#help-39
1 messages · Page 224 of 1
Right
and tbh i think being able to state this kind of result is a big part of why partial recursive functions are interesting
and also more generally that a turing machine just isn't always a total function, but you can always view it as a partial function
But like this makes me a bit worried because we say Turing machines and partial recursive functions are equpotent models of computation right?
yes
Then when we look at the turing machine for the halting problem
We can't point to a partial recursive function corresponding to it?
well that's because there isn't a turing machine for that either
that means it doesn't compute the halting problem
because it doesn't compute a total function, and the halting problem is a total function
if you mean this thing then this computes a very different function that isn't total, that does also have a partial recursive function that computes it
So if it's a total function then it's corresponding turing machine must halt on all inputs
yes
And if its a partial recursive function then the machine is allowed to loop on only those inputs which are undefined
yes
and on the inputs where the function isn't defined it also has to run forever
(otherwise it's instead computing a different partial function that is defined at the inputs where it halts)
This is confusing me a little though, because why can't we say it's simply a Turing machine which tells if a {tm, input} will halt but loops if not, like it's just a acceptor machine?
Does this mean its a partial recursive function where the domain is the subset(halting pairs) among the superset(all pairs) of Turing machines, inputs?
well that's a thing you can talk about, but it's different to "a machine which outputs 'halts' if the machine halts and 'doesn't halt' if it doesn't halt" which is what people normally mean by "the halting problem"
Isn't that just a hypothetical machine where the assumption is "halting problem is decidable"?
yes, a turing machine that halts on only the turing machines that halt computes a partial function and its domain is the set of turing machines that halt
Yes! That would make a lot of sense
well yes, it's something that you mainly talk about while proving it doesn't exist, but still
Closed by @lament knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
Here why are we saying the domain of definition is unknowable?
Since we can as we mentioned earlier, list out all the pairs which halt
@meager trellis sorry for the ping but kinda again got confused
i think they're being kind of informal there by calling it "unknowable"
but also like, there's no computable function that can decide if something is in the domain or not, that seems reasonably "unknowable"
Hmm right
We can have a computable function which starts listing them all the pair out, but ofc it never finishes
Yeahh
Makes sense
Thanks
.close
Closed by @lament knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @slate forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not really understanding whats going on, I included the markscheme
theyre finding the angle between OB and OQ then using the arc length formula
and they find the radius with pythagoras
but how
ok so they split the rectangle?
for the radius yes
after what do we do
we want the angle BOQ
so we need to know angle BOA
^
yes?
you have an angle at B, an angle at O and a 90 angle at A
im talking about the angle BOA
as in the angle between BO and OA
i apolgize for my lack of intelligence as im still not getting it
so we got this right now right
A = 90 B = 45 O = 45 right because they are just right angles in half
the angles arent cut in half
that would only be true if BA=OA
the angle youre trying to find the the one at O in the upper triangle
we call it angle BOA
so the angles are not 45 and we are currently trying to find out the angle at O. ok we do this with the SOH CAH TOA
yup exactly
so according to the markscheme it would be 8/5
after we just add that to the 90
from BOQ?
right again
then we use the lenght of an arc fomual to find the lenght of the arc
right once more
Closed by @dense cargo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
3rd quartile means 196, the right edge of the box
as in "i don't get what it means conceptually" or "i don't get how to compute it"
standard score is her score - mean / standard deviation right
brackets!
ok
standard score = (raw score - mean)/stdev
do i understand correctly that it's the concept of it that you're missing
yes or no
actually not really im just confused how to get the answer
say 1 use (197 - 135) / 62
aint the score 1
since the mean can be in a large range
that's the lowest(ish) possible score
(the mean need not be an integer)
im not sure if im misisng something
is the question expecting an exact standard score i guess
anyways thank u very much
.close
Closed by @hallow zinc
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the strategy to solve this exercise? I am stuck with figuring out how a general element of V* looks like, so as to prove that f1,f2 and f3 span V*.
a general element will look like f(x,y,z) = ax + by + cz
ah, right. a=f(e1), b=f(e2) and so on, correct?
yes
chat gpt failing to do simple math
wow who guessed
always been like that
That we are dealing with functions and not points in space as vectors confuses me. So we know f(x,y,z) = ax + by + cz is a general element in V*. What would be the next step in showing f1,f2 and f3 are a basis?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
prove that for any a, b, c in R there exist constants u1, u2, u3 in R such that u1 f1 + u2 f2 + u3 f3 = f
.close
Closed by @wind lagoon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could you solve this?
