#help-41
1 messages · Page 65 of 1
???
Given that (2, 1, 0, 1) is a common solution to both linear systems, it means that (2, 1, 0, 1) satisfies the two equations:
ax_1 + x_2 + 3x_3 + 2x_4 = 1
x_2 + bx_3 - 3x_4 = -2
Plug (2, 1, 0, 1) to get a = -1, b = 0
Now all that's left is to check that the two linear systems indeed have infinitely many solutions
@tough mica Has your question been resolved?
b is not zero
@tough mica Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
b can be 2 3 4 5
all of them satisfies (2,1,0,1)
because b is free I think
@tough mica Has your question been resolved?
??????? WHAAAAT
idk, this exercise is so nasty
Do you see the 4 given linear equations? One of them is $x_2 + bx_3 - 3x_4 = -2$
Arya
Can you plug in (2,1,0,1) in this equation?
Yeah so b is free mb
Therefore you have (a, b) = (-1, k) where k is any real number
But you have to check to make sure S_1 and S_2 together have infinitely many solutions
what does it mean that S1 and S2 have infinitely many solutions in common
The matrix is 4x4 with coefficients of x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4 in each equation
this is so nastyyyyy
,,\begin{bmatrix}1&0&-2&-2\a&1&3&2\1&-b&-3&b\0&1&b&-3\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x_1\x_2\x_3\x_4\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}0\1\2\-2\end{bmatrix}
Arya
yeah
Now for infinitely many solutions, determinant of the 4x4 matrix need ta be 0
And you've arrived at a = -1 so you should just put that in before solving
,w det {{1,0,-2,-2},{-1,1,3,2},{1,-b,-3,b},{0,1,b,-3}} = 0
,w det {{1,0,-2,-2},{a,1,3,2},{1,-b,-3,b},{0,1,b,-3}} = 0
Closed by @tough mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Basically the set of solutions are more than zero dimensional
Sounds stupid but if u think about it that’s literally it
like if all solutions lie on a line then there’s still infinitely many solutions
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is regression coefficient affected by linear coding
Use this and don't instantly ping helpers @split sail
can you close this, he made another one
I've been waiting for 1o minutes?
10*
Close the other one leave this
do .close
I already closed the other one
Alright
I thought you posted that at 50 minutes past my mistake
oh ok
@split sail Has your question been resolved?
@split sail Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I honestly have zero clue how to begin this
What do you understand by an inflection point
when it changes in concavity
would i need a calculator at all for that?
No
So firstly let's look between x=-5 and x=-4
From -5 to -4 does f'(x) increase or decrease
it decreases
Good
Yep
Closed by @river spade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If a differential form admits primitive, then is it exact?
that is, if I can find a primitive one can I say that it is exact?
Without even seeing the domain
<@&286206848099549185>
There are the questions above
wdym
if a differential form is exact I just need to find the differentiable function f such that the differential of the function coincides with the differential form of df=w?
why this ?
@sinful tusk
@ruby dome Has your question been resolved?
@ruby dome Has your question been resolved?
@ruby dome Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello having a tricky time understanding the logic of this question
imagine that A_1 is the natural numbers
A_2 is the natural numbers without 1,
A_3 is the natural numbers without {1, 2}
and so on
what is the intersection of these sets?
infinite?
Which specific natural number is still in the intersection?
Won't A_1, A_2,... eventually catch up
well, if the set is infinite, then there must be at least one natural number in the set right?
but any natural number you claim is in this set is eventually removed from the set by the intersection
so actually, this intersection is not just finite, but empty
yet each of the sets has infinitely many elements
Sorry, this is probably a lot
Digesting
I am thinking now that if A_n is starting infinitely to the right, then I guess there can't be an intersection
I mean, there is an intersection, it's just empty
Closed by @viscid mesa
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
sorry, okay isn't the intersection just A_n?
