#help-39
1 messages · Page 196 of 1
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
what
"An associative R-algebra, A, is a vector space over R with a prodct s.y. for all u,v,w in A a,b in R we have: associativity, distributivity, etc"
@burnt ibex if you need help, ask in another channel, #❓how-to-get-help
so i guess the ring is with scalar multiplication and vector addition
so yea componentwise multiplication
what would be the mapping?
from R(beta) to R^2
but them being isomorphic still doesnt mean they are the same thing right?
here i have another doubt aswell.
Why do we say A = C for beta^2 < 0 but A is only isomorphic to R^2 when beta^2 > 0. From my understanding isomorphic means preserving structure. But if they preserve structure isnt it pretty much the same thing
atleast in abstract nonsense when we say two categories are isomorphic we can treat one as the other with no issue
well when I have two groups like Z_4 and Z_5*, they are isomorphic but still different
different operations and so on
if beta^2 > 0, then A is R[beta]/(beta^2-x) iso R[beta]/(beta+sqrt(x)) x R[beta]/(beta-sqrt(x)) iso R x R
right i get it
I should have texed that
ohhhh yea makes sense
okay yea thanks!
i think i get it now
:)
.close
Closed by @chrome river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got a logical question
(why doesnt integral of sin(x), upper limit pi , lower=0 )= (pi*1)/2
I'm not sure how to interpret this question; why would you expect the integral to evaluate to pi/2?
because the integral means the area under a curve and sin(pi) is a semi circle
it isn't
i meant sin(0) to sin(pi)
this isn't a semicircle
if it were, then we'd see a circle here with the other "hemisphere" added
but we don't
wait i saw a question like this i am not sure if it was only sin(pi)
but thanks anyways
Closed by @prime bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If a numebr to the power of 2 is divisible by a number, then is the original number also divisible by that number?
that's not true, a^2 divisible by b does not imply a is divisible by b
2 isnt divisible by 4 as a simple counter
Would by working for 2 be right then?
,rccw
i dont think so for the second part
Damn alright what do u think I should do for it then?
personally id do modulo but i have no idea if thats applicable here (my learning road is fucked)
Ok
@brittle onyx Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brittle onyx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am getting 15/36 which 5/12 as ans
condition would be alpha < beta
so
1/6 x 5/6 + 1/6 x 4/6 ................ 1/6 x 1/6
but no correct option
This condition is wrong. If you put $\alpha = 3, \beta = 4$, then your equation becomes,
$$x^2 + 6x + 4$$ which has value of -4 for x = -2
Facter10Br4g
|| think of completing thesquare ||
oh
cannot we just do D < 0
that tells you about the roots
not the polynomial itself
nop
when c > 0 and D < 0
it gives positive value
Yea. You need c>0 as well was my point
Also, you put the condition wrong
D<0 gives $\alpha^2 < \beta$
Facter10Br4g
Closed by @upper drum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thanks
it would be always positive
as dice cannot give negative
i just kept condition wrong
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please help me on this question:
Th total probability of picking a blue, red, or green ball has to equal 1.
@exotic gale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you turn a quadratic expression into vertex form from 3x^2+1
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
.close
Closed by @compact ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why these two expressions are not the same
Closed by @sand robin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yw
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @west sapphire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I can reach this point, I found put of that 1/siny is equal to ln|tan(y/2)| but I cant find how to reach that conclusion. I see my professor is doing like in the second photo but cant understand how he thinks about that substitution in first place
tanx=t is quite a useful substitution as anywhere there is sec^2x you can write it as 1+t^2 another common thing is to multiply and divide by sec^2x or sec^2(x/2) like the later works in this case
you can also proceed with integrals of 1/(asinx+bcosx) in a similar way, putting tanx = t
.close
Closed by @carmine forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
gif
.close
Closed by @feral sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
2+2 = ?