A parallelogram is divided into 4 regions in which regions A, B, C have areas of 45 cm2; 30 cm2; 60 cm2 respectively. Calculate region D.
Area of D?
yes
Consider the heights of the parallelograms
and?
observe the ratios in area and deduce where the region boundaries must be
wait
this is my solution
lets call them h1 and h2
A and B have h1
C and D have h2
yes
then A/C = B/D
correct
yes
Closed by @chilly vector
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone tell me how to do them
what do you know about transformation of functions
well i know
that like
if its f(x-3) then its 3 units to the right
so horizontal shift
and f(x)+3 its horizontal shift of 3 units up
3f(x) means its been stretched right?
-f(-x) means its reflected y and x axis
you mixed up vertical and horizontal but yes you're right
f(3x) means theres something done to it by 1/3
oh
wait
oh ye
where are you facing problem applying this
stretched horizontally by a factor of 3
but for this part i dont understand what im tryna do
you know that the transformation will be 3 units to the right and 4 units down right
for the first one
hm why did our teacher say smth like its a horizontal dialtion scale factor by 1/ |b|
oh
wait
yes move toright by 3 and 4 down
she's right, she said what i said but more sophisticatedly
yes, simply apply this to the point given
that's it
ok wait uh
apply 3,-4 to -2,-5?
wait what
yepp
how do i do that
add 3 to the x-coordinate and subtract 4 from the y-coordinate
wait why are we doing that
cause you know that horizontal change will apply to the x-coord and vertical change will apply to the y-coordinate
nonono
the questions asks you to find the coordinates
after this transformation occurs
if (-2,-5) lies on f(x)
yes
we need to find what this point will be on g(x)
oh so the change in f(x) to g(x) is 3 units right and 4 down
so we add that
to the previous coordinate
yeppp
to find the new place
yess
yep
can you write the points given in the form (a,b) for me
hm i dont rlly understnad wording
all three points
(-3,0) (4,0) (0,2)
yep, now g(x)=f(x)-3
so we know it's 3 units down
can you determine how this will change the given points
yep
because hm as it goes down like the graph basically becomes wider when they intercept
i think they just want you to comment if the intercept will be larger or smaller, do you have an answer key?
lemme check
how do u figure out the intercepts and stuff
whats inconclusive?
the graph never touches any axis?
the question so u dont need to keep looking back up
ok the a part they only want you to judge the change in y int which is easy, and b is similarly easy too
just apply the transformation like before
let me see c
also why does c have a ? at the end
i didnt know that was a sign in math
ahh i see so for a we cant determin the exact value of x as it doeesnt tell us but it does say the graph moved 3 units down so -3+2 which is -1?
c is inconclusive because we don't have the function given, and transformations are being applied to both the x and y coordinates
yess
dont have the function given?
wym
so you will be able to tell what the points are after transformation
but not what the intercept of the function will be
wait but isnt the interecpts before the function (-3,0) (4,0) (0,2) and since we could do like juding the change between part a and b can we not do that for part c as it tells us grpah moves 2 units left and 4 down
we've just been given f(x) and g(x) we need to know what f(x) and g(x) are to determine the intercepts in some cases
intercepts are strictly when one coordinate is zero, do you agree?
yes
try the transformation and see if you get the points with coordinates that are zero
if not, then it's not feasible to determine the intercept
ok hm i dont rlly understand as like
i know that int means x or y must be 0
but i dont understand like why is this inconclusive and what happens if transformations are both are applied to both x and y or "we've just been given f(x) and g(x) we need to know what f(x) and g(x) are to determine the intercepts in some cases" for that wym as in we need to know because hasnt it told us like other equations
is it because the sign are f(x) = f(x+2) -4
did you understand why we only found the y intercept in the a part
f(x)=f(x)
and only the x intercepts in the b part
because we cant determin the change of the x int
exactly
but in part c isnt change in x 2 to the left and y is 4 down so we just put that in so -2-3 and -2+4 for x
and then -4+2 for y
hm
(-3,0) (4,0) (0,2)
(-5,-4) (2,-4) (-2,-2)
the line below is the points after transforming
we can determine this much from the information given
yeppp
but for the others we assume that their x is 0 when we given y and vice versa right
because only 1 has changed
yes
yes perfect

Closed by @mystic wraith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why are we able to integrate from 0 to 1 of 1/sqrt(1-x^2) when it's undefined at x=1?
isn't there an asymptote that tends towards infinite at x = 1-
meaning that there should be an infinite area?
