#help-39
1 messages · Page 306 of 1
toast
toast
look ath the recursive formula for h now
\textbf{(a) Prove that for every set $x$, $TC(x)$ is transitive.}
\\
Let $x$ be any arbitrary set. Select $a \in TC(x)$ and $a' \in a$. So $a \in \bigcup {h_n(x) : n \in \omega}$. There exists some $b \in {h_n(x) : n \in \omega}$ such that $a \in b$. Call $b = h_{n}(x)$, where $n \in \omega$. By definition of $\bigcup h_n(x) = {z : \exists y \in h_n(x) \land z \in y}$. So by definition $a' \in \bigcup h_n(x) = h_{n+1}(x) \in \bigcup{h_n(x) : n \in \omega}$. Therefore $TC(x)$ is transitive.
@autumn fossil
toast
okay yeah, the idea is certainly right, ill double check the details (im kinda rusty with this now). But maybe it'd be a bit clearer if you used some theorems instead of refering to the definition everytime. Like surely you have proved that if a' ∈ a ∈ hn(x), then a' in U hn(x)
its pretty much coming from the definition,
if x ∈ y ∈ A, then x ∈ U A
but ig that it doesnt really do any harm to write out the defns fully
its just hard to read, prolly bc of the latex
oh shit
it will prolly look nicer on paper
Closed by @warm elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What am I doing wrong here, I believe no. of terms should be 41 for me to get the correct and with this approach…but why 41
110275 seems wrong to me, they probably meant 11275 instead, also that it's 41 terms and not 40 terms is because when you do 66-26 you compute how much you need to go from 26 to 66, but you are not accounting for the 26th term itself, which needs to be considered as well.
Yes
I see
Tyy
I can use this formula to calculate number of terms right:
(a-l)/n + 1
Please give me something to evaluate.
See ,help calc for usage details.
@amber spire Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
have u tried anything
No
the solution i saw calculated f '(x) first
like $f'(x) = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{2x \cos^2 \theta}{\sin^2 \theta + x^2 \cos^2 \theta} d\theta$
Wouldn't it be too long?
like tan theta = t from there
yeah it is kinda long lowk but i think u can get somewhere w it
Pretty sure integration by parts would produce expressions harder than the original problem
well i took u=ln(..) and v=1
so what we integrate is basically
(theta)(tan theta)/(x^2+tan^2theta)
Which is more difficult...
but ur right this is not easy to integrate either
,, f'(x)=\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{2xcos^{2}\theta}{sin^{2}\theta+x^{2}cos^{2}\theta}d\theta
scoob
Ok so divide by cos^2
Wow
That was cool
It comes out be pi*something
Pi/x-1
So integrating that will give f(x)
its kinda not intuitive to calculate the derivative tho 💔
Fr
Interesting
So do i leave the answer in number + C?
i mean this is like the one sum which i saw having this weird method
my package covered it too but i ignored it
Yh ts wont come
This is the infamous feynman trick afaik
Closed by @thorn agate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so far I got that 72 = 2^3 * 3^2
i can't see how 4. contributes anything to the deduction
its more like a puzzle than math
math puzzle
i suppose it implies that a newest model exists, there is only one youngest model
yeah
a 3,3,8 case wouldn't hold
and there is also the fact that
whatever the sum is
it must be shared
with something like a 3,3,8 case
so when they say the sum is 14
they were like mayb 2,6,6 or 3,3,8
but then they said newest
so they were like
yes
oh 2,6,6
yep
Closed by @final shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
oh it was all about listing the factorizations then
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you divide fractions?
The other channel used letters and a bunch of stuff that’s impossible
The bot told me ai couldn’t even help and said not to use it
@ruby cargo
@untold swift
Yes
First: Do you know how to multiply fractions?
No
I’ve heard you multiply top and bottom numbers but idk what that means
Ok now I do
Long division is a great way if it cant be simplified normally
@ruby cargo
Does this make sense @untold swift
Yes
No
Ok so
When you take reciprocal of a number
you basically interchange it's numerator and denominator.
I'll use the -1 in superscript to denote reciprocal for now (if you don't understand it for now don't worry, just know it means I'm taking reciprocal of the fraction) $\left(\frac 3 4\right)^{-1} = \frac 4 3$
@ruby cargo
Does this make sense?
Yes
Aight cool
To divide two fractions you have multiple the dividend with the reciprocal of the divisor
In other words
@ruby cargo
Does this make sense?