2 + 2 = 4.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone has a correct definition for a k-ramsey graph? couldnt find one online
@pulsar stump Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this considered inversely proportional ?? (y=k/x)
when yx doesnt add up to 12 (5*2)
it's either an error in the table or the answer
i think they meant to write 2.4 not 2
if k isnt a constant
its NOTHING proportional to right???????/
what
if u mean to say y isn't inversely proprtional to x here ur correct
but i think theyu just forgot to write the .4 after 2
they marked me wrong
did u write 2 or 2.4
i did a wild guess cause the choices were just direct/inverse/joint/combined
the teachers were the one who wrote that
it was a quiz
they showed the table and these were the choices
ur not wrong cause the last values aren't consistent with inverse proprtion and if they wrote the wrong values thats on whoever wrote it not u
so im guessing MY TEACHER IS WRONG
It has to be a writing error
thank you bro
i knew i was right
they were the ones who were wrong
/close
closed
close
close after a dot
@left dock Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @left dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
write this without the root if x<-2
sqrt(x^2)=|x| for all real x
can you tell me how the x>-2 would affect the answer?
well
I think he supposed to not have abs either
x has to be less than -2 so
so?
In that case its just abs(2+x) but if you must have no abs also, it will be -(2+x) since 2+x < 0 for x < -2
when we get to |2+x|= 2+x
we need to use a - in front of the right side to make it true right?
|2+x|= -(2+x )
no idea
because if (2+x)<0
yup!
yeah so if I write this:
|2+x|= -(2+x )
am I done with the task? I eliminated the root
and that was the task
am I overcomplicating it
Seems done
is this the correct final answer? @spare lark
Yeah its good
I let u close it
Closed by @oblique rune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, please help with this question, i find it extremely difficult and the method i am trying isnt ont he mark scheme :((
Here is the mark scheme
Hey guys can somebody help me, im not in school or anything this is just beyond my knowledge
<@&286206848099549185> please help 🙏
What help u need ??
its not him, its the question above, that user is just confused
i would use casework tbh
1P2C3B4 where 1,2,3,4 are slots where other papers can go or can be empty
multiply final value by 3! because pcb can be swapped around
Yo
the rest is trivial i think
You need help ?
wait but how are you dealing with the 18 possible slots?
but P could also be in the first slot, no?
ohh
def not the most efficient way to do it here
better with groups of indistinguishable objects
honestly I thought I was cooking up a storm in the moment but I feel like I forogt to substract something that I
*that i overcounted
prolly
no actually your answer is smaller
4.39 * 10^15
you got 12.1 * 10^14
which is 1.21 * 10^15
your answer is 4x smaller
well that answer is actually not the answer
oh
i would have to substract that from 18!
ah
although I also think I miscounted the zeros and that its supposed to be 12.1 * 10^15
okay
true
method 2 is similar to the method i wouldve used
but they did like the contrapositive
they placed the 15 non-scinece papers first
like 1A2A3A...
and there are 15! orders of those papers
and then there are 16 slots in between to put the science papers in
16*15*14*15!=4.39*10^15
oh yeah
honestly I find that hard to wrap my head around...
i think the closest to my attempt was method 3
yeah
@alpine glacier Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @alpine glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ill post my working in a few mins
gg
??
actually you can close this one open a new one and i can help u there 😄
oops
unlucky guys
alg
.close
so i realized that $a_1+a_2+a_3...a_{20}=6(a_1+a_2...a_{10})$
;(
then i denoted d to be the common difference so i got $20a_1+210d=6(10a_1+45d)$
;(
this implies that $40a_1+60d=0\implies 2a_1+3d=0\implies a_1=-\frac{3d}{2}$
;(
oh ok
a20=a1+19*d
added one term too many
im trying to work without arithmetic formula
😄
$20a_1+190d=6(10a_1+45d)$
;(
thats so odd cause i did it correct on the RHS
yup
20(2a_1 + 19d) != 20a_1 + 210d
breh my mind is fucked i think
i stayed up till 230 yesterday playing games and doing this shit
You should be getting: (2a + 19d) = 3(2a + 9d) => 4a + 8d = 0 => a = -2d
Closed by @cobalt hinge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
mandelbrot is z_n+1=z_n^2+c i think
julia sets are of this kind of form
Closed by @cobalt hinge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have been looking for a while but I can't find anything good on volumes of revolution about a line
if you can share a resource or tell me how to do it I would be very pleased
khan academy
anything specifically?
