#help-42
1 messages · Page 62 of 1
hows this for a comparison of joint and combined variation?
@lucid knot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lucid knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone tell me how to do this step by step?
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please explain why they can assume f(a)=g(a)=0
<@&286206848099549185>
its a weaker version of the proof
that doesnt actually work
Wdym
basically it assumes that the functions are continuous
just cuz the lim x->a f(x) = 0 doesnt mean f(a) = 0
yeah
they are saying that lim x->a f(x) = 0 implies f(a) = 0
which is only true for continuous functions
the way you have to actually do the proof is define F and G such that F(x) = f(x) and G(x) = g(x) except at x = a when F(x) = 0 and G(x) = 0
and then use the cauchy mean value theorem on that
Well it’s the only proof my book gives😭
Can you recommend somewhere I can learn a more robust one
its the same basic idea
you just have to be careful cuz you dont actually know that f(a) = g(a) = 0
This one doesn’t cite a limit for the f(a)=g(a) either
I know it’s referring to the weaker one
But I just don’t get how they are stating it
Even if you assume continuity how can you necessarily assume they are 0?
well the standard definition of continuity is that lim x->a f(x) = f(a)
we are working with the indeterminate form where the limits are zero
because 0 = lim x->a f(x) = f(a) we know f(a) = 0 if f is continuous
same thing for g
Where was that stated
Nvm I think I see
Because otherwise it’s not indeterminate
@white mountain Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
u need to bring the (5x)^3/2 up
so that it isnt a decimal
Closed by @lucid knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(8x-1)/(3)=7-(4x+2)/(5) solve for x
I didnt get the correct answer which is x=2 i was left with x=116/28 which simplified is x=58
where did I mess up to not get x=2
ohh that makes more sense know I got lost in my own math. Thank you for that .
Or actually.. having a hard time following your work, but.. looks like you corrected for it
.close
Closed by @gray briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do not post images that contain your personal information
I can see your school, city, email address, etc.
all from this one image
you should delete it and take a better screenshot
ok
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
open a new channel
oh ok
@remote mural how old are you btw?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Disclaimer: Self-teaching calculus two years before I took the actual class so forgive me if this is the most bare-bones calculus question you can come across.
=====
Does anyone know exactly what purpose Sigma represents in an equation regarding area approximations on curved functions?
For example, I know how to work this problem. You would use the symbol Sigma to prepare one's equation for adding together the approximate areas of all the other, smaller rectangles in correspondence to the function. Still, it's never actually told me what Sigma itself represents. I've never had to do anything regarding it because the two values associated with Sigma I can easily define off to the side.
Funnily enough I got this one wrong only because I forgot to multiply my answer by delta x 💀
@thorny sage Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
sigma is just the notation for summation
the same way the integral symbol is notation
sigma is just notation to represent summing up/adding up the rectangles
to give an area
and you obviously want infinitely many rectangles
Oh ok, so it's what I originally thought
to have an exact answer for area
it’s not a "value"
the sum has a clue
value*
but
it’s literally just telling you to add the inputs
Yeah
Well thank you kind sir
you’re welcome good sir
Just wanted to know, since I'd rather understand the math than just input a bunch of values
mhm understandable
.close
Closed by @thorny sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I enter a pizza store where they have 10 slices of pepperoni, 8 slices of margarita, and 5 slices of hawaii on display. In how many ways can I give it out to 10 people where each person can get anywhere from 0 to 23 slices of pizza?
I enter a pizza store where they have 10 slices of pepperoni, 8 slices of margarita, and 5 slices of hawaii on display. In how many ways can I give exactly one slice each out to 5 people?
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@sly geyser
@quartz nexus Has your question been resolved?
@quartz nexus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there an efficient way of calculating the sum the rounded down function of n/i given i ranges from 1 to n?
if someone could help me latex this, it would be great
ren
yes
i dont think there is a general formula to that
no, im looking for an algorithm to find the quickest way of calculating that
I think my ma'am @graceful dust might know about this
lmfao
so you want $\left[\frac{1}{n}\right]+\left[\frac{2}{n}\right]....\left[1\right]$?
harvey, mike, jessica, and louis
Why am. I here
no it's n/i
oh
not i/n
right
yes, this
and btw u put square bracs, it's floor
$\left[n\right]+\left[\frac{n}{2}\right]+\left[\frac{n}{3}\right]....\left[1\right]$
Why am. I here
that;s what I meant
so basically he wants
f(n) + f(0.5n) ...