Why’d division be multiply and only 5/8 is 8/5
Do you remember how we defined division originally?
A fraction
Well a fraction is a way we represent a part of a whole
Which actually is identical to division
but it becomes a bit complicated if you take it that way because then you're thinking about dividing division and it may feel like a mess
Is it opposite of multiplication
Yes
It's the inverse of multiplication
to be more precise
Now, think of it this way, if I have a number say x, and I divide it by itself, what result do I get (assuming the number is not 0)?
@ruby cargo
1
Correct
Now let's say I had a value y, which on multiplication (instead of division) with x returned 1
@ruby cargo
Multiplication with this y would always yield the same result as division with x
Y is x but inverse
@ruby cargo
The inverse. Y/x
.close
Closed by @untold swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't really understand what this question means
LOLOL HAHAHA
maybe don't sleep in class next time
yes
@bronze coyote Has your question been resolved?
Do you know how to sketch those sets in the complex plane?
So if I'm not wrong all you have to do is just sketch them and then sketch the sets that you get by squaring each point in each set
That is simply notation, basically it tells you that f send the complex number z to z^2
so its like f(z) = z^2
yes
Closed by @bronze coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i make sense of inverse of hyperbolic functions
Closed by @shadow elm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you're welcome
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In 1. b is (-2,4) but is completely different in answers when drawn on coordinate system.
Answers:
looks fine?
b vector shows these changes ,
x position decreased by 2 and y position increases by 4
i think she is thinking like -2i+4j should be the vector
The vector doesn't mean the point (-2, 4)
You can move vectors around
Oh i see
In the answer image, they just moved it to the end of vector a
As the sum of vectors goes from the start of the first vector till the end of the last vector
The geometric idea
Then fucking what
yo chill
I don’t understand this
stop being rude 😭
Have you tried reading Linear Algebra Done Right by Sheldon Axler?
this is b vector from origin (position vector)
vectors are spatially invariant, you can move them around, direction remains
is that a thing
-# they teach us vectors in physics before in maths hence i said idk i have 0 linear algebra knowledge
Oh I thought he meant an element of a free vector space
-# ignore me
But it’s 4 not 5.
Yeah stuff like position vectors aren't "spatially invariant" in classical physics since the reference point/choice of origin matters
But if you fix the origin then you can move them around
What is 4 not 5
@crude parcel Has your question been resolved?
a is 6,1 vector are not like permanently attatched from one point to another u can move them around and they are still correct
Its called vector translocation or transposition or smth i forgit
Forgot
So lets start from origin, add vector a to go to the point 6,1 now look at b, it says -2,4 meaning like u subtract 2 in x and add 4 in y
6-2,1+4
4,5
So if u start from origin and do a+b u get 4,5
Like u understand this like
Vectors are used to define positions
But positions cannot always define a vector
Like in this case,
Position/point 6,1 can be described by a vector
But a vector cannot be described by that point cuz like u can just move vectors however u want
@crude parcel Has your question been resolved?
took the 'you have the right to remain silent' too srs
Unfortunately I am still in the process of mastering telepathy, so I can't help them without two-way communication just yet 🙁
Skill issue, smh /s
Maybe they believe in the super helpful legends, who knows...

@crude parcel Has your question been resolved?
I’m gonna cry
cry
Why is this?
I don’t understand nothing
Can u tell us where you felt being left off? What's precisely your doubt?
Don't understand nothing mean understand everything?
can you not just hop in randomly, post some message then disappear without answering questions
You can't just say you "don't understand nothing", only to then keep disengaging the discussion
I’m busy, im in school.
you could have told so earlier
Don't open a help channel if you're not available to engage with it
I don't get it
Why react with an ❌ then to the bot
If you are busy
Even though there's like 5 people waiting to assist you
queueing theory
She dont want to collaborate...
@crude parcel Has your question been resolved?
sounds good
.close
Closed by @plush bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So he says that finding primitives is easier than evaluating an integral. Then he says to find the primitive we read the differentiation formula backwards which gives us the primitive and then we evaluated this primitive at two endpoints. But isn't that what evaluating and integral means. Find its anti derivative and evaluated at upper and lower bounds
I think he's referring to evaluating an integral as a limit of Riemann sums
he has never talked about the integral being the limit of riemann sums yet though
How has the notation been defined then?
so he first defines partitions then step functions then he defines integrals for step functions as the area under the rectangles. Then he when he says we will look at the integral of a general function he says say we have two step functions s and t and then some function f. s <= f <= t If there exists only one I such that I is always satisfies integral s <= I <= integral of t then I = integral of f
then he adds some more stuff
and that is how he has defined then integral
Well then that's what he's referring to
but then we have proven integration formulas
so I don't see how this is easier than using an integratino formula
Doesn't he say that the integration formulas follow that paragraph?
yes he derives formulas that we have already derivied
is then not a mathematical question anymore but one of taste?
