#help-42
1 messages · Page 14 of 1
Springsskateboard
nice
Now expand that out 
now wolfy simplify
Or at least just get the constant term
No, no wolfie
constant term would be 11?
Wolfie won’t save you this time 
How did you get that, explain!
Uh-huh, what do you notice about that sum?
increasing?
Well, that’s not what I wanted you to spot 
Like you see how it’s kinda like we have (1)(2)(3) in each of them
But each time, one of the numbers is missing yea?
yeah
So can you figure out what the general case would look like?
(So much pain without sum and product notation
)
n(n+1) + n(n-1) + (n-1)(n+1)?
Hmmm, not quite
fk
Say we have to k
let’s do it
cool looking symbols
We kind of have like k!/1 + k!/2 + k!/3 + … + k!/k
You agree with that one?
I thought we had (1)(2) + (2)(3) + (1)(3)
See what I said here
yeah
Put k=3 in that
What do you get?
k=3?
into this?
6+3 +2+…2
💩
yeah
$\frac{3!}{1} + \frac{3!}{2} + \frac{3!}{3} +…\frac{3!}{3}$
Springsskateboard
It’s just [shit] notation to explain you could have an arbitrary amount of terms
Just these
Something like $\sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{k!}{n}$ in this case
chartbit
ah ok
Put in n=1 and work that out, then put in n=2 and work that out, all the way up until n=k
Then add those all up together
Does that make sense? It’s kinda like a crash intro to the notation hahah
wait what would the general notation be for this case
since we’re not just plugging in n=1
is it just n
then they would have laid out conditions like n is in the set of all reals or smth
$\sum_{n}^{k} \frac{k!}{n}$
Springsskateboard
where $n\in{\mathbb{Z^+}$
Springsskateboard
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Yeah that’s it
It basically is like from the bottom value to the top value (in integer steps)
sending for convenience sake
Ah, sheiittt, notation makes this so much better 
We have that $A_{k} = \sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{k!}{n}$, so $g_{k}(x) = \frac{A_k}{k!} = \sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{1}{n}$
chartbit
But are you happy with that?
wait what’s Ak
Oh I relabelled the A’s to A_k because they depend on k
Me being naughty, but I prefer showing they depend on k tbh
ah so the A_k is f_k?
It’s like not constant for everything so less confusion
not as naughty as the person who made this
It’s the constant term for the same f_k
wait but where did it say $A = \sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{k!}{n}$
Springsskateboard
A is basically the constant term of the numerator of f_k
I thought that was f’_k
And that sum is how we expressed what it was
OH
ok cool stuff
We have that $A_{k} = \sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{k!}{n}$, so $g_{k}(x) = \frac{A_k}{k!} = \sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{1}{n}$
Springsskateboard
so you related $f’_k(x)$ and $g_k(x)$?
Springsskateboard
OH WAIT
nvm
I didn’t read the question LOL
ok cool so how do we show that as k increase g_k(x) —> infinity
It happens, more than I’d like to admit 
LOL
With what they said, I’m so tempted to just screenshot the proof I have in my notes and send it
oooo you did this question before?
But anyways, we turn our attention to $\sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{1}{n} = \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + \ldots + \frac{1}{k}$
Well, not this exact question, but the last bit of it here I have, it’s part of series convergence/divergence
chartbit
Sorry my bad!
ah I see I see
aye let’s go im learning
np
wait but that sum can’t tend to infinity
fk my sch math department
It’s more that as you let k go to infinity, so you add even more terms of 1/k
So like if you add that infinitely many times, does the value of the sum go off to ♾️
shouldn’t be
I thought
since it’s all reciprocals
oh wait
nvm
it’s the same thing added repeatedly
You know what, I’m on mobile, too lazy for all the typesetting
how do we prove it 🧐
yea same LOL
hmmm
After the Geometric Series, the Harmonic Series is one of the most important examples in Calculus. This is a series that we will show - by investigating the partial sums - diverges. But it turns out to diverge incredibly slowly, taking over 10^43 terms just to add up to 100.
YOUR TURN! Learn...
That guy can explain it for me 
Basically search up “harmonic series” and a proof should come up haha
so this is an example of harmonic series?
It is the harmonic series 
WATCHED
so we needa bring limits into the proof?
