -kx3 = 0
- -2x4 + 4x4 -kx4 = 0
- x1 = -2x3
- x2 = -2x4
- -2(-2x3) -6x3 + 2x3 = 0
- -2(-2x4) -6x4 + 2x4 = 0
- -2x3 + 4x3 -2x3 = 0
- -2x4 + 4x4 -2x4 = 0
ok ok let sjsut go back to Ax=0
do you know when is this true for non-zero A?
like what does it imply about x
- x1 = -2x3
- x2 = -2x4
- -2(-2x3) -6x3 + 2x3 = 0
3.1) 4x3 - 6x3 + 2x3 = 0
3.2) (4-6+2)x3=0
3.3) -2 + 2 = 0
3.4) 0x3 = 0 - -2(-2x4) -6x4 + 2x4 = 0
4.1) 4x4 - 6x4 + 2x4
4.2) (4-6+2)x4=0
4.3) -2 + 2 = 0
4.4) 0x4 = 0 - -2x3 + 4x3 -2x3 = 0
- -2x4 + 4x4 -2x4 = 0
idk
no
do you know what nullspace is
ye
the kernel
all the vectors that map to 0
would you agree any matrix A, multipie by vectors from its nullspace will give 0
rrefing an matrix augmented by zeros
A multiplied by vectors in the kernel give 0
naturally x is vector from nullspace of A
so we can find x
if we are finding x for (A-B)x=0
we can just find nullspace of A-B
ye
,, (A - B)X = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \ -k & -6+k \ 1 & 4 -k \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x_1 & x_2 \ x_3 & x_4 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \ \textbf{ k } = 2 \ (A - B)X = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \ -2 & -6+2 \ 1 & 4 -2 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x_1 & x_2 \ x_3 & x_4 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
,w Nullspace[{{1,2},{-2,-6+2},{1,4-2}}]
naturally ur X is?
Ker(A-B) = (-2x,x) = x(-2,1)
Ker(A-B) = <(-2,1)>
X ∈ R^(2x2)
help
Ker(A-B) ∈ R^2
X ∈ R^(2x2)
You already had the parametrisations x_1 = -2x_3 and x_2 = -2x_4
So plug those back in to X
[ X = \begin{pmatrix} -2a & -2b \ a & b \end{pmatrix} ]
its true as long as the 2nd column is a multiple of the first
shsgd
where did "a" come from
a = x_3 and b = x_4
Renamed because easier
a and b are free variables so you know there are infinite solutions
Also notice the columns of X are the same format as the kernel that was given by wolfram here
This makes sense because a and b are free variables, so any choice of a and b means the column will be found in the kernel of A-B
ye
That’s it, you solved another one
they should AFAIK all be a
because otherwise the dimension of the kernel will be 2
unless I am tripping hard
no, because, a(2,1) is a linear combination of b(2,1)
dimension of the kernel is still 1

3.2) (4-6+2)x3=0
4.2) (4-6+2)x4=0
It doesn’t matter what x_3 or x_4 you choose, it will go to zero
ye
Which means there is no constraint on x_3 = x_4
Closed by @simple musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there a way to solve this type of problem other than just guess and check?
i think youre going to take a while with that
what do you need for this to become an integer?
70
whenever you have a square number, all of the powers of the prime factorization should be even
Closed by @twilit gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$(2x-3)^2 = 6-5x$
Simon James B
Simon James B
i don't see it
either - 2 * 2x(3) or +2 * 2x (-3) not both
$(2x)^2 \textcolor{red}{-} 2 * 2x(-3) + (-3)^2 = 6-5x$
anti-algebraist 𝔸dωn𝓲²s
if we have (2x-3)^2 don't we use a^2 - 2ab + b^2?
anti-algebraist 𝔸dωn𝓲²s
i never seen this before
me too
usually i was not changing signs when doing -
but it's to explain
you know the formula for $(a-b)^2$ ?
ss
that would be the case in (a+(-b))²
-*- = +
$(a-b)^2 = (2x-3)^2$, whats the a and b ?
ss
no bro
youre saying b is -3 then it would be (2x-(-3))^2
well how can it be 3? even +(-3) makes it -3
then youd have to use (a+b)^2, here b would be -3
but youre using (a-b)^2 so b would be 3
i get that it should be 3 but right now for me it makes no sense lol
when i had a-b i always did it with - with no issues lol
we have $(a-b)^2 =(2x-3)^2$, so if b=-3, we would have $(2x \textcolor{red}{-}-3)^2$
ss
we would have a double $-$
ss
you see it ?
yea i see it
okay its good so whats the result of $(2x-3)^2$ ?
ss
$4x^2 + 2* 2x * 3 +9$?