square braces are used for floor by some people
hmm,w $\sum_{i=1}^{n}\lfloor{\frac{n}{i}}\rfloor$ (edited)
Why am. I here
n is an integer, right?
prime factorization+mods maybe
,w $\sum_{i=1}^{n}\lfloor{\frac{n}{i}}\rfloor$ (edited)
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
welp
lol
try using induction maybe
,w algorithms for sum from i = 1 to n of floor (n/i)
no he wants an algorithm to solve this ASAP
THAT'S NOT EVEN WHAT I TYPED
try for say i from 1 to 5
huh
$\sum_{i=1}^{n}\lfloor{\frac{n}{i}}\rfloor$ (edited)
ColdTee
he wants the fastest algorithm for this
yes this
try using mods and prime factorization maybe?
Lemme think
if n is an int
n is an integer?
yes
hm
ok, say n=a, until i=a ,it's 1
say summation to n=10
explain again, idt i got this
this might have a lot of dependence on the prime factors of n which is bad
i was wondering if there was a way of simplifying the expression for any given n
yessir
yeah
The sum will depend on whether n is bigger or smaller than i
what i was saying b4 ;-;
bruh
Lmao
oh .-.
n=6 , 6+3+2+1+1+1
if n > i then it's 1
but if n < i it's 0
but the thing is
sum's upper bound is n
so its never 0
omfg im an idiot
,w summation from i=1 to 10 of floor(11/i)
23,27,28
i was wondering for example, if i is a factor of n, we can calculate the exact values without need of the rounded down function, but i was wondering if there is a formula for when i is not a factor of n
$\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left[\frac{n}{i}\right]=\left[n\right]+\left[n\cdot\frac{1}{2}\right]+\left[n\cdot\frac{1}{3}\right]\ ...\ 1$
ren
no use related fracs i think
Why am. I here
like how it varies
you can express that with mod or something
how would we do that, could u give an example?
$\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left[\frac{n}{i}\right]=\left[n\right]+\left[n-\frac{n}{2}\right]+\left[n-\frac{2n}{3}\right]\ +\left[n-\frac{3n}{4}\right]...$
ren
$\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{n}{i}-\left{\frac{n}{i}\right}$
{} refers to?
also check this out
fractional part function
it's - not plus
Why am. I here
my bad
and put brackets around the function
example: floor(10/3) = 10/3 - (10 mod 3)/3 i think?
the summ of fractional parts shouldn't be too hard IMO
this is my thinking. idk why.
1/2+2/3...
me thinks it will be as they depend on prime factorizations
so 3+1/3-1/3 = 3, hmmm that seems to work, could u explain why though?
10 mod 3 is the remainder that 10 leaves when divided by 3. so 10/3 has (10 mod 3)/3 "extra" past its integer part
ohhh yeah, i get it
,w summation of (1-i)/i from i=1 to n
ykw imma go
where did this problem come from/what do you need it for?
ColdTee
i made the problem myself, and i need it for an experiment
the harmonic number don't have a closed form for theri summation if I remember right
I made a mistake nvm
it seems hard
$\left[\frac{n}{i}\right] = \left[\f1i\right] + \left[\f1i + \f1n\right] + \left[\f1i + \f 2n\right] + \ldots + \left[\f1i + \frac{n-1}{n}\right]$
This works for $n \in N$
ColdTee
yep that confirms every single suspicion i had about this problem
thank you
ColdTee
yes, i knew there wouldnt be a formula for this, i was just wondering if there was a faster way of calculating the summation
approximate it using an integral for sufficently large values?
say, n=100
this could be appoximated as 100ln(100) ti think
,w 100ln(100)
$\sum_{i=1}^{100}\lfloor{\frac{100}{i}}\rfloor$ (edited)
,w summation from i=1 to 100 of floor(100/i)
Pretty much
,w summation from i=1 to 1000 of floor(1000/i)
,w summation from i=1 to 10000 of floor(10000/i)
i'm curious...
