#help-39
1 messages · Page 194 of 1
I keep confusing dft and dtft, when we sweep the frequencies in dtft, are we not using Riemann sums rather than integrals for area? Wont this area be off from the actual integral area? And isn’t the effect of this meaning our area isn’t quite reliable for large T
yes our area isn't reliable because of this effect of multiple copies of the frequency spectrum overlapping with each other
And if T is large, our area could represent the area beneath another curve
Or is that just nyquist taking over there
the effect that you're describing where the Riemann sum doesn't approximate the integral well is exactly aliasing from frequencies above the nyquist rate
I don't know how to intuitively explain why, but that's how it is
so as T goes to 0 we just get back out Fourier transform?
yup
then the width of your frequency range gets infinitely large
so you can resolve higher and higher frequencies
And the aliased copies are so far away they’re irrelevant
yeah
I guess that makes sense
alright that’s all I can think of at the moment thank you for your help!
Much appreciated you beat every YouTube video and website I could find
you're welcome!
I'm guessing this is related to Poisson summation
so look into that if you're curious
Alright I’ll check it out thanks!
im gonna go try and replicate my learning on a whiteboard now, see you later thanks
.close
Closed by @rose sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have parts A, B, C done, but I do not quite understand part d
@proud kiln Has your question been resolved?
A "non-zero quadratic form" refers to a quadratic expression where the coefficient of the squared term (the "a" value) is not zero
So just a quadratic right?
I would assume
And google says A "finite dimensional inner product space" is a vector space where every vector can be represented by a finite number of components
Well, I decided to turn them into sums
But I don't know how vectors have anything to do with this
Do you know how to do all the LaTeX stuff?
This is pretty bad
And the bottom is where I start
The quadratic form I defined using Sylvester's Law of Inertia
And the norm squared part I worked through on the bottom right, so I am then just stuck with these two sums divided
And I've been thinking
It may have a directional dependence
Bro this is next level I'm sorry
Lol you're all good
I thought this was just multivariable limits
Ah my course is weird
At my uni they call it Honors Calculus, and it's essentially real analysis, Calculus 3, and Linear Algebra smushed into a year long course
We rarely have nice computational questions like those earlier limit ones lmao
The only thing I know is that if x tends to 0, the square of the modulus will always tend to 0+ due to the nature of the modulus
So it should be infinity unless the top part tends to 0
Thats what I was thinking
I will look it up tomorrow
I was thinking about maybe something as simple as a unit vector
Taking the form of as Im sure you know, x/|x|
Yes I know that
And my thought was that since my lamba terms can be positive, negative, or zero (Sylvester's Law of Inertia), my final answer would depend on how the x term aligns with the eigenvalues
So essentially, I could have tons of different terms
So in general, I think it would not exist
I'm sorry I didn't even know you could do limits with vectors
I dont either
I hope someone else helps you
Im just guessing at this point lmao
Hahahaha me too
Thanks for the thought though!
No problem, good luck!
Closed by @proud kiln
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm wanting to understand the Z-Transform and its relationship to the DTFT. From my understanding it is a generalized version of the DTFT that is just a lot more useful. It's also like a discrete laplace transform (comes from it being generalized fourier) and I need to learn about it, where it comes from, what it means, and how to use it. Can anyone walk me through it? Thank you so much
@last moth Sorry for bugging you again, if you're available I'd appreciate it if not its fine
Yes a z-transform is a discrete-time Laplace transform.
The Laplace transform differs from a Fourier transform in that it can analyze signals which grow exponentially over time
Yes
The alpha corresponds to a growth/decay and the beta corresponds to a frequency of oscillation
I get that, where the alpha multiplies everything by an exponential term
right
Yup, I'm familiar with laplace transforms, how does Z do the same thing as S?