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Closed by @boreal raptor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk how to draw the figure
@plush sundial Has your question been resolved?
@plush sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi there. I just need some guidance on how to re-do this topic. I mostly know how to do it. I just need some help to make sure i'm doing it right. This is the question i'm currently doing.
what have you done?
Currently nothing. But I think the perpendicular part would be.. -1/5? Thats the part thats throwing me off
Almost correct
Do you know the relation between the slopes of two perpendicular lines?
I'm not sure what you mean by relation
ok just, what do you know about the slopes of a pair of perpendicular lines
if you know that two lines are perpendicular to each other, what can you say about their slopes, and/or how can you find the slope of one knowing the slope of the other?
I know that its basically the opposite of a parallel line. And thats pretty much it.
Probably a more direct question. If a line has slope "a" (where a is a number, like 2), what is the slope of a line perpendicular to it?
I mean... I know that if the problem was like. 2/3 then the perpendicular line would be like. -3/2 but the singular problems like these are trickier for me
Fair enough, but can't you just write -5 as -5/1?
I think so? That somewhat sounds right.
-5 divided by 1 is just -5... so -5 = -5/1
That way you can have it in a more workable form
So a line perpendicular to one with slope -5/1 would have what slope?
Okay and then you write the equation as -3=-5/1(2)+B to solve to find the equation of B?
ah. Okay thats the parallel then?
Yeah
Yep
okay okay my bad
For the perpendicular, you do the same thing, but just do the "perprendicular" operation on the slope -5/1
so then you do the opposite? Which I think is 1/5? Ahhh i dont know
exactly
you flip the numerator and denominator, then add a "-" (which cancels out the existing one)
okay that makes sense.
Formally, if a line has slope "a", a line perpendicular would have slope "-1/a"
Understood
So I got this for the parallel. But i'm not sure if its right. y=-5/1x-13/1
oh wait hang on thats wrong
Okay. So I got:
Parallel: y=-5/1x+7/1
Perpen: y=1/5x-17/5
.close
Closed by @gray bluff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that the angle bisectors of the angles of a triangle are concurrent.
Just tell what theorems are to be used here.
I need to stop doing Maths all day.
I have a family 🥲 .
<@&286206848099549185>
yes you do
but also the locus thing i said in your last channel does the job handily
prove the smaller triangles congruent
you also need to do a construction
wait do you mean the vector one ?
cus the one im thinking of is basic ash
You said "Prove the smaller triangle congruent."
You didn't specify which "small triangles" you're referring to.
wdym
what you can do is uhh draw three perpendiculars on three sides of the triangle
and then you draw the angle bisectors asw
Like this?
you havent drawn one of the angle bisectors
i see
you needa prove ADE and ADG as two congruent triangles
I have drawn the angle bisectors AD and CD.
Any point on the angle bisector of an angle is equidistant from the rays of the angle. So GD = DE.
and DF = DE.
So DF = DG.
Join D and B. DG is perpendicular to AB and DF is perpendicular to BC.
By RHS, triangle BGD is congruent to triangle BFD.
So angle GBD = angle DBF.
So BD is the angle bisector.
basically you have EAD = DAG, AD as the common side and if you draw the perpendiculars you will get DEA = DGA
Is this correct?
No way this is as simple as this.
looks correct to me
yeah it is pretty simple
the method i was going ahead with is easy as well
just do 3 sets of congruencies and you would be done
Because when I searched for the proof of this theorem on the internet it gave me proofs using Ceva's theorem and the converse of the angle bisector theorem.
Yeah, that's the same thing
yh
Closed by @proper flare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I am leaving this server.