Like just working with smaller sets A_1, A_2, A_3, the intersection of these sets is A_3 which is infinite
right
We can think of it like this, all finite n, we have the test "if m >= n then m is in A_n"
what if we apply this logic to our hypothetical A_inf?
"if m >= infinity then m is in A_inf"
Obviously this is an abuse of notation somewhat
but there is no such m in the naturals for which that holds.
Hmmmm okay, I think it clicked a little. I think my biggest confusion is how a pattern that can happen infinitely can be broken as soon as infinite is introduced if that makes sense
Should be good now though, thank you very much
.close
Closed by @viscid mesa
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
To be fair, it's quite confusing
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$x^4 + 81$
can someone help me factoring this? i tried to do something but it failed
Simon James B
x^4 + 81 = x^4 + 3^4 = (x^2 + 3^2 i) (x^2 - 3^2 i) = (x + 3 i^2)(x - 3 i^2)(x + 3i)(x - 3i) = (x + 3)(x - 3)(x + 3i)(x - 3i)
$x^4 + 81 = x^4 + 3^4 = (x^2 + 3^2 i) (x^2 - 3^2 i) = (x + 3 i^2)(x - 3 i^2)(x + 3i)(x - 3i) = (x + 3)(x - 3)(x + 3i)(x - 3i)$
Simon James B
i am so very sorry but i do not understand
which step?
$i = \sqrt{-1}$
OmnipotentEntity
we never learned this
ah
srry
wait, did I make a mistake?
no idea
I think I also just simply made a mistake
yeah that should have no solutions in the reals.
as omni said you can't factor it in the real
yeah my bad, let me fix my factorization
they never said in what to factor
wait so if not in the reals.
means in none below it
yeah
\begin{align*}
x^4 + 81 &= 0 \
x^4 + 3^4 &= 0 \
x^4 - (-1) 3^4 &= 0 \
x^4 - 3^4 i^2 &= 0 \
(x^2 + 3^2 i) (x^2 - 3^2 i) &= 0 \
(x^2 + 3^2 \sqrt{i}^2) (x^2 - 3^2 \sqrt{i}^2) &= 0 \
(x^2 - (-1) 3^2 \sqrt{i}^2) (x^2 - 3^2 \sqrt{i}^2) &= 0 \
(x^2 - 3^2 i^{5/2}) (x^2 - 3^2 \sqrt{i}^2) &= 0 \
(x + 3 i^{5/4}) (x - 3 i^{5/4}) (x + 3 i^{1/4}) (x - 3 i^{1/4}) &= 0
\end{align*}
I'm surprised they are having people factor these without knowing the concept of imaginary numbers first.
it should be (x^2 +3 * sqrt2x +9)(x^2 - 3 * sqrt2x + 9)
OmnipotentEntity
oh, ah, that's what they want.
they gave this as homework 
I mean, that's what I'd give to students after they learned the concept of imaginary numbers
ok ignore what I just wrote.
What's the point of giving homework if the answer is gonna be having no real solutions
😂
Atleast have some solutions
Imaginary or not
the real point is to "how say" that there is no real solution
it should be (x^2 +3 * sqrt2x +9)(x^2 - 3 * sqrt2x + 9) it is what they say
which is completely useless
do you have the whole thing or just the answer ?
this is the whole answer that they marked as correct for the given expression x^4 + 81
i do not have how they solved
well, we can assume that there is a solution, and then figure out what it must be, I suppose.
there was a bot to check if (x^2 +3 * sqrt2x +9)(x^2 - 3 * sqrt2x + 9) = to the initial expression
i do not remember how to do it tho
like, you assume there is a solution of the form (x^2 + ax + 9)(x^2 + bx + 9) then work out what a and b must be.