You can rewrite z^-n as e^(-(log z) n), maybe that makes it more obvious?
here, n is your time variable
In comparison to the Laplace transform where you have e^(-s t), where t is your time variable
where is log z coming from?
ohh
so the z does the same thing as the s in a Laplace transform
you can write z in polar form as r e^(i theta)
then r determines the growth/decay and theta determines the frequency of oscillation
why not just use a complex exponential like we have been before?
it's the same thing
you can write it as a complex exponential if you want
this notation seems cleaner though
so is its derivation similar to how you showed me the DTFT is derived from the CTFT?
either way you can convert between the two notations using an exp/log, so it's good to understand how both work, as both forms come up a lot and are useful in different circumstances (polar vs rectangular form of a complex number)
you pretty much just replace the integral with a sum, yeah
so if I'm following correctly its
$$\int^{\infty}_0{f(t)e^{-(\alpha+i \beta)t}}dt$$
Nathan
as the laplace
yeah
change that to a sum over values of t instead
[\sum_{t=0}^\infty f(t)e^{-(\alpha+i\beta)t}]
synaptERIC_integration
btw, just like how the laplace transform reduces to the fourier transform when Re s = 0, the z-transform reduces to the discrete-time Fourier transform when z is on the unit circle
so they just kind of expanded notation and let z be the complex exponential rather than just letting s be a complex variable in the exponent
yeah
yeah ive seen that, its really neat
Okay so basically
so i just let that whole complex exponential be z and thats it?
or well z^-t
what about it being a polar plane?
why is it different than the s plane?
because of the complex exponential
wait let me guess its because we defined the plane as the entire
yeah
dang
that is not as bad as I thought
you can convert between the rectangular plane vs the polar plane by using exp/log
could you show me an example?
sure
thank you
s = 1 + 2i corresponds to z = e^(1 + 2i) = e * e^(2i)
the further right you go in the s plane, the further outwards you go in the z plane
the further up you go in the s plane, the further counter-clockwise you go in the z plane
right
okay so going to the right aka just sliding along the real axis in the s plane corresponds to a stronger exponential term in the z plane right
stronger real exponential
yes
and that makes it go out why?
further right in s = more magnitude in z
bigger magnitude number
but then you would pass the unit circle if you go to like infinity, yet that is still stable in the s plane no?
what do you mean?
like the right side of the s plane is stable
yes
poles being there are fine
the right side of the s-plane corresponds to outside the unit circle in the z-plane
wait
isnt that unstable
i think i got it backwards
left hand side of s plane is stable
negative exponents
okay and so when the real component of s is greater, the magnitude is greater?
yes
and what value is it when its the unit circle?
1?
or 0
wouldnt it have to be zero
which is why this makes sense
yeah it's just a different way of looking at things (polar vs rectangular)
but same concepts
so is there any particular reason we decided to define it as the entire complex exponential
cause we didnt do that for dtft
like you mean why we write z^(-n) instead of e^(-sn)?
I don't think these approaches were historically as unified as they are now, the z-transform in particular has many names, such as a "generating function" in combinatorics or a "probability generating function" in probability or a "Laurent series" in complex analysis
it is mathematically convenient to work with sums of this form, due to their resemblance with power series from calculus
mhm okay
as for why the laplace transform uses an exponential
I think it's weird to think about a complex number raised to a fractional power
you start getting into questions of branch cuts and so on
like what is i^(1/2)?
no clue
any square root has two possibilities right
right
with real numbers, we just pick the positive one
with complex numbers.. seems like you have two equally valid options
it's just mathematically more convenient to work with exponentials generally
when dealing with complex numbers and continuous exponents
with the z-transform, the exponent is always an integer because we are working in discrete time, so it's perhaps mathematically more convenient to think of it this way in terms of z^(-n)
i see
there's a straightforward relation between the z-transform and Laplace transform anyways with z = e^(sT) so it's trivial to convert between the polar vs rectangular representations
alright hope this helped
it very very much did thank you
If you have any free time some other time, could you explain to me what it is about poles that gives you the system function, not quite sure what its called, but I saw connections to the characteristic equation in the laplace transform being the coordinates of the poles in the complex plane, I image you have some other stuff to do right now, but maybe some other time?
you can ask in #odes-and-pdes I'm sure there are people there that can help you
okay thank you 👍
you're welcome
I really appreciate your help you just helped me skip past like 5 weeks of doom forum scrolling

Closed by @rose sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this q 😔
oh and if possible, could somebody explain the answer to this question as well?
Newton's second law ?