It seems he's just explaining that those have been proves before from first principles but they come out of the FTC1-2 naturally without appealing to the definition
Closed by @royal galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@shadow elm Has your question been resolved?
these 2 are definite integrals bro
they evaluate to constant not functions of x
@shadow elm i think you made mistake here
let the first integral be A, and the second one be B
than it should be f(x( = e^x + A + xe^xB
B here is a constant then
oh nevermind yeah i checked this is correct
👍
but this line i think sth off
y is just a dummy variable in the integral
should have just remove this line
i used integration by parts here
.
I think this is unnecessary
no you solved it correctly
i just suggest that the last line is not need
cross the last line would be nicer
?
can u just tell me how i solve the ques
i think let 2 of these definite integrals be A and B
then set up the system: $A = \int_{0}^{1} (e^y + B + Aye^y) dy$$B = \int_{0}^{1} y(e^y + B + Aye^y) dy$
Minhh
then solve for B?
it is i suppose
Closed by @shadow elm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help pls
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Mr. Bumble
so 0
because the area of the cosine alternates between positive and negative
@sterile python
@green aurora Has your question been resolved?
yeah you wanna use double integral magic here
$\frac{e^{-2x} - e^{-5x} }{x} = \int_2^5 e^{-tx} dt$
Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)
so it's $\int_0^\infty \int_2^5 e^{-tx} dt dx$
Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)
@sonic patrol @grave mirage so was I wrong?
idk where you got this from
About what?
I had shown my steps above
That is indeterminate
Where did the sin term go?
but can't we multiply above and below for j and then do the complex transformation?
how
will be okay in the angle inside cos being imaginary
what year of college are you in
this seems fairly doable tbh
i really don't understand why people are suggesting using trig for this
yes ofc
dont you know double integrals tho
yes
like this?
or you want to do it using trig
this
how did u get here
its a complex cosine
this right?
🥲🥲 then im afraid idk
Closed by @green aurora
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i took the integral of acceleration got velocity +c added the initial and did it with displacement
and it says crosses why axis so i assume its x=0
is this right?
yes
Closed by @warped kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for this would be multiply the series together?
yes
Yup
As tan has no constant term, you can just develop e^x to order 3 instead of 4 btw
Yeah it's horrible for me too
@quick venture Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @quick venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not sure where to start with this question
Does {.} Mean decimal part
im not sure
idts
Does it mention
taylorreihe
the answer is -1/10
,w taylor series of sin(x)
so a fraction
,w taylor series of cos(x)
neglect x^4+ terms
so i find sin^2x?
you square (x - x^3/6)
that will be some x^2 + x^6 - x^4
idgaf about constants since im neglecting all x^4+ terms
so it reduces to just x^2
,w (-x^3/6)^2
similarly, cos^3(x) = (1-x^2/2)^3
,w expand (1-x^2/2)^3
hmm
the limit becomes 1 - 2x^2 + 3x^2/2 - 1 / 5x^2
i thought we find sin^2x and cos^2x and sub into the numerator
no, you remember that sin(x)'s series is x - x^3/3!
i mean yeah
the idea is that
just do the sub carefully
and disregard all terms over x^4 for simplicity
it will reduce to a neat form
try it out!
just use lhopital
@quick venture Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @quick venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i find the missing zeroes?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
What have you done or think of so far
hello everyone im new here
Hi
hello
Please dont chat here if not helping
sorry i didnt know that part
@storm parcel Has your question been resolved?
oop
1
i tried plugging it in but idk how to solve for the other zeroes
this is algebra 2 writing equations of a polynomial btw
so, what can you conclude from the vertex?
given that this is (-1,16)
<@&268886789983436800> SCAM
@storm parcel what do you think?
maybe that the second root would be 2 since a parabola is symmetrical?
notice the -1
this is the horizontal coordinate of -1, this is the symmetrical axis
<@&268886789983436800>
scam again
@storm parcel Has your question been resolved?
ohh you’re right
okay nvm
or idk
OH i get it
so -1 is like the axis of symmetry so the next point has to be the same distance from -1’s line
Then if the first solution is x=-3
It is 2 units to the left
Then, what is the other point?