,w is (x^2 +3 * sqrt2x +9)(x^2 - 3 * sqrt2x + 9) = x^4 + 81 ?
bruhh
you meant sqrt(2x+9) ?
no no i said that because the result said it is not always equal to
If you expand (x^2 + ax + 9)(x^2 + bx + 9) you get x^4 + (a+b)x^3 + (18 + ab)x^2 + 9(a+b)x + 81
then you have a+b = 0 and 18 + ab = 0
nav i give up
this gives you a = -b, and 18 = a^2
so a = sqrt(18) = 3 sqrt(2)
Therefore (x^2 + ax + 9)(x^2 + bx + 9) = (x^2 + 3 sqrt(2) x + 9)(x^2 - 3 sqrt(2) x + 9) = x^4 + 81
i give up i am moving to functions. Thanks for trying tho but this problem assigned to us is way more advnaced then we are so i have no idea why they gave it
.close
Closed by @obsidian shoal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
👋
A-AnB?
i understand we can write it as P(A)- P(A intersection B)
would P(A-B) also yield the same result ?
i was trying to prove P(A union B) = P(A) + P(B) - P( A intersection B)
i used this result and it worked
not sure if it correct though
yes, A - B and A - (A intersection B) are the same sets
Closed by @ancient quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Q=0.18 (L√(SA))/(³√D)=25
This was on a Mazda CX=90
We have 3 mechanical engineers, and one electrical trying to figure it out
@split sail Has your question been resolved?
Trying to figure out what? There's no question here.
Closed by @opaque quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this sufficient to prove the incenter exceter lemma?
( kinda sloppy if anythings unclear i can explain )
also i took the wrong order in quadrilateral IBIaC
but other than that
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @river brook
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, how do i simplify this to make it easier to solve
Apparently i need to do long division on it but i am kinds confused on that
so you don’t know long division?
or synthetic division
if you don’t then you could always add 0 to the numerator and split the fraction
-1+1
$\int \frac{x^2-1+1}{x+1} , dx$
knief
see where that gets you
Ahaaa
I think i get it now
i can expand (x^2-1) and that would have x+1 so i can just take those 2 out right?
then what’s left
so (x-1) + 1
nope
Wait
that would be x
$\int \frac{(x-1)(x+1)+1}{x+1} , dx$
Mystic
yes
would it not be like that and i cancel the top and bottom out?
write out what you mean
Mystic
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Like that you get the idea
Mystic
like that?
Oh yeah
Mystic
So like that?
i can alreadyintegrate 1/X+1 as ln|x+1| just gotta simplify the other
Alright so I integrated x-1 into 1/2x^2-x and the other into ln|x+1| so the final answer would be 1/2x^2-x+ln|x+1|
Let's go
nice
Closed by @maiden field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am wondering what the best way to take notes is for a class like real analysis or modern algebra? 1 book divided into sections (definitions, proofs, ...) or like perhaps using a plastic file divided into sections idk
"best" falls on you. Imo, studying and knowing the why of things really helps. In math, the task is to apply your knowledge. So rote facts on paper will do you no good. Take note of its utility and try to form your own thoughts on what you are learning
I 100% agree with knowing the why, but having a neatly compiled list of definitions and theorems comes in handy when you stuck on a proof and you wondering what else you could try
correction: sometimes raw facts can be helpful, if you need to refer to them constantly, say the name or details of a theorem
Then have two sets of notes: comprehensive and organized, and then a "fast-facts" sheet
Closed by @cursive wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Derivative and where it is 0
I'm doing algebra actually so I don't think I need to find the derivative
try cross multiplying
you will get a quadratic and then you can determine the range for y from the discriminant
@mossy eagle Has your question been resolved?