OH
wait nah
we can just show
Sn and S2n
so confirm it’ll diverge
Pretty much the question they're asking is a limit question in disguise
Basically yep, you'd do it in the way that they've done it in the video really!
but how do I show the part where it tends to infinity regardless of x
That's why they gave you the hint
Note that g_{k}(x) doesn't depend on the value of x, it only depends on k
oh and that was shown here?
cool
Matter of fact, they're kind of dicks for labelling it as a function of x, when it clearly doesn't depend on x
let me write down everything and try to present it correctly lol
Massive dickheads 
LOL
why is it even a function of x then 😭
shouldn’t it be a function of k
Exactly lmao, it really didn't need to be because they didn't add any dependencies on x
ah ok
It's basically a function of both, only that it's constant with respect to x
Like for a given fixed k, it doesn't change as x changes
Ayo, whoever set these questions... even satan is looking at them like "you're going way too far though, stop, that's enough"
should pull them down with him
so after I find S8
do I use S_(2^n) > 1+n/2
and hence proved?
since it’ll eventually tend to infinity
Basically, yep, this is the key statement we want, from that point we can deduce that the sum goes off to ♾️ as k get's bigger, though be careful with the labels
Let me dig through my notes a moment
noiceee
Ah found it finally, looked in the wrong .pdf for this haha
ayeee
Actually I think you're good, I might be fried 
I'm still in shock they've basically tortured you like this 

wth is that 2^infinity
I see
I mean, I guess it's doable, but it surely isn't trivial
Ah, that's 2^n, poor resolution
ah LOL
Hopefully this is clearer maybe
aye nice
Ah yes, better
yea
wait
the first math line
when it’s 2
how is it 1/2 + 1/3?
isn’t it 1 + 1/2?
It is, but for the purposes of showing it diverges [or converges] you can ignore the first term[s]
As in if it converged without that 1, then it would converge with it, and similar if it diverges with it, it would diverge with it
ah I see I see
Yea you can include it if you wanted, just modify the argument as appropriate
No worries, was an interesting question! Somewhat surprised it went down the path of harmonic series in the end, but I really should have seen that coming
But hopefully all of that makes sense!
[I mean, I couldn't see myself doing this at 16 tbh
]
I think, a better way of stating this would be that you have $g_{2^{m}}(x) = \sum_{n= 1}^{2^{m}} \frac{1}{n} > \frac{m - 1}{2}$ via similar arguments as before
chartbit
As that explicitly involves the function they stated, but it's like a tiny point hehe
And as a final point, the $\Pi$ product notation is basically the equivalent for $\sum$ but for products, so $\Pi_{m =1}^{n} a_{m} = a_{1} \times a_{2} \times \ldots \times a_{n}$
chartbit
ahhh okok
NICE I’m learning notations
E.g. you can represent the factorial $n! = \Pi_{m = 1}^{n} m$
chartbit
Yep it actually makes life so much easier, that's how I instantly spotted it would be a harmonic series question
- there's less ambiguity as well
yea HAHA the thing is we didn’t learn these notations
so idk what my teacher is smoking cuz he expects us to try these
So e.g.
$$
\ln\left( \Pi_{n=1}^{k} (x + n)\right) = \sum_{n=1}^{k} \ln(x+n)
$$
chartbit
Is how I'd have written the first part of the question if it were me doing it
Whatever it is, me no wan it
LOL
But yeah, there you go, done quite a bit of math here
hope that's been all good!
YEA it’s been amazing
gna rub this in my teachers face
he’s gonna think I cheated
technically it’s not officially an assignment
he just asked us to try
I still learnt new stuff though 🤙
I mean, I think quite a lot of it you would have made progress on, you could have done the differentiation and common denominatoring, it's just knowing how to write that constant term [which might have taken time to spot]
The general case is a bit to visualise [hence do small examples and try to generalise from there]
But we done made it now 🥳
YEA
wait for this
what is m?
It's supposed to be some random integer, but to be fair you can replace that m with any other letter of your choice [except n, as we used that as our summation variable, and that would be really bad form
]
You can just say "for some integer m", it should be clear from the context what you're doing - like you can say "if we take the sum up to 2^m, then our sum becomes..." then clarify that m is a positive integer if you wanted
oh so
$g_{2^{m}}(x) = \sum_{n= 1}^{2^{m}} \frac{1}{n} > \frac{m - 1}{2}$ for some $m \in \mathbb{Z^{+}}$?
Springsskateboard
More the other way round: let $m \in \mathbb{Z^{+}}$ be given, then $g{2^{m}}(x) = \sum_{n= 1}^{2^{m}} \frac{1}{n} > \frac{m - 1}{2}$
chartbit
That's something you'll hear about in e.g. classes in logic, the order of statements and the wording really matters
Yep that'll do 
oh sheesh
what’s QED?