Use the formula, s = ut + 1/2 gt² here u = 0
distance traveled when accelerating is proportional to the square of the time
If ur referring to C. its not right 🙁
Rate of change of momentum
F = dp/dt
u sure man?
nah its b
oh
The solution set is described by a blood type
OHH
Newton's second law states that
im also struggling here with maths
is it cuz F=ma=mv/t
but im alr alone
Opened a channel?
open another help
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
yh better
For easy understanding yes
wait but why would it be rate of change in momentum and not just change in momentum
is it becasue of the t
mv/t
Yes this represents change in momentum w.r.t time
okay
but why is C wrong?
oh wait nvm i ujndertsnad
that would be F=a/m
right?
Yeah
yay
F = ma/m
thank you so much for the help
Wlcm !
@wraith badger Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wraith badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
@stoic imp Has your question been resolved?
,w Nullspace[{{-1,1,0,0},{4,0,1,1}}]
@stoic imp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$4x^2 -9-2(2x-3)$ i am stuck on factorizing this
Simon James B
notice that 4x^2 - 9 = (2x-3)(2x+3)
I do not see how we got 2x+3
Yes we have 2x-3 but how did we manipulate the other terms to get 2x+3
difference of squares
$a^2 - b^2 = (a + b)(a - b)$
asm
Simon James B
like this?
asm
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
What is next bec this is is not final answer
Well
wdym?
$(2x - 3)(2x + 3 - 2)$
asm
I suppose
Hold on
Yes i got it
guyz will u help in basics of parabola?
Ok yea it is true
Open a help channel, this is occupied
.close
Closed by @rancid steppe
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me solve this integral?
i have a feeling it's a trig sub or something
because of the 1-x^2 at the bottom but idk how to get rid of the -x
don't solve it please
just.. point me in the right direction
u = x+1?
wait no its not nvm
i don't see what the u sub would be
yeah sorry i read the top as 2x+1 :D
i did think about doing u sub and then splitting the x+1 into x + 1/2 + 1/2
but it doesn't work
u can try but i didn't get anywhere
yeah because when u split, u get u's and x's
I think you can use trigonometric substutuion
but how
which
i dont see it ;-;
wait let me try it first
,wolf tan^2 x - sec x
reshape the denominator into vertex form
when i see a 1-x^2 in a square root, i think about trig sub but i don't see how to work it because there's a -x
oh complete the square?
yes
$1 - x - x^2 = \frac54 - (x + \frac12)^2$
hiidostuff
but it's -x^2 - x + 1
And we can go from there
AH
oh rightt
neat
Then just factor the 5/4 out
And trig sub the x + 1/2
I think let it equal sin(x)
So we have $\int \frac{x+1}{\sqrt{1-x-x^2}} \dd x = \int \frac{x+1}{\sqrt{\frac54 - (x + \frac12)^2}} , \dd x = \frac{\sqrt{5}}{2} \int \frac{x+1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac45(x + \frac12)^2}} , \dd x$
.close
Closed by @boreal raptor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ty
Np
hiidostuff
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain how this works
Why do we set u to that
What happens to 18y^2 -4y +3
Wait I see it
.close
Closed by @craggy crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help a boyo out
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
@bright gate Has your question been resolved?
pls someone save meh
I think you should try greens theorem for the first one
And the second one is by definition, you can find
For the third one, you have normal vector as k that means your plane is the XY plane, so you can write dS as dxdy
Got the answer?
Can you show what you did
Yeah so apply the greens theorem...
Or if you don't want to do that
Break the path into two different sections
First when it goes from 0,0 to 1,1 on y = x
Then from 1,1 to 0,0 on y = x^4
Find the work done for them individually and then add
You have your F and dr
dr = <dx,dy>
Now if you do F•dr you will get xdx + (x^2 + y)dy
Then for the first path, you have x = y => dx = dy
Now it's easily solvable with x from 0 to 1
Similarily do for the the second path
would i do the sum of two integrals one with respect to x and one with respect to y/
Ummmm, can you explain....
