#help-39
1 messages ¡ Page 244 of 1
the interest per quarter is the 4th root of the interest per year, because it gets stacked 4 times during the year
the same principle applies to each month, but with 12
wait but when i do (0.065/4) x 400,000 i get 6500 which is considered correct according to the answer sheet
same for 12
representing per month
is that rlly right? bc like sorry i was just checking if the method was correct
if the interest goes up as a smooth exponential function, then my method should be correct.
But if it gets recalculated once every year or if it is a fixed rate forever, then your method is correct.
I don't know enough about banking to know for sure which one of the two is how it should be calculated.
yeah me neither đ ur method makes more sense to me but ig it gets recalculated if thats the answer
bc i tried ur method first but didnt get the right answers according to the answer sheet
but anyways thanks a lot for helping! i appreciate it!
.close
Closed by @stuck vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I solve with u sub
supposedly meant to use u² so even if thereâs an easier way please show both
@ when u reply
What Iâve tried
I'm fairly sure you can get away with u = x^3 + 1
Perhaps
Tbh it's the first thing that came to mind and it works so yeah
u = x^3
k
didnât know where to go or if I should do sum else
I will quietly reiterate this 
I tried that dk where to go
,rccw
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
,rccw
you used u^2 for some reason
don't do that
Read the message
^
you don't need it
Read it again cs u clearly didnât understand it
teacher said I have to

are u sure u understood correctly
okay, in that case
Yes gng
set u = sqrt(x^3 + 1)
how will I get rid of the 4x^5 after
bagelguy3
$du = 3x^2 dx$
bagelguy3
have to use u²
BRUH
have to?
as if in
no other choice?
Why tf would your teacher give you some assignment like that?
idk
bruh what
$v = u^{1.5} + 1$
bagelguy3
that way you get $x^3 + 1$
bagelguy3
I think if you set $u^2 = x^3 + 1$, then we get $2u du = 3x^2 dx$, which we can rearrange for $x^2 dx = \frac{2}{3}u du$
I initially js wanted to do u=x³+1 and then u²=x^6+2x³+1 so i have a power of 5 in my derivative but idk how to put it in
combine that with $x^3 = u^2 - 1$
and you can rewrite the entire integral in terms of u
higher!
then it becomes a standard integral
$\frac{du}{3x^2} = dx$
bagelguy3
3x²
and then u get x^3 = u-1
Isnât it
please
Bro scroll up
yes, my bad 
it was the first thing I sent
I can stand aside and let bagel do his thing 
Iâd rather you đ
well, you can try my sub 
$\frac{4}{3} \int u^{1.5} - u^{0.5} du$
bagelguy3
So if I have 2udu/3x²=dx and then I sub that in and sub the u in u just get 8xÂłu²/3 donât I
I never try to get powers in my substitution'
our integral is $4 \int x^5 \sqrt{x^3 + 1} dx$, yeah?
higher!
so if we write $2u du = 3x^2 dx$, we have $x^2 dx = \frac{2}{3} u du$
higher!
Yea
our substitution was $u^2 = x^3 + 1$, so $x^3 = u^2 - 1$
higher!
now write the integral as $4 \int x^3 \cdot x^2 \sqrt{x^3 + 1} dx$
higher!
we have an x^3, and an x^2 dx
we can sub our expressions for those into both
My next class abt to start
and the sqrt is just u
ahh, I'd rather not go to DMs, apologies
I like having the TeXit bot here
you can come back to this channel when you're free again
K
or open a new one and ping me
Itâll be like 4 hrs or sum probably
that's okay too
@solid siren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
looking for an answer to a simple question
but the answer probably isn't as simple as the question so if there's anyone who's experienced in math that could help me out
ask
yeah just ask your question lmfao
if we're asked to prove a certain relationship between some variables in a question, if we build up an equation solely consisting of whatever variables we need for the final proof can we always arrive at the given answer in more discrete math problems?