Simon James B
$4x^2 + 2* 2x * 3 +9$?
its $a^2 -2ab+b^2$ , $a=2x, b=3$
ss
the a^2 and b^2 are good
(2x)^2 is 4x^2
ah ok
-2ab = -2 * 2x * 3 wdym. 2ab if our a is 2x and b 3 it is - 2* 2x *3
yeah it’s $-22x3$
ss
In this formula of (a-b)² = a²-2ab+b² = a²+2a(-b)+b² the minus is already taken into account
is there somone who understand frensh
oui
Closed by @rare inlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
est ce que tu comprend integral à parametre
retourne dans le channel d’avant
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
@errant knot Has your question been resolved?
please don’t ping the mods for math help
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Needa help
The answer is correct, and I could not spot any errors :|
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
Those calculations are too intimidating in many ways 😭😭
Thanks for looking it for me 🥰
Another question for cal 3 course can I use frechet differentiablity for related problems and discuss it in normed metric spaces (which isn’t taught during the lecture but I feel it would make life easier)
@fluid swallow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fluid swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for finding the number of solutions in sin(x) = x/100
how do i know for each period, there's exactly two intersection points and not any more any less
the pattern suggests that is the case
but like uh
i'm guessing it has something to do with sin being periodic but hmm not convinced
there cannot be more than 2 intersection points per period
the only case where there is 1 intersection point per period is when the maximum/minimum of f(x) = sinx - x/100 is also the root
show that this is not possible
this looks like using ivt or calculus in general
can't use that
i'm reviewing trig and this is a trig exercise so only concepts below/equivalent to trig
complicated to only use trig for that
though you know that for n such that (2n+1)*pi < 100:
sin(2npi)-2npi/100 < 0
sin((2n+1/2)pi) - (2n+ 1/2)pi/100 > 0
and the function is increasing on [2npi, (2n+1/2)pi]
so there is a unique point on that interval where the function is 0 by corollary of IVT
the tricky stuff comes for the interval [(2n+1/2)pi, (2n+1)pi]
i'm thinking about it 😭
oh actually it's the opposite
the function isn't increasing on that interval
f'(x) = cos(x) - 1/100
the function is increasing on [2npi + arccos(1/100), (2n+1/2)pi]
which isn't a problem when n is big enough
okay so i'm guessing that calculus is almost required for this problem?
yeah this part makes sense
did they skip over the calculus part here?
also i guess this solution messed up the part where 30pi <= x <= 31pi
where you get another 2 solutions
2 * floor(50/pi) = 30 + 2 from considering values of 30pi <= x <= 31pi
but since it's a stackexchange answer i'll assume i'm probably wrong somewhere
😭
there might be a way to consider (2npi,(2n+1)pi) immediately
so f(x) = sin(x) - x/100
or f(x) = 100sin(x) - x
to get rid of the fraction
are we going to ignore the scaling factor?
something = 0 is the same as 100something = 0
yeah okay sure
so
taking this function
sure
on the interval (2npi,(2n+1)pi):
f(2npi) < 0
f((2n+1)pi) < 0
no actually take any n > 0
so
two cases
solving for f'(x) = 0 on that interval
we get x = arccos(1/100) + 2npi
right
so the max of the function on the interval is f(x) = 100sin(arccos(1/100)) - arccos(1/100) - 2npi
😭 mhm okay evaluating at the critical point
yes
f and f' all being smooth functions
it won't be hard to prove that
f(x) is indeed a maximum
(for example computing f'' < 0 on that interval can be helpful)
yeah fair showing a max can be done with first derivative test or second derivative test
bla bla
so
if max > 0
by IVT, splitting the interval into (..., x) and (x,...)
two solutions exactly
now to understand when f(x) = 100sin(arccos(1/100)) - arccos(1/100) - 2npi > 0
righttt okay f(2npi) < 0 and f(2(n + 1)pi) < 0 and if max > 0 then yeah by ivt there's 2 solutions
okay i think the general thought process makes sense
well if the approximation is good enough it's ok
we just need to know the max value of n that works
i see okay fair enough
but wait so how do the amc folks solve this question
do they take this route too?