thanks 🙂
actually wait use lesson 9 to end of unit
coolio, will do!
you can also ask in what ever channel they share resources in
i cant link it for some reason

XD
the server
I Don,t understand this and tommorrow is my exam
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
man, chuck this in a free channel XD
yup that was exactly what I was after! thanks man
.close
Closed by @hot star
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
did u mistype?
.close
Closed by @iron stream
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somebody explain how we get the highlighted inequality?
they are using induction
so assuming 2<=2z_k<2_k+1<4
and then they show that z_k+1<z_k+2
But how does the root come in the inequality?
@midnight haven Has your question been resolved?
from the first sentence
Closed by @uneven glen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, this problem is from a topology book, and while I've somewhat gotten to a solution, I'm not sure it's right, so I'd like to get it checked:
Show that there exists no f:R->Q such that f is continuous and non-constant.
Essentially, my idea was to show that if this were true, there would be some irrational value contained in the image of f(which is Q, hence it cannot happen)
And to do that:
I assumed the existence of such an f and considered a generic open set A in Q, from which I considered a point x
Since A is open and f is continuous, f-(A) is open in R and therefore exists some open ball of radius δ>0 for f(x)
However, the image of all those points is also in A⊆Q, so I returned to the classical definition of continuity in R:
x∈(a-δ,a+δ)->f(x)∈(f(a)-ε,f(a)+ε) for some a, and some ε,δ>0, hence, I considered a succession of points {xn} contained in the open ball within the preimage I considered
All points in that succession must also be in A, and since f is continuous, they must satisfy that condition
Considering points from {xn} I then said that they form some interval (a-δ,a+δ) for some δ>0(which can't happen if f is constant)
From there, since a-δ and a+δ are reals, there exists some irrational value between them for any delta chosen, which would also be in A, which was chosen to be contained in Q
Hence, absurd and f does not exist
(does it look good?)
are you sure about this?
all points of {xn} could be contained in that interval, but they could be all equal to a
That's the thing I'm doubting the most
i actually didnt fully grasp your argument
have you proved the intermediate value theorem already btw?
Wouldn't it be constant then?
not necessarily
Someone mentioned that before, if you mean the intermediate value theorem for R, then yes
it could have the same value on all points of xn, but a different value somewhere else
If you mean some generalization to connected spaces they mentioned, then no
not mean value
mean value is for derivatives
The one that states that if there exist values greater and lower than 0 for a continuous function over R there exists a root in the interval?
yeah, this one is good
see if you can apply it
I cannot assure the existence of sone value greater and lower than 0
you can slightly modify your function though
Fairly sure, and even then, don't see how it'd help me, 0 is still rational
like shift it up and down
Which was the composition that shifted functions upwards? I'm thinking (x-a) but fairly sure it's a translation
And still don't really see how it'd work out if I'm being honest
Let's start from scratch
The only thing I've got to work with is that it's continuous and goes from R to Q
so you somehow figured out the proof would be by contradiction
Most of these kind of statements are proved that way, really
So assume there is a function f:R->Q such that f is continuous and non-constant.
what does it mean to be non-constant?
Can you give me a statement that defines it?
That there exists some a,b such that f(a)≠f(b)
okay, perfect
and this will be our assumption
notice that in your proof you actually never used this, you just took a random open set in Q
that's probably the main reason why it didnt lead anywhere
anyway, we now have a continous function and 2 points on its graph which are unequal (in y-coords)
and we need to find some point with irrational y-value
where on the gaph do you think it would be reasonable to search for it?
think in terms of a and b
it can be general
What do you mean by “where in the graph“?
say that these are our points
and we have some continous function passing through them
what would be the irrational value in range of the function?