feels vague
yh give an example
yes, that would help
stated like this, if you're supposed to prove e.g. a = b and you managed to form an equation a + b = 10, then it's of no use
uh alright lemme see
Equations are often useful, but discrete mathematics frequently requires domain-specific reasoning
'If a particle moves under uniform acceleration describes successive equal distances in times t1, t2, t3 respectively. Prove image
is this like google translate
1/t1 - 1/t2 + 1/t3 is not symmetric
if we build an equation with the given constraints consisting of only t1 t2 t3 and no constant terms can we always arrive to that answer?
it doesnt have to be symmetric, does it?
rhs is symmetric but lhs isnt
nah nah i just sent the thing we have to prove as an img cause it might be confusing if I type it
you need extra information
because that equation isnt provable unless there are certain constraints on t_i
could you explain a bit more?
drop more context
the only other information (we're sort of meant to assume this) is that there's an initial velocity (unknown)
t1<t2<t3?
that's the whole question though
where is it from?
wait let me re check if I typed it from
does this mean that the initial velocity is non-zero?
it wrong*
yeah yeah
my math class tute
what book
it's just a part of simple linear motion equations
it's not really from a book, its a tute from my tuition
the question's correct as far as I'm aware
I just gave that as an example
hey I'm not rushing or anything but just to confirm, this help request is still active right
yes
got it
I can help with this but idk what your original question was
do you mean you cant see it or that my explanation is unclear
I mean, I can help with the question in the image, if thats what you want help in
oh, no no, I gave that as an example to make my actual question more clear
ah ok
how do you solve that though?
I was asking if for discrete math problems, if we're asked to prove a certain relationship between some variables
I would find the times in terms of s and a
if building up a relationship with just those terms, can definitely lead you to arranging it in the desired way
yes but still it doesnt simplify nicely though
try cancelling out the s and the initial velocity
by either substitution or division
time for 0 to s=t1, s to 2s = t2, 2s to 3s = t3
so t1 = sqrt(2s/a), t1+t2 = sqrt(4s/a), t1+t2+t3 = sqrt(6s/a)
im assuming u=0
then calculate both lhs and rhs in terms of s and a and see if they come out to be equal
u isnt 0
oh
same method probably works thuogh
yeah probably
anyways aside from that question, does anybody know the answer to my initial question
would be great if there's someone who could tell me
is there some general or formal proof of things like that? I've had this question forever but I don't for sure know the answer
@split depot Has your question been resolved?
still active?
@split depot Has your question been resolved?
@split depot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Some numbers times to give u c, and plus to gives u b
Any specific examples?
omg
that helps so much
lets go
now i can factor the equation x^2+7x+12
with your help i figure out that 3x4 is 12
which also adds up to 7
so the answer it
is
Yep
Bingo
...Isn't a binomial already a factored expression?
i meant to say trinomial aura goat
(also not the Bennet thumbs up lmao)
Poe's Law, just be careful đ¤Ł
how to factor trinomials
whats that
"Something you mean as a joke may, and often will, be vague enough to be taken seriously by someone"
jk ur a nice guy
But trinomials aren't necessarily something generally factorisable
All that defines a trinomial is that it's a three-term polynomial
There are multiple ways to do
ok sigma
I presume that OP is talking about a quadratic?
no shit sherlock
Yeah
it's complex đĽ
hang it up unc
I can find a helpful video that explains better than me
I'd've thought so, but that was OP's first comment, so...
ok bet
Well, not all trinomials are quadratic
thank you beta
x^100 + x + 1 is a trinomial, for example
skibidi indeed
Dude, you can stop being weird kek
That doesn't make it something that can be factorised
Yh it's just getting in the way
ok im actually sorry
There's a time and a place
This math video tutorial shows you how to factor trinomials the easy fast way. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems for you to work on including factoring trinomials when the leading coefficient is 1 (a=1) and when it's not 1. This video will also help you to solve quadratic equations by factoring and by using the quadr...
let me use my ai for the transcript to sumarize
though every now and again is okay (just don't constantly spam jokes)
ok srry
Itâs only 12 min
my final exam is in 8
attention span is less than 12 sec
đ
btw im not joking @azure ether
Just look some of the example not all
ok
Can you guys not
Go study and close the chat
.close
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @cold pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
,calc cos(e)
What are these .close permutations
Result:
-0.91173391478697
Free bingo
Result:
-0.91173391478697
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with my 3d model for my math exploration. Im doing it in geogebra
I have problem with the lettuce... like idk how to do the form with functions
@balmy lily Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@balmy lily Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @balmy lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it true that There is no scalar equation of a line in three space?
