#help-39
1 messages · Page 191 of 1
i for sure, 100% didnt
its not the form they want
would this work tho?
but i think its pretty good
like, i dont wanna redo it for nothin
ill just redo it then
the whole thing looks right
im pretty sure its the same form but I wouldn't know how to show the 2 are the same using trig identities
aw man
ill show u
appreciate it
thats very nice
yup
it is
ill send you the next one
if you get tired
or bored
or just dont wanna do anymore
Yo hii new question?
nah i dont mind
then just tell me
yea, in a bit
I need to prep for the integration bee antway
this ones should be way easier, thats what the book thinks at least
ill send them now
so as much integgrtion as possible i good
i could send you these hell exercises from this book
oh shit
my phone is dying, imma go grab a charger
brb
im on my laptop, but like i need it to take pics
makes sense
also, i dont understand volumes with integrals, but ill leave those for tomorrow
volume integrals are actually not to bad
cause its basically nothing new
cause they wont make you do a difficult substitution
yea, i just dont think we do them in school
but they require it for the uni exam
which means that i gotta study them by myself
yikes
doesnt seem too bad
it shouldnt be
splitting it up seems to work nicely
The fact that there's an easier way
did i miss something
Divide numerator and deno with x⁴
partial fractions seemed obvious
Not needed
Do this and sub 1/x -1/x³ = z
if it works it works though
right
so i remember what i didnt get at this exercise
so what do you guys think the answer is?
oh damn you are quite far from the answer
Can ya do this ?
man, if you come up with these clever substitutions yourself at 16
then you are a god at maths
Integrals was my fav
i am not a god at maths tho
yeah
But I was 18 then
i did it and it worked out like crazy
?
i just have no idea how you spotted it
I learnt integrals at age 18
didnt u say ure 16? or am i confusing you with someone else?
I'm 19
oh
damn
never mind then
yea idk, just check what i did
and tell me what i did wrong
how do you spot these substitutions
well not substitutions but like
There's no specific answer to address this question.
that came out of noweher
What made you think to divide by x^4
but sometimes it seems like u dont come up with these yourself
welp, i think hes looking them up
but it doesnt matter
i personally could never come up with these subs
because also
its not like they are universal
no
well in the end that substitution got me the right anser i think
its very specific subs that would only work in THIS specific exercise
can you please check what i did?
this
idk some people are crazy good at spotting
what answer did you get?
it feels like its inhumane
to spot these things
e
the substitution just solves the entire question its crazy
oh no way i actually got this answer as well
sure
You missed a negative sign somewhere
thats for sure
but where
actually no its not about the negative sign
it would have to be (1-x)(1+x) to get 1- x^2
oh well
thats your negative sign
swap the bottom multiply the entire thing by -1
and that flips the log
huh?
i dont get it
also
this is the solution from the solution book:
which would mean that im right
but then, the solution from the multiple choice book
says its e)
i hate this book
i will burn it
i will do to it what they did in germany in ww2
it wasnt quiteright
no i made a mistake when i saidyou could minipulate it
cause yeah that
then you would get ln (x^2-1)/x^3
which is just wrong
if it were e) there shouldve be a -ln
yea i think im right
the book just made a typo
I got the sme answer as you the first time i did it
man im gonna check an integral calculator
bro, XOR-11's inhumane formula did us dirty
,w integrate [x^2-3]/[x^3-x]
im sure its right i missed a minus somewhere
yup
thats the same answer as you
no
i got x^2 - 1
he got the correct answer
the one from the book
wild the integral calculator is arguing with wulfrum alpha
wow
i asked chatgpt too, but his off his goddamn gourd
he god some insane result
every chatgpt answer is nonsense
hes just a little special
It's always advised to consider the 1-x² form
You have considered ln(x²-1) and that's causing the issue
ok so, the correct answer is mine
Idk the exact reason but my teacher said this !
yup
Maybe because then, the function is defined for trigonometric functions
how did you spot
What ?
how did you spot dividing everything by x^4
Idk bro it just came to my mind 😭😭
insane
i dont believe you for one second
like once i see it it makes sense
also, what differentiating site did you find?
