#help-42
1 messages · Page 45 of 1
ohhh accha
Lekin sir ye bhi bole ki T=0 means infinite frequency that is infinite oscillatios in 1 second
For a object at rest, oscillation never ends so that analogy should also be true and both gives T=0 and T= infinity
Lekin sir T= infinity bol diye toh wo me convention le lunga lekin pure clarity nhi mili sigh
same lol
i am also confused
but good thing is
it is never used
so i dont care
I can give you the video
kk
Do you have telegram
I watched video on telegram
ohh
Closed by @sage cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Suppose a population of wolves grows according to the logistic differential equation dP/dt=3P - 0.01P², where P is the number of wolves at time t, in years.
Find the number of wolves in the population when the population is growing the fastest.
I know when the population is growing the fastest, but do i just take the integral of dp/dt from 0 to 150 or something?
that kinda feels wrong
When is it growing the fastest? how did you obtain it?
L/2 right?
i factored out 0.01P and got 300 for L
so it’s growing the fastest when t=150?
what is L?
the kP(L-P)
thats the formula i remember for differential logistical growth
its the carrying limit right
also pls hurry, i only have like 4 mins left
is this homework to deliver?
quiz in 2 mins
or less i forgot
@stray tundra could you just quickly explain what i do
is it an integral?
wait can i use the L/1+Ce^-Lkt thing
actually idk what C is
yea no idk what to do
time to fail the quiz
@strong dew Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you have a specific problem
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
Say you have some infinite sequence of numbers $(a_n){n=0}^{\infty}$ indexed by the natural numbers (you can start at 1 if you want).
The sums $S_n \coloneqq \sum{k=0}^n a_k$ are called \emph{partial sums} for the series $S \coloneqq \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_k$, and if they converge to a number, we define $S$ to be this number.
LemonGeneSorcerer
Specifically, in the question, the sum is the \emph{geometric sum}, for which there is a specific formula (that you can find e.g. on Wikipedia)
There's also a formula for the partial sums
Ahm.
Did you learn about limits anywhere?
My answer would depend on whether or not you did.
Closed by @steady ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have to approximate the value of arctg0,2 using Taylor series with Lagrange reminder
how to evaluate the last inequality?
what value of c should I consider
<@&286206848099549185>
should i pick a value of c, looking at the range of c (0;0,2) for which the inequality is correct?
like that I mean
What am i doing wrong
<@&286206848099549185>
Hello there
hello!
What error do you need?
0,01
That's n = 1 isnt it
this
Why did you plug in c = 0.2 though, that doesn't give you an upper bound
but I have to calculate n+1 expressions
what you wrote would be for n=0, no?
For n = 1, p(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x, r(x) = f''(c)/2 * x^2
ah i see what you mean, then yes
$\abs{R_2(0.2)} = \abs{\frac{\frac{-2c}{(1+c^2)^2}}{2!} 0.2^2} = \abs{\frac{c}{(1+c^2)^2} \cdot 0.04} = \frac{c}{(1+c^2)^2} \cdot 0.04$
where did you get 0^2 in the denominator?
And the c in the denominator with 0
Because 0 < c < 0.02
Making the denominator smaller would increase the fraction
oh i see
Honestly you should start taking n = 2 and above more often
when picking the c should i always pick at the edges of range of c?
either 0 or 0,2 in this case
The whole idea is to find an approximation using simple methods
Using the bounds on c is very easy
Sometimes it might not be enough, and that's why I always recommend taking at least n = 2
I see
In this case, 0 is very close to 0.02 so you only needed up to the first derivative
my biggest problem is knowing what value to replace c with
Just use the bounds on it..
so in this case 0 or 0,02?
Which side depends on the expression
I chose to replace the c in the numerator by 0.02 because that gives me an upper bound
And the denominator with 0, because it again gives me an upper bound
Replacing the c in the denominator by 0.02 would only give you something smaller, meaning your inequality will be >=
Instead of <= which is what you want
I see
but the values themselves, that you replace c with
are on the edges of the range of c
Yes
np
Now, that I have n, is the expression itself wrong?