it's true that you have to either give it as a parametric equation, or as a system of two scalar equations
Closed by @willow veldt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
pretty much
mclaurinâs centers around x=0
taylor centers around x=a, a being real
the opposite, taylor series are a generalized version of maclaurin series
So, I've been doing Mclaurin's series.
if you can do mclaurinâs you can do taylor
itâs just a bit more work
you âchooseâ an a where you want your series to be centered around, or âaccurateâ
Do you have a video for Taylor's series?
usually youâll be asked to find the taylor series around a specific number
This calculus 2 video tutorial explains how to find the Taylor series and the Maclaurin series of a function using a simple formula. It explains how to derive the power series of composite functions using known Maclaurin series of elementary functions.
Full-Length Math & Science Videos:
https://www.patreon.com/mathsciencetutor/collections...
Can I ping one of the helpers
what for
It is a bit superfluous
i see
But Taylor's series is necessary for my work
you want to understand what itâs for
how it works
Taylor polynomials are incredibly powerful for approximations and analysis.
Help fund future projects: https://www.patreon.com/3blue1brown
An equally valuable form of support is to simply share some of the videos.
Special thanks to these supporters: http://3b1b.co/lessons/taylor-series#thanks
Home page: https://www.3blue1brown.com/
Full series: ...
this wonât teach you how to work with them but itâll show you what theyâre for and how they work
good
But he talks about the Mclaurin's series unfortunately
I gotta do the same drill for Taylor's now
mclaurinâs series are only accurate around 0
taylorâs series are accurate around whichever âaâ you use
that a can also be 0
All the approximations are different, aren't they?
when we change the a, the approximation changes accordingly
what do you mean
The same approximation doesn't work for two different points
Let's say I found an approximation for cos x near 0.
Lets say I found another approximation for cos x near pi.
The approximations are not the same
then change a arbitrarily to âmoveâ it around
The same approximation does not work
I haven't got around to that part yet. I have only watched that one video on Mclaurin's series and Taylor's series
for cosine the radius of convergence is infinity, so in that case the approximation does work in either the x=0 or x=pi case, although they do generate different terms yes
Can you elaborate on the former part?
An approximation exists both for x=0 and for x=pi.
Have I correctly interpreted your thoughts?
[
\begin{cases}
a=0&\quad\cos(x)=\sum_{n\ge 0}\frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!}\
a=\pi&\quad\cos(x)=\sum_{n\ge 0}-\frac{i^n((-1)^n+1)(x-\pi)^n}{2n!}
\end{cases}
]
PajamaMamaLlama
both of these series converge on the true value of cos(x) for any value of x
What are both of these series?
Are they the formulae for Taylor series and Mclaurin's series?
they are both Taylor series, although the MacLaurin is only the a=0 series
MacLaurin series are a "subset" of Taylor series with a=0
Can you explain the formula for the second Taylor series?
Particularly the (((-1)^n)+1)
How did Taylor arrive at this formula for the coefficient of the variables?
@blissful cloak
Well Taylor didn't, WolframAlpha did lmao but Taylor's result asserts [f(x)=\sum_{n\ge 0}\frac{f^{(n)}(a)(x-a)^n}{n!}] WolframAlpha jsut determined (f^{(n)}(a)), which in this case just happened to include ((-1)^n+1)
PajamaMamaLlama
,w series cos(x) at x=pi
Wait
Why are the coefficients of the generalised Taylor series, the same as the coefficients of the Mclaurin's series?
at pi and at 0, the coefficients of the series are the same.
<@&286206848099549185>
no they're not, not quite
[
\begin{cases}
\mathrm{Taylor Series}&\quad f(x)=\sum_{n\ge 0}\frac{f^{(n)}(a)(x-a)^n}{n!}\
\mathrm{MacLaurin Series}&\quad f(x)=\sum_{n\ge 0}\frac{f^{(n)}(0)x^n}{n!}
\end{cases}
]
PajamaMamaLlama
observe, the maclaurin series is obtained when setting a=0 in the taylor series
Right, because it is 1, -1/2
and the Taylors series for cos x near pi has -1 and 1/2
@cosmic crag Has your question been resolved?
do .close
.close
Closed by @cosmic crag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
â
please close this channel from your side
It stays in the occupied section for a while, it only moves after like 5 mins usually
.close
huh what
Closed by @autumn fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you should probably clarify which specific problems you need help with
is that past exam or current one?