i looked up derivative calculator
i got it differently when i put in d
weird
this is a isnt it
yea
i put both a) and e)
both differentiate the same
but the integral looks different
wowza
,w differentiate ln(x^3/(x^2-1))
i dont even know what to make of a and e both being correct
i thought it was uniqu
i guess cause when you integrate its modulus
yeah
it is
hm? no it isnt
oh wait
yes you are right
like integral 1/x = ln|x|
but also a
why is a not counted
because x belongs to (-1, 0)
it is
i just didnt get the right answer
these are very easy ones
but ill get back to the super duper hard ones after this one and the next one
is this one c
well i be damned
it is
ill do it quickly
maybe i get the answer right this time
cool
didnt do it in my head
alright
i agree
Im gonna say c and e are wrong
ill check
well yea
its because of the constant
c
this wouldnt be the same if it were a defined integral im pretty sure
maybe b and e then
it continuous so it does have Darboux's property...maybe
If f : I → R is a function, and I ⊂ R is an interval, f has
the Darboux property if for any a, b ∈ I, a < b and for any λ ∈ (f(a), f(b)) ∪
(f(b), f(a)) there is c ∈ (a, b) such that f(c) = λ.
aw man
no no
it does have darboux's property
because it says that there is an f'(c) = gama
which is true even if the function is not differntiable on R
it only needs to be continuous and differentiable on an interval
so it does have it
so d) is wrong
yea, idk, its just something the helped with that property that f'(c) = 0
im pretty sure
like he helped Fermat
and then fermat helped Rolle
complicated stuff
doesnt matter
anyway
darboux is a good chap
we are left with b) or e)
sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh
cause b implies e
thank god i dont know em
its not too bad its just integration
no, it cant ever be multiple
oooh, its not b) because it sais on R
which doesnt make sense
and that would mean that c) is correct too
which isnt
because its not differentiable on R
aha
insane
why dont you think its e
no, i do think its e
me as well
i just said that b) is wrong
hoorays
in how long
i only got the last 10 turbo hard exercises at the end
thats insanely fast
yea, i work 8 hours a day
lets see these hard exercises
oh god
i need a break
can i be back in like 30 mins?
ill dm you in private
and ill close this chat
good integrating today though
eh, its fine, we can just do some more tomorrow
LMAOOO
same
bye
.close
Closed by @mighty meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove the following:
For any weighted, undirected graph $G=(V,E)$:
For any proper subset $U\subset V$ of vertices
and any edge $e={u,x} \in E$ with $u \in U$ and $x \in V\setminus U$
and $w(e)= \min { w({u', x'}) \mid {u', x'} \in E, u' \in U, x' \in V\setminus U }$:
There exists a minimal spanniung tree $T$ with $e\in E(T)$.
And if $w(e)$ is strictly smaller than any other edges between $U$ and $V\setminus U$, then $e$ is included in all possible minimal spanning trees.
Bob Goldham
My idea was the following
case distinction:
We consider the graph (V, E\{e})
it is either connected or not connected.
If it is not connected, then e must be in any spanning tree of G whatsoever, including any minimal spanning tree.
If it is connected, then the minimal property of $e$ guarantees that any edge $e'$ between $U$ and $V\setminus U$ has at least weight $w(e)$.
If the weight is larger for all such edges, then the spanning tree of $G'$ is no longer a minimal spanning tree of $G$.
So every minimal spanning tree of $G$ contains at least one edge of exactly weight $w(e)$.
If there is more than one such edge, then we could remove all except (any arbitrary) one of them and still have a minimal spanning tree, since they all connect the same subsets of vertices and have the same weight. Thus the resulting spanning tree must always remain minimal.
Bob Goldham
Is this correct?
@gusty flume Has your question been resolved?
@gusty flume Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@gusty flume Has your question been resolved?
@gusty flume Has your question been resolved?
@gusty flume Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
you didn't define G'
but i assume G' is (V, E{e})
i don't think the proof is correct
you said this but
isn't this a counter example?
@gusty flume Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A bucket was sold at 8% loss had it been sold for 56₹ more there would have been a gain of 8% what is the cost price of the bucket?
yeah
i didnt even did this
should i show my working?
sure
how?
108/100 x - 92/100 x
(108-92)/100 x
16/100 x
Closed by @exotic crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\lim_{x \to 2^-} \frac{\sqrt{x^2-4}}{|x-2|}$
prograce
Help please
Does not exist, or are you talking in complex numbers?
x - 2 > 0, x>2, so undefined limit... can't do left side limit only right side
Oh
Because if x-2<0 it becomes 2-x so it's just 2-1.9999999 which approaches 0 and it's undefined
@rapid wagon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rapid wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with this
multiply and divide by $\sqrt{e^{x}+1}$
thats for sure the right approach
math rocks(wai)
I'm confused
no no, i think that its the right approach, i just didnt do the calculations right probably
let me retry real quick
i think that maybe it would better to multiply by $\sqrt{e^{x}-1}$
Gustavo
because then when you do the sub for $e^{x}$ you get something a little better, maybe
Gustavo
math rocks(wai)
That makes it easier I think?