I did that but there's an issue
@plush fjord
what did you get
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
That's the method I was following
That step ehich I circled I reduced the equation by 4 rather than -4
So i got -4y²+3y+1>=0
(-4y-1)(y-1)>=0
So the -4y-1 changed the sign in my table which changed my solution set
@plush fjord
yeah this is mine as well
it looks like you simplified it? I used the quadratic formula from the unsimplified version
which was
$16y^2 - 12y - 4 <=0$
clair
Solving it like that gives me a wrong range of values why
I thought its the same thing
did you change the inequality?
after you get the inequality with y you just simply solve
@mossy eagle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
rq can we cancel terms if the denominator continus with a plus/minus sign?
ex 3/3(2)+2
you can cancel the top 3 with the bottom 3 leaving you with 1/(2)+2
Closed by @light ore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not sure how to set this up
book says it’s newtons law of cooling but it didn’t help out when i read through it
Whats the question??
gotta do separation of variables
would it not be dA/(100-A) = kdt?
the integral of 1/(100-A) isnt ln(100-A)
but also the integral of k wouldnt be t
and youre missing the integration constant also
sorry my internet is being annoying
it’s saying that k is a constant
and the integral of a constant in terms of anything would be that term
or am i missing something
the integral of a constant k wrt t would be kt+c
think to how if i differentiate 5x im left with just 5
then go in reverse
if the k was a 1 and you integrate 1dt it would be t right because the derivative of a constant with a variable would be a constant, and it doesn’t specify we have more than one k so i’m just confused why it wouldn’t be just t
but it also kinda makes sense now that i read it
ok i have 100 - A = C + e^kt now
not quite, the left also had an issue
and the removal of the ln here is a tad off but we'll get there
alr
how do we integrate 1/(100-A)
not really
ah, alrighty then we can go ahead with the u-sub
unless it was an inverse trig function i just assume 1/anything is ln
often we can manipulate the expression into this form, then reverse it to the ln, but the u-sub does that in a more worked way
eg i know the derivative of 100-A is -1
so i may rewrite 1/(100-A) as -[ -1/(100-A)]
then jump to -ln(100-A)
because i need the numerator to be the derivative of 100-A in order to reverse to the ln without doing a u-sub
which happens to be -1
1=-(-1)
oh it’s just chain rule
yup
my bad my bad
so -ln(100-A)=kt+C
so then would it be -100 + A if i distribute the negative or should i not bother
after i get e^kt + C
you cant distribute into the ln im afraid
i meant after i put an e
youll also never have this
yeah but it would be multiplied not added
ideally you should multiply the -1 across first or youre going to just get 1/(100-A)=Ce^(kt) which is fine but just an extra step
not quite
what did i miss
youve pretty much said that if -1=x then -e^1=e^x
but it would be e^(-1)=e^x
you left the -1 out when you raised both sides
the negative one from the -ln?
yeah
oh i forgot to do that
you did -e^ln rather than e^(-ln)
you can just multiply by -1 before you do it
then you just have ln(100-A)
and then it would be dividing by C in the end? bc it would be -kt - C or am i getting ahead of myself
a bit ahead of yourself
e^(-C) and e^C are both constants
can replace either with just C
so it would be C*e^-kt?
okay that makes so much more sense
then i have my initial t = 0 from the problem
if A = A_not
i’m getting A = -(100-A_0)e^-kt
i think i’m close but i might’ve missed a step
hm so C=100-A0
youre missing the other 100
A-100=-(100-A0)e^(-kt)
just need to add it over
oh
wait
that 100 seems like it just spawned in from how i did it
i did 100-A = Ce^-kt
A = -Ce^-kt + 100
set t = 0 and A = to A_0
A_0 = -C + 100
C= 100 - A_0
A = -(100-A_0)e^-kt
compare the second line to the last
yup
silly old me
thank you so much i might’ve ripped hair out if i had to look at the problem longer
.close
Closed by @frank sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
So the area the inequality covers should be all the points which have y greater than 2
Firstly let’s draw the line y=2
You can just sketch this on a notepad
Not sure
All the points above y=2 have a y coordinate greater than 2 yes?
Ye
As such to graph the inequality y>2 what should be the area shaded?
Welp ig we’ll let otori cook
@little frigate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do i consider r1=r2 here
<@&286206848099549185>
r1 and r2 are PK and QK?