Byee
what is this sacred geometry shit 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A home improvement contractor is painting the walls and ceiling of a rectangular room. The volume of the room is 998.25 cubic feet. The cost of wall paint is $0.12 per square foot and the cost of ceiling paint is $0.18 per square foot. Find the room dimensions that result in a minimum cost for the paint.
here's what i've done so far
letting the length, width, and depth of the room be x, y, and z, we have the following relations
xyz = 998.25
and
the cost C(x, y, z) is 0.12(2xz + 2yz) + 0.18xy
= 0.24(xz+yz) + 0.18xy
trying to eliminate z from the equation, we have z=998.25/xy
and
substituting into C(x, y, z)
=C(x, y)
= 0.24(x+y)(998.25/xy) + 0.18xy
taking partial derivatives to find the minimum
(here, you should simplify (x+y)/xy to be 1/x + 1/y so that the partial derivatives are easier)
i get
2derpy
and here i don't know how to solve for x and y such that both become 0
you can solve the bottom equation for y, then pluyg that into the top
nw
2derpy
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
2derpy
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Closed by @agile valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In the first attatchment, consider the following question:
How do we improve the leading question in Section 4.2, so "satisfying" is defined in Section 3.2 and the expected value of fᵣ* (where fᵣ* converges to an explicit, everywhere surjective function) is finite?
If you want evidence to make sure I know what I write, see the second attatchment.
Here is the link to the second attatchment: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389005047_Defining_a_Satisfying_Expected_Value_From_Chosen_Sequences_of_Bounded_Functions_Converging_to_Pathological_Functions_v2
If you can't asnswer the question directly, is there a research paper that can help?
You might find better help in the advanced channel
Here its mostly for pre-uni undergrad math
@quiet vessel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @quiet vessel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For this NFA, can it be simplified such that it still describes the same language but has fewer states overall?
I also came up with a regex for this: 1(000* + (100*011)*), I wonder if it is correct
@bitter pasture Has your question been resolved?
@bitter pasture Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@regal herald srry for ping but cuz u were helping me before
i tried ur statefy
strategy
but it iddnt work
a^[x-h] -1 = y
si
when y=0, x=-3
you got y=0 for x+h=0 si?
can u show me how u do it
like step by step pls
i rlly wanna understand
x+h = 1
x =0
so h =1?
no
x+h=0
ok then what do i do
then we have y=a^0-1=1-1=0
so no translation?
thats not what that means
we just have y=0 at x-h=0
now look for the point on the graph where y=0
because that is where x-h=0
thanks bro
nw
@lucid hazel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is partial fractions the fastest way to do this?
appears so
its not that long though since all the partial fractions have constant numerators
Kk thank you
.close
Closed by @junior vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
kinda related to my other question, but is the partial fraction meant to be ax+b/x^2 + cx+d/(1+x^2)
.reopen
✅
x^2 should be a repeating factor
Oh so it's A/x + B/x^2 + (Cx+D)/1+x^2?
yea should be
Closed by @junior vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does mass a accelerate?
Determine the tension developed in the cords attached to each block and the
accelerations of the blocks. Neglect the mass of the pulleys and cords
this is the prompt
@cobalt patrol Has your question been resolved?
There's a common way to analyze mass-pulley systems, by writing equations for the length of each string
Okay I see you did get that far
You differentiate those equations to get equations for the pulleys' accelerations
@cobalt patrol
For example, 2a_a - a_c = 0
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does it even mean by one root tends to infinity??
💀
Doesn't it just mean a tends to 0?
does it?
my teacher ghosted me when i sent him this 😭
Lol
how much is at stake with this problem
cause if you dont get a clarification and can skip, i would
yeah i should ig
.close
Closed by @pale atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need to find m and i have no idea how to solve polinoms
find m such that what happens
its in turkish wait lemme translate the question
post the original Turkish too just in case
What is the sum of the possible values of m?
please help i have exam in two days and people say that this chanel helps a lot 🙏
A polynomial is defined such that the exponents of x in all terms have to be integers
So basically we have to make sure all exponents are integers
And find all possible "m"s such that the exponents are integers
Non negative integers actually
Does that make sense
so do i leave the negative ones
So whatever m you take, both "16/(m+2)" and "m-3" need to be non negative integers
okay
If you look at 16/(m+2) that really leaves you with a limited set of outcomes don't you think?
yes so maybe a 3?