Oh, well, within [f(a),f(b)]
yeah
and this already hella looks like the theorem above
we are finding certain value between 2 bounds
so we have some irrational value there, say sqrt(2) for now
how do we guarantee in this specific example that sqrt(2) is indeed in the range
We still cannot assure anything if the function crosses 0
Yeah, but we can modify the function
if f(b)>✓2 and f(a) is lower?
in our specific example, say f(b) = 2 and f(a) = 1
we can generalize later
now I want you to use the theorem above to prove that sqrt(2) is somewhere in the image
Oh, so we assume some irrational value c , compose the function with a traslation of the graph c units downwards
Yeah, that's the idea in the right direction!
And show that since f(a) is either higher or lower than c and so is f(b), f reaches c?
yep, that's the idea
But they can both be above or both be below, right?
Actually, nvm, we can choose c so that doesn't happen
yep
as you said here
Yeah, alright, guess that makes sense
Only thing now
Is that I don't remember which composition mapped the plane upwards 💀
Let's assume (without loss of generality) that f(a) < c < f(b)
how do you guarantee that g(a) < 0 < g(b)
where g is some newly defined function
Subtracting c?
there is only one step to do here
perfect
you'll be applying the theorem on f(a) - c and f(b) - c basically
Can't this also be used to prove that if a real function is continuous on an interval [a,b] it reaches all the intermediate values between its maximum and minimum?
(which is quite the useful proposition, really)
intermediate values... hmm.... that could be the "Intermediate value theorem" lol
but yeah, its a pretty useful proposition
Actually, guess that makes sense 💀
i was actually quite surprised when you came up with that root thing
intermediate value theorem is a simple corollary of that
Which root thing?
that theorem
it's often only used to prove the IVT and after that IVT is the main tool
proving that theorem and stopping there is like stopping 10 meters before the finish line
Well, that tends to happen to me
I sometimes come up with some really strange ideas I later don't know how I thought of
And sometimes can't see the most obvious implications of things
That sometimes happens to all of us ig
Well, regardless, thanks for your help, it ended up being an easier problem than I was making it out to be
Didn't even need to use topology, which is somewhat weird, but oh well
.close
Closed by @west bluff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
topology and analysis are strongly related
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My brain hurts just by looking at it can someone help solving it😭
do you know FOIL?
yes
roots are basically also powers
ohh yea so do I rewrite all the roots into powers after i did the foil?
yea
makes sense give me some minutes i’ll say if i did it
@rough forge ok i got:
(a^3)^1/2 * (a^2) ^1/2 +(a^3)^1/2 * -(a^5)^1/4 +a^1/6 * (a^2)^1/2+ a^1/6 * (a^5) ^1/4
can I do something with those that have the same power?
I am a bit confused
is it wrong?
wait no
anti-algebraist 𝔸dωn𝓲²s
where did I mess up
How did you get (a^2) ^1/2 and -(a^5)^1/4
anti-algebraist 𝔸dωn𝓲²s
it comes in as a^4
im confused
you have the 4-th root not square root
anti-algebraist 𝔸dωn𝓲²s
ohhh
I forgot about that one
yea thats where I messed up
ok so after we did the foil coorectly and wrote it to all powers what’s next
You'd simply the powers
anti-algebraist 𝔸dωn𝓲²s
so at the left* starting from (a^3)^1/2= a^3*1/2 ?
yea
and then since the terms are multiplied with the same base you can add the powers
yea so now just add the powers where you multiply
oh yea
long task
I hope it wont be in the test
it probably will be
anyways thanks for the help!