Correct
x = 1?
i’m not sure how to put it in standard form
So you have ax^2 + bx + c = y right
But you already have 3 points (1,0), (-3,0) and (-1,16)
Substitute in x y values and find a b c
@storm parcel Has your question been resolved?
oh okay
i wasn’t sure if it was that one
do i need y intercept?
@storm parcel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have no idea tbh
The only idea I had was to integrate this over R and show its considerably more than 1, but on second thoughts that doesn't help
wait is it simply that this is a product of probabilities which is.>1 at certain poingts>
i mean
surely it has to do with the fact that what do you do when theta is non-positive
like what does it even mean if i let theta = 0 and then my likelihood is identically the 0 function everywhere
I see
that makes more sense
thanks
.close
Closed by @sharp smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone free to help
yeah just ask away
Ik the line is 180
I originally thought y was 40
And x was 70
But chat gpt n google says it’s wrong
And I don’t understand how they re doing it
Hint: angles in a 4 sided shape add to 360 degrees
Also do you know about F and Z angles?
No..
And the remaining angles is same as as angle x
are arrows supposed to highlight parallel lines?
yes
Yeah
Yes I do
What now
x can be found by using what giraffe said and Z angle
Lk z angles are equal
Do .close if you are done btw
.close
Closed by @heavy phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wht is derivatives
you ask a deep question
Any questions in particular about them? If not then it's a bit hard to conduct a course in calculus in a help channel
why they work the way they work
why they determine how steep a hill is
The main idea is that if you're given two points on a curve you may compute the slope of a line joining them
If you get those points close together, you get a better and better approximation of the steepness at a point
Just briefly, it’s a function that is “derived” from some function, that tells you how quick that function changes at any specific point
yeah but why
its like reading a speedometer when driving a car
lots of application
u find this a lot in the entire of field of science
yeah but why does it determine the speed of my car
Are you asking why it's done or why it works?
why it works
y cant a book determine the speed of my car or a basketball
What
yes like why cant a ruler determine the slope or carbon fiber why derivative
Just watch that video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vKqVkMQHKk&list=PL0-GT3co4r2wlh6UHTUeQsrf3mlS2lk6x&index=2
What is an "instantaneous rate of change" when change happens across time?
Help fund future projects: https://www.patreon.com/3blue1brown
This video was supported in part by Art of Problem Solving: https://aops.com/3blue1brown
An equally valuable form of support is to simply share some of the videos.
Special thanks to these supporters: http://3b...
even mentins the car example
depends how long is it
16 mins thts not long
y wht he do
how does writing MOD in capital letters call a mod instead of pinging one??
funni
Before you guys invest in this I just wanna leave this here
https://discord.com/channels/268882317391429632/1482474916539531489
lol
yeah no I see going from basic multiplicatoin to calculus in a day is quite the leap
well think about it this way, you know how a slope is in form of change in y/ change in x
now make x smaller and smaller, finally you will get a elemantary x (called dx) which makes change dy (elementary change in y), this is what derivative is (dy/dx)
coming to velocity same logic but y is distance/displacement and x is time
You can determine the slope by a ruler tho
Divide the y change by the x change
Measure with ruler
yes but why derivative
now you might ask "why cant we just put y/dx and consider a significant change for dx" , well because it is basically in finite/ 0 for which will give infinite
im still confused
see, now you will be given some y = function representing location with respect to time t
like why is it derivative
or y = f(t)
Wdym why derivative
now
Explain the concern deeper
why is it derivative
what is velocity, change in location by change in time, but for elementary change in time , we have elementary change in x, and hence we end up with v=f'(t)
why a derivative y not a ball a ruler or a keyboard or a speedometer
why derivative
Well you don't have a speedometer or ruler on your function
derivative is the name of the method
can you measure an infintesimally small thing with anything?
input change output
no but why derivative
no but maybe u can
this is where sir god chad (maybe idea stealer) newton came up with this logic, for which the change is so small, not even anything can measure it
If you're given a function f(t) giving your position in time, you may consider taking the average velocity between two points
why cant anything
This is the slope between two points
well, if u can measure 1/infinity, you can measure infinity, which itself is wrong
because this is the logic sir made it for
The derivative is what you get when you take the average velocity and take it between closer and closer points
ik but why is it derivative
why not another logic
Effectively giving you the velocity at a point and not between two points
yes but why derivative why not a pea
am not following what u tryna say now....