What all non negative integer values do you think 16/(m+2) can take
do i need for 16 to be devided completely?
Yes
İDK
What do u think of m = 6
Yes which is a non negative integer right?
yea
so i can use any numbers which can devide 16 right
Yes
oh then its 2, 6 and 14
Correct
Now
We need m-3 to also be
Non negative integer
So what possibilities of m remain
Do you think 2 works
no my bad
Do you think 14 works
like the final answer of it will depend on its exponent number (language barier 😭 )
thats why
then 14 wouldnt work since the answer would be negative
14 works
Because
14-3 is still a positive integer
We just want the exponents to be non negative integers
The terms themselves can be negatuve
Negative
What do you think of 6
it will work too
Actually you should really start with defining what a polynomial is
That's what this question is really asking you to do
Yes
This is the heart of this question
okay then the answer is D
Defining what a polynomial is
💯
thank you profesor 🙏
Make sure you get the definition of a polynomial tho
im gonna try to speedrun whole polynom chapter tomorrow
still thankyou
althrough do yall know imagination numbers
wait let me find an question example
nvm i gave up 🔥
.close
Closed by @idle bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i differentiate help i genuinely forgot
what
or apply the quotient rule
do you know the product rule?
yes
yep go ahead and use it
nx^n-1
that's the power rule
neon
does this look familiar
yep so use it
oh
u is x and v is the other thing
ok
u=x v=(x+1)^-1 = 1/(x+1)
u'=1 v'=-(x+1)^-2 = -1/(x+1)^2
dy/dx=uv'+vu'
= x(-1/(x+1)^2) + 1/(x+1) (1)
idk
yep that's right
you can simplify to 1/(x+1)^2
or directly achieve it by doing this
also directly acheive it by doing the quotient rule
should be
Closed by @nova hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've done this question myself but am wondering anothher persons opinion on working out A
to calculate the dip estimate
@desert thorn Has your question been resolved?
did i not end up getting the right answer?
but i wasn't given any velocity or displacment values
@desert thorn Has your question been resolved?
Around 0.48? Idk what shape to consider except a cuboid
Awesome I got 0.47 so good to know I'm not way off
@desert thorn Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @desert thorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
correct, then you need to bound y
which two lines y = .... bound the region?
you already have x = 0 and x = 1 remember
well y = x is also correct
but not y = 1
exactly
the bottom line is....
the bottom line?
you're overthinking this
yep! you just needed that
yes
so if you now start evaluating $\int_{x = 0}^{x = 1} \int_{y = 0}^{y = x} 1 \ dy \ dx$
south
note how the bounds match with the dy then dx
you'll just get $\int_0^1 [x - 0] \ dx$
south
so it checks out
your inner bound is a function of x
but that's the principle
replace 1 with a different function if you want the integral of that function over that region
1 actually just gives you the area of the region
np!
Closed by @naive marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
definitely!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
those are common textbook exercises
so you can find formulas for the volume of a cone, a sphere, and so many more shapes using triple integrals also
sadge
.close
Closed by @compact ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you can definitely transform finding the extrema of $g(x,y) = x\log(1+x^2+y^2)$ on $D$ into finding the extrema of $h(r,\theta) = r\cos(\theta) \log(1+r^2)$ on $[0,1]\times \bR$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
by arguing that first, $(r,\theta)\in [0,1]\times \bR \Longleftrightarrow (r\cos(\theta),r\sin(\theta)) \in D$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
and then that for $(r,\theta)\in [0,1]\times \bR$, $h(r,\theta) = g(r\cos(\theta),r\sin(\theta))$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
but now I'm realizing that the question is phrased a bit weird
are you supposed to find the global extrema of g defined on D
or are you supposed to find the global extrema of g defined on R^2, that lie inside D?
what is the difference?
pretty huge difference
if g is defined on D, a compact set
it will always have global minimum and maximum
if g is defined on R^2
then some extrema may not exist
and who's to say they even lie on D
continuous*
so why use the word "global" here
global as in "on the entire domain"
?