.close
Closed by @high garden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the questions
rewriting
-|x-1|+2 simply the c is 2 and there is -1 for a
what i did was multiply the -1 by 2 as they were next to each other
that's not how it works
the question was sketch y=2-|x-1|
it is seperated by the minus sign
Heres how you do it:
yea but that is same as -1 right
imagine the line without the absolute value sign
and it's just a line
that is flippe
from the x-b or where
that's it
yep but still the expression is still like this
oh because its same thing as y = +2 -1 |x-1|
yep
yep
.done
.close...
@desert cliff Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i find the answer to f and g
i know f = 155 and g = 15
but idk how i would work it out
Closed by @last walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain the signed test? like i know how to do it when alternate hypothesis is not equal to median
am i supposed to use Z score? we were taught with binomial distribution
how do i manage the case where alternate hypothesis is lesser than or greater than median
Do you only work with the binomial distribution? Or also with normal distribution or another one because the way to do it depends on which distribution you are using
@gilded portal
we havent really been taught with normal
is normal just approximation of binomial? like mean = np, sd = root npq and then continuity correction
no the normal distribution is for quanitative variables while the binomial is for qualitative variables
can you show me an excersise or theory of your book that I can see how they teach it to you @gilded portal
we learnt it on rstudio
so just pbinom(minimum of + and -,n,0.5)
yeah
critical value with Z yea
ok wait
@gilded portal do you perhaps want a powerpoint from my school where there are examples
yea that would help
here there are 25 + signs
so in z calculation do i take 24.5-mean or 25.5-mean
ahhhh you learn it this way
okay now i understand
here first you form you hypothetis H0=50
H1 =/ 50
then you take you values and each time the value is above 50 you write a +
H1>50 right?
yeah sorry my bad didn't read it to good
if the value is below 50 you wright -
if it is 50 you ignore it
here if you do it with you values you get 24 +'s and 11 -'s
so n= 24 + 11
Under H0 the number of + signs follows a Binomial Distribution with n=35 and p=0.5 (from you H0 hypothethis)
Mean: đ = n*p = 17.5
Ď = the root of [n*p(1-p)] = 2.96
Z-value is= (24- 0.5- 17.5)/ 2.96
= 2.03
then look up P(Z >= 2.03) = 0.0212
significane level= 0.05
so 0.0212 < 0.05
=> we reject H0
Conclusion: There is significant evidence at the 5% level to conclude that the median weight is greater than 50 kg.
@gilded portal do you understand it?
@gilded portal you still here?
@gilded portal hello
do you understand it
@gilded portal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In these tasks, we're given the task to determine the original function, the first derivative, and the second. Now I know that when the y value of the first derivative is 0, that it's extremal point, if the second is 0, it means there is a turning point. Yet I find it quite hard to determine which one is which. Is there some trick to this?
Well blue cant be either original function or fâ because its increasing while the other 2 are zero
"...when the y value of the first derivative is 0, that it's extremal point...", speaking of the original function.
so blue is fââ
Where do you mean by this?
you should be able to see that when green curve is flat, red curve hits 0
At x=0
Im not sure if my reasoning here is correct
but
wouldn't it be 1. blue 2. red and 3. green
mainly suspecting this as the blue function has 3 points where it hits the x axis
red has 2, green has 1
All three functions bypass 0, including the blue one.
Focus on red and blue in the interval [-2, -1] ish., look their relation.
that dont matter
@torn sky Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @torn sky
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find any three positive integers A, B and C so that (C^2 - AB)/(A+B - 2C) is a perfect square.
A condition is that A is not equal to B and (C^2 - AB)/(A+B - 2C) is not 0.
I got that root(AB) <= C <= (A+B)/2
hm
and how'd you get that?
i think i managed to cook up an entire family of solutions to this btw, though not exhaustive by any means
If C > root(AB), then we also want A + B - 2C > 0 to make the whole expression positive.