Idk what you wrote here
here
Now that you know |R_1(0.2)| < 0.01
Meaning the error of the expansion for n = 1 is less than 0.01
You can approximate arctan(0.2) using it
arctan(0.2) is about f(0) + f'(0)x = 0 +1 * 0.2 = 0.2
so arctan(0.2) is about 0.2 lol
ah I see
because arctan(0.2) is 0,197 and when I approximate it to the second decimal place
it's just 0,2
Yeah I guess
Closed by @red spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
he
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
lp
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
GET UR CAMERA BITCHH
?????
?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is the graph falling from the point -pi/6 i tought it would rise because A is positive.
There's a negative number multiplying theta
Closed by @heavy cairn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have to do 4-27a
Well I need help writing an equation for the graph
I got a(x+3)(x+1)(x-2)^2 but i’m not sure what a is
It's y = a(x + 3)(x + 1)(x - 2)^2, use a point from that plot, plug it in, and solve for a
A point that isn't a root to the function
No, because that's a root
If you plugged in that, the right side results in 0, making it not useful to finding the value of a
Closed by @rose fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
TP and TQ are tangents to $y^2=4ax$ at Pand Q. If the chord passes via(-a,b), then find the locus of T
Why am. I here
I would like a hint
I mean I could startby finding general tangent equations, the points wt which the tangents intersect the parabola and so on
but is there any other better way
what is b
is the a in (-a, b) the same a that is used to define the parabola
Closed by @blazing coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay, I'm stuck on a simpler problem, maybe this will be a good chace to figure out how this epsilon business works
bonk
bot?
Assume $|E|_e < \infty$. Then $E$ is measurable iff $|E|_i = |E|_e$.
jan Niku
I'm working on the forward direction now
jan Niku

idk its too many to list
This was more or less the definition of measurable that I had while reading Folland
we have nothing about the inner measure
this problem is actually the first time ive seen it
Can you write down the definition of measurable again then
Okay
we have some equivalent theorem
Makes sense
thats probably a better form
basically identically as above, up to Closed F subset E such that |E-F|_e < eps
So you're assuming E is measurable and trying to prove that the inner and outer measure are the same
Use both of these theorems
The closed one relates to the inner measure, the open one relates to the outer measure
that the outer measure is the measure for sets of finite measure is PPT
but it doesnt, it relates outer
theyre both defined using outer
I'm not sure that that matters
The definition of inner measure is based on closed subsets
i guess im asking
i had no idea what the other person was talking about with the epsilons

Let's see
So I mean the intuitive idea here is
"You can get closed subsets as close as you want to the set E. You can also get open supersets as close as you want to the set E. Therefore, you can get the inner measure and outer measure as close as you want, i.e. they're equal."
Obviously you have to formalize this but
That's the gist of the argument
supersets?
Yeah, you take open supersets when you define the outer measure right?
Like open G such that E is a subset of G
ive never seen that word before
i dont think so
we're both learning
we use volumes
But the volumes are of open sets, no?
no
Or, sums of open intervals
no
What
theyre volumes of closed intervals
That's weird, but that should be basically the same idea
'intervals' are hard-defined as being closed at least in my notes
Do you have a theorem relating open supersets to the outer measure
im not sure what supersets are, so i dont have anything like that
superset is just the opposite of subset
we have that defn of measurable that has the word open in it
and the paired one for closed
this one i posted a moment ago
Okay
Hmmmm
can we do like
okay so clearly F and E are mble
then |E-F|_e < eps
i think i can say that E-F is measurable?
so |E-F| < eps
then |E| - |F| < eps
That seems like it should work yeah
but idk where youd go from here

and then make eps arbitrarily small, and you're good
idk i can actually assert all this
Which part are you shaky on
|E-F|_e = |E-F|
So, the difference between two measurable sets is measurable, right? Have you proven that previously
because |E-F|_e < eps doesnt mean E-F is measurable
oh wait but were assuming E is measurable
Yeah
but we dont know F is measurable
ah
BTW have you proven the Lebesgue measure is additive
so |A disjoint union B| = |A| + |B|
no, its an assignment on this pset
Can you use it for this problem
and we arent allowed to use stuff on the current pset
Oh
I'm not sure how you assert that |E| - |F| < eps then 
maybe subadditivity suffices?