that's not the weird part
"global" means "on the entire domain"
so if the domain is D
there's no shame in calling the extrema on D "global"
the thing that trips me is they specify afterwards that the closed unit disk is "in the Euclidian plane"
but
i think we are overthinking it
it's this one
according to the solution
yes
g will always have global minimum and maximum
you just need to find where they are in D
solution
yeah sure
$\nabla g (x,y) = \begin{pmatrix}\log(1+x^2+y^2)+\frac{2x^2}{1+x^2+y^2}\ \frac{2xy}{1+x^2+y^2}\end{pmatrix}$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
if it's 0 inside the interior of D, then x = y = 0
and g(0,0) = 0
compare to g on the boundary
which is g(x,y) = log(2)x
we get -log(2) on (-1,0) and log(2) on (1,0)
@naive marlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @naive marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any ideas on how to solve this?
<@&286206848099549185>
what does R ^0 mean?
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
I think it's supposed to be just R
well, firstly
a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + (k-1)(a^2b/a+b + b^2c/b+c + c^2a/c+a) >= ab+bc+ca + (k-1)(ab+bc+ca)/2
(a-b)^2+(b-c)^2+(c-a)^2 >= (k-1) ( (ab + bc + ca) - 2(a^2b/a+b) - 2(b^2c/b+c) - 2(c^2a/(a+c))
(b-a)^2+(c-b)^2+(a-c)^2 >= (k-1) ((b-a)(ab/a+b) + (c-b)(bc/b+c) + (a-c)(ac/a+c))
ye I got this too
@mellow idol Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
thats
hm
interestin
you think am gm might help?
probably not
in most oly inequalities, am-gm helps usually only after simplification
I got stuck beyond this
hm, lemme try somethings
also, i am going to talk about "t" where t = k-1, as maximising t is the same as maximising k
yup
only thing I got is k is at least 1
yeh, because the first part is trivially atleast 0
yeah
is there any way to upper bound the expression on the right
lower bounding will probably not work since we need an upper bound for k
since it's homogenous i'm gonna try assigning some sum for a,b,c and hope it gives me something
hm
yup
<@&286206848099549185>
@mellow idol Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Acceleration due to gravity is approximately 10 m/s2 pointed down. Mr. Husic throws an eraser vertically into the air, from the ground level. The eraser lands 10 seconds later. (4, 2 marks)
can someone explain this to me
i've so far said a = -10m/s/s
so v(t) = -10t + Vo
from there im not sure what to do
this isn't a question 0_o
what do u need to find
0
no
u need to use this formula T = (2 * u * sin(θ)) / g
💀
here theta is 90 degrees
no i dont think so
use $v_f=v_i+at$
00100000
its math so like thats not
what??!?
i can't use physics stuff
oh yes let's drown OP in black boxes
ok what in the world is that supposed to mean
you can't use any kinematics formulas?
I am sry😭
that's a really arbitrary restriction
and also, this isn't a math problem
you physically can't do it without physics things
those are kinematics formulas tho
its part of my math course and we aren't expected to do it with a detailed knowlege of kin stuff
arguably, he's using as much physics as I am when I suggest using $v_f=v_i+at$...
00100000
i might've not been clear, like we only need to know that acceleration is the deriv of velocity which is teh deriv of dispalacement
what?!?! why would you use a differential equation for this
like we should be able to solve with js that knowledge and the rest being math
that's so overkill lol
well then like
h''(t) = -10, h(0)=h(10)=0
you're using derivatives...
lmao let's take the characteristic polynomial now
and then find an annihilator to solve the IVP
ok wait heres my working so far
well ok this is actually not a diffeq but...
i mean regardless it probably still has eigenvalues if you can split it into two lin. indep. 2 element vectors somehow lol
to find velocity
its a math course i have to use math things otherwise i can't get marks
what characteristic polynomial
v(t) can be expressed by integrating a(t) wrt t
there's none, I'm just being dumb lol
do a = 10 = dv/dt
but... why would you do that for this question that requires no calculus?!