,w 10000ln(10000)
,w summation from i=1 to 10000 of (10000/i)-(1/2)
why am i here your estimate seems to be missing something
,w 10000ln(10000) + (2*0.577215665-1)*10000
pretty close
is this
a(n) = n * ( log(n) + 2*gamma - 1 ) + O(sqrt(n)) ?
yea
could u explain how it gives a good approximation
i have no idea and it probably involves analytic number theory way above my paygrade
i do happen to know an expert in this
austin?
no definitely not
look up rienman summation
@queen wave hi daddy explain why asymptotic formula here works pls
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/486002/finding-the-summation-of-the-floor-of-the-series?noredirect=1
that may provide some insights on why this works
I givw up
coldtee really out here trying to resolve open problems

Closed by @rocky flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @steel tide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can I find the probability in this
so I can get the mew and sigma

The problem you are referring to can be rewriting using the divisor function. Namely, $$\sum_{n \le x} d(n)=\sum_{n \le x} \sum_{d|n}1= \sum_{d \le x} \left\lfloor x/d \right\rfloor$$
Now you can go ahead and express the floor function as x-{x} and get a rough estimate of $x \log x + O(x)$ but we can do better than this by taking a different method of estimating our sum via Dirichlet hyperbola method. With that method you get all these additional constants that come for free in the big O term in $x \log x + O(x)$
Deltoid
Closed by @glacial raptor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thank you
I love just waking up at 4 am and see this
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey guys need help on this one
I don't understand why number 42's answer is a negative
how did it get the negative
arctan's principal branch is (-pi/2, pi/2)
yes im aware that's the restriction for tan
why couldn't it just be pi/2
wdym
i meant positive pi/4
what;s tan(3pi/4) equal to
it's -1
i meant for this, why is it negative one
It is not
it is
,w tan^(-1)(3×π/4)
whattt lmaooo
im doubting everything now
where did the negative come from tho
,w tan(3pi/4)
try deriving it using a unit circle
ohh okay
how bout for number 36 then
4π/3 is in the third quadrant, why is it not negative
From where u get 3
I read 2
Maybe it is a 3 i cant read
Ok it is a 3 yes
But cos^-(1)(cos(3pi4)) is in the second quadrant
So it has to be positive
i dont get it WASHSHAHSHSAHAS
isnt sin the only trig function thats supposed to be positive on the second quadrant
Ok let see
Cos(3pi/4) how much is it
Now we want to find the angle whose cos is -1/2, but arcsin gives the value from 0 to pi for negative values of cos. In the unit circle the -1/2 is pi/4 and 3pi/4
But because we are interested in 0, pi range
We get the second cuadrant
Pi/4
@maiden crater Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I determine where the turning points of f(x) is coordinate wise?
I know that since the f'(x)=0 at 1 and -1 that will be the x coordinate of the turning point in the graph of f(x)
but how am I able to determine the y-coordinate of the respective x coordinate?
can we assume that f'(0) = -1?
I read this earlier thinking it was insignificant to the question but is this what you're looking for?
did you get the f'(x)=0 at 1 and -1 also from the exercise or did you just look at the graph
I just looked at the graph of f'(x)
if f'(0)=-1 we know that f'(x) = x^2-1 so we can get f(x) by antiderivative
well if you know f(x) you can sketch it
or well it says rough sketch so my idea is maybe a bit over the top
yeah I personally haven't dealt with antiderivatives before lol but I'm open to learning
aka integrals
i could explain both ways your choice
I mean if you'd like to explain it the antiderivative way go ahead, but that hasn't been covered yet
ok sure
so the goal of the integral is to find the function that, if you take the derivative, results again in the function you want to find the integral of
basically just reversing the derivative right
so e.g. f(x) = x^2 and g'(x) = x^2 whats g(x)
okok gotcha
yeah you could look at it that way
so what would g(x) be in that case f(x) = x^2 and g'(x) = x^2?
what are we trying to do here?
yeah
yup nice
but note that you could add something e.g. 1/3 x^3 + 5 and it would result in the same derivative
yeah cause thats a constant
definetly
so to generalize that you just add a +C at the end always
so like g(x) = 1/3 x^3 + C
mhm yea makes sense
but thats just for looking nice
so now you know the basics how to get the integral of a function
so now back to your question if you look at the graph we get f'(-1) = 0 = f'(1) and f'(0) = -1
what does that tell us about the function f'(x)?
you talk about f(x) not f'(x)
oh right
the goal currently is to get a function for f'(x)
right
so what function does the picture remind you of
a parabola
x^2-1 then
$\tfrac13 x^3 -x + c$
Safiya
yeah nice
so to be easier just set the c=0 and ignore it
and then the goal would be to sketch that function
ah yeah didnt remember that info but yeah
$f(x)=\tfrac13 x^3 -x + 2$
Safiya
yup
so because of the info you could find the one definite integral
thats often the case in exercise if i remember correctly
so how would you sketch f(x) ?