well first i need to show that difference thing
Oh you haven't shown that the difference of measurable sets is measurable yet either
ah we have
Okay wait
i have it checked off as ok i did it myself 
okay so then
|E-F| is measurable apropos basically the entirety of this problem
I don't think you even need to switch to Lebesgue measure here as long as you know about subadditivity of the outer measure
|E|e ≤ |E-F|e + |F|e < |F|e + eps
so you can pick F so |F|e gets arbitrarily close to |E|e
I think we're overcomplicating this
if E1 E2 are measurable, E2 subset E1, |E2|<inf, then |E1-E2| = |E1| - |E2| is good too
I just didn't know which facts you've already proven
im not sure i track all this
Are you okay with the first inequality? (Subadditivity)
Hint: write E as a union of two sets
right you could write it as union E and F
Close, not E and F

I wanna introduce the set difference in there somehow right
So what should I write E as a union of
sorry im not really sure
we ultimately want to write it as a union of sets that have a positive distance
but im not seeing how to do that
Please stop spamming, this is a help channel
Here, fill in the blank: E = (E-F) U ?
right, i know this
but they dont have positive distance
so it breaks the chain of equalities
E = E-F U F
You still have subadditivity, no?
Why do you need a positive distance
dont we need that | E-F U F |_e = |E-F|_e + |F|_e ?
No, we only need subadditivity (as far as I know)
≤
I mean unless something about this argument is broken, but I don't see it
^
well we can get to |E|_e <= |E|
im not sure what you mean with the chain you have written
Our end goal is to show that |F|e can get arbitrarily close to |E|e, i.e. for each eps, there exists F such that |F|e > |E|e - eps, right?
That would prove the inner and outer measures of E are equal
? no we wanted to show that the inner and outer measure are equal
oh
I'm not sure how that would show what we are trying to show
The outer measure is just |E|e
The inner measure is ≥ |F|e
If the two get arbitrarily close together, then |E|i = |E|e
Also out of curiosity, is this a first course in analysis? Or a second course
Measure theory seems like a pretty advanced topic lol
I had real analysis back in 2020
there is literally no reason for ppl with my major to take this class
it makes 0 sense that its included as part of the degree
my last proofs-based course was that real analysis class
although ive done proofs here and there
I'm sorry im dumb and stupid, i still dont see
|E|e is the outer measure
I guess I havent shown that
It's the definition of |E|i, right?
it is?
It's the supremum of all such |F| s
one second
its defined using the lebesgue measure
the sup doesnt stop us from using outer measure does it
because F is otherwise measurable
Yeah, F is measurable so |F|e is the same as |F|
So we get this right
sure
Okay
So we have a chain |F|e ≤ |E|i ≤ |E|e for every single closed subset F of E?
Does that make sense
I think it was a previous part?
oh
Like the last question you asked
wait we arent allowed to use stuff on the pset though 
You're all good
Wait isn't this the same question
but its the second part of the problem
maybe that means youre actually supposed to
okay sure
so chain chain chain
|F|e <= |E|i <= |E|e <= |F|e + eps
does this actually show equality
is this a standard way to do it 
can you just say this shows equality or is there something else to do
i think ill stop here
i appreciate it eric
.close
.close
Closed by @old falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
no problem!
yes
make eps as small as you want
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me determine the chromatic number for this graph?
Since it has an odd cycle, I know we will need at least 3 colors. I seem to require 4, but I am not sure if that is the real chromatic number, if it can be done with 3, or how to tell
@vapid aspen Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> anyone up for helping with some graph theory?
@vapid aspen Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @vapid aspen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this integral?
it got cut off
@chilly oak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it correct to say that all 3 cases could be binomial distribution?
like, in question (a) the number of days in april is constant (30) so n=30 and p=1/2 (either it rains or it doesn't.)
for question (b), there are 12 months in a year, and this holds true every year, so n=12, and p=1/2.
for question (c), here I am a little unsure, but IF we set n=number of years, and p=1/2 it's still OK for a binomial distribution since both n and p are fixed values. BUT, since the Easter sunday may vary between mars and april for different years, I assumed there were some trickery by my teacher and so maybe it's not optimal for a binomial distribution?
Yeah, good observations - but have a look at your argument that p = 1/2, because either it rains or it doesn't.
You can say the same thing about playing the lottery. The chance that I win is 50 %, because either I win or I don't.
ahh ofcourse... How do I think of p in the correct way then?