.close
Closed by @oblique rune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@brave sluice Has your question been resolved?
okay we know that everything is G-sets already, so i think this question is only about defining an isomorphism
that's what we needed 14(a) for; not for an isomorphism, but to know that the disjoint union of left cosets is a G-set
still not sure what 14(b) is for
@brave sluice Has your question been resolved?
@brave sluice Has your question been resolved?
@brave sluice Has your question been resolved?
@brave sluice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i integrate this
Is that 2+sint
multiply by conjugate
okay let me try thanks
Now just consider tant/2 = z
whats that
is my handwriting that bad
If you have a+b then the conjugate is a-b
it was a long ques I don't really write it when i practice
what is it actually
ohh ok
What is the original question?
1/1+sinxcosx can be integrated
By writing 1 = sin²x+cos²x and considering the sub tanx = z
Closed by @bright kindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct
what did you do in the second step?
Closed by @craggy crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
uh
but by doing this i am getting tan²x in numerator
it will be harder to integrate ths
Solve definite and indefinite integrals (antiderivatives) using this free online calculator. Step-by-step solution and graphs included!
try this its pretty good
@bright kindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I was here yesterday and a user showed me that I can reindex the sequence $(1 - \frac{1}{n+1})^n$ (which converges to 1/e) like this $(1 - \frac{1}{n+1})^{n+1-1}$ now let m = n+1: $(1 - \frac{1}{m})^{m-1} = \frac{(1-\frac{1}{m})^m}{1 - \frac{1}{m}}$ to show that $(1 - \frac{1}{m})^m$ converges to 1/e (since the denominator converges to 1)
p1za
now I was trying to do the same to prove that $(1 - \frac{1}{n+2})^{n}$ converges to 1/e aswell but Im not sure how i can apply the index shift here
p1za
m = n+1 --> (1 - 1 / (m+1))^(m-1)
can I say $(1 - \frac{1}{n+2})^n = (1 - \frac{1}{n+2})^{(n+2) \cdot \frac{n}{n+2}}$ and since $\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \frac{n}{n+2} = 1$ we have a sequence that is shifted by 2 so it also converges to 1/e?
p1za
it's the same thing as before
u think the way i described is also ok?=
I think so, to rewrite it as the other example you showed it would look like:
Let ( m = n+2 )
[ \implies \left( 1 - \frac 1m \right)^{m-2} ]
[ \implies \frac{ \left( 1 - \frac 1m \right)^m }{ \left( 1 - \frac 1m \right)^2 } ]
shsgd
hope that helps
yep definitely does thanks
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @spark rock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i bet u can't solve this
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Just ask if you have a question
Find the first and second differences.
so i am kinda sure that i am gonna burn this world down
for all this time i thought it was geometric
but turns out its gay
it could be anything
quadratic, cubic, quartic
Yeah it's not geometric but you'll realize the second differences have a pattern
it could be anything, which is why these questions are not good questions. constant n-th differences mean an nth degree polynomial
bruh we can't , we need atleats 3 2nd diffrences
infact there are a bunch of polynomials that will interpolate this. there is no real answer for this stuff
i hate this shi
so when people give us 3,6,9,12 how do we know that it won't change after it and how do we know that the formula is 3n
my life hurts by feeling my mind explode
i though since there are bunch of polynomials that will interpolate this thus its an exponential
but turns out it still remains gay
do my questions have answer or maths just hates me
(-1/24)x³ + (1/8)x² + (17/3)x − 1
bro i dont think u are understanding the problem
what why
for cubic there was only 1 difference
thus u can can't confirm that the sequence goes like this
thats the issue , how do we know the answer to a sequence
if its not about that , that should mean its indefenite meaning infinte answers
it's a valid guess, maybe you're right and that's what it says in the answer
my guess is different
luck in maths is a bit weird
the cubic is natural to u , quadratic might be natural to me so does that mean answer of it is different relative to the person solving?
everything is getting complex
that should also mean that an infinite series should have 1 answer?