Then no, r1=r2 only if the chord is perpendicular to the axis
ok then how do i solve this
@glad pulsar Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @glad pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let ABCD be a trapezoid as in the image. If P,Q,R bisect AD,BC,BC respectively, S,T split CD into 3 equal side lengths, AB = 4, BC = 6, AD = 3
a) Find the area of QST
b) If the star shaped polygon PIQERFSGTH has an area of a, and pentagon EFGHI has an area of b,
Find a + b
@solemn escarp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How did they get the f? (Histogram - Statistics)
<@&286206848099549185>
f stands for frequency
!noping
Please do not ping individual helpers unprompted.
How did they get that?
i didn't draw it during the discussion sorry
then youre out of luck
but do you know how did they get f?
f is the height of the bar
!15min
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
like the numbers 2, 3, 7, 3, 2?
yes
What do you mean height of the bar?
Height of 'a bar' represents its frequency.
thats based off the data
Okay here the question that was only given is 5, 15, 12, 16, 8, 10, 22, 16, 13, 15, 12, 12, 14, 19, 17, 16, 18, 22
My step 1 is 22 - 5 = 17
my step 2 is S^k >_ n
that part is a coincidence
my step 3 is i = 17/5
finally my table is that
for step 4
I don't know how did they get the frequency
with just those 3 steps
you count the number of data points you have in those ranges
for example in the range 5-8, you have one 5 and one 8
so there are 2 points in the range 5-8
hence the frequency f of 2
it would be easier if you sorted the list
5 - 8 is 2
9 - 12 is 3
13 and 16 is 4
HA THEY ARE WRONG
Its not 7 it's 4
wait hen 17 - 20 is also 4
along with 21 - 24 is also 4
dang
@split sail Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Decide whether the following is negative or positive:
tan(9^9^9^9^9^9)
,calc tan(9^9^9^9^9^9)
Result:
NaN
damn
@vocal isle Has your question been resolved?
,w tan(9^9^9^9^9^9)
,w tan(a^b)
@vocal isle Has your question been resolved?
where does this question come from..? I doubt any question bank would ask you to evaluate at such a large number
also
I believe that its -ve
because your huge number (if I havent messed up) is congruent to 3 mod 6, so it can be definitely written as 2kpi + 2.something, meaning that you get tan(2.something) which is definitely less than 0
assuming ofc that ur number is inputtted as radians
@vocal isle Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @vocal isle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
back
F
alr
can someone explain why Xdiv2pow2=perfect square root of the original number?
so if you did it with 9 or 7 youd get anumber with factors that perfectly square?
???
that is
tho
like
if you had 7 and you wanted to get a number which has two factors that multiply by each others to make 7
youd devide by 2
so 3.5
^2
I know you are a troll.
i will give source
Now we know how to factor polynomials, but sometimes that just won't work. We need a different method that might seem a little trickier, but it works every time! It's called completing the square, and it might sound like geometry, but it has to do with manipulating an expression to generate a polynomial that is a perfect square. What am I doing ...
also over 5 ppl answered prior to you
but the answers were extremely technical and nobody attempted to simplify or explain it directly without long arduous proofs
except for 1 or 2 people but idk where there answers were bc they got lost in the crowed
is this about (x+a/2)^2 formula
alrr can you explain how and why it works?
well
it's about quadratic identity
(x+y)^2 = x^2 + 2xy + y^2
you just expand the left hand side
You are also A(aperture)
to see that's what you get
so
taking y = a/2
(x+ a/2)^2 = x^2 + ax + a^2/4
this way
if you have to factor something like
x^2 + 6x + 5
notice that taking 6 = a
we get
(x+3)^2 = x^2 + 6x + 9
i cant understand that
because its spoken in math language but i cant process that mentally because even when I did know what you were talking about it was still really hard to match that to my understanding
tbh
this is one of the only times
where ive felt like understanding a problem is actually nearly impossible
because
-
Understanding it looks like itd take a rediculous ammount of permutations and calculations to check whether or not it were true and in what way
-
the context is extremely vague and not mentioned anywhere so its very hard to gain info on it.