those?
or is there a heuristic approach to this
i mean the source
"source: AMC" and well i'm guessing they are only expected to know till precalc
graphic
in a single sine cycle there is a bump above the x axis and one below it
they do it graphically
basically they ask "when the positive bump of sin becomes below x/100"
so in a cycle it wouldn't matter if the positive or negative side of the line intersects
it would intersect twice for a considerable number of cycles
yeah that's fair but they would have to assume that the "pattern" holds right?
the pattern being that x/100 intersects sin(x)
twice every period
which you can approximate
or do they have a tool to justify this
yeah but u can't draw the graph for 0 <= x < = 100
for a period yes
for several periods too
but then they have to resort to assuming this pattern holds, no?
well they are 'assuming' it but the reason why is because sin is concave on its positive bump
like it's almost a horizontal line passing through a bump
here that would mean there is an n such that 1 = (2n+1/2)pi/100
and what's the justification for 30pi <= x <= 31pi, for example
do we just say that 0.94ish <= x/100 <= 0.97 and 0 <= sin(x) <= 1 and since sin(x) is concave in said interval then it must intersect the line twice?
sin(x) is concave, and sin(30.5 pi) = 1 > 30.5pi/100
the line has to intersect
and isn't tangent
so intersects twice
oh so without the calculus thing we did prior
we just see heuristically
that okay yeah a line intersects the concave bumps ( > 0 ) of sin twice each period
ofc there are values of k such that sin(x) = kx will show some tangents
but here picking k = 1/100
being rational
and under 1
it won't happen
so bonus question: what are the values of 0 < k < 1 such that sin(x) = kx has an even amount of positive solutions?
wait 😭 i'll tend to this
okay just to recap what we did
we wanted to examine the roots of f(x) = x/100 - sin(x)
and for that we considered the derivative
if there's a max in our interval then there must be a root in some closed interval [2npi, 2(n + 1)pi]
and well since there's only one max in the said interval
wait why can't we just stop here?
do we have to mention ivt for f(2npi) and f(2(n+1)pi/2)
ivt is the completely rigorous way
no i mean like
if we show that there's only one max in the said interval
then there must be two roots, no?
uhhh
okay yeah i can think of a function > 0
over the entire interval
and still having one max
that would have 0 roots
okay i see how ivt ties in with this
ivt guarantees that you must cross the x axis twice
because of f(2npi) and f(2(n+1)pi < 0
okay
and the "heuristic" approach was to just uh say that a line intersects the concave bumps of sin (when the y values are > 0) exactly twice?
no idea 😭 but just a rough sketch already suggests every value of k >= 0.1 works
but between (0, 0.1) it gets pretty hard
are you sure?
we're not counting x = 0 as a positive solution
not really
some k around 0.13 works
i got down to eliminate all k between [1/(2pi), 1)
maybe 1/(2.47pi) ish
😭
i think it's time to use calculus to find a line that is tangent to sin(x) between 2pi and 3pi
wait uh u can't have a tangent of the form y = kx so that is out the window too
is it that you can't have even amount of positive solutions?
it's cuz y = kx can't possibly be tangent to any of the concave bumps of sin
i first got rid of all the cases where kx just intersects sin(x) once
so like around k < 1/(2.5pi)
now if we admit the line passes through one of sin's concave bump then it must again intersect an even amount of times to the next sin bump
it can't be tangent
so yeah, uhhhh it's not possible?
this is really hard 😭
thanks for the help btw
.close
Closed by @exotic cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok that's the area of the base 
no, that would give you the volume
so what would i do
you need what's called the "lateral area" now (and since there's two bases, multiply the area of the base by two)
Ok now the lateral surface area is the area to the side of the cylinder
ok
You can basically roll it out like a rectangle https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRPEH-ncqjxP4sjqsT0L-1-dNq6s9cPHh6Ppw&usqp=CAU
what do we do with the 21?
21 x 3.14
307.8
2 x 3.14 x 7
44
307.8 +44 x 21
.close
Closed by @subtle gate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Today I've started to learn about the use of cos sin and tan. I learned a trick called 'soh cah toa' which I'm sure many know here.