I would use a table of values
yup
hmm okay
this doesn't seem too bad
are you sure there's a different way of doing it?
yeah if you didnt have integrals until now how would you get the function of f(x) then
I probably would've done something similar because it seems intuitive
you could try to find a few fixpoints like -1,0,1 because you know the value or know how the function behaves at that point
and then you also know its a x^3 function because the derivative is a parabola
so try fitting that function somehow on those fixpoints
because it says you just need a rough sketch i guess that was the goal
so you'd have it as y=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d
but d=2
and then find the original fxn based off that?
yeah kinda
yup no problem 🙂
e.g. like this
just focus on 0 where we know the value and -1,1 because there is the slope 0 and then between -1,1 the slope needs to be negative because f' is negative there and outside the slope is all positive
and rising
@remote mural
yeah that makes sense
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @old nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\dv{y}{x} = \frac{y(x - y\ln y)}{x(x\ln x - y)}$
NEON

Don't know where to begin
tried writing it in terms of differentials and nothing seems to work
Closed by @bronze adder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
really sillly question, but why isn't the energy stored in a region with no electric field not necessarily zero?
ask this question in a phyaics server
Closed by @blazing coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@blazing coyote to give you a good analogy
your question can be asked as
"If some land is flat or horizontal, does it imply that its height above sea level has to be zero?"
Why am. I here
if E=0, wouldn't that mean energy density is zero
actually, no
because what you have is infact an integral
,, \412 \eps_0 \int E^2 \dd \tau
E = 0 just implies that the integral is equal to a constant
ah
you can associate the energy with a potential.
your question is essentially does the potential need to be zero if electric field is zero, which is clearly false.
whats tau
This is half of the energy.
Time
I thought the energy was stored in the field
yeah yes,
yeah it should be volume
this is an eternal debate between physicists for some reason
is energy stored in the field or in the charge?
field obvs 🙄
if its in the charge you hvae $\ds \412\rho V$ as your energy instead
i mean both are correct but like you really shouldnt care
hmm, so to find the energy stored inside a sphere for instance, I first find the energy required to construct it, and then remove the energy outside the sphere, right?
self energy stuff
what?
nvm
made a mistake, let me retry
hmm, so considering the energy required to construct the system first
let the surface charge density be $\sigma$
Why am. I here
so the radius of a ring element varies with the polar angle, say $\theta$ as $Rsin(\theta)$
Why am. I here
so the area varies as $2\pi R^2 (\sin(\theta)) d\theta$
Why am. I here
nah. this won't work
I'm trying to find the energy stored inside a sphere of charge Q
$U = \frac 12 \epsilon_0 \int_0^R \left ( \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}Q \frac rR \right )^2 4\pi r \dd{r}$
just that?
NEON
wait, how did you get that
E_in=0
ah
potential
you integrated that?
thanks
NEON
This is a hollow sphere
I know the derivation no need of that
It's a hollow conducting sphere
uh
pretty sure it's solid
I mean the field inside a hollow sphere is obviously 0 because of gauss's law
Yeah, that was my question, so the energy stored inside a solid sphere is zero, right?
Thanks !
no it's not
I meant hollow sphere sorry
0 yes
Closed by @blazing coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How come in the final equation it’s not sec(x)tan(x) times tan(x)sec(x)tan^2(x)?
u mean this?
the plus being a multiplication sign? if so then
(1+tanx)(secxtanx) = secxtanx + secxtan^2x
Oh I thought u we’re supposed to distribute tan to both sec and tan
So after the plus sign secxtanx times tan^2x
secxtanx is basically 1 term so u first multiply with 1 and then with tanx and get
Closed by @unborn stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The problem:
Given a convex pentagon ABCDE with AB + CD = BC + DE. It is known that there is a circle centered on AE which forms points of tangency with the sides AB, BC, CD and DE P, Q, R, and S, respectively. Prove that PS and AE are parallel.
So, there is already a given solution (shown below), but I don't understand one part.
Let AP = x, P B = y, QC = z, RD = t. From tangency we get BQ = y, CR = z, DS = t, so AB = x + y, BC = y + z, CD = z + t, DE = t + SE. Thus AB + CD = BC + DE gives x + y + z + t = y + z + t + SE, SE = x = AP. Together with OP = OS (radii) and ∠AP O = ∠ESO = 90◦ from the tangent
Why are the angles APO and ESO = 90? What kind of rule is this?