-10
yeah ive done that
also why is it -10
bc downwards
and presumably you want to run your height axis up
mb
not down
perfectly fine way to do it tbh with the integral
you can define g=+10 if you stay consistent with your coordinate system and define up to be negative
but often times it is just convinient to define down negative
yeah i can js flip my answer at the end the teacher said if its unreasonable
but anyway
what am i supposed to do after v(t)
cuz i tried finding the slope but thats js going to give me the equation of v(t) again
do you have s(t)?
max height is given by max(s(t)) which is given by v(t) = 0
ok can i just say, he's using no calculus in the model solution here
he gets the equations using calc
is this for initial velocity?
why dont you use kinematics equations
just derive it first then use it directly
well, isn't it a standard that in a math class, when your professor derives a result on the board, you're allowed to use it on hw/exams?
if he derived them in class, they're fair game
he actually does he just uses the formula for the integral of acceleration and velocity
because if your accel is a constant it always comes out to look like that
oh, you mean from step 1 to 2?
well idk i can use kinematics equations but i dont know them well enough and i js want to understand it from the math perspective
and 2 to 3
I honestly read that as him just using $v_f=v_i+at$ originally
00100000
integral of 10t plus Vo is certainly 5t^2 +v0t +C
but I see how it can be interpreted as him taking the integral
what do i do next
you find s(t) to find the initial velocity, yes
from a math perspective, an integral is just the limit of riemann sums (well, the riemann integral at least). from a strictly "math perspective," you understand it already without applying it to physics
can you explain this agian, i really dind't understand what you mean by saying the max height is given when s(t) is maximized cuz in my head thats related to finding the max height
I see I see. I'm convinced he's using calculus now. sorry for being annoying 😅
we know the position function is maximized when V(t) = 0 and a(t) has a negative sign due to the first and second derivative test
we have that the eraser falls back down after 10 seconds. We also have that
s(t) = -5t^2+ut where u is the initial velocity (found by integrating v(t))
we know that s(10) = 0 since at 10 seconds, the eraser falls back down to its initial position (s is defined as change in position aka displacement)
this lets us find u and then we can solve max(s(t)) using v(t) = 0
when you integrate $a(t)$ to get an expression $v(t)$, you have some constant of integration $v_0(t)$ left over. you know $t$, so now you need $v_0(t)$ to solve for $v(t)$ at the relevant $t$
00100000
I guess to understand it intuitively, you can think about it like this. If you have some acceleration, $\frac{d}{dt}(vt+v_0)$, it only tell you what rate at which the velocity changes. That's why the derivative will be $v$, and the "information" of the initial speed you were traveling at, $v_0$ is "lost"
that's why the integration constant $C$ exists, and it can be interpreted as $v_0$ here
00100000
hopefully that helps a bit with understanding why the equations have their respective physical interpretation 😅
right no that makes sense now
thank you
it was confusing for me why we needed distance to find velocity
00100000
.close
Closed by @orchid token
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
sorry, the way I worded this earlier made it sound like $vt+v_0$ was the acceleration
00100000
acutally, my notation is really shitty and confusing 💀 I am using $v$ for the acceleration whoops
00100000
sorry about that
dw, it's closed already; the bot just hasn't kicked us out yet
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I solve this without using l'Hopital's rule?
The denominator simplifies to cos(theta) as cos(2pi-x)=cos(x)
and also some trig equalities
(e.g. cos(2pi - x) = cos(-x), because the period is 2pi so you can just subtract it)
Yes
later, this should make it turn into sin of something
instead of that
write cos(2(pi-theta/2)
and subsitute x in it
2x/cos2x
where x is tending to =
cos 0 =1
x=0
final answer you get 0
is that the answer
Okay
I have worked this out
[
\lim_{\theta \to \pi/2} \frac{2\theta - \pi}{\cos(2\pi - \theta)}
]
waffle
its not even 0/0 form
why are you applying l'hospitals
oh wait
nvm
actually
wait
it its not
[
=\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2x}{-\sin{x}}
]
waffle
This is -2
Closed by @carmine storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
problem 2
Why is problem 1 and 2 from two completely different level
@balmy oracle Has your question been resolved?
dont know
its kind of a hybrid of field theory and complex analysis
@balmy oracle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im completely stuck, no idea what to do, asked chatgpt but they dont understand my question
What do you know about all the triangles?
literally nothing
equilateral has all equal sides
thats all i know
oh WAIT
is it D
@fringe robin
someone asked this earlier today...?
anyways