My question really is what we find out when using for example here, the question is
"Use sinus and cosinus to find A and C."
The book used this trick to find A, but what do we really get when we get to 0.598? Since it doesnt really have any unit, is it relevant to know, or is it just a constant we find in the process?
it's the ratio of the relevant sides
My understanding is that these 3 functions have quite a lot of uses for them correct? We can enter degrees, but also constants?
Or is this why we would use sin^-1 instead
sin,cos,tan of an angle gives the ratio of sides
applying the inverse to a ratio gives the angle
.close
Closed by @indigo cloak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to solve this limit?
try to factorize by $e^{xln(x)}$ maybe
ss
or you can use taylor series
How should i do it using taylor?
Dunno how to continue
<@&286206848099549185>
Pls help
i think this would work
factorize e^(-xln(x)) from the denominator
$\frac{e^{x\ln\left(x\right)}-1+x}{e^{x\ln\left(x\right)}-e^{-x\ln\left(x\right)}}=e^{x\ln\left(x\right)}\cdot\frac{e^{x\ln\left(x\right)}-1+x}{e^{2x\ln\left(x\right)}-1}=\frac{e^{x\ln\left(x\right)}-1+x}{e^{2x\ln\left(x\right)}-1}$
MæthIsAlwaysRight
after this, the denominator can be "compared" to a function with similar asymptotic growth
there is a well-known limit (e^x - 1) / x = 1, as x -> 0
2xln(x) tends to 0, so we may use that as well
$\frac{e^{x\ln\left(x\right)}-1+x}{2x\ln\left(x\right)\frac{e^{2x\ln\left(x\right)}-1}{2x\ln\left(x\right)}}$
MæthIsAlwaysRight
the limit in denominator would now evaluate to 1, so we can cancel it
$\frac{e^{x\ln\left(x\right)}-1+x}{2x\ln\left(x\right)}$
MæthIsAlwaysRight
that gives us this
and this is sum of 2 limits, one of which tends to 0
@copper notch you here?
Closed by @copper notch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Your solution is correct
thank you
lasty question
i learnt
first principles product rule
and power rule
what do i learn next
Try the book of Ron Larson, just search ron larson calculus pdf
When you write fg(x), do you mean f(x)g(x) or f(g(x))?
f(g(x)) im pretty sure
yeah then it's kinda off
you need chain rule
You're implying chain rule there
oh is it cos its a function inside of a function
chain rule is like
g'(f(x)) f'(x) isnti t
for g(f(x)) yes
okok wait
wait
wait
dont tell me anything im gonna try and solve it rn using chain
tell me if i get it wrong or right
chain rule: g(f(x)) = g'(f(x)) • f'(x)
product rule: g(x)•f(x) = g(x)•f'(x) + f(x)•g'(x)
pretty sure im wrong
Your g(x) should be sin x, review f'(g(x))
in f'g(x), you only differentiate the outer function, which is the cosine. So, it should be -sin(sinx)
oh okay
So you won't get lost in the process, its better to assign the inner function to a variable.
f(x) = cos x; g(x) = sin x
find f(g(x))
y = cos(sinx)
let u = sin x; u' = cos x
y' = cos'(u) • u'
y' = -sin(sinx) • cos x
In this way, you won't be confused
@sage girder Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey what's the solution to this problemo
I don't think n!/(n-r)! Can solve it
@hushed crater Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Are these answers correct P. 68 M. 72 R.108 T.70 S.108 N. 108
@stark smelt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stark smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help with 9b
<@&286206848099549185>
Try writing the cosine terms as a sum of the ninth roots using demoivre
So like (z-alpha)(z-alpha^8)?
Should be no z at all if you're doing this
Do u mean these roots?
I don't know why you're setting z^6 = 1
But yes those are the ninth roots of unity
@lime solar Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lime solar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The following image appeared in a newspaper in 1979. What is missing from the image from a statistical perspective?
Title of the chart: “Purchasing Power of Wage Rates Compared to 100 in September 1978.”
X-axis labels; months.
@floral dew Has your question been resolved?
@floral dew Has your question been resolved?
@floral dew Has your question been resolved?