yea yea, thats what i was thinking too
but then the problem is that you now have u*sqrt(u^2-1) in the denom
You can start with e^x=u
ah, okay
yea
so first split this into the sum of two integrals
so then i thought of breaking the integral into two
alrighty
Think of a way to integrate $\frac{1}{\sqrt{e^{2x}-1}}$ now
math rocks(wai)
idk why you put it back in e^x
i think the u sub looked better
alright
i think i got it
Yeah,but when you let $e^x=u$, you get $e^xdx =du$
i almost did it
math rocks(wai)
math rocks(wai)
wait, how did you you get $dx= du/u
ah, that works too
its just a basic trick, idk if you knew that a= e^(lna)
I should hope I know that, I'm doing a UG in maths lol
yes
looks right to me
mhm
now look at the multiple choice
the problem is
we gotta figure a way out to turn arcsin in arccos
because i checked and d) is indeed the right one
recall the relation between arcsin and arccos
but i have arcsin not arccos
arcsin(x)+arcos(x) = π/2
well, I think in your working it should be -arcsin(-1/u)
$\arcsin(x) + \arccos(x) = \frac{\pi}{2}$
math rocks(wai)
use this
how is this identity true?
yes
recall that π/2+C=C here as C is just an arbitrary constant
and also
is arcsin odd or even?
like
is arcsin -x = -arcsin x?
or maybe arccos -x = -arccos x?
cuz otherwise, this is still not doing it
yup
ok
,w is arcsin(-x)=-arcsin(x)
ill write it down real quick
1 sec
btw
i got more integrals to solve
you wanna help me more?
or should i make another help channel?
open a new help channel, if I'm done by then,I'll try to help
.close
Closed by @mighty meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @worldly bane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅

Refer to #❓how-to-get-help to know ho to get help probably
And also just ask the question, don't ask to ask, this will just consume more time for you.
It would be faster for you and the helpers to just ask the question
.close
Closed by @cinder bane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a very simple question.
I have got a math idea, which I'm able to prove it, but there is no any application for that, and I don't have any reason for doing this, just curiosity.
I'm an UG student, and the idea is about set theory.
So question is, shall I open this with my professor? or it's very bad idea? Thanks
mathematicians dont care about applications
if its a problem, and youre able to solve it, why not?
whats your concern here?
Are you sharing your idea?
an applied mathematician encounters a problem and uses his knowledge to solve that problem
a pure mathematician creates a solution to a problem that may arise in 10-20 years, not that he gives a shit
there have been plenty of times where mathematicians discover some maths and then like 100 years later then find it has applications
Well you can share your idea and others might find an application for it.
@quick sand Read A mathematician's apology by gh hardy
@quick sand Has your question been resolved?
Hi, thanks for answering. Well there is no problem too. Just playing with math stuff, since it's fun
Nothing really(yet)
I haven't constructed my idea into papers properly, but I do it. And I'm able then to prove and setup relations and properties of my stuff.
So if it's a normal thingy, then I'm going to open it with my prof soon. I'm just too scared my prof finds it very nonsense since there is no application or reasoning for that, although he's a pure math guru as well.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$x^3-3x^2+3x-7=3p$
Bob Goldham
I want to solve for x, p is a variable
Is there any simpler way than the Cardano formula?
$x^3-3x^2+3x-(3p+7)=0$
Bob Goldham
Do you know (a-b)^3?
=(a²-2ab+b²)(a-b)
=(a³-2a²b+ab²)-(a²b-2ab²+b³)
=a³-3a²b+3ab²+b³
=a³-b³-3ab²+3a²b
that?
What do you have from that in your original
Also
Is -b^3
3a^2b and -3ab^2 too
In any case
You have almost all
For (x-1)^3
Just split -7 into -1-6
(x-1)³=
x^3-3x^2+3x-1
so this term
So (x-1)^3-6
is just (x-1)³-6=3p
= 3p
is there a name for this formula? like the binomial formula for (a-b)²?