It doesn't seem like you're asking and trying to understand it in good faith
pls elaborate what you tryna say
i am but yall tryna make me understand something else rather then answer the wuestion
@vapid stump don’t repeat your question, say exactly what you don’t understand
Wdym “why it’s a derivative”
Because "why the derivative" is a weird question to ask if you don't know what a derivative is in the first place
i dont understand derivative why cant it be a pea or a speedometer etc why is it a derivative
ik wht it is
Well it doesn't seem like so because then you wouldn't be comparing it to a pea
It's called a derivative that's the name of the process
well @vapid stump , try to find the length of perimeter of a circle using scale only (NO formulas allowed) you will see the issue
curved lines are made up of elementary straight lines, but if the straight lines arent elementary (like how you are saying why not a pea) then it is no longer a circle, it is a polygon
i can compare it to a pea i can compare ur atoms to a pea
look i call ^2 a sqaure function, |_| aboslute value function similarily we call rate of change of a function wrt to the variable as differentiation
okay this is just a troll help
please use this server in good faith
Again I don't think you're asking in good faith
why cant the perimeter bend and form
wdym bent and form?
i would suggest you to rethink your Question or maybe try to seek more detailed explanations on web
why cant the straight line bend into a circle or any other shape
If there are parts in those texts which you do not understand go ahead and message ehre
bro...., which grade are you in
for now i think this is a ragebaiting conversation
does tht rlly matter
guys @smoky gull wait maybe he is in a lower class
a teacher irl would be much more helpful than us
oh yall are very helpful yall just dont understnad my question yall are not escaping logic
you will understand that the definition of straight and curved lines, and straight line are "straight " not curved, you cannot just say curve it like a rope
but why cant it bend and form
well , you need to have a certain idea before talking with us, most of us are in a class above you i guess, which makes it difficult for you to understand what we are saying since you haven't learnt the basic yet
it won't bend without a bending action
yessssssssssssssss
what will bend it mathematically? explain
as i said
it aint like a bamboo pole that you can magically bend
maybe an unidentified force
i mean like why sphere
@vapid stump pls focus on your current class, when time comes you will understand much better than now
sphere is made of elementary planes, not a bent plane, pls
no i cant sleep without figuring this out
keep it to rest for now, when time comes you will understand
mobius transformation
aint plane a 2d shape
not 3d
he asked yesterday how basic multiplication like 5*5 work ?
okay yeah thats thats not getting in his head if hes asking whats is derivatives
that is basically using elementary vectors and adding, not valid
What pea
guys this is clearly an etymological question
nothing just a concept a name an object
Derivative is a tool in math that very easily gives us the slope at any point
@vapid stump ask this to mit professors, we aint advanced enough
Derivative is also a function like you said, input and output
how did u even went from basic arithmetic to calculus in a day
maybe we should list the zfc axioms for him
Though the input is the x value, and the output is the slope of the original function at that point.
@vapid stump
This is the basic answer to your question
i just ask why a derivative
yall let him rest he will figure it out later, youtube exists for a reason
do u know the formula: (y_2 - y_1) / (x_2 - x_1)
There are ways to compute a derivative
youtube will help
@vapid stump
to calculate slope?
now close this channel @vapid stump youtube will teach it better trust me
slope form
just watch the video I linked
im good ty tho
ok
can we ban this guy?
y
Don’t be harsh
wht i do
Everyone started somewhere
Fin if you are actually interested, you will be able to learn it
he asked why does an apple fall but not the moon
Just start from the ground up
i did i learned multiplication
i started by figuring out that there was a switch (button) in the fridge which turns of the light in the fridge, was crazy experience ngl
Derivatives isn’t the next step…
Do you know division?
yall let him watch the vid
What’s 12 divided by 3
Great
i do
Do you know powers?
wht tht
idk division still kinda hard
kizner
i am surpried bro didnt say batman or superman
2 x 3 6
😭😭
it 6
No
@vapid stump i cant just jump straight to writing essays without learning basic tenses right?
no
i can tho
pretty easy if u pour ur heart and soul into it u could
similar logic here, you have to start from baisc, (and there is no shame in tht) and slowly work your way upto the tougher problems
okay this is just annoying now
<@&268886789983436800>
chatgpt in with the military i prefer copilot
now
What military
whats up
do u like roosters?