i don't wanna be that guy
but maths is rigged
convergent and divergent shouldn't exist because of this
I dunno. I got 25 T-T
mine is 25.25
:c if you're considering -0.5 = 2 x (-0.25) so the next should be -1
but by geometric/exponential sequence
ok i don't get it
but ow what froggie is doing is -0.5 = -0.25 - 0.25 so next is -0.75? :p
yeah i see
but i am thinking 6-0.25x2^(n-1)
this is a geometric for first difference
it could be 0.25 0.5 1/sqrt2 btw
anyway i think it's a cubic
just i like it, like you said
yeah so me and my friend got alot of answers for it, cubic,quadratic,quartic,geometric
but can you write them as one expression
as they become more complicated they become less likely to be what was meant
and cubic is short
25 should work ✅
in part b they asked
Yes, I'm saying we'd be safer to assume whichever general "a_n" gives 25 for the next place
so thats why i wanted to detroy earth
Can you send a screen shot of the question? Or a pic?
in the end it was the friends we made along the way
can't , it came in a exam today they still have'nt given the exam paper
Did you write $a_n = 6n - 2^{n-3} - 1$ ?
Arya
no
;-;
i am pretty sure in exam i wrote the worng answer for part a
but i think my part b was correct = 25
@odd mason Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $\mathbb{L}{1}: X = \lambda(0,1,1) + (1,-3,0)$ and
$\mathbb{L}{2}: X = \mu(-1,-2,0) + (4,4,1)$.
Let $\Pi$ be the plane containing $\mathbb{L}{1}$ and $\mathbb{L}{2}$.
Find a line $\mathbb{L}{3}$ such that
[
\mathbb{L}{3} \perp \Pi,
\quad \mathbb{L}{3} \cap \mathbb{L}{1} \neq \varnothing,
\quad \text{and} \quad
\mathbb{L}{3} \cap \mathbb{L}{2} \neq \varnothing.
]
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
theres a special vector product that could really help here
,w (0,1,1)x(-1,-2,0)
hopefully L1 ∩ L2 is non empty
if we find a point of intersection we use it for L3 and we are done
it is expected given that the problem sttates theres a plane made by L1 and L2
wdym
if the two lines dont intersect (and we know they arent parallel) they will not have a plane passing through them
they will be skew
,w a(0,1,1) + (1,-3,0) = b(-1,-2,0) + (4,4,1)
you can also set up a system like a(0)+1=b(-1)+4, a(1)+(-3)=b(-2)+4
if they are parallel then what happens with the direction of L1 and L2? they are orthogonal? or they have same direction
the third equation should follow
there will be a plane that passes through the lines, but their intersection will be empty
true
yeah but direction of L1 is (0,1,1) is not parallel to (-1,-2,0) forrunately
otherwise this exercise will be hars
so, by the statement of the problem, we should expect the two lines to intersect
and they do
which can be shown by solving the system of equations
very nice observation sir
it would be impossible; you cannot intersect both parallel lines and be orthogonal to them unless l1 = l2
@stoic imp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ive been trying to study for a uni exam and i just dont understand what functions are and how to do them. the source they have provided makes no sense and i still dont understand some practise questions when put through chat gpt.
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
please never use chatgpt for maths questions
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
so you need to find $\dv{y}{x}$?
Bonk
Bonk
i dont understand :(
which part?
what youre asking me
have you done derivatives?
i am not very good with termanology
this is all new to me
i havent done math since secondary and this is my first semerster at uni
ok...
thats a big jump
have oyu ever seen $f'(x)=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$?
Bonk
i dont think so
so far ive done graph theory, calculating deltas, finding gradients of straight lines and boolean expressions
which i understnad
i suggest you study up on derivatives then
have you had limits?
i could explain them to you but it might take some time
sorry im just stressed rn and i feel bad having to come here and ask for help
if you want to it would help i think
okay so, this is calculus
what do you know about calculus so far
calculus includes, limits, derivaties, integrals
can you give examples
uhm
i dont thinkk ive learnt any of that
but rn im only doing derivaties
it seems
i havent seen anything like that in my resource
consider this function
this is a discontinuous function
as you can see by the "jump" at x=2
yes?