Can someone help me with simultaneous word problems
@floral dew Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with this question i got 1/n+7, 993, 1/r-7. but its all wrong
@kindred rapids Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Looks right to me, maybe try nearby values like 994 or smth in case they messed up some strict inequalities
Also don't forget parentheses where needed
ok let me try
yeah idk i give up
,w simplify abs((n+5)/(2n+14)-1/2)
Or maybe they want the absolute value in the answer?
im not sure
i only have 1 try left
should i do sqrt(n+5/2n+14 -(1/2)^2)
?
and the 2nd one is not 993 or 994
so i got no clue for that
Would you know if anyone else got them right?
this is like one of the example work
no
we dont know until the 19th
its just graded hw
Rip
This is some bad quality hw
Your answers seem right to me at least, so it's just a pb with the website solutions imo. If you can ask any other classmates/prof I'd suggest that
Just solve for x_N =10 or 20 or K like before
Capital K?
Well this is just dumb
nope wrong
(no capital)
Lol it's not your fault, whoever made this did it really badly
i honestly think its the rounding
but ill see after the results
from previous hw it just looks normal so im not sure
No the last one is definitely K^4
Np, you too
@kindred rapids Has your question been resolved?
@kindred rapids close it
Closed by @kindred rapids
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I fail to prove the following equation
Also I'd appreciate if somebody could tell me how to recognise the 'patterns' of trigonometric equations
essentially the goal is to turn the equation into two same parts, like 1 = 1, or more likely in this case, sin 2a = sin 2a(only an example of the result)
@stone prism Has your question been resolved?
Sinc +sind =2sin(c+d/2)cos(c-d/2)
@stone prism Has your question been resolved?
?
Can you elaborate, please?
I tried using the sum-to-product identity, but I get stuck later
@stone prism Has your question been resolved?
$4sin(\frac{\alpha}{2})$ $cos(\alpha)$ $cos(\frac{3\alpha}{2})$ $ is $ $2cos(\alpha)[sin(2\alpha)-sin(\alpha)]$
Horsi135
and that can be opend to $2cos(\alpha)sin(2\alpha)-sin(2\alpha)$
Horsi135
and that is $sin(3\alpha)+sin(\alpha)-sin(2\alpha)$
Horsi135
and that is the left side
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone know how to solve b(ii)?
I try to use y = ax+b (hint from (i)) and I get y = -x -a
Also I figured out as a = 0, infinity ,both (x,y) = (0,0)
Then I tried to use the Green theorem, and the integral became nasty. Should I change the method, or were my assumptions wrong?
@fading shuttle Has your question been resolved?
@fading shuttle Has your question been resolved?
@fading shuttle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i go about solving part a? so far i have done the base case which is (10^0 - 1) = 0 which is a multiple but idk what to do from here
you do the step case and then you modify 10^(k+1)
then subtract 1 in the end and somehow factor a 9 out
well you wanna relate 10^(n+1) - 1 vs 10^n - 1
these are both almost ||geometric sums||, it should get you a useful equality for the problem at hand
otherwise, since they're keen on you solving it by induction
||what's their difference||
||yeah we're essentially doing the same thing, yours is a bit more to the point||
so can you do (10(10^k)-1)=9m? m being a constant
well that's what you want to prove
I'm suggesting you look at 10^(n+1) - 1 - (10^n - 1)
where did you get the - (10^n - 1) from?
well
it's your induction hypothesis
10^n - 1 is a multiple of 9
so if 10^(n+1) - 1 - (10^n - 1) is a multiple of 9
you'll get the result you want
so 10^(n+1) - 1 - (10^n - 1) = 0?
you sure about that ?
bc i thought you did 10^(n+1) - 1 = (10^n - 1) then just moved it to the LHS
10^(n+1) - 1 - (10^n - 1) = 9k
so 10^(n+1) - 1 = 9k + (10^n-1) = 9k + 9m
sorry went ahead
that's what we're going for
if A = 10^n - 1 is a multiple of 9 [induction hypothesis]
and B = 10^(n+1) - 1 - (10^n - 1) is a multiple of 9 [which remains to be shown]
then A+B = 10^(n+1) - 1 is also a multiple of 9
and you win
it's fine we wrote essentially the same thing lol
Assume P(k) = 10^k - 1 = 9m
Then P(k + 1) = 10^{k+1} - 1 = 9*10^k + 10^k - 1 = 9*10^k + 9m = 9(10^k + m)
With m' = 10^k + m => P(k + 1) = 9m' and you're done
i dont get where you guys are getting the -(10^n - 1) from,
the base case is (10^k - 1) = 9m
the step case is (10^(k+1) - 1) = 9s
then what did you guys do?