=> (A+B)/2 > C > root(AB)
If C < root(AB), then we want A + B < 2C to make the whole expression positive.
This gives (A+B)/2 < C < root(AB), which is absurd.
ok yeah i guess that's true
here is my idea
start with $\frac{C^2 - AB}{A+B-2C} = n^2$ and do some algebraic fuckery to it
Ann
@sonic hound Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
So we have to show that $\exists a \neq b, c \in \bN. \sqrt{\frac{c^2 - ab}{a + b - 2c}} \in \bN$?
@ruby cargo
What does E represent?
Such exists
Also, with n < A,B < 2n + 1
Prove the inexistence or prove the existence of at least one.
I'd start by trying, $a + b - 2c = c^2 - ab$ because then, you can just get 1 as the result of expression and 1 is in $\bN$ so yea
@ruby cargo
1?
well you just have to show that there exist such numbers right?
Yea
can you give the set?
?
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
Ann told her answer before I gave the condition n < A,B < 2n + 1
Fair, is the n in, n < a, b < 2n + 1 the same one in ann's equation
what is n?
ok, you can prove there is no solution, use modulo n^2+n is a hint
use anns method
Closed by @sonic hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did my teacher find j?
TrigonometryâŚ
Try drawing a right triangle for ur vector T
This is an example of vector decomposition if u wanna look into it
The horizontal component of the force vector T has the same magnitude as the force vector A.
well i've basically just done the first step of j
and sketched the graph
then i checked the answers and got confused
So you can rewrite vector T as having vertical and horizontal components.
The vertical component of vector T should equal the objects weight. This is because the object is not moving at all in the vertical direction.
The horizontal component of vector T should have the same magnitude as vector A because the object is not moving in the horizontal plane.
which is sin60 and cos60?
for i and j parts
okay
oh so you just do sohcahtoa
but you don't know the adjacent, do you?
or is it equivalent to a
Yes it's equivalent to vector A
okay
Because the object is not moving horizontally at all.
yes but how do you know what A is?
So the forces need to balance out.
You need to find the vertical force first.
You know from the problem that the vertical component of vector T is equal to the weight of the object.
okay
i understand these individual parts, how do i put it together?
so T = 10, sin 60 = A/10?
if T is the hypotenuse?
The tension is not 100 N. The vertical component of the tension is 100 N.
You can imagine the tension force with two components: one vertical and one horizontal.
isn't the gravity 100N?
The weight of the object is 100 N.
W = m * g.
What is the force that's acting downward?
oh okay
Weight â mass
gravity
I mean the value of that force according to the figure
100N
Weight is a force (due to gravity), whereas mass is a scalar quantity, not a vector
Now what the value of force acting upward
It is the vertical component of T
how do i find that
What is formula for vertical and horizontal components of T if the angle is given? Do you know?
no i dont
The vertical component of vector T is equal to the weight of the object. They both balance each other out.
this is what my teacher did
Consider hypotenuse is T and angle it makes with base is theta, now tell me what's sin theta?
Opposite side represent the vertical component and adjacent side represent the horizontal component of T
Now tell me sin theta
can someone just help me do it please i dont know what you're talking about
Well if you don't know this honestly you won't be able to do anything related to inclined vectors
If you don't know basics of vectors, idk why you even doing this.
Ok let me tell you a trick
so vertical T is 100N?
If any vector is given (say T) and the angle it makes with base is given (say theta) then
$$Horizontal Component of T = T sin{\theta}$$
Shubham1029
Correct. The vertical part of vector T is 100 N. Equal to the weight, and it cancels it out.
uhh it's sin(60) *100?
The object is stationary so they must cancel out
Yes
ohh okay
so i got for sin(60)*100 = -30.48
Ok i am back
If upward force is T sin60 and downward force is 100 N and I tell you that net force is 0 then make an equation.
j: Tsin(60) - 100 = 0
is my calc supposed to be in radians or degrees?
Degrees
Don't you know sin 60°
what does that mean
What is your age?
17
Huh alright i am getting this done fast now fr
=100/srt3/2?