-
it looks very kinetic like i cant solve it because it doesnt make sense outside of something that is true just because it is
to be fair
if i can identify it as a self-evident truth rather than an abstract contextual concept
it technically may negate as thered be no point in learning it
as it'd be something only true because it is true rather than because it has an idea behind it
hmm, either way, its very difficult to find help here, and that guy did specify the name of it
too many hooligans in this world smh
half the time im too pained to even talk properly tbf but i dont worship my ego like most
erm
thinking:
may as well just continue i guess
unless someone comes here
SHRUG
painful!!!!
this is the worst type of problem
there is nothing enjoyable about this
well anyways i may as well start
This is a short, animated visual proof showing what is meant when we "complete" the square algebraically and justifying why the formula holds for positive real numbers. #mathshorts #mathvideo #math #completingthesquare #mtbos #manim #animation #theorem #pww #proofwithoutwords #visualproof #proof #iteachmath #algebra
_______________...
- In context of quadratics where the goal is to find roots (values that make the equation/function/set of operations equal to zero) they factor to find the value of X by itself that'd make
no
no im serious
that
that thing
is like
hell
that explanation was so so overcomplicated i had no idea what was going on
the video?
and ik it is cuz i alr understand quadratcs its literally just the way they are wording and symbolically representing it that causes me the problem
thats why im always so angry at ppl who try to help me
its not that i agree with my pain its just that it hurts me when i try to understand and someone comes to me with symbols and representations that ruin understanding then leave without ever trying to adjust
shrug
ima just continue with what i was doing
In context of quadratics where the goal is to find roots (values that make the equation/function/set of operations equal to zero) they factor to find the value of X by itself thatd make the equation zero (root)
btw i have a much more verbal/chain of concepts-based understanding which is why when I see numbers alone it basically makes it extreme diff to read
During factoring, they may do things such as intentionally adding things to the equation to forge a factorable equation if it isnt possible to factor.
processing limits smh
to even think about this problem takes everything
whatever
3.In quadratics the factored multiplication looks like (x, 4) (x, 9) where 4*9 and X*X both recreate the whole numbers prior to factorization and 4*x and x*9 attempt to recreate the middle number.
to be honest people who do math here probably are aliens in the sense they have completely different life experiences the way im explaining this here is wholly alien to the way theyve explained it tbh
i wonder how they think tbh, thinking in chains of numbers and expressions seems impossible to me but I guess they have far more complex models of everything so nothing appears difficult to them leading to extremely difficult explanations becuase people probably forget why and how things were hard or why a person of lesser intelligence would be stuck on something they could generalize through via principles
thats probably it
they have truly clear and deep models of things meaning they dont struggle because they can generalize and think in clarity. The jump in processing hypothetically could be over 5 times higher because getting stuck can lead to days of time loss vs someone who can clearly see through any problems steps immediately and generalize on top of that.
shrug
either way i should continue, philosophical ponderings are for later but I do need to find an answer for my anger otherwise it might eternally stress me out which is why its hard for me not to mention this since nobody would take it seriously. The answer might come from within tbh as again one can might only be capable of relying on the infinite maelstrom of aspiration within ones soul to see through such things.
moving on...
4.But, sometimes you cant do that, you have to remove or add things to the equation which works because the goal is to solve for X when you add five thats five on top of the original answer of zero its from zero.
a
5. ```A perfect square is when the factors are the same for a problem so (x, 4) (x, 4) or (x,4)^2 meaning you can sqrt that to get (x,4) which also sqrts the answer which lets say was 5 now 5sqrt = 2.23
```This is useful because x +4 = sqrt5 to x=sqrt5-4 which turns the problem into a linearly solvable equation rather than guessing answers to the equation.```
@civic spindle Has your question been resolved?