Did you not get this either?
P(k) is the base case, P(k + 1) is the step case
im not sure why you're doing 9*10^k + 10^k - 1
to reduce the step case into base case, and since we need to show the step case is divsible by 9 also, pulling out 9*10^k out of 10^{k+1} = 10*10^k kills two birds with one rock
gets me a 9multiple in addition to the base case which we assumed was divisible by 9
so your turning a 10 into a 9?
my bad i missed this
i got it thanks
how about part b? would the base case be P(k) = (x-0)?
@upbeat shoal Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @upbeat shoal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm not sure how to go about this
clearly {0} is a two-sided ideal. Then I assume epsilon != {0} and also epsilon != L(V) and try to get a contradiction
I feel like I have to do something with T in L(v) which is not in epsilon
but I can't put my finger on it
slightly reworded, show that if there is a nonzero map in E, then all maps are in E
like earlier, I would recommend to think about it in terms of matrices
yes
ahh
of course
matrices
so this amounts to the fact that I can transform any matrix to any other matrix using elementary row and column transformations
but I don't know how to prove that
||I'm feeling an urge to revisit linear alg||
it's great so far I like this
instead of going from A to B for all A,B, it can be helpful to instead show A to C for some fixed C and then you also have B->C, so by reversing time you have A->C->B
Right
Wait but if a matrix is not diagonalisable then it can't be converted to a diagonal matrix right?
you are messing up what you are allowed to do to the matrix
you can construct 3 elementary matrices for:
- row switching transformation
- row multiplying transformation
- row addition transformation
and you're done ?
to diagonalise you are only allowed to do XAX^-1
here you are allowed to do XA and AX
well
hmm
well yeah I do know what elementary transformation matrices look like
does that not suffice to show this? 
It probably does, I just don't see it
I'm assuming by C you mean the identity?
or any diagonal matrix
for example
on second thought that isnt actually the best approach because to be able to reverse time you are only allowed to use invertible X
but its still enough to show that the identity is in E
why
because then T is in epsilon for all T in L(V)
why
because TI=T
I was just about to say that
we need an invertible matrix
but what happens if epsilon is entirely composed of singular matrices
basically you have to show that that doesnt happen
try to get the identity
its easiest
as a first step, try to create "simple" matrices
I can isolate any non-zero element A_{i,j} of A by pre-multiplying it by a matrix X with all 0s except 1 in the (i, i) slot and post-multiplying it by a matrix Y with all 0s except 1 in the (j, j) slot
X isolates the row and Y isolates the column
good start
and I can scale this so that the A_{i,j} element becomes 1, so I have a matrix with a single element 1
which means I have an E in epsilon such that E(v_i)=v_j for some i, j and E(v_k)=0 for k != i
where v_1, ..., v_n is a basis of V
ah okay and then I can just duplicate the 1 to make the identity
Now to translate this to the language of linear maps
yeah
But something like $$\varepsilon=\left{\begin{pmatrix}
a&0&0\
0&0&0\
0&0&0\end{pmatrix}: a\in\bR\right}$$ is also a subspace
kheerii
ah wait with any matrix with a single 1 I can get all the matrices with a single 1
Is this not sufficient Denascite? what am I missing
(and I dont understand how axler expects anyone to solve it without the matrix perspective)
just by changing the rows and/or columns
yes
which forms a basis of the whole space
We technically have never established what a basis of L(V,W) looks like though
you can also construct the identity and follow the previous plan
That works yeah
Wait, I think we have
or at least for L(F^n,F^m)
This should be easy enough to appropriate into a basis of L(F^n, F^m)
which in turn should be easy enough to appropriate into a basis of L(V,W)
but I think I'll just do the identity thing
Let me see if I can translate this to linear maps
@pseudo wedge Has your question been resolved?
v_q/c_j, not c_k
there's a lot of indices going on here and idk how to make it simpler
youre rushing a bit
first get the map with only a single entry
and then afterwards get all the other ones you want
does this look good?