;-;
See for the first path
It now becomes
Integration from 0 to 1 of (xdx + (x^2 + x)dx)
And now there shouldn't be any problem in integrating as all terms are in x
;-;
Yeah you can do this too
But don't forget to rewrite x^2 as y^2 because you're integrating with respect to y in the second integral
For the first path from 0,0 to 1,1 on y = x
Work = $\int_{0}^{1} xdx + (x^{2} + y)dy =^{x = y, dx = dy} \int_{0}^{1} xdx + (x^{2} + x)dx = \int_{0}^{1} (2x + x^2)dx$
@leaden marsh
For the 'first path' now do similarly for the path from 1,1 to 0,0 on y = x^4
This is for the first path
For the second path from 1,1 to 0,0 on y = $x^4 \$
Work = $\int_{1}^{0}xdx + (x^{2} + y)dy =^{y = x^{4}, dy = 4x^{3}dx} \int_{1}^{0} xdx + (x^2 + x^{4})4x^{3}dx $
Now add both the works
I think you should get -1/3
@leaden marsh
@bright gate Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bright gate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys i have a question
dividing by 2 make it more clearer that you can use a)
but to me its good
alright thanks
i have one more if u dont mind
sure
i can't tell
alr thank you for your time
@stiff mauve Has your question been resolved?
@stiff mauve Has your question been resolved?
@stiff mauve Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @stiff mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk how to solve this
free numbers? but this chapter hasn't covered it yet.. can someone explain plz?
matrix theory. btw.. sry i thought my textbook had it but no they dont in this chapter. idk why they hvae this question in this section.
do you know how matrix multiplication is defined?
yea but im not doing matrix multiplication
this is elementary operattions to solve
sry this is a bad picture
here this is the question i need to solve
idk how to make latex for that
for the matrix
i was in another help but i closed it bc i thouhg it was gona be in my textbooksection but its not
they told me to use free variables
Yes
how do i do that then
plz jiust help me solve it so i can apply it to the next question
So
do i just make x3 = 1?
No need
Yes
and x2 = -2 -5x3?
Indeed
ok but how do u solve for x3 then
You don't
Can you show it ?
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
This is just one solution among infinity solution
this is all they give you
that should have instructions
pretty crazy
like "solve this" or "do this"
Why ?
and the next one is basically the same as this
well how did they get that as answer
You have it
but how do you get (5, 3, -1)
Its not correct
There are infinite answers
so how do i produce one
and why are there infinite answers
we learned abt infinite answers in this section actually
And after replace value of x2 and x3 in this to get x1 value
well , since x2 = -2 -5x3
And you have the triple
there is no value though
I said take x3 = 2
Or x3 = 1
they chose -1
Thats why its infinite
ok that's weird they didn't cover it in this section
Thats why its stupid to write it as unique answer
that you let x3 in R
can i not solve it as a system of eq.?
it's weird bc
like it's aasking me to verify the values i got..
in q. 17
whatever
.close
Closed by @charred dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
write 512 as a power of two different bases each base less than 512: so i got an answer but it seems too simple. I got 2^9 and 4^4.5
,calc 2^9
Result:
512
,calc 4^4.5
Result:
512
4.5 
is there anything else to it
$e^{\ln 512}$
SWR
nope
alr thanks, it seemed too simple for 4 marks so... thanks anyways
.close
Closed by @pastel haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
-49 = p^2
so I took the square root of this and I'm wondering whether to put the +- sign or just put 7. I have had a similar conversation before and moral of the story a square root symbol calls for the positive value. but this is a negative value so im confused
There’s 2 solutions to this equation
yeah, so do I put the +- sign?
p = 7i and -7i both solve the equation
but then again the square root symbol
The point of the +- sign is to say there are multiple solutions
And to contract this statement so it’s quicker to write
Sqrt symbol over a negative number ?
uhh im not sure
$\pm\sqrt{-49}$
frosst
What
im so confused
To me the problem is using the sqrt symbol
and keeping the 49?
@warm current what’s wrong
or should i go ± 7
4b 
I just liked that you omitted i
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
sorry
it ok
Oh I was trying to show that you can have the +- outside a square root
Without evaluating the square root first

Is your question -49 = p² or is it 49 = p²
And what is the instruction
²³⁴
I have a special keyboard on my phone that lets me do it
solve the variable in each of the following (there were other questions hence the word following)
Well then do you understand that there are 2 solutions?