For a given day, there is some probability p that it rains that day. It might be p = 0.05, if you're in Qatar, or p = 0.7, if you're in London (I'm making these up).
The probability of rain will vary depending on where you are and the season.
So for the first one (the one with April), I would say that it is reasonable enough to assume that the probability of rain is the same every day in April.
(as long as you always measure at the same location :))
For the binomial distribution, you also need independence between different measurements. I'm no meteorologist, but I would assume there is some correlation between it raining on consecutive days.
So that's another assumptions you have to make - besides the probability p of rain being the same for all days in April - there is independence between whether it rains or not on any given days.
@odd knot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I did not understand this whole topic in my lecture
Please start from explaining this condition for the uniqueness of solution
I have 0 idea where in the world this came from and what does this even imply
@hexed ginkgo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Either AM-GM inequality or derivatives
Are you learning derivatives right now?
So what are you learning?
Well be more specific
But what tools have you learned for analyzing these functions?
tools?
What have you learned that lets you know stuff about these functions
Okay, anything else?
we didn't learn the tp of the lines
How do you usually find min/max points
I've never learnt thay
the teacher only teaches easy stuff
and expects us to learn the hard ones
can u send me a videos on it
I've been searching youtube
and I can't find one for this type of graph
all of them are for normal graphs
I find it hard to believe you're expected to learn that yourself
AM-GM inequality is the easiest way to solve this one, but it might not work for other examples
she only teaches this class because she is the coordinator
for Rectangular hyperbolas I always use AM-GM?
can u send a link to a yt video I dunno how to learn that
also I have another question
Google AM-GM inequality
okok
also I have to ask
why is there no x ints
y≠0 is just what I copied but I don't understand it
x intercepts is when y = 0
yeah but apprently there's no x int of this
But the fraction is never 0 because the numerator is never 0
so whenever there is no other numbers
and only a fraction
there will never be a x int?
y = x + 4/x >= 2sqrt(x * 4/x) = 2sqrt(4) = 4
So y >= 4
(When x > 0)
And AM-GM also tells you that when x = 4/x, there is equality.
Meaning x = 2 is when y = 4, and for all other x values, y > 4
So (2, 4) is a minimum point
I don't undersatnd
I just watched a yt video
I have no idea how u applied it
😭😭😭
You understand this?
not really
I feel like they don't have a coknection
I don't understand the connection between am-gm and this graoh
y is equal to x + 4/x
For every point on the graph
But x + 4x is greater than 4 according to AM-GM
(when x is positive)
So y >= 4 for every point on the graph
why is y eql to x+4/x
isn't the function
y-coordinate = x-coordinate + 4 / x-coordinate
also y = f(x)
so theres no difference between y = and f(x) = for your problem
x+2+(4/x-1)
That's what you sent
It says y = x + 4/x there
Unless you have a different problem
and its x + 4/x thats ≥ 4 (if x > 0)
alr @spark stratus u can take over
whatd I do wrong
nothing, but it seems you want to help him
on second thought Im gonna send an image and go
ok
,,\text{AM-GM: }{\color{yellow}a}+{\color{cyan}b}\ge 2\sqrt{{\color{yellow}a}\cdot{\color{cyan}b}}\
{\color{yellow}x}+{\color{cyan}\frac4x}\ge 2\sqrt{{\color{yellow}x}\cdot{\color{cyan}\frac4x}}=2\sqrt{4}=4\
x+\frac4x\ge4
mtt07734
Nice latex
thanks
alr
thats because youre asking a question youre not supposed to be able to answer
most likely they marked the point with the coordinates on there so you know that its there
you dont need to know how to get one
from what it sounds like, this is something you can get to later on when youre more familiar with algebra
and with what a min or max is
@digital swallow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why exactly is this the same as the thumbtack definition of an ellipse?
Dandelin spheres, conic sections, and a view of genius in math.
Help fund future projects: https://www.patreon.com/3blue1brown
An equally valuable form of support is to simply share some of the videos.
Special thanks to these supporters: http://3b1b.co/dandelin-thanks
Home page: https://www.3blue1brown.com
Thoughts on the recent change to be sp...
I'm not sure I understand grants explanation
More specifically the this is vaguely remeniscent of the thumbtack definition
6:48 is the timestamp
The thumbtack thing is when you fix the ends of a string onto two thumbtacks and then pull on the string with a pen, and draw a figure that way
It draws an ellipse because the sum of distances to the foci remains the same
Why does it in this case
In which case? Thumbtack or cone slice?