BRUH
"Q.E.D." (sometimes written "QED") is an abbreviation for the Latin phrase "quod erat demonstrandum" ("that which was to be demonstrated"), a notation which is often placed at the end of a mathematical proof to indicate its completion. Several symbols are occasionally used as synonyms for Q.E.D. These include a filled square filled square (Unico...
we broke wolfie
with our first question
so QED = hence proved
is that Latin
wait wtf did I ask
it literally says Latin
They basically asked this guy to prove divergence of the harmonic series 
what a roundabout way
to prove divergence of harmonic series
Honestly the setup of the question didn't help one bit, why on earth did they need to define that function as one in x when it clearly doesn't depend on it
Swear they just want @hidden elbow to suffer 
SEND HELP
indeed
wait I asked my friend and she said it’s not conclusive cuz I only did it for 3 cases?
eh oops wrong ping
@upper sparrow
Hmmm, as in you'd show it in general what it would look like, as per here, that should be enough really I would think
As in you should do something like this one here too
AH
I see I see
Yep, once you've shown that pattern like that, you should be good imo!
Yep 
@hidden elbow Has your question been resolved?
W H A T 
LMAO
that’s why I was prepared for a comedy show
That's just outright disrespectful there
whoever did that, honestly, is an opp 
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅

wait
@upper sparrow
this look alright?
that's what I would like to see 
NOICE
so then after this I do 3 cases
and show the pattern
Actually wait a moment
uh oh
Group them like this
oh wait why
As you want to replace 1/3 by 1/4, all of the 1/5, 1/6, 1/7 by 1/8 and so on so forth
but the picture grouped them like 1/2 + 1/3 etc
Ah yeah, they did, but got an even better way to do it now
aye cool alr
This will make use of the hint they gave
wait how about the 2^3 pattern
Same idea
Actually give me a second, I'll write it on paper for you
@hidden elbow Has your question been resolved?
it’s been 3 hours on this problem ☺️
Been quite some time! It's the wording of the last proof that's the nuts bit
Try this one out, hopefully I've counted right 
ayeee
wait what does the orange part say
"there are n of these terms in total"
ahh
Ah shit it should be n+1 of them, fuck
Actually shit I've confused my poor brain 
No it's n of them
...I think 
nw I’ve been cooked since the first question
wait btw
1/2^n repeated n-1 times right
then let’s say n=2
1/4
it should only appear once no?
why does it appear twice
Oh yeah was gonna say, they done fuqd up there
Actually no hang on, I don't think so
No yes they did 
That should be $2^{n-1}$ times
chartbit
They have the nerve to set that shit and fuck up the quoting, kmt
lmaoo is snow here also
@ancient thistle
wait so assuming they typed 2^(n-1) there,
I find the pattern for 2^k
wait I don’t have to show 3 cases?
here they said using the estimate
what does that mean
What they're saying is that they're going to bound the sum below by replacing all the terms with something smaller
So like in that one, all the terms will be less than 1/2n, so replace them all with 1/2n and you get a smaller sum
wait so for our terms
since we’re grouping different from theirs
what would our estimate be
We're basically here replacing all the terms with something smaller, the next 1/2^n up, so like the blue is replaced with 1/4, the purples are replaced with 1/8, the greens with 1/16 and so on
It's a similar idea to what they have, but we're trying to change our sum into one based on 1/2^n looking thingys
Kinda like in this picture here!
AH ok
wait what does “the sum is bounded below by 1 + n/2” mean?
Basically at the end because we replaced the OG sum with something smaller, we know the sum must be at least [bigger than] 1 + n/2
oh we can prove that way?
Yep, prove the sum is at least something which ends up going to infinity and you’re done!
wait but how does it show the sun ends up going to infinity
It's, like, trivial 
Think about it: you are at least something, and that something gets bigger, so you must get bigger too
Yep 
Damn, for a whole 5 mark question 
But yep, all that all good now?