7 and -7 right?
what i
Imaginary number
uhh i dont understand what that means
yeah i understand that now
cuz two negatives make a positive ovb
If you have not learned about imaginary numbers then there would be no solutions
is there a way you could give a small description for my curiosity
It is exactly what we want from this i
It has the property that when you square it it’s negative
i² = -1
From this you can do a lot of crazy stuff
So if we allow this use of i, then (7i)² = 7² * i² = 49 * -1 = -49
No
i is defined by this
or is i^2 always -1
Always
If $n=0$, then $n^2=0$, if $n>0$, then $n^2=n\times n>0$. If $n<0$, then $n^2=n\times n=(-|n|)\times(-|n|)=|n|\times|n|>0$.\
\
In any case, $n^2\ge 0$. So, the square of no number can be negative. We therefore define some "imaginary number" whose square would be negative. That is, we define the value $i$ such that $i^2=-1$
SWR
i see, so just i is imaginary
It’s called the imaginary unit
wow thats so cool
Cos it’s like the number 1
1 is 1 lot of “real” numbers and i is 1 lot of “imaginary” numbers
2i is 2 lots of imaginary numbers
Or 2 lots of the imaginary unit
As in 2 * i
Then i suppose there are no solutions
do you want me to give u the full question
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
It’s not solvable then
ok
Its e)
,rotate
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
ok
Ignore the last step
bruh i hope I didnt mess up otherwise this would be for nothing
here
add 52 to both sides of -3=p²-52
thats insane 😭
how did I mess that up
mb guys, atleast I learned about i. it always confused me. thanks
.close
Closed by @pastel haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yup. Always fun to learn stuff
maybe one day you will learn why $i^i=e^{-\pi/2}$
SWR
bruh thats too much
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
If you read what I wrote, you would know my status
😭
1
I don’t know where to begin
Do you know what an arithmetic sequence is?
,w arithmetic sequence
So something like, 5,6,7,8, would be an arithmetic sequence
you know what r is
🤨
And so would be 9,5,1,-3,-7
Right here
you also know what a_21 is
What is the _
subscript
key word "didn’t"
like ^ but for below
Oh, mb
Never really had to use it. What is it for?
its hard to format math in plain text
subscript, he already told you
so people use ^ for exponents and such and _ for subscripts
$a_{21}$
knief
That’s what it is named. I don’t know what function it serves.
sorry
That's what @jolly parrot is for :)
to denote which term in the sequence it is
Yeah
im guessing you know the arithmetic sequence formula
$a_n=a_1+k(n-1)$
CrEpasPmkinPie
have you seen the general formula for it?
Yeah
$a_n=a_k+d(n-k)$
CrEpasPmkinPie
Yes
geometric series
yes
some people i know use a_n for both but i think that's weird
so you know a_1 = g_1
find the formula for a_1
like this
Okay
keep in mind you also know a_21 = 72
show me
oh you solved it?
thats not the method I thought you would use so im going to do it out myself to see if the answers match
I ended up actually using that same method 😅 but I somehow got a different answer
,rccw
let me find where we went different
Oh, lol
had to be positive yeah
It's laright
As long as I understand it
it should bees fines
do it from there to see if you get a different answer
@small cape Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @small cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi!
i need to solve this:
prove that, if (x,y) are integers, and (x^2+y^2+1)/xy is also an integer, (x^2+y^2+1)/xy =3
here i proved that the thingy can't be lesser than 3 we get xy<1
which is not possible
if its greater we get 4xy<4xy
also not possible
is that enough to prove it?
Why is xy < 1 not possible
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
i just said i made a mistake w that case
i think we'll get the same inequality in both cases
wait nvm found another solution, thanks!
.close
Closed by @mellow idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does one do this integral
polynomial
The book said this is an expansion-type problem
Idk if that’s messing me up
expand the whole square
is that it
yes
am I overcomplicating this that hard
since after that you will just have powers of x you will have to deal with
i thought youre tripping over the 2^x
lol
you tell me
Closed by @radiant whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @silent bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain me how does it works?
If you don't like the geometric approach, using Euler's formula is also a neat, algebraic alternative
what does Cos(b · Cos(a -Sin(b · Sin(a
?