Well that's kind of what this whole video is about
Once you slice the cone with a plane, you can add the two spheres such that they are tangent to both the cone and the plane
Call each of the points where the spheres touch the plane "focus"
Cool, need me to continue?
No need, thanks!

Closed by @blazing coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yeah
Yeah
@flat pumice Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @flat pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
assistance please
follow normal algebraic logic while substituting x into the expression
keeping in mind that i^2 = -1
show your work
that isn't the given question i suppose
it seems like you worked out the solution for a different question
no i get to retry questions if i am wrong
i think the correct answer was -32-6i but I am not positive
for which question?
the one i tried to solve first
share the work for the question you're trying to solve along with the correct question
Talent Unlimited
is it minus?
$= a^2 + b^2 + 2ab$
Talent Unlimited
ok but why
Talent Unlimited
ohhh
now try to simplify it again
yes, good!
Closed by @proper berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
maybe it could be useful to try integration by parts, by integrating 1/x+1=ln |x +1|+c
that is equal to ln2 when it is been intgrating fro 0 to 1
Show what you tried
This is only half the formula
Write out the entire formula for geometric series for 1/(1-q)
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
It does if you choose q correctly
This is just a finite sum. Series means infinite sum which is what you have.
Well then do this instead
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why the answer for b 2?
It's not 2
Look at what h(x) gets close to as x gets close to -1, considering only values to the right of -1.
OHHH
ok
so for a its 1 cause thats whats it getting close to from the left
and for b its -2 cause thats what its getting close to from the right
?
yes
Precisely
importantly, what the function actually does at the point doesn't matter
Closed by @finite quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How many different equivalences on a 7-element set with three equivalence classes of sizes 4, 2, and 1 exist?
How to calculate it
I know definitions of equivalance on a set and equivalance class, but this is some combonatorics so i need help
well first you need to choose 4 elements to be in the big class, then 2 elements to be in the middle class and then the last one is left over
yes
another way to think about it is, for every permutation of 7, identify any permutation of the first 4 and any permutation of the next pair, so it's 7!/4!2!
these both give the same total, just different ways of counting it
Closed by @magic olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $a \in (0, 1)$. Find all solutions $x: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ to the IVP $\dot{x} = sgn(x) |x|^a, x(0) = 0$ and justify that these are all the solutions.
For this question, my thought process was to break it up into 3 cases: $x = 0, x > 0, x < 0$. Clearly, $x(t) = 0$ for all time is a solution to this IVP. When $x > 0$, $\dot{x} = x^a$; this is separable, so we can do some algebra/calculus to eventually get $x(t) = (1 - a)t^{\frac{1}{1 - a}}$. I'm struggling to work with the $x < 0$ case, when $\dot{x} = -|x|^a$. Is breaking the problem up into three cases likes this the right approach?
@digital cobalt Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> any help is greatly appreciated! 🙏
splitting into cases seems sensible
if you have x<0, you should be able to remove the modulus in that case, like how you did with the x>0 case though
i.e., x' = -(-x)^a
@digital cobalt Has your question been resolved?
oh i see; ok that was simple lol
as for justification, do you think it'd be enough to say that these are three distinct cases that cover all possible choices for x?
i think one of my confusions also makes me question this casework; can't a solution x fluctuate between being positive, negative, or zero depending on time?
hm idk
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
try expanding (x+y)^2
yea
now is that >= 4xy?
try subtracting 4xy from it and find out
i'm assuming OP doesn't have amgm available
and needs an elementary proof
and can you write that another way
idk do you factor it?
(x-y)^2 >= 0 ?
okay
so how tf do i do the next part
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @eternal bluff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
me?
ok so who's helping me?
no
wha are u saying
oh shi
i sent the wrong problem
thats the one
they make triangles?
@remote mural
ok
ngl
i have work thats hard but simpler than this, this one is the hardest of them all
thats why im asking u it first
tell me numbers bro
this why i be confused
im literally confused
i would undersand this one @remote mural
@turbid canyon Has your question been resolved?
@turbid canyon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone help me with this?
Use the definition of fixed point
I got this...do you agree?
Anyone?
<@&286206848099549185>
@fierce cradle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It should be divergent no?
what kind of convergence test could you use for this?
@flat pumice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
@flat pumice Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @flat pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me derive a, c and d in terms of b. the equations are : a+b = d , 2ab= cd, c/b = (a+b)/a , b+c = a
<@&286206848099549185>
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
can you show your work
it is a mess
its okay
@odd egret Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rccw
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @small musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
Have u tried subbing in numbers
wdym
try to guess a root so u can factorize it
For example 1 is clearly a solution to the cubic
@eternal bluff Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @eternal bluff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When finding local/global maxima/ minima of a function
Does the derivative at those points have to be 0?
What about when finding extreme points
I think so
Or is it simply the point where the function has the highest value?
@amber wedge Has your question been resolved?
@amber wedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @amber wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
man where'd 1 and 2 come from in (x-1)^2 and (y+2)^2 
is this chatgpt
ye,,,, lmao

you never ever use chatgpt for math
it is a language model, it sounds smart but it contains innumerable fallacies
my bad g
ima ask sm1 else then 
.close
Closed by @mild saddle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is anyone able to make sense of the solution
I mean i guess its the Maximal value of our sample but how is that using the Maximum Likelihood Estimate lol
.close
Closed by @wanton dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
And how to do 2
Let's set the width as "x", and length as "3x"
That's going to make it a lot easier
No
Length = 3x
Width = x
The perimeter of a rectangle is length + length + width + width right?
Since we have the perimeter, how can you try and solve this
1 should be correct, but I would suggest assigning 2 or 3 more values for x and y, 2 is not a lot
I think it’s enough
What I thought it was 1200
Why?
Ok so it’s 8x=1200
3x + 3x + x + x = 1200
Yup, solve from here
What you'll get is the width, and the length is 3x. Plug in x to find the length
Yes that's the width, now find the length
Width is x
Length is 3x
You have found x now
What do you do to find length?
It says length three times the width tho
Yes, you already have the width, 150
3 times the width
What do you get
450
I still don’t get this tho I thought width is 3x length
Wait so is L=3W wrong then?
Length is equal to 3 times the length. We set x as the width above
It's correct
Width is 150
Length is 150 × 3
Yes
Instead of 3w, write w
Or just replace L with 3W
👍
@unborn stone Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let n be a positive integer. Prove that n * sqrt(19) * {n * sqrt(19)} > 1, where {x} is the fractional part of the number
this solution is wrong but it's just there to "inspire" some ideas
@torpid dune Has your question been resolved?
what exactly has to be done here
show the question
.
@surreal wave
mb
pretty straightforward answer ig
thats not the full qn
?
thiis is the full quetsion
it looks confusing cuz its typed out
where is "x"
wdym
you never mentioned "x"
so... {x} = x - floor x?
yes
okay
so how is that needed
it's obvious
(n sqrt 19)(n sqrt 19) = 19n^2
since n > 1, n^2 > 1
so 19n^2 > 1, and actually 19
if the fractional part is really really tiny, then it's not > 1
@modern peak
if any of you have an answer, dm me, im going to bed
@torpid dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.help
Commands:
- clopen:
.close,.reopen - consensus:
.poll - factoids:
.tag - help:
.help - version:
.version
Type .help <command name> for more info on a command.
is there a quick way without calculator to check which is bigger
yes
you know that $\sqrt{a\times b}=\sqrt{a}\times\sqrt{b}$
DerTheo
so you can say that $3\sqrt{6}=\sqrt{9\times 6}$
DerTheo
and $6\sqrt{3}=\sqrt{36\times 3}$
DerTheo
and now you can compare it
wheres 36 and 9 coming from
because of this rule
you can add an additional step $3\sqrt{6}=\sqrt{3^2\times 6}=\sqrt{9\times 6}$
DerTheo
could you show how it would be with 4 diffrent variables
like a * b^0.5 vs c * d^0.5
DerTheo
assuming that a, b, c, d >0
you can say that $a\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{a^2}\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{a^2\times b}$
DerTheo
and the same for cd i gues
and you can say that $c\sqrt{d}=\sqrt{c^2}\sqrt{d}=\sqrt{c^2\times d}$
DerTheo
now you just have to compare the two
thx
.close
Closed by @median crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