@manic cape Has your question been resolved?
@manic cape Has your question been resolved?
nope
@manic cape Has your question been resolved?
Put the diagram
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
also, is this a test?
make this into cosa - cosb form
,rotate
no need
and then it'll be easier
its just a small problem i think
yes i tried that but its wrong
i did IBP twice
Use the product sum formulae
but the problem is that the initial integral cancels out
first convert it..
No point doing IBP, use sin(x)sin(y) = 1/2(cos(y-x)-cos(y+x))
Yep
oh its because we only learnt IBP
we only did the beginning of integration so i only know IBP and u-sub
yes but this is like product to sum formula and its taught before calculus.. well as far as I know
yeah.. it isn't like one method would work and the other would give a wrong answer lol
yeah but my double IBP cancels the initial integral out which makes me think the answer is 0 but its not
First reduce the integral
2times
Then do kings rule
@tall hemlock
you will get πcos1 ig
@tall hemlock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone help me with problem 2?
images are not working discord issue
what have you tried
@fierce cradle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Working on it right now, do you underatand part 1?
@fierce cradle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
chat whats this
What have you tried
i thought it was the y intercept
how do i do it
@exotic falcon
plz
i need the answer
rn
its almost due
do you know integration
@opal zodiac Has your question been resolved?
@opal zodiac Has your question been resolved?
@opal zodiac Has your question been resolved?
@opal zodiac Has your question been resolved?
@opal zodiac Has your question been resolved?
Hi
Did you figure it out?
In case you want to know, if you look at the graph carefully you will look that at x= -2 , y= -2 so f(-2) = -2 then just plug the -2 and solve for b
κέχοδα
the hell does that mean
ok sure
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain why there's also $h > 4$? Shouldn't it only be $0 < h < 1$ since we can split these two by the purple line?
skyglow
@buoyant grove Has your question been resolved?
@buoyant grove Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> This is for SVM.
@buoyant grove Has your question been resolved?
it's annoying since it's off the grid but if you keep going there's another line
So we would have two lines. For the second line, the blue at (0,0), circled in pink, would be an outlier for the linear SVM?
https://imgur.com/a/9cYZ774
Is that essentially what I'm missing?
oh there'd be no outlier, swap where you're writing the o's and +'s
OH, because the red dot we're looking at is (h,1) and can be shifted.
the intuition for visualizing this is that if you connect the blue ones with a line (or like convex hull in general), you want to draw lines that don't cut through that line
Yea, I think I was just stuck on trying to draw a second line with (h,1) at where it's currently drawn. Not where it could potentially be.
Thanks!
makes sense
.close
Closed by @buoyant grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
on d rn
apparently iii) is x=2?
need someone to explain that to me
that isn't a local minimum or maximum
it's a graph of the derivative of f
a local maximum or minimum corresponds to a point where the derivative is 0
Closed by @old nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help for discretization. (I will apply explicit FTCS scheme) In the explicit FTCS (Forward Time Centered Space) method, the time derivative and the spatial derivative terms of the Navier-Stokes equation are discretized separately. For the temporal derivative, a forward difference approximation is employed Meanwhile, the spatial derivative term is discretized using central differences.
,tex \rho\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}=-\frac{\partial p}{\partial x}+\mu\frac1r\frac\partial{\partial r}\Big(r\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\Big)
pantograf
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
How do I discretisize this?
@dry glacier Has your question been resolved?
@dry glacier Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question 48
This is going to be the line that perpendicularly bisects line FF’
So you need to find line FF’, find an equation for lines perpendicular to that, and then find an equation for the specific line that passes through the midpoint of FF’
Well what’s the slope of that line
0?
Oh wait that’s a vertical line
So what would be the slope of a line perpendicular to it
Um
What kind of line is perpendicular to a vertical line
Also o
That one would be 0
Line FF’ has undefined slope
The perpendicular line has 0 slope
You follow that?
Yes.
So the midpoint formula with the foci points?
Yes
(0,0)
So what’s a line with slope 0 that passes through (0,0)
The FF line?
No, the FF’ line is a vertical line with undefined slope
Sorry I’m like new to hyperbolas 😭
We want its perpendicular bisector
Ok draw this on graph paper
It will make sense
FF’ has undefined slope as it is vertical
It’s perpendicular bisector has 0 slope as it is horizontal
FF’ goes from (0,-17) to (0,17) and has a midpoint at 0
Now what line with slope 0 passes through (0,0)?