Bob Goldham
Closed by @gusty flume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help
ill try to explain where i'm at right:
i know column [1 1 1 1 1 1] transpose is a solution
i now need to find solutions where ax = 0
to get the set of all solutions of the system Ax = [ 1 1 1 1] transpose
i make augmented matrix with [ A | 0 ]
i dont know how to continue
anyone?
after you reduce [A | 0], what do you get
i begin by saying x1, x4 x5 are free variables
and then?
x2 = x4 - x5
x3 = -x4
x6 = 0
x1 = x4 = x5 = free
ohhh righttt
your presence was enough thanks i understand it now
heys
(1,1,1,1,1,1) + b(0,1,-1,1,0,0) + c(0,-1,0,0,1,0)
a,b,c are real numbers
whatever
should be correct idk
Where tf the 1 come from
we need to find every possible solution of ax = [1, 1, 1, 1] right
one possible solution is when x = [1 1 1 1 1 1]
oh yeah
@stiff mauve Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stiff mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
it is hard to follow
ok ill explain
the given eqn of the normal is y=2x-lambda
slope of normal is 2
so slope of tangent is -1/2
and i differentiated the parabola eqn and got dy/dx as slope
assumed the point of intersection as y itself (got too lazy lol)
and equated the slopes
from there i got y as (-6)
feel me?
yep
aight after that i put the value of y in the parabola eqn
got x as 11
so the point is (11,-6)
to where the tangent is drawn
yea 11,-6 is good
what
just use the equation of the normal
line
y = 2x - lambda
y = -6
x = 11
-6 = 22 - lambda
lambda = 28
what is this for
like i got the POI and i have the slope m
x1,y1 = 11,-6
oh shit
ye i got it
man brain crashed
thx tho for confimation
.close
Closed by @plush sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
first complete the square, get the radius
then calculate the distance between the center of the circle and the point you got (1,3)
call it d for distance
hello guys sorry i need help about a math thing
then also calculate the distance between the point (1,3) and any point on the circle
occupied for a while brotha
call it D
how do i do that?
what the hell bro
wont it be d + radius?
just asked everyone not just you :>
yeah
d + radius
as any point on the circle
is just the ending point of the radius
yes
rookies
btw i am working on uhh some kinda integrals that has circle in middle of em
in available
Closed by @plush sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You didn't have to.. But it did get a little cluttered in here... 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Simon James B
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
√x^2 -6x +25 + √y^2 +8y+ 41 <= 9 \newline √x^2 - 6x + 9 - 9 +25 + √y^2 + 8y + 16 - 16 + 41 \newline √(x-3)^2 + (y +4)^2 <=9$ what now
come on are you kidding me right now? I waited 30 mins for a channel 
Missing a dollar sign?
Yes but the compiler did not made it as it is supposed to be
do i open a new help chat now?
Just try your message again here
Perhaps don't delete the original message. 🤷♂️
I am not trolling?!!
They deleted the original message which is why the channel was closed.
30 min ?!
${√x^2 -6x +25} + {√y^2 +8y+ 41} <= 9 \newline {√x^2 - 6x + 9 - 9 +25} + {√y^2 + 8y + 16 - 16 + 41}$
Simon James B
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
why cant i type √
Its better that you open a new one they're free now
Use \sqrt{}
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
are groups of prime order cyclic?
or are groups of prime order abelian?
i think they are but i'm looking for a theorem in my book
or am i misremembering something?
I know that groups of order p^2 are abelian
maybe it is the same for groups of order p
both
thanks
if you can prove they're cyclic, then you're good cause cyclic groups are already abelian
cyclic implies abelian
what is the argument?
for prime -> cyclic/abelian
my book has a chapter on cyclic groups
you might need to use lagrange's theorem
the order of an element divides the order of the group
therefore an element other than the identity generates a subgroup the same size as the group
oh i found it as a corollary to the theorem of lagrange
every group of prime order is cyclic
thanks folks 🙏
.solved
Closed by @brave sluice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
are there any videos about homogeneous and non homogeneous recurrence relations with explanations of why the "formulas" work?
@regal heath Has your question been resolved?
@regal heath Has your question been resolved?
@regal heath Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk how to do this
I'm not sure exactly what method they want you to use, but one method is to use the fact that the derivative (here, g') is the slope of the original function at that point.
So, when x is 3, g'(x) gives you 3, so the slope is 3 there.
Right, so the formula from algebra for the slope is (y0 - y1)/(x0 - x1) or something like that and the slope is 3.
Closed by @charred lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You're welcome.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Determine if it's possible to have a cauchy sequence with an unbounded sub-seqeunce.
\
I was thinking $a_n = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1}{i}$
math rocks(wai)
is that a cauchy sequence?
do you know the theorem that (in R or C)
cauchy <==> convergent
Closed by @sharp smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, i was solving a question on functional equations and to prove the functions injectivity i assumed f(af(0))=f(bf(0)) and then got this implies a^2=b^2. but then this implication would mean f(0)=0 which would make my initial assumption f(0)=f(0) does this make it invalid?