6.Finding a number that contains factors that may generate a perfect square may be extremely difficult; however, there was a method proposed titled the "(x+a/2)^2 formula"
ight
finishing:
i would have to gtg right as i got to the good part smh
saved
7 The question of why exactly dividing a number by two and powering it generates a number with two factors
(FOR EDITING)
.close
Closed by @civic spindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys I have a question if I’m finding the percent change of 370 to 444 would the awnser be .2?
?
Percent change
I subtracted 444 by 370
And got 74
I divided it
And I got .2
yup
So it 20%
thats not a percentage though
Or 2%?
Oh ok
Thank you
Hey
I’m getting confused about this problem
Can I get some help?
I have to find the percent change of 275 to 418
I subtracted 418 to 275
And got 143
But when I am dividing it
The number just never stop?
Hey can I get some help with this question I’m confused
should be 55 not 65
Where
after first subtraction
the 13 should turn to 12
ye
Wait but
Don’t when you subtract
And u borrow another number
Don’t u just add that ont?
Ontop*
itll be 0-5 which won't give a positive number
@barren swan Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @barren swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what are you stuck about here, and what is the translation?
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
how to find the lines
any ideas
Look. here is the trick
since every P in L' is at a distance 2 to the plane Pi
and particularly L' intersects L
then there are some points in L which are at a distance 2
to plane Pi
@fresh hatch
anyways, lets find a lambda and then the possible points which are at a distance 2 to Pi
also, notice that L is orthogonal to L'
in particular the direction of L is orthogonal to L'
and notice that if every P in L' is at a constant distance 2 to Pi then what does that mean? that every L' is parallel to the plane Pi
in particular it means that there are two possible L'
one from below one from above

anyways lets find the direction of the lines L'
so, because the lines L' are orthogonal to the line L. in particular their direction vectors must be orthogonal
the direction vector of L is (2,1,-1)

and the direction vector of the two lines L' is (a,b,c)
so (a,b,c) is orthogonal to (2,1,-1)
and because the lines L' are parallel to Pi they must be perpendicular to the normal of Pi :)
think about it this way @fresh hatch a two lines floating within your ceiling, being parallel to your ceiling and the plane being the floor of your house
the normal of the plane is orthogonal to the lines floating in your ceiling because
the floor is parallel to the ceiling
think about the normal of the plane
it has to be orthogonal to the direction of L'
anyways, (a,b,c) = (1,-2,2)×(2,1,-1)
,w (1,-2,2)x(2,1,-1)
the direction of lines L' is (0,5,5)
now to find both points we need to find the points in L that are at a distance 2 to Pi
particularly because we know every P in L' is at a constant distance of 2
and we know L n L' have a nonempty intersection
there must be one or two points in L which are at a constant distance of 2 to the plane Pi
lets find them using the point to Plane distance formula

Could u help me when I make a form?
open your own channel and people will help u I swear

@tough mica Has your question been resolved?
@tough mica Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
N is natural number set, P is prime number set, and R is real number set. If f : P -> N, g : N -> R and h : P -> R with g(x) = x + 1, f(x) = (3x² - 6x - 27)/(x-1) and h = ( f • g), then the value of x so that h(x) = 9 is....
How to solve?
so you're basically solving f(g(x))=9
g(x)=f^(-1)(9)
so 9=(3x^2-6x-27)/(x-1) then solve the quad equation and do shennanigans?
Where does this equation comes from?
i took the inverse on both sides
not 100% sure if its legal but thats how i naturally solve these types of equations
I don't really understand... 
uhhhhhh
do you know how inverses work
How to find the inverse of that f(h(x)) = 9
Yeah i only know the inverse like f(x) = x + 1 then f^-1(x) = x - 1
that works too (thats g(x) tho)
So I only need to solve f(g(x)) = 9?
yeap
Closed by @shy sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
instead of giving a counterexample for AB
i took the transpose of AB which is just BtAt, and since Bt = B and At = A, so traponse of AB = BA
and then I said BA may or may not equal AB
So, what's your question?
my proof is also correct ye?