200/sqrt3
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Syntax error in part "â3" (char 7)
u have to do swrt
Yes
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Syntax error in part "\sqrt {3}}" (char 6)
thank you so much!!
Whatever just use calculator
Closed by @little terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
$\frac{200}{\sqrt{3}}$
hello
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What exactly Is wrong with this
Dual enrollment stats
@lost umbra Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I don't think just because the donut hole is smaller it changes something, the ratios would still stay the same
@lost umbra Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lost umbra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not sure on how to finish subdivision (g) in this question
im locked on the first few steps, but got lost pretty quickly with the remaining steps
@iron basin Has your question been resolved?
i think 10 might help if you swapped x and y
-zQy ->-zQx or -xQy
Closed by @iron basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was thinking (x^3/3,0,0,0),(0,x^2/2,0,0),(0,0,x,0),(0,0,0,1)
you want to find elements of P_3, so your idea is fine but the way you're writing the basis is wrong
hmm
I can define an ordered basis
right
yeah, I get that
great okay. so an ordered basis is just going to be one list
so (x^3/3,x^2/2,x,1)
yeah and it seems like you already had this in mind when you chose your basis of P_3
wait
not quite
i misread your answer lol it's sort of late
when you take D of the first basis element of P_3 (in your basis) what do you get
okay
and that's what the first element of your basis should be in P_2
because the first column of D is [1;0;0]
hmm
right
x^2,x,0
so just x^2,x
that's not a basis
you can do the same thing for the other ones. like when you take D of the second basis element what do you get?
and similarly for the third and fourth, what do you get?
x,1,0
right.
so the second basis element in P3 is going to be (0;1;0;0) and when you take D of that you will get (0;1;0)
which will be the second basis element of P_2
ok great, so you know that x is the second basis element
and then for the third basis element, you know that (0;0;1;0) has to map to (0;0;1)
yes
okay so what is D of your third basis element
0
D(x)
1
Closed by @sharp smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I have a hint
I was thiinking of starting off with a basis of V , then defining the basis of W as an extension of T(e_i)
or is that the wrong. idea
the problem with this is that if you have a set of vectors that are linearly independent in the domain, they don't have to map to a set of linearly independent vectors in the codomain.
yea, I'l have to deal with that
like i'm sure that an idea like this can work but you can modify the idea a little bit to get something cleaner.
that is, ||start with a basis for range(T)||
yeah this is another way to modify the basis of V idea
like if you extend a basis for the kernel of T to the rest of V then the rest of the vectors in the basis will map to something nonzero in range(T)
Let dim(V)=n, dim(range T) =m. Then $dim(Ker(T)) = n=m$. We start off with a basis of $ket(T)$ $e_1,e_2,\dots e_{n-m}$. We extend this to a basis of $V$. $e_1,e_2,\dots, e_{n-m} , e_{n-m+1}, \dots, e_n$.
wai
Let dim(V)=n, dim(range T) =m. Then dim(Ker(T)) = n=m.
n-m

TYPO đ
typos, typos, typos...
okay, this is a good start. now what do you think will happen when we push these basis vectors through T?
I can get a basis of Im(T) from this and then extend that
right, so you first have to show that these guys form a basis for Im(T). you already know that the image of your basis spans Im(T) because the basis itself spans V. so all you have to do is show that the vectors are linearly independent
What I was thinking of doing is define a basis by constructing it recursively ( not sure if it's the right word here)
i don't really understand which basis you're trying to construct
that of W
you mean the extension from the one that you got from Im(T)
?
i mean i have no doubt that you're going to be able to do that without a problem. and yes, you can do that inductively
please use a different help channel, this one is occupied.
i just want to make sure that you understand how to use rank-nullity to show that pushing the non-kernel vectors through T gives you linearly independent vectors in W
pushing the non-kernel vectors via T doesn't HAVE to give LI vectors
does it
they do by rank-nullity and the way we constructed our basis of V
like say V is 10 dimensional, withe kernel 5, and the rest of the vectors mapping to a 1D vector space
hmm, but by rank nullity that isn't possible
is it
right rank-nullity says that the dimension of the image would have to be 5
yes, okay so hear me out
okay
you have $e_{n-m},...,e_n$ mapping to 0, and $e_1,\hdots, e_n$ mapping to nonzero vectors in $W$. but since the dimension of Im(T) is n, and the $T(e_1),\hdots, T(e_n)$ span Im(T), then we know that they must be linearly independent
smay
sorry for the terrible tex
we have n vectors that span an n-dimensional subpsace of W
yes
so they must be linearly independent
by the definition of dimension.
or whatever other lemma that you have for dimension.
let me try to write a proof?
if you have n vectors that span an n-dimensional space, they have to be linearly independent. sure you can go ahead and prove this fact if you want to.