@hidden elbow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Someone said before that it was already solved
how are we supposed to find tangents if not with calculus
This was a question for 9th grade surprisingly haha
how are 9th graders supposed to know what a tangent is
Ask miss @ancient thistle herself haha
She administered it to her students lmfao
I have no clue though
@ancient thistle 

finger got pointed at you
Name dropping snow 
the tangent and the conic are supposed to intersect at a quadratic root
so you solve for discriminant = 0
Wait conic? 
f is a hyperbola
so you can calculate the k for every x_0 by \delta=0
You mentioned loss?
and you can find two spots which satisfies x_1 = 1/x_2 and k_1*k_2 = 0
who let ms snow near those poor 9th graders
I tried that, but the roots are not that easy
She got like 5 people in vc trying to solve this 
$y = m\cdot\left[x-a\right]+f(a)$
sopinha
$m\cdot\left[x-a\right]+f(a) = \dfrac{1}{x}+x \iff mx^2-max +f(a) \cdot x = x^2+1$
she 
sopinha
It's meant to be a secret 
i put that to practice and got a super long equation
your mind just keep you from doing this after you learned a advanced method
Closed by @dawn spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got an answer of f(g(x))= 9x^2 + 6x - 11, but the marking scheme says its f(g(x))= 9x^2 + 3x - 12, can someone help where i've went wrong?
Closed by @dull salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i convert radians to angles/degrees
how do i find in what quadrant and what angle these are refferring to
my course completely jumped over that
multiply the radian by 180/pi
in the examples you have the pi will cancel out immediately
and generally, you'll be looking at examples like that
yes
you know that $2pir = 360$
phoestaclies
$2*\pi*r = 360$ so you can have r = something
phoestaclies
no? 2pi(r) is the circumference of a circle. not a degree measure. unless you're using r as rad, which is very confusing.
i do not know that 2x pi x r =360. i thought 2pi equalled 360
oh no sorry i said nothing forgot
yes
yes
with a theta of 45?
maybe i used that word wrong
i guess the theta is 135
whats the inner angle called
inside the triangle
yeah, it would be equivalent to +/-sin(45) and +/-cos(45) depending on the quadrant
whats with the +/-
i keep seeing that in trig
isnt it clear if its + or - based on the quadrant
because sin(x) and cos(x) change signs depending on the quadrant. For short hand +/-sin(x) just means "positive or negative sin(x)"
also last question, do i always multiply radians by 180. or does that change to 90. 270. 360 ever?
i suppose its 180 because that equals pi right
for example, in the first quadrant cosine is positive, in the second quadrant cosine is negative
you need to decide which one to use based on the quadrant
np
.close
Closed by @mint cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so do you see what type of triangle triangle ABC is?
.close
Closed by @ashen solstice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would i simplify this?
What's f
Yes. Whatever f is
@main remnant Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you know how exponents work
i think it should 3^8
i mean im learning exponents now
its showing up as wrong though
6561 is it solved, but thats also wrong
Post screenshot of the entire page? Maybe there are specific instructions
,w (3^-2)^-4=6561
I figured it out, thanks for the help
my friend put a comma originally, and I didnt realize
it is 6561
.close
Closed by @craggy oar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
quick question about propositions
It is a false proposition
Because you can prove that 5 + 7 = 12
and that 12 is not equal to 13
Closed by @burnt cobalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Drop a perp from D to BC and a perp from A to BC
Let BD be x
What do you mean ous?
Everything is written in terms of x @sterile seal
@sterile seal look what I did
I found
I did
IT
It's Square root of 2
.close
Closed by @fiery torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$cos\theta=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Zyme><SOL
$1^{\circ}$
Modus
What do you need help with?
Zyme><SOL
What have you tried
I tried to find a degree
using a handy dandy table
but none of the degrees for sin cos and tan had $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$
Zyme><SOL
unless I modified $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$
Zyme><SOL
If I draw a right triangle with leg 1 and hypotenuse sqrt2, what do you notice about it
That aside, a table isn't a good method anyways
The best way to remember trig angles related to 30, 45, 60 is to remember 2 triangles
look at the table
is $\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$?
Zyme><SOL
yes prove it
Isn’t the only method to calculate using the complex form of them
what can you multiply by top and bottom
because in mines it had sqrt2/2 as the values for that
Rationalize the denominator
to rationalize the denominator yes
Really?
sqrt2*2 is 1?
draw them neater on a piece of paper and you will find it does the job
yh for 30 60 45
??? what
Oh I thought you were talking about for all triangles
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{2}\sqrt{2}} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$
yes?
$\frac{\sqrt{2} * \sqrt{2}}{2 *\sqrt{2}}$
Zyme><SOL
first step multiply by sqrt2 / sqrt2 = 1
???
bro what I'm lost
how do you change sqrt2/2 into 1/sqrt 2
divide both sides by sqrt 2?
why would that occur to you though
what's the trigger that would say yes, divide both sides by sqrt 2
I'll try remembering this but I need to understand it at base value
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \cdot \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{2}^2}=\boxed{\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}}$
backwards would be dividing by sqrt 2 right
kappa
This might be easier to see
yeah I get that
What are you having trouble with?