you willnt wrote essays if you hasnt knew tense
see the problem eh?
i tagged mods not you sorry
ok rude
u cant right
Ma kore akhi
exactly, hence without knowing tenses, you cant write an essay, unless you want a 0 for it
I agree that it can help explaining scuh kinda stuff but I dont like that it then goes on to pretend ur some kind of super genius so Im not sure how helpful that is
but who says u have to
@sharp vigil could you please take action (sorry for the ping)
morse code
so tht dont really apply
buddy at this point just watch the vid 🥀
k
“Explain like I’m 5”
no u dont understand, writing with others for 3 hours trying to understand anything takes significantly less time then watching a 10 minute video
bro the more you write, the more you remember you know what they say 
idk and idk
😔
why not call newton stupid since he asked why does an apple fall
How is this a productive thing to say?
lets leave him alon in peace bro 🙏 let him see the vid pls 😭
To your question of why derivatives work to define things like speed and velocity, these words are defined in terms of the derivative.
idk pls dont mute me again
tht was not my question
but thanks
The q in the pin seemed like it was asking that?
doot let him see the vid trust his doubt will be solved 🙏
Can you rephrase your q for me?
yall make it sound like im stupid
why derivative
No
Why not? Be more specific.
No one in history learned derivatives before powers
what grade are you in @vapid stump ?
why cant it be a pea
idk
Why can't + be a pizza?
Okay, how old are you?
He won’t answer
If you ask questions with no real point to them you probably won't get very good answers.
idk but it can if u cut it into a shape of a plus
so why derivative
Are you wondering why we study derivatives at all or something else?
no just why derivative
Ah okay. Well if you're asking troll questions to waste peoples time I should just mute you.
Why bother making these sentences
yo fin, why are we called human why not rock, because the rock is called the rock......
Just understand what we tell you
im not tho
No one is against you just make it easier for us
idk but we can be called a rock
Okay. so then elaborate more on your question
You can ask why about anything.
Clearly just saying why for no reason isn't so productive.
why cant it be something else like a pea or an apple or atom why derivative
you dont need mathematical guidance, you need philosophical guidance, pls this is not related with math, this is related to philosophy
Because words are arbitrary. We pick words to refer to things. The actual words/sounds we use are less important than the thing they represent.
Why don't we call cats dogs instead?
It would be confusing and hard to communicate if we did
There's not much of any other reason for why not.
why is why why and not whynt or whyied
This is true
Not really a math q
structure of english my guy, who found it gets to name it
Are you asking why is it called a derivative? @vapid stump
math is probability not just facts u can say u have a hand but not with upmost certainty u can say u have a hand but be 99.9999% sure but not guaranteed
ur hand could be a apple
Math is different from empirical sciences.
maybe ur brain is playing trick on u
Math is based on the axiomatic method.
doot do the honors, pls give him the treatment
You make a set of base assumptions called axioms. You derive new things via logic from those assumptions.
salute of 21 cannons
The things that happen in the real world are somewhat irrelevant to that process
With the exception that sometimes we like to build logical/mathematical models of irl things using math.
i did actually
clearly you did
no why is it a derivative
Again, if you're going to waste time asking why pointlessly and not elaborating your question I'm just gonna assume you're trolling.
Last chance :^)
wdym by a derivativer lmao
fin are you fin or are you a fin of fish who is controlling fin ? pls no brainrot answer
parth bhai chod yaar isko nhi pata he ye ese hi kuch bhi bol rha he
im fin cuz i chose tht name
Still not elaborating the question
i did elaborate
Not really
kinda really
I guess your trolling. Everybody wave bye to fin while they take a break for a bit.
no technically why arent you a fin of a fish?, why are you a human rather than the fin? you are technically a fish
wht
what is the question again
aight salute comarade 🫡
Going forward don't ask troll questions when you come back.
.close
Closed by @radiant terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys im first year into high school just did quadratics and basic trig and inverse trig by myself what should i do next
Combinatorics is the study of "how to count the number of things"
For example, let's say there's 10 cards. You want to make a hand of 3 of those cards. How many ways can you do that?
