#help-42
1 messages · Page 98 of 1
Ok so how would i know which ones work or which ones will not
sometimes they exhibit chaotic fluctuations
is it just luck of finding a close enough interval
i mean its not luck
you can find where |g'| < 1 pretty easily
then, apply something as brainless as bisection to get an interval
or something like banach to argue one exists or something insane
but no, iteration methods can be absolutely insane
so just a level of trial and error
yeah

its fun
difference equations are fun lol
and they dont get enough love
for how wacky they are
anyways, hopefully that answers ur question
Yeah it helps lol
I think im starting to get it
ill shoot you a dm if anything else comes up
if thats ok lol
.close
Closed by @wild marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me with sig fig? I know this isn’t chemistry but please help if you can
Number 3 at the bottom
@rain sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
There are multiple ways you could proceed, one step you may want to do is to get all the e^{...} terms together, maybe...
Well, I meant more by dividing so that you have a ratio of the things with e, and then using rules of indices
(it probably should come as no surprise that you'll need logs at some point, so you could instead take natural logs straight away and instead use log rules...)
Well-
You wanna use those log rules, on the original expression you have, and noting that e and the natural log cancel each other out
I'm saying that you can take logs of this here
Taking logs of both sides, and use those log rules on both sides, simplifying both $\ln(3e^{5x + 9})$ and $\ln(e^{4x})$
@upper sparrow
Would you be able to work with something like $e^{y} = b$, solving for $y$?
@upper sparrow
Do you also know how to simplify an expression like $\frac{a^p}{a^q}$?
@upper sparrow
Yes and yes
Let's restart and go back to $6e^{4x} = 18e^{5x + 9}$, can you use those to solve it instead?
@upper sparrow
@upper sparrow
Well, I mean, you could take logs, do you know what $\ln(e^{4x})$ becomes?
@upper sparrow
(that wasn't what I was hinting at, but anyway)
Yep, that's good 
Now, do you know how you could simplify that $\ln(3e^{5x + 9})$?
@upper sparrow
ccgul
I do
and don't calculate anything yet, but yep, ln(e^{4x}) becomes 4x
Well wait one second 
Remember that it was $e^{5x + 9}$, but you basically have the right idea, $\ln(3e^{5x + 9}) = \ln(3) + \ln(e^{5x + 9}) = \ln(3) + 5x + 9$
@upper sparrow
Which now gets us to the equation that $\ln(3) + 5x + 9 = 4x$, which hopefully you can solve for $x$ now?
@upper sparrow
(the reason not to, is so you don't lose accuracy until you get x = ..., rounding errors can be annoying sometimes so better to keep things exact until the very last moment!)
ccgul
you're pretty much there 
Closed by @brave roost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The graphic of which of the following functions is shown in there?
I completely forgot how to do such tasks please explain me if its possible.
where is y=0?
at the O on the painting
no like at what value of x is y=0?
what value of x would be at O
i dont know, the question is
"The graphic of which of the following functions is shown in this painting?"
as i said i completely forgot how to do these
The options given to you are all 2nd degree equations. That means that there will be two linear factors, x - a and x - b. a and b will be the points at which it crosses the x-axis, if it does so.
that`s it ?
For this type of problem, yes.
thanks
You could also use the Quadratic Formula.
Closed by @kindred timber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Factorize $$z^6-4z^3+4$$
Good
It could be factorized to $(z^3-2)^2$, but do I find the complex solutions to $z^3-2$?
Good
Depends if you’re factoring it or finding the solutions to that equal to something (maybe 0)
The question asks "Find the complex and real factorizations of the polynomial"
Then I would recommend finding the complex solutions and then the factorisation would be (z-a)^2(z-b)^2(z-c)^2
The answer is following, I got $\sqrt[3]{2}$ in the expressions of $z^3-2$ roots.
Good
At least this would be the complex factorisation
Yeah this would be the real factorisation
But I can't get the roots
$w_0=\frac{\sqrt[3]{2}\sqrt{3}}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt[3]{2}}{2}$
Good
Nevermind, I saw my mistake.
I got w1 and w2, but the imaginary parts have opposite signs.
.close
Closed by @rough arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you know the formula for elasticity of demand
$-6p/(200-3p^2)$
knief
yeah
so what did you get for p/q
p/200(-3p^2)
^
plug it in?