Think y=mx+b
Vertical line
A vertical line does not have slope 0
A vertical line has undefined slope
You cannot make a vertical line with slope intercept form
A horizontal line has 0 slope because it is of the form y=b
So a horizontal line?
Yes but what is the equation of a horizontal line passing through (0,0)
Don’t overthink it
Isn’t that the only type of line that can have slope 0
Yes
Slope 0 means horizontal by definition essentially
Because it means y does not change with x
It stays the same for all x
If we have a line of the form y=b, and it passes through (0,0), what is b?
0
So what is the equation of the line?
But what is the equation
That is the equation
O
But what about k
LMAO
yeah…
Onto the actual problem
Let's consider both points in isolation
What represents all points 30 units away from F?
And similarly, what represents all points 30 units away from F'?
no....
Or line
if i ask you to draw a curve with all the points some distance away from a certain point, what would you draw
A circle ⭕️
Indeed
o I thought it was a hyperbola
Parabola
Yup
you want an equation for the distance of a point to each one
you should get there eventually
but first find what is the expression for the distance from F to a point (x,y)
And a similar expression for F'
yes
no no no
as an expression of x,y
So you could plug in x,y for any point and get the distance to F
🧠 an eclipse formula
?
Since the distance is always the same ?
no forget that for now
think just simply in terms of the distance from (x,y) to F
use pythagorean theorem
Yup
use that
So the distance between the F and F’
yes
now we know that |d1 - d2| = 30 right?
as that is what the question is asking
So we subtract the two distances?
yes
and set them equal to 30
square both sides to eliminate the absolute value and it's all algebra from there
you need to plug them in to this
d1 and d2 are the two distance expressions you derived
Is this set correctly
there should be a minus sign instead of a plus sign between the two distances
but otherwise yes
this equation literally states the premises of the question, now you just have to simplify it
Idk how to simplify this 💀 it seems wrong
i'm not sure, there might be an easier way of doing this, but this is just taking the question and putting it in mathematical form
i am trying to simplify it myself, you have to start by squaring both sides
Should I check on Photomath this seems like it’s going to be a really long answer
i have it simplifying down into a regular conic section
?
you just have to do a lot of annoying algebra to get rid of the square roots
why is it taking a derivative...
that is not at all what you need
O I see
Doesn’t everything cross out
you just have to do the algebra
square both sides and do all the multiplication and whatnot
Is it y=900\68
it should be a hyperbola not a line
I can’t
@honest quiver tysm for you help
sorry i couldn't help much :/
alright
👍ty
you're welcome
Now

How do I close this
.close
.close
Closed by @shell spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey! I have an exact different equation here that I'm trying to solve but I'm getting stuck when it comes to integration constants (...yes, really.)
I need to find a solution for this:
$2 \frac{x}{y} dx + \left(1 - \frac{y^2}{x^2}\right) dy = 0$
Lucas
Where x and y are non-zero. My step by step got me this far:
$2 \frac{x}{y} dx = - \left(1 - \frac{x^2}{y^2}\right) dy$
$\text{Find } \phi(x, y) \text{ s.t. } \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} = \phi_x = 2\frac{x}{y}, \ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y} = \phi_y = 1 - \frac{x^2}{y^2}$
$\phi = \int \phi_x dx = \int 2 \frac{x}{y} dx = \int \phi_y dy = \int 1 - \frac{x^2}{y^2} dy$
Lucas
$\phi = \frac{x^2}{y} + g(y) = y + \frac{x^2}{y} + h(x)$
Lucas
$g(y) = y + h(x)$
And then I got stuck. The expected answer is $\phi(x, y) = y + \frac{x^2}{y} + K$ where K is a constant. What I don't understand, however, is how on earth g(y) and h(x) became K. Can anyone enlighten me please?
From my understanding, both g(y) and h(x) are functions, not necessarily constants
let me reopen this with proper formatting. god damn.
.close
Closed by @willow cove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have no clue where to start from 😐
would rewrite 8 in terms of (sqrt2) to the power of something
8^2?
do u know what "sqrt" means
square?
is shorthand for "square root"
Oh ☠️
valid tbh
umm no clue
well do u know what (sqrt2)^2 is
2?
so m = 2?