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
i mean the initial assumption that f(0) = f(0) is valid
you basically just showed that your assumption of f being injective doesnt fail in this regard
@mellow idol Has your question been resolved?
huhh
i mean f(0) = f(0) need not be assumed right
i assumed f(af(0))=f(bf(0)) and got that the functions injective but when i use injectivity i also get f(0)=0
im asking does f(0)=0 invalidate assuming f(af(0))=f(bf(0)) to prove injectivity
can someone tell me if my proof is valid or not? cause if it is it trivialises the question
I don't really see or understand your proof
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello can someone give me some resources for prepare for math competition? or some book for proof? I'm currently in high school year 12
For proof , book of proof ( yes, that's the name) is a nice book
For the most part, yes
oh ok i will check it out
oh i see
@harsh nymph Has your question been resolved?
what is the syllabus?
Closed by @harsh nymph
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
stupid question but percent increase can be both additive and multiplicative?
wdym
increase by 20% and then a further 20% can be additive or multiplicative.
additive: 100% + 20% + 20% = 140%
multiplicative: 1 * 1.2 * 1.2 * 100 = 144%
this is a statement not a question
oh wait
like can you give us the exercise or something?
Can be both add and times i think
its like
the difference between compounding and simple interest
to give you an analogy
the multiplicative one "adds on" to the previously applied percentages
whilst the additive one is always a linear increase based on the principal amount
So yes, percentage increases can be additive or multiplicative, depending on the context and the assumptions made about the base value
@quick star Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
quick question: if z = (1/ i*x )
lim x->0+ arg(z) = ?
@prisma elk Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @prisma elk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
@pearl pond
Don’t spam the helpers ping
@ebon burrow Has your question been resolved?
so where did you get till yet?
try constructing a square
How come you couldn’t start?
I did not understand the first part
Like how to proof.
Give me some hint please
Just try things out
Not working for 3x3
How about 5x5 then
Do you know that's 5! Many combinations
About 120
I'm not to try ot
Is there, say any suitable algo for it?
Idk, could be. It looks like you’re supposed to figure out such an algorithm on your own though, cause you’ll learn a lot more that way. Unless this is supposed to be easy homework
@ebon burrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ are cauchy seqeunces then prove that $x_n+y_n$ is a cauchy sequence, without using the cauchy criterion or the algebric limit theorm
math rocks(wai)
I'm confused
so here I cannot use the defn of a cauchy seqeunce in my proof?
The proof I had in mind was $\abs{x_n - x} + \abs {y_n -y} = \abs{x_n-x_m + x_m -x} + \abs{y_n - y_m+y_m-y}< 2 \varepsilon \implies \abs{x_n-x_m} + \abs{x_m-x} + \abs{y_n-y_m}+ \abs{y_m-y} < 2\varepsilon$.
math rocks(wai)
Now as $\abs{x_m-x}$ and $\abs{y_m-y}$ convergre, i replace, both with $\varepsilon/2$, to obtain $\abs{x_n-x_m} + \abs{y_n-y_m} < \varepsilon$
math rocks(wai)
@sharp smelt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sharp smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain how n^-n come
at the third equal sign
they are doing $(n+1)^{-n}=\left(n\left(1+\frac1n\right)\right)^{-n}=n^{-n}\left(1+\frac1n\right)^{-n}$
Bonk
.close
Closed by @sleek junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,, a \frac 1b
mmmm7
is this mixed fraction or product?
i know something like $2 \frac 12$ is mixed fraction but like is it the same with variables?
mmmm7
why is it not mixed fraction?
but if you insist it be written that way yeah its mixed
for mixed fraction you see them as 2 + 1/2
for variables youd just multiply any adjacent thing
yes mixed fractions means that
but that's not notation for mixed fraction, is it
mmmm7
ofc 2 + 1/2 is a wrong notation
but unless you tell your readers this is a mixed fraction youd expect everyone to treat it as a/b
depends on context?
my teacher wrote that and expected us to know it's a mixed fraction
a + 1/b?
this or (ab+1)/b would be much more common than mixed fraction notation
yeah well they wanted me to interpret it that way
anyway thanks
i won't make a big deal out of something trivial
😭
.close
Closed by @quick star
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$ax - bx + ax^2 - bx^2$
Simon James B
I did $x(a-b) + x^2(a-b) \newline (a-b)(x + x^2)$
Simon James B
but it seems that this was not right
it should be correct
ah, yes
Simon James B