24/25
$\frac{4}{200-48} = \frac{1}{38}$
knief
,w calc 4/152
knief
we didn’t even find dq/dp
-6
can we start over
knief
$\varepsilon = \frac{dq}{dp} \cdot \frac{p}{q}$
knief
yes?
yes
you just said q
I have
what does q=
$(-6)/(dp)*4/(200-3p^{2})$
LunaLoves❤
no
why not
dq≠-6
and just no
dq is not a value
it’s dq/dp
q’
and that isn’t -6 either
?
of
neither is dp
can you write out how to do this
Sorry man i've been awake since 3
no worries
its 7 now
we already know p = 4 because it’s given
so to find p/q all that’s left is to find q
which is given by 200-3p^2
since p=4 we know q is 200-3(4)^2
so its 4/200-3p^2
ok put in p
yup
this is 200-48 which is 152
then p/q is 4/152
ok
🙂
so we differentiate
differentiating 200-3p^2 gives -6p
because the derivative of 200 is 0
and we use the power rules
$-3(2)p^{2-1}$
knief
yes
so we do dq
dq/dp
it’s not a fraction
with a dq and dp being individual values
if it’s helpful we can write q’
pronounced q prime
to denote the derivative of q with respect to p
so we find the derivative of q
yes
^
its -6
oh its -6p
mhm
so p is 4 though
which means -6p is -24
thus our final result is (-24)(1/38)
wait is the bottom 0 because we do p prime
or -24/38
no
why
it’s not a fraction
then why is it there
dq and dp are not individual values
dq/dp is notation
used for the derivative of q with respect to p
it’s one singular value
dq and dp are not individual values
so its saying find derivative of q and put in p
dq/dp means the derivative of q with respect to p
so yes we evaluate dq/dp at p=4
in other words dq/dp is the rate at which q changes as p changes
ok i have another problem
think of slope
i have to go
Closed by @hallow rock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@errant knot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a question about arithmetic sequences
Does the common difference stay constant or can it change after some terms? Let's say d is 2 and a_1 is 1
The sequence goes like 1, 3, 5, 7. After 7 the common difference changes to -2 so it goes 7, 5, 3, 1..
Is this possible?
it has to stay constant
wouldn’t be an arithmetic sequence
Ahh, alrighty thanks for the clarification
i forgot what kind of sequence that was called
melons are tasty
but it is technically a type of sequence
it's like triangles can;t have 4 sides, but shapes can
I'm not 😂
but melons are
i think it was like "tickster" sequence or something, idk 1s
Yep, indeed they are
Welp gotta close this now
Thanks again
.close
Closed by @edgy elk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
just to get a bit of understanding
VPW is the person
VWS AND VPS
VWS would be what and VPS?
both represent the shore?
oh
he explained it later
.closed
.close
Closed by @halcyon ore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It asks me to sketch the derivative
Doesn’t give me a function tho
This is what I put is it right???
you should be able to figure out the circle equation from that lol
like?
I don’t feel like wasting my thumbs rn can you just verify😭
Probably should account a little bit for the rate of increase, your f’ should be “more curved”
Ohhh what about it being between interval -2,2
Does that like matter
(And there are general examples where you aren’t given a function, and you can’t figure what it is, where you’re meant to sketch the derivative based on the behaviour of the graphed function)
Well, you want your plot to be within that interval, but for example-
dang alright
At -2, you’re like “infinitely increasing”, like you want the derivative to be undefined there, almost vertical
Then as you get closer and closer to 0, you increase at a smaller rate
This almost implies that you have a quadratic like -x^2 or something as your original 
Yep 
@proven torrent Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @proven torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone know why its K/M?
If the balls are replaced, how many black and how many total balls are there
@icy mulch Has your question been resolved?
K^n balls and M^n balls
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
so from that its (K/M)^n, how do u get rid of the n exponent?
But why is it the ratio of black balls to total balls
can you explain using counting techniques?
because i was trying to find it using a priori definition of probability
Probability of a black ball among all balls is just the number of black balls divided by number of balls
is that fr just it
Yes
I guess its starting to make sense
Thank you!
.close
Closed by @icy mulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
cardinality of set containing 2 elements {2w, 3w-1} where w in Z
what is cardinality
size
and how do you find that
@exotic cosmos Has your question been resolved?
@exotic cosmos Has your question been resolved?
is it 2 and 1 or infinity?