How is someone supposed to do this without knowing what a matrix and matrix transformations are
technically you dont need it ^^
looks good
although I didnt fully check every index
Lol
Yeah the indices should be right, I was talking about the writing of the proof
Thank you so much for your help 
.close
Closed by @pseudo wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
help with b
ive narrowed it down to 13 17 and 19
we know that this number is bigger than 10 and smaller than 20
numbers like 15 dont work as if u multiply it by itself it would always yield 5 as its last digit
however the last digit number is 1
so its either 13 17 or 19
any way to solve this without a calculator without estimating?
maybe a dumb thought but you can write x^16 as x^4^4, so just calculate 13^4, 17^4, 19^4 (should be doable on paper maybe?) and then just look at the last two digits as you take ^4 again
oh man im dumb
but they all have 1 as last digit in 4 steps, 9 in 2, so you get 1 at the end for all 3 after 16
11 would also have 1 as last digit, no matter the power
<@&268886789983436800>
sure, but i'm saying that his justification is not enough to discard 11
Oh sry !
Honestly I can see a few ways of doing it but none of them are that pretty. You could calculate each of them raised to the 16th power modulo 100 which rules out two of them (but in principle it could only rule out one of them)
16^16 is quite easy to estimate so you can do that to rule out one or two of them
But I would probably just divide it by each of those numbers with long division
It's not very painful
it cannot be an even number
Yes but if 16^16 is smaller then it can't be 15^15
I'm not saying it's 16
sorry 15^16
sorry 13
I'm tired oka
It cuts out options
As followup on what Gandhi stated
You can check 13^4, 17^4 and 19^4
Then you can get the last two digits of each of those, and take it to the 4th ower as well, which will give you the last digits of the number
x^1: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
x^2: 0, 1, 4, 9, 6, 5, 6, 9, 4, 1
x^3: 0, 1, 8, 7, 4, 5, 6, 3, 2, 9
x^4: 0, 1, 6, 1, 6, 5, 6, 1, 6, 1
Then this repeats every four powers, so x^16 uses the x^4 line.
So, it's some odd number other than 15.
This is a brute force method, which while will clearly give the solution, but i think the idea is doing it with theory?
Else we may try to factor
a¹⁶-1
So just factor by division
Until we get the least factor
It's not "brute force" because you're not actually raising the numbers to the power of 16
Depends how you define it ig but it's much much easier
(a+1)(a-1)
Yeah, long division will work nicely.
It also relies on the fact that those numbers are all prime so it does still use theory
well i guess cutting it down to only three possible candidates is the "enough theory" to cut it down to a reasonable effort by brute force
long division of a 18-digit number three times is not particularly difficult or tedious
,calc 6+6+5+4+1+6+6+0+9+1+8+3+1+7+9+8+4+0
Result:
84
,calc 84/3
Result:
28
So ig 13 works
13^n mod 3 = 1
We may use similar logic to check the remaining possible combinations
16^16 = 2^64, which, if you know the highest value of a 64-bit unsigned number plus one, you can perhaps discard two answers.
Or discard one.
This doesn't work well !
If 13 is an answer then a¹⁶-1 will have a factor (13+1) = 14 that is we can check if 7 divides a¹⁶-1
@keen sigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the difference between f(x) and f(y)?
Here's the part of the problem that's confusing me (from the review chapter in Calculus 1:)
- Let f(x) = x^3
- f(y) = ?
What I'm struggling with:
It appears the answer would be simply y^3 just like f(q) would be q^3, but I've not encountered f(y) before and want to confirm this is correct. It doesn't feel right to treat "y" like a regular variable but perhaps I am overthinking it. Thanks!
you're right, if f(x) = x^3, then f(y) = y^3
You're probably used to treating y as a dependent variable, but it's just a symbol, no different than x
Closed by @winged beacon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np 👍
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
should i seperate it first?/
but then derivative of ln is u'/u right
how would i do that if 2 is on the bottom
is it possible to take out 1/2 out of an ln then
Write the formula purely and remember some quotient proprety
Such as dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by his reciprocical
wait so
where do we apply it. .
Write u'/u
Indeed, if you know it its also good
What is u'
No
Its not a quotient
Its a sum of function
/2 is just a factor
You don't have to use quotient rule here
If you find it difficult to deal with the 2, you can use the laws of logs to get rid of it before differentiating.
.close
Closed by @slim cove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