Closed by @tribal shale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
im having trouble setting up double integrals
so far i know that the points of intersections are (0,0) and (2,4)
and i can choose either the x values to represent a bound or the y value
if i choose x=0 and x=2 for one integral
then the bounds for my second integral would be y=x^2 and y=2x
the video im watching tells me that i need to choose the lower curve as my lower bound and the upper curve for the upper bound
how do i choose the upper and lower bound
figure out which one is bigger on your interval
if you get it wrong it'll just be negative
well, which one is larger at x=3? x² or 2x?
x^2 is larger
ok so that's your upper bound
lmao
do you mean at x=1? inbetween the interval
I thought it was my channel
oh LOL hi hi
x=3 is not between the area of the curve
when i choose x=1 then 2x would be the upper bound
help
x^2 is my lower bound right?
elp
@split badger Has your question been resolved?
oh. yeah, whoops
I misread it
again, if you get it wrong you'll get a negative number
so it's pretty easy to identify
why are you reacting to the bot my question wasnt answered...
does it always have to be the lower bound? im confused on how that works
and when if i chose the y variables instead, like (0,4) would i then choose x^2 to be the upper bound instead?
@split badger Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @split badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have about 40 numbers, lowest = 600 and highest 890. I need to do a table with a range of 20 between
So i got i need to do 14,5 rows
I'm gonna do 15 rows
how do i know from which number do i start?
Canonically, we start in an ascending order: 600-620, 620-640, so on and so forth
Someone said that ur allowed to go above and below the minmumim and maximum number
incorrect!
ur supposed to do 600-619
Yes you may go above or below the max. or min of your data, but the idea is counterproductive as it effects how you deal with the data.
After you're done organising the data in a continuous distribution table, you'll be interested in class marks and herein, the addition of extras would err your boundary class marks
Exactly, as stated above, a class size of 20 is not feasible. Instead you might want to use a class size that divides (max - min) = Range of data
As it's 290 here, a class size of 10 or 29 would be ideal
So 600-610, or 600-629 is nice
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
The addition of context would enable us to better help you
,rotateccw
Alr. You're required to go:
600-620
621-640
641-660
.
.
.
860-880
880-900
As the class size is given and FIXED, you are not allowed to go 600-619 ^^"
@fossil badge Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fossil badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What
hm
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
are you asking to help cheat on a test?

take a picture of the whole thing
show us
just take a pic of the whole page

lmao
brother is this a banned from math discord speedrun
how do you have that?
Not likely, he's already at least 10mins in
I can't wait
now we need to help bro
@versed mica (sarcasm)
yep
Yes
the mods are coming to help rn
go study then
Should he dm mod mail for more help
come back when you have a concrete math problem
yea sounds like a good idea
also nobody knows what time zone you're in
lots of time to study
easy peasy just read book
light work
do home wook
(you might be missing the part where OP is asking us to do his test. I don't think he'll be coming back...)
my best rhyme ever
he’s gone
.close
Modded
Closed by @opal lantern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yall dont need to come in and joke around
just ping mods and let us handle it
you make it messier by shitposting for 40 messages
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i prove it rigorously?
what should i use
it's pretty obvious intuitively, that to turn a face down card to face up, you need a face up card to the left to be turned down
probably you need to find a monovariant
hmm
mathologer has a video on a similar problem
Recently one of you requested that I explain the math(s) in this clip which recently went viral.
It's a clip taken from the movie X+Y aka A brilliant young mind. The math(s) problem that Nathan, the main character in this movie, is working on in this clip is a simplified version of the first part of a problem that...
yup
okay, it works, thx!
.close
Closed by @pastel raven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If f(x + 1) = 2x² + 4x - 1, then f(x) is...
subsitute
What??
yes
I don't understand the concept behind this type of problem...
its just subsitution
Let x + 1 = u, then to find x, wich is u - 1.
And then I substitute x = u - 1 into the f(x).
f(u-1) = 2(u-1)² + 4(u -1) - 1
Substitute x-1 in x of the function 2x² + 4x - 1
Im confused
yes
Can you give me some visualization?
What is the name of this topic?
just translations
or
uhhhhhhhhh
(idk)
k
.close
Closed by @rain river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for which interval is the second derivative of f(x) = 2x^3 - x^2 + 5x negative ? if possible shown without a graph
take..the derivative twice
dont know what else to say
literally just solve f''<0
ok thank you ver much 🙂