<@&286206848099549185>
its just 2
2
"set containing 2 elements", cardinality is the number of elements in a set
so 2
it can contain only 1 element though
how
x = 1/2
still 2 elements
yeah in that case 1
not infinity tho
if its a set
it cant even have repeated elements
someone said answer is infinite
because {x | x in R} means all x right?
the form u have here is set roster form
this is set builder form
if u said {2w | w in Z} then its cardinality would be infinite yes
but if u say {w} w in Z then its not infinite
yes but do they not mean the same thing?
no
A = {2w | w in Z} means A is a set of all integers
A = {2w} is just A = {2w} (u can w=1,2,3,4.... but A still has only 1 element depending on the input)
@exotic cosmos Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
?
this is optimization
so you differentiate
and set equal to 0
then solve for x and input that into y
okay one second
y become 0
what
no
show me ur working man i can't understand like this
ur answer is correct tho
x = 3
now input that back into y
I put 8/3 over -4/9(2) to get the rate of change which is 3
Okay Ill try'
you mean x right?
plug into x
13
(I think they were using that it's a quadratic and e.g. completing the square?)
y=-4/9(3)^2+8/3(3)+9
y=-4+8+9
y=13
yeah i got that later
sorry I was using that one formula
but at first -b/2a was a little confusing
How do you remember to use this formula for this question, I just cant wrap my head around it
its not a formula
am I just finding the y in the vertex or smt
to find maxima/minima simply differentiate, set equal to 0, and solve for x.
you'll get the x-values for the extrema
How would I find minimum?
same technique
no
that's the maximum
because this is a downward-facing parabola
in R it only has a maximum
try it for some sort of quartic, you'll get 3-or-so values
wait so whats 13
the maximum...
what???
no?
(3, 13) is the max...
3 is the x-value
13 is the y-value
that's it
Closed by @rich horizon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np
you too
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I start 39? I’m not sure how to begin except to find the derivative
I have a question about related to the typical epsilon delta definition of a limit
What would be slope of the horizontal tangent
Horizontal tangent is parallel to the x axis (y=0)
y is 0
So
0 = 1 + 2cosx
Because that’s the derivative
Looks good
y=ax+b
y=0x+0
2cosx = - 1
cosx = -1/2
Just explaining why the gradient is 0 😅
So just find where cos is at its max which is 1?
Actually I don’t know what I’m talking about
Just find x values, try known angles
To see when it equals 0?
To see where given equation is true
You should be given a range smh
He said between 0, and 2pi is fine since it didn’t specify
Sorry
Should’ve said that
They can do
$\alpha + 2k\pi$
Ok
MetuMortis
The first one is pi
Idk about the second one
Oh
Nvm
It is not pi
Is everything good till here?
Its 4pi/3
Thats one answer, there is one another also
Can’t I just do
$\alpha + 2k\pi$
Light
Yes
Then I wouldn’t need to find the other
Result:
0.66666666666667
Wha-
Are you just guessing
Yea
2π/3 was correct I think
,w solve cos(x degrees) = - 0.5
I mean pi over 3
And 5 pi over 3
Those are 1
Try it again.
Cosx=-1/2
Yes
Then just do + 2kπ
For both
Aaaaaaaa
Can I ask why did I need to find those two points
I don’t understand how they correlated with me finding the horizontal tangents
They both satisfy the solution
When the gradient is zero
Oh ok

Closed by @green cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is the answer 104??????
im putting it into desmos and im getting -76. since it says determine the positive angle theta against the positive x axis, surely the answer would be 360 MINUS 76 (which is 284)??
can someone draw a diagram of this or something this is baffling me to a ridiculous extent
If you add 180 to -76, you get 104
why is it 180?
i have vague notions of "tan has a period of pi" but im not sure what that has to do with this problem at all
Pretty much that notion
Adding multiples of 180 or pi to the argument of tan preserves the value of tan
so tan(-76) = tan(104)
?!
What's confusing about that lol
You literally just said that
"tan has a period of pi"
why does that change the basis against you weigh an angle?
(also be very careful, that you should be using radians in problems like these)
like regardless of whether or not its tan the x positive axis stays the same
See the red/blue line? Against the x-axis, it has angle -76 or 104 depending on how you look at it
if you draw a line its gonna have a particular degree against that axis no matter what
What?
i thought it was being measured against the line y=0
It's more a matter of preserving the clockwise orientation I suppose
You're going against the positive x-axis with the positive angle theta
why?
what the scallop
but it just says x axis
How the question is worded
?!
Okay
man this is NOT something we tackled in class tf
Basic idea is just that tan(-76) has a negative argument and you want to make it positive by adding 180 to -76
okay...
how would this change if it was sin instead
idk im not good at trig
Im having a really hard time understanding this concept
Uh sin is kind of different
I'd like to see a problem with that before I make any claims
But I'd probably just add 360 to any negative angle?
why does tan theta equal the angle of the tangent line against the positive x axis in the first place?
tan theta is the slope of the line
The slope here:
and the slope here:
are the same
It's just a simple way to visualize that tan(x) = tan(x + 180)
because flipping around half-way preserves the slope
but why is it the slope?
ahhh
(sin is a rise, cos is a run)
Closed by @west geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i graph lim x approach plusminus ifinity. sorry am lost
@tribal marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
solve each equation:
tbh! im new to this stuff so im gonna need a thorough explanation of at least one and i should be able to pick things up
ive figured u should log both sides tho correct me if im wrong
seems reasonable
yea
just stuck on what to do after
important rule is $\ln(x^a) = a \ln(x)$
b
@queen citrus Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @queen citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Solve the right triangle ABC, where C =90. Give angles in degrees and minutes. a=17.00 c=21.00
b rounds to 12.33
A is 35 degrees 57 minutes
B is 54 degrees 3 minutes
For b it says round to nearest hundredth
And for both angles A n B it says to round to nearest minute
I don’t understand how I’m getting it wrong?
What am I missing
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
,rotate
You swapped the two results
You drew that AC is Opp and AB is Hyp and to find angle A, it's using sine
Did that fix it all? Is it correct now?
Yeah I’m just going to do it again rn and enter it in rn
Wait I’m confused
I did the equations again and I got the same answer
Here’s my re workout
Yeah the results should be the same, you just swapped the results of A and B
A is 54 degrees
Here you said B was 54
Good now?
Closed by @north copper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there any dimension at which it becomes impossible to take the Riemann Integral? Meaning, we can handle R^2 very easily, but R^3 already becomes very hard. At what point is it not longer just "hard" but more-or-less impossible (or actually impossible)? Is there an R^n that makes Riemann integration not possible?
Yes, we can then use Lebesgue Integrals, but I'm curious about the limitation with Riemann
For example, I'm not sure what it even means to take a Riemann Integral in R^4 space. Sure, with R^3 we have cuboids, but what do we have in 4d?
Just use Cartesian product of 4 intervals
@crystal vigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help asap
please help i dont understand any of it
please someone help
i have a quiz tommrow
and i dont get any of this
Where are u struggling?
all of it
i pointed the cordinates
but i dont know how to find cordinates of p
or what ever partition
for example 1
You can use the formula.
a = (mx2+nx1)/(m+n)
b = (my2+ny1)/(m+n)```
can you show me
this not homework
its review for quiz
Use section formula
Just put the points from your first question, i have written in that way , you need to find (a,b) . Points A(x1,y1) and B(x2,y2) are given and ration m:n as well
P = (m₁x₁ + m₂x₂) / (m₁ + m₂), (m₁y₁ + m₂y₂) / (m₁ + m₂)
Is it m1x1 or m1x2?
I might be wrong
just tell me how to do first question bro and ill do rest
No, u are right. It's just the point of view...which are you assuming
tell me how to do first question and ill do the rest
P(x) = (1(3) + 2(6)) / (1 + 2) = (3 + 12) / 3 = 15 / 3 = 5
P(y) = (1(4) + 2(10)) / (1 + 2) = (4 + 20) / 3 = 24 / 3 = 8. Tell me is it correct. Or is it same with your formula?
@sullen dock
Yeah you took 1:2 , I will take 2:1
It's same
:/
You can use the formula.
a = (mx2+nx1)/(m+n)
b = (my2+ny1)/(m+n)```
Do you understand this @tulip kindle
(a,b) are the cordinate you need to find
idk
I have drawn the line as well
A(3,4)?
10 not 19
m:n = 2:1
so?
So put the values of m,n,x2,y2,x1,y1
And calculate
You can use the formula.
a = (m * x2+n * x1)/(m+n)
b = (m * y2+n * y1)/(m+n)```
first cordinate is x1 and then the second x2?
like 4 and 10
4 x1 and 10 x2?
hello?
a = ( 2 * 6 + 1 * 3)/(2+1)
Then you need to find b as well
Oh you got b as 8?