What you are saying is correct, but if you want to be rigorous, you still need to provide a counterexample
You can't conclude "AB may not equal BA given A, B are symmetric" without a counterexample
ye i get what you mean. thank you
@green inlet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk how to solve 32
i simplified to -(sinx+cosx)=0
so sinx+cosx=0
now we want to do this
sinx=-cosx
tanx=-1
but wait! we must note when cosx=0 since that is where we would be dividing by zero (and thus we must extract those solutions)
so is the answer any x except 0
Why would tan x = -1 include cos x = 0 solutions??
so when tanx=-1 it works?
its a solution, yes
it doesn't, but it's good to check
im saying to not include them because then the equality would fail as we would have division by 0
No its not.. and it's not necessary as cos x = 0 => sin x = 0 here which cannot be
So just checking for tan x = -1 is sufficient
so the answers are 3pi/4 and 7pi/4
Nvm
yes
yes 7π/4
but next time
please note the extraneous solutions
you may end up getting something similar, and dividing by cosx is risky since you could potentially be dividing by 0
thats why i noted this earlier
@patent dock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with probability
Shit someone helped me with a difficult question yesterday and I forgot it
Search the server for your own comments to find it again
🥲 that's gonna take so long lmao
I forgot what time it was also
@silver mantle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i would expect that you should calculate the two probabilities
then presumably bet on the one which has favorable odds (better than 50%?)
okay i will try
for the second
would the probability be
$\frac{1}{36} + \frac{1}{36^2} +... + \frac{1}{36^24}$
how do you get that expression?
they said double 6 atleast once
so
sorry bad internet
for the first case
💀
ah yes
so for the first case
getting double six just for once of the 24 throws
so it would be 1/6 * 1/6
oh
When you're dealing with the probability of, for this case getting atleast 6, you should do P(atleast one 6) = 1 - P(no 6)
i thought that would make the expression quite complex so went on with this
which is wrong
This is a very low number
i forgot to multiply it by 5/ 6
Just do this, the probability of getting two 6 in two dice is 1/36
So the probability of getting not a double 6 is 35/36
And you have 24 trials
would be expression be
So the probability of not getting a double six is (35/36)^24
And you want to get atleast one double 6 so just subtract it by 1
So the equation would be 1-(35/36)^24
Closed by @ancient quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How should I try to relate the length of de to the length of ab
@obtuse bolt Has your question been resolved?
I think you could connect ADE together and find the lengths of the triangle using sin cos tan, then connect with the length in the middle AD
<@&286206848099549185>
what I told you would work
the big triangle angle is 180
where a is 90
c = 30
b=60
bc would be 60 because 2acb would be 60
e to d would 3meters
connect AED into triangle
find length of hypotenuse with sin cos tan rule
and then find the opposite length
with same rule
b angle is already 60
which the other half of triangle would be 30
find the hypotenuse with the b angle and length AD
.close
Closed by @obtuse bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Just a quick second
@obtuse bolt
You can extend BA to O such that ACO = ACB.
Now, note that CO/CB = OA/AB . Also, OA/DE = OB/EB
=> AB = (OA•BC)/OB = 2(OA•BE)/OB = 2•DE = 6
You should probably check this ^^"
@obtuse bolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, I'm confused about the middle section when they went between these two lines. I haven't seen d used in that way before, and what happened to d(theta)? Where did the 1/2 come from?
I'm assuming the cos(theta) has been replaced by d(sin(theta)) but I'm still confused
cos theta dtheta was replaced with sin d(sin theta)
Well. I guess I'm actually confused about how they went from the second line here to the numerical answer
what 1/2 are you referring to?