Basic set theory, functions and relations, Combinatorics, elementary number theory and binomial expansions then limit, continuity, differentiability (LCD) and sequences and series, then calculus till calc 2 and ordinary differential equations, then probability and stats, then linear algebra,PDEs and vector algebra/geometry, then calculus till calc 4 then analysis ig
Depends
@austere wraith Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @austere wraith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is symmetry a transformation that renders object identical looking or the object itself ?
the example you gave is one kind of symmetry but the term can refer to something broader
or the object itself ?
I don't know what you mean by this
This is what I saw
"used to refer to an object invariant under some transformation"
This was slightly different from my earlier understanding of symmetry
Which was it itself being a transformation
Which renders some object invariant
I think the difference is that "objects" (by which I assume you mean 2D or 3D geometric figures) in this new definition are subsumed into more abstract things
for instance, a square and a circle have symmetries, but an equation can also have symmetries
Sure
But that still doesn't uhh
Fit in
Because here it says that object whatever it maybe
Is invariant under a transformation
But I was under the impression that the object we are talking of (symmetry) is itself a transformation
Because here they refer to symmetry as an object
Which I always thought was a transformation
Or are they subsuming transformations themselves under this definition of "object"?
yes there is no reason you can't think of transformations themselves as objects
But then
What do you mean the transformations are invariant under transformations
What meta transformations are they talking about here

Huh
They say "is usually used to refer to an object that is invariant under some transformations"
And if that object itself is a transformation
well no
what they mean is we can say that object has a symmetry
it is not the symmetry itself
it's just wording issues
So my earlier understanding of symmetry being a transformation that renders object invariant
Is right?
it is roughly correct
Can you smoothen the rough edges
you should talk about a transformation being the symmetry of an object
the two are tied
What's "the symmetry of an object"
the set of transformations that is invariant
well informally it is just the transformations that leave (some properties of) the object unchanged
How can a transformation be a set of transformations
my point was when you talk about a transformation being a symmetry you have to say what it is a symmetry of
symmetry isn't a transformation wdym
I think this is just a wording issue I guess kmu interpreted your question as "what are the (set of) symmetries of an object"
Well tl give you some context, I am starting out with group theory basically, so I want this idea of a symmetry clear in my head
oh
a symmetry is a transformation that leaves some property of an object invariant, yes
Yeah
e.g. the dihedral groups preserve the vertices of a polygon
That definition and this one I am not able to reconcile
-# not sure if thats the best way to phrase it ngl
yes i saw your image
they are isomorphic
…?
its just colloquial
if you know about groups, a symmetry of some object S with some properties φS we care about is an action of G on S that leaves φS unchanged
I've pinned that image because I've seen it like three times throughout the channel, so you can refer helpers or yourself to pins if necessary.
did you just say the definitions are isomorphic 
yes
thank you bina !!
I think for some reason you keep getting tripped up on minor language inaccuracies
Right
the object itself is not a symmetry
Not sure what you mean
the transformation is a symmetry
Right
Im confused as to what this wikipedia on symmetry is saying
Like for example here it says "Symmetry ... is usually used to refer to some object with ..."
this definition is incorrect, as it says the object that is invariant etc etc is a symmetry. that is wrong
The one which is pinned
What it meant is that "we say the object has symmetries when ..."
go to the wiki for group theory instead
but it's just a minor language bug
Ah ok that's what I wanted to get clarified
the object is not literally the symmetry
Yeah that's what I thought
e.g. a CIRCLE has rotational symmetries — rotate it it stays the same
the circle itself is not the symmetry
the symmetries are the rotations
acting upon said circle
Yup
a set with these symmetries
That clears it up
Right
in this case, the group of 2d rotations is U(1) on S^1, depending how you look at it
minor sloppiness in language like this shows up very often and it's best not to get stuck on them
So any time we take all transformations that are symmetries and keep them in a set
We have a group?
Acting on the same object
it has to form a group
and ensure that
- they are closed; you can’t escape from the set by applying a bunch of symmetries
- you can compose two symmetries to get another one in the same set
- there is a symmetry that doesnt change anything (the identity)
- there are inverses of each symmetry which reverse each symmetry
the requirement that it be a group is a part of the definition of what a symmetry is
these form the grp axioms
jesus i hate phones
anyway
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
What I mean is that if we have an object invariant under some transformations, and we take the set of those transformations with operation of composing these transformations will it always naturally folllow the group axioms?
the symmetry group of an object is, as expected, a group
not rlly what helpee asked
inverse don't necessarily follow i think

you'd need the transformation to be invertible