How did you get 8?
i answered the other one
but
(5,8) is cordinate
it would not make a stright line
it makes a angle
a----------- -------------------b
p
like the line is up
but the p cordinate
is below the line
not on the line
does it have to be on the line?
of line AB
Try to draw on graph and show me
I don't have a graph paper or pen paper unfortunately
yea
the teacher printed it ass
thats why
it looks bad for me
if point P(a,b) lies on A(x1,y1) and B(x2,y2) with a ratio of m:n , then
a = (m * x2+n * x1)/(m+n)
b = (m * y2+n * y1)/(m+n)
i use this for all?
Yep
3,4
Are different
Be careful
Same formulas will be there but in 3 A and B will be swapped because ratio is given in BA , not AB
And in example 4 P is given , you need to find B
If ratio is given m:n along AB then you use my formula with A(x1,y1) B(x2,y2)
But 3 says m:n ratio is along BA, so now B(x1,y1) and A(x2,y2)
Nope
Read this
dude im confused
Understand the concept rather than formula
i would if you provided me the setup
You can use the formula.
a = (m * x2+n * x1)/(m+n)
b = (m * y2+n * y1)/(m+n)```
```if point P(a,b) lies on A(x1,y1) and B(x2,y2) with a ratio of m:n along BA then
a = (m * x1+n * x2)/(m+n)
b = (m * y1+n * y2)/(m+n)```
Find the difference of words in question 1 and 3 . Read it properly
For question 3 yes
Visualise the points or atleast draw them
Then you will have a better idea
A----m----P----n----B
This was first question
A----n----P----m----B
This is 3rd question
Do you see difference @tulip kindle
where is the n and m coming from
That's the ratio given
oh ok
Now it's always m:n given but you need to read the question whether RATIO is given to AB OR BA
That's why I asked you to read question 1 and 3 again and see difference
I doubt that 😅
im not taking the quiz tmr i hope my teacher gives me time
whats the formula for 4?
Well same formula but you don't know what's B(x2,y2)
so p instead
So you will get 2 equations in terms of x2 and y2 which you will have to solve
@tulip kindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got the maximum , no clue how to get the minimum
i found out the value of x^2+ y^2
and substituted it
i got r = 53-4(x+y)
so when x+y is zero we get the max as 53
but x+y could be negative
hint for this would be ||to think geometrically||
i have tried using circles but im not sure how to apply it here
i got 53 by taking x=y too ( taking both the terms to be equal usaully gives either the minimum or maximum)
@honest swallow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @honest swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hiii have i done this correctly?
yes
Closed by @worn heath
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to evaluate further
Closed by @mossy geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey can someone help me with setting up this problem, im really struggling
what was your process
I tried to set it up as dv/dt = -g - air resistance
tried to double with chat gpt,
I struggled integrating it into velocity and then position
@lyric flame Has your question been resolved?
from the 2nd red line to the 3rd, you divided by the mass
you forgot to divide the 3rd term as well, its v/(30m)
as a result, the numbers below it change
also, double check your work, you cant have e^(t/30) in the expression of the velocity
otherwise the system is unstable and the velocity explodes to infinity as t increases
its e^(-t/30)
when you divided to separate the variables, you should have left the minus sign in the dx side!
but overall its good, its the method
Newtons' 2nd law and signs are correct
$\mathrm{\int e^{at} , dt = \frac{1}{a} e^{at} + c}$
Emily
also, dont forget the initial conditions, theyre not there for decoration!
@lyric flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
@rain bay Has your question been resolved?
five down and five to the right
how
green circle down 5 units and right 5 units
Did you get the first one right?
yea
mhm
no 😭
Sophomore
yea
this is easy
okay so
you see the first blue dot to the right of the green one
raise it up 1
and the first blue dot to the left of the green one move it down 1
Do u understand
how do u know what inputs to put
coordinates?
yea how do u know what 2 cube root x becomes
like i legit dont know what the numbers x and the sqrt does
so what would that graph be
it would compress the 3rd root by 2
so it multiplies whatever point you got on the regular root by 2
so u dilate by 2
o
ohh i see it now
it makes it grow by 2
cuz multiply by 2
lmk if it workesd
this is basic algebra
kinda
but my teacher doesnt teach anything she just assigns stuff
and yea i have no idea how to do anything
no
average highschool teacher lol
its been 2 weeks since school starte
she hasnt taught a single thing
no grades up at all
its that bad dawg
what are you struggling with
just reading functions and graphing
i can help
could i just dm u when i need help
ye i added u
@rain bay Has your question been resolved?