@craggy torrent
can i ping you btw?
yes thats fine
that makes sense yes
a limit is approaching it slowly from one side
you have a left limit
and a right limit
which approach the point from the left and right respectively
$\lim_{x\to 2^-}f(x)$ is the left limit and $\lim_{x\to 2^+}f(x)$ is the right limit
are those the black dots
Bonk
i will tell you about the dots later
okay
ye i see that
the - is from the left, the + is from the right
now, we define $\lim_{x\to x_0}f(x)$ to be the limit at $x_0$
Bonk
and this exists only if the left and right limit exist and are equal
so at this, lets look at $\lim_{x\to 0}f(x)$
Bonk
indeed it is
because approaching it from the left is 5
and approaching it from the right is 5
now, those dots are where the function is or isnt
if you look at point a, you see a white dot
yeas
and its at x=-2
okay yea
that means that f(-2) does not exist
because there is a "hole"
but, lets take the limit
what is the left-sided limit?
remember, we approach it, but never actually reach it
and now what about the right-hand side limit?
yeah it can be any number
is ther one for right since its disconnected
we are looking at point a
point a has a right-sided limit
(yes, its as easy as you think just like the left-sided limit)
so, whaddya think
whats the difference between right and left
are they always the same number?
i know the - and +
3.5 again?
indeed
and now, the left and right sided limits are equal
and are 3.5
thus
$\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=\lim_{x\to a^-}f(x)=\lim_{x\to a^+}f(x)=3.5$
Bonk
this seems a bit strange at first right? because the value at a doesnt actually exist
beacuse of the hole
yes?
sorry its just i dont think im doing these
theres nothing about limits
that is a whole new thing to me
yea
so the limit exists
because if we approach it slowly from either side, they agree
but if we actually look the function at that point
it doesnt exist
yes that makes sense
and the right?
yup
ye
so what can we say about the limit as x approaches b?
im not sure what you mean
Bonk
x-6.5 x+9?
what?
idk 😭
like
yea
i see what youre talking about
uhm
the - side is 6.5
igjht
then the + side is 9
?
wait
i
sorr
y
xd
remember that the limit exists only if the left and right limit exist and are equal
are they equal?
no
Bonk
yea tha makes sense
so, now what is the value at f(b)?
it wont have one?
so 9?
indeed
how come
the white means theres nothing there
but the black means an end or soething>?
alsos orry for my typign
my keyboard is displaced
and its only like that because its not equal?
yes
it couldve also been that the lower one was black
then f(b)=6.5
but the important part here is that the limit does not exist
now, lets look at c
its a gap there
and the black dot means the opposite?
black dot means it is there
white dot means it is not there
thats just how we define it
now, lets look at c
whats $\lim_{x\to c}f(x)$ and $f(c)$?
Bonk
thats correct
does the black dot below c come into play here at all
the limit at a point does not necessarily have to equal the function value at that point
thats f(c)
f(x) = 5 f(c) = 2
\begin{align*}\lim_{x\to c}f(x)&=5\f(c)=2\end{align*}
Bonk
dont forget to write the limit
this is how you would write it down during a test or smth
i see
do you kinda understand what a limit means now?
i know its a bit small but bear with me
its fine
what is $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x)$?
idk
Bonk
what do you think it is
this graph is 1/x btw
as x gets bigger and bigger
what does f(x) approach?
not quite
x approaches infinity
but what does f(x) approach
like, fill in 1/x with increasingly bigger numbers x
1/10, 1/100, 1/1000, 1/10000, etc
,calc 1/10
Result:
0.1
,calc 1/100
Result:
0.01
,calc 1/100000
Result:
1e-5
what does this sequence approach?
a repeated number of zeros with a 1 at the end
it approaches 0
ye