It’s a common technique to make computation easier
For example, if sqrt2 is approximately 1.41, then what is 1/sqrt2?
1/1.41
And that’s hard to find right
yeah
But if we rationalize the denominator and find that 1/sqrt2=sqrt2/2
We can simply divide by 2 and find that 1.41/2=0.705
oh alright, do you happen to know anything about transformations of the parent function sqrt x
Maybe??
I posted a question in #help-32
if you could take a look at it
would be appreciated
.close
Closed by @terse pine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
Need help with a q
"Lethna buys some boxes of pens and some packets of pencils
There are 40 pens in each box
There are 12 Pencils each box
Lethna givesone pen and one pencil to each student in Year 7 of her school
When she has done this she has no pens and no pencils left
Work our how many boxes of pens and pencils Lethna could have bought"
Do you know least common multiple?
idk howto find it
okay
i relearned how to find it
its 120
cause 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 5 = 120
What now
used prime factor decomposition to get this btw
alr
i got it
3 boxes of pens and 10 boxes of pencils
.close
Closed by @uneven saffron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just needed some help remembering what sides are on both the 30-60-90 triangle and the 45-45-90 triangle
For the 45-45-90, you have a [right angle] triangle whose non-hypotenuse sides are equal
For the 30-60-90, take an equilateral triangle and fold it in half
I'm looking through my lesson pages if your wondering
the information in them is apparent
you just need to draw an equilateral and split it in half
and a right isos
there was an example where I wrote down the exact side length associated with the angle
Wait sorry misread your question
you wanted the sides???
It doesnt really matter what the sides are
Its the same scaled up or down
You get the same fraction but the numerator/denominator is multiplied by a constant
is the 30 60 90 triangle the sine triangle or the cosine
or am I just making things up now
You use sine and cosine to solve for the sides
that's the purpose of my question
It's not restricted to just one of those
so sin 30 for the 30 angle?
which case would you use either
it gives different results
Do you know the mnemonic SOH CAH TOA?
yup
So if you did $\sin(\theta)$ that's opp/hyp
dldh06
If theta = 30, then you are using the sides opp and hyp, if you are applying sine
If you are using cosine, that's adj/hyp
So you are using both trig functions to find opp and adj
@terse pine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @marsh canyon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help drawing this out
@toxic igloo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @toxic igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
<@&286206848099549185>
to find the bearing, i found the angle of about 41 degrees but on the answer key it says the bearing is S27W
thats my work
never mind
i figured it out
i just had to subtract 41-14
.close
Closed by @toxic igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello i need help on a math problem
@tribal kernel Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@tribal kernel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whenever i write that something is true because [fancy A] is a sigma algebra
@wintry glacier Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @wintry glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wasnt paying enough attention in class lmao
factor out an x
1 x or 0.1x
x
@west fossil Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @west fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
You don't need to close and open new channels if no one answers you, just wait patiently for help
So that’s x^(-3/2)
To find antiderivative, +1 to exponent and then multiply the whole thing by 1/(the number u got in the exponent)
Yes, if we change it to a negative exponent, it has to go to the numerator
- Use parentheses, 2. Show ur work. 3. No
Ye in the exponent
Back to the original problem
Just the way you’ve been doing it
or still something wrong
Ur good
Actually, the last line u did
The limits are from 1 to 3
Not 3 to 1
Remember we changed that alrdy
It’s read bottom to top
what?
The limits
the first second or third one
The original problem had 3 to 1 right?
Wdym
Bottom limit to top limit
Just read this lol
I’ve said it a few times
The integral was from 3 to 1 originally, we read from the bottom number to the top number
…
but flipped it
Yes
Why’d u flip it back here…
Ok I understand
not sure how to subtract this mess.
oh nvm
i got it
multiply both by
sqrt
num/dem
den*
done
,rotate
look good?
ty
can i show u some other simple problems
that i just finished?
that i asked u a while back
Can u wait like 5 mins
all 3?
u got em all right
ye thats right
btw if u just wanna check ur answers, search up integral calculator
ok
nah its fine
ok
first flip the limits of the second integral
anyways
think abt it like this
the area under the curve from 1 to 7 is -5
from 4 to 7 its -7
not sure what u mean
actually lets do this
we should
break that last integral up into 2 integrals
flip the integral
well yea do that to the limits of the 2nd integral