I prove it earlier, it's fine
okay great
so now what we have is that T(e_1), ... T(e_m) are a set of linearly independent vectors in W
and they span Im(T), and furthermore, the other basis vectors that we have map to 0
my indexing is wrong
sorry
but
the other n-m vectors were in the kernel so they map to 0
n-m vectors map to a m D vector space
m vectors do
n-m vectors mapped to 0
ah yes
Let dim(V)=n, dim(range T) =m. Then $dim(Ker(T)) = n-m$. We start off with a basis of $ket(T)$ $e_1,e_2,\dots e_{n-m}$. We extend this to a basis of $V$. $e_1,e_2,\dots, e_{n-m} , e_{n-m+1}, \dots, e_n$. We the define a basis. We then define $T(e_{n-m+1})=f_1, T(e_{n-m+2})=f_2,\dots, T(e_m) = f_m$. We then extend this to form a basis of $W$.
n-m
wai
this looks good
so now you have to show that the matrix does what you want
and then reorder your basis so that it's right
How do I show this gives the desired matrix, I just explicitly write it out?
well, you know what your basis vectors map to
like what does e_1 map to
that will be the first column of T in the basis that you chose
similarly for all the other guys
yea
in your definition of the bases e_1 maps to 0 right
so the first column would be (0;...;0)
since e_n-m+1 maps to f_1 then the n-m+1 column will be (1;0;...;0)
yes
got it
thanks!
:D
ngl axler's matrx problems are quite fun
compared to other books
matrices are pretty cool
people don't like them for some reason
i really think they're neat
We aren't introduced to them properly
how would you change the way that we are introduced to them
They should first be introduced in the context of linear maps
not in terms of a way to solve equations by guassian elimination
with heavy motivation
ah, yeah. i agree
Like I hated , absolutely HATED that part of LA
they are sort of different pictures of the same object in a sense
yea
i mean gaussian elimination takes on a whole different picture when you think about it as modifying a map
yea, but it isn't taught that way
i think my linear algebra class was pretty good in the sense that we covered both sort of at the same time.
i am pretty fortunate.
nice :0
I'm on my summer break rn
yeah LA courses that are not a first course really emphasize the linear transformation part.
it's good
I was fortunate enough to personally follow axler for my first course though we used another book in class
was pretty nice
exercise: prove the same claim by gaussian elimination
the reason gaussian elimination is often taught first is because its so immensely powerful
i love gaussian elimination
you can even apply it to questions like this
hmm
for that don't I first need a matrix
yes
just pick any bases for V and W
you need some knowledge on elementary matrices for this approach. and that invertible matrices and basis changes are the same thing
given any invertible matrix A and any basis B, you can see A as a basis change from B to some other basis or from some other basis to B
prove that first
Can I do this in like 2 days, once I warm up to the idea of matrices a bit more, I've never really personally used them conceptually before
I'll be sure to do this then, I'll make a note
do it whenever
Closed by @sharp smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yes yes
Closed by @gilded portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to do q7
calculate the straight lenght and curved length separately
the curved length is just certain fraction of the circumfence of whole circle
and the straight length can be calculated with some trigonometry
The chord and the arc length?
For wht?arc length?
I calculated fhe arc length and chord and then added it but im not getting the correct answer
So take it as 240?
That's what I think
I did that also
And add that line
I took the arc length as 240 but i got a bigger answer for arc length
Answer is supposed to be 29.6 cm
Maybe i got the chord wrong?
For arc length
Which line?
Arc length at the bottom is correct. Itâs probably the chord length thatâs wrong.
